Muscle Mass May Reduce Risk of Death and Explain the Obesity Paradox
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,948
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3786 Post(s)
Liked 1,050 Times
in
792 Posts
Muscle Mass May Reduce Risk of Death and Explain the Obesity Paradox
Not really surprising for those of us cursed by the BMI mindset
https://www.realclearscience.com/qui...y_paradox.html
https://www.realclearscience.com/qui...y_paradox.html
There are a few key takeaways from the study. One, it provides another example of how BMI is flawed for estimating health. Two, it shows that the obesity paradox is likely a statistical artifact of utilizing BMI in research, not an indication that additional body fat benefits a generally healthy adult. And three, it suggests that adding muscle mass may promote health and longevity.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,207
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 410 Times
in
236 Posts
So perhaps a better metric for measuring healthfulness might be body fat %.
These findings shouldn't surprise anyone. Exercise promotes better healthy because exercise generally helps to develop more muscles and lower body fat, generally speaking, of course. The other side of that equation is the diet.
These findings shouldn't surprise anyone. Exercise promotes better healthy because exercise generally helps to develop more muscles and lower body fat, generally speaking, of course. The other side of that equation is the diet.
#3
Life Feeds On Life
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 2,143
Bikes: Too many Motobecanes
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4432 Post(s)
Liked 4,544 Times
in
3,039 Posts
According to the BMI charts I’m obese. My doctor said those charts are BS now I’m stocky but not tall 5-10 with shoes on and at 190 I have little fat. I admit I could lose about 10 pounds a That is what I’m working on right now. Not recently but I lifted weights all my life in the gym or on the farm/ranch. I do a fair share of physical work. IMO don’t worry about what a chart says.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
I don't even use BMI. I just look in the mirror and it tells me everything I need to know.
#5
Senior Member
I ditch BMI completely, its not make sense in the first place.
Height-to-waist ratio is the way to go and more accurate.
By the way, bicycling is muscle mass burner.... its quite paradox, its can make you skinny-fat if one not careful about diets.
Height-to-waist ratio is the way to go and more accurate.
By the way, bicycling is muscle mass burner.... its quite paradox, its can make you skinny-fat if one not careful about diets.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18388 Post(s)
Liked 4,520 Times
in
3,359 Posts
BMI is probably a cheap way to get lots of subjects into a research project.
In the past, several researchers were dunking their patients... well, actually calculating the specific gravity, which is likely a better measurement.
As the price of research MRI machines comes down, one could also simply create a program to calculate muscle volume, fat volume, etc. But, it could be complex to get thousands or millions of subjects measured and recorded.
I have thought that there is a benefit of having a bit of a buffer. So, for example, having enough fat that one could go without eating for a week (or on a super-low calorie diet), and still be just fine. Or, have some buffer to endure a wasting disease (cancer/chemo).
Whereas, a person that is super thin will become extremely weak if they can't eat for one reason or another.
Certainly some muscle is good as it is much easier to pack it on in one's 20's and 30's than it is in their 60's and 70's.
One of the things I like about cycling is that I think it helps keep up leg strength, and hopefully will prevent falls as I age.
In the past, several researchers were dunking their patients... well, actually calculating the specific gravity, which is likely a better measurement.
As the price of research MRI machines comes down, one could also simply create a program to calculate muscle volume, fat volume, etc. But, it could be complex to get thousands or millions of subjects measured and recorded.
I have thought that there is a benefit of having a bit of a buffer. So, for example, having enough fat that one could go without eating for a week (or on a super-low calorie diet), and still be just fine. Or, have some buffer to endure a wasting disease (cancer/chemo).
Whereas, a person that is super thin will become extremely weak if they can't eat for one reason or another.
Certainly some muscle is good as it is much easier to pack it on in one's 20's and 30's than it is in their 60's and 70's.
One of the things I like about cycling is that I think it helps keep up leg strength, and hopefully will prevent falls as I age.
#7
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
All forms of cardio/endurance burn muscle especially if done in excess, running is even worse than cycling due to it's higher impact. That's why every cyclist who cares about their long term health should be lifting weights or doing some form of strength training.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
That's why cyclists who put in a lot of miles have quadzillas.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 186
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
BMI is a broad stroke tool to easily generalize populations health. It's not BS, it was never intended to be very useful at the individual level.
A pool of people with a BMI reading obese is going to have a lot of unhealthy individuals in it.
A pool of people with a BMI reading obese is going to have a lot of unhealthy individuals in it.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
I'd go one step further and say that even muscular people who are significantly "overweight" have health risks associated with that extra weight.
The key word there though is "significantly". A guy who is 250 lbs of muscle (like say a pro bodybuilder) is still going to have detrimental health effects from having too much mass. This will be offset somewhat by the fact that he's exercising regularly, but it still isn't the same as a 150 lb guy who is equally fit.
Like many things in life, there a happy (or healthy) medium between extremes.
If the BMI says you're obese, you probably would be better off (from a health perspective) losing weight. There are far fewer legit exceptions than people think.
#11
Banned.
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 821
Bikes: Wahoo of Theseus, others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 428 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
46 Posts
There's too many statistical anomalies to rely too much even on an accurate body fat %, such as weight loss being a symptom in a large number of ailments that generally lead to your death. I mean you technically lose all your weight when you die, right?
But it's clear from science at this point that the most dangerous thing is simply complete inactivity. In nature people would not stay indoors much and would seldom sit down for very long, so that makes sense. And of course common sense says a fat but active and blustery personality like brian blessed is going to be a lot more healthy than a guy who just sits and eats.
But it's clear from science at this point that the most dangerous thing is simply complete inactivity. In nature people would not stay indoors much and would seldom sit down for very long, so that makes sense. And of course common sense says a fat but active and blustery personality like brian blessed is going to be a lot more healthy than a guy who just sits and eats.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18388 Post(s)
Liked 4,520 Times
in
3,359 Posts
But it's clear from science at this point that the most dangerous thing is simply complete inactivity. In nature people would not stay indoors much and would seldom sit down for very long, so that makes sense. And of course common sense says a fat but active and blustery personality like brian blessed is going to be a lot more healthy than a guy who just sits and eats.
That is if they survive infancy, childhood, and childbirth for the women.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Anyone here tried a DIY hydrostatic measurement of body fat percentage in the bathtub? I'm imagining measuring your volume by the level of displaced water (probably have to model the slope of the tub sides), weigh on the scales, and plug the density into some equation, should be fairly accurate.
I think Archimedes did something like this a while ago, more interested in some jewelry but the same general principle. If you've tried it, how well did it turn out?
I think Archimedes did something like this a while ago, more interested in some jewelry but the same general principle. If you've tried it, how well did it turn out?
#14
☢
Anyone here tried a DIY hydrostatic measurement of body fat percentage in the bathtub? I'm imagining measuring your volume by the level of displaced water (probably have to model the slope of the tub sides), weigh on the scales, and plug the density into some equation, should be fairly accurate.
I think Archimedes did something like this a while ago, more interested in some jewelry but the same general principle. If you've tried it, how well did it turn out?
I think Archimedes did something like this a while ago, more interested in some jewelry but the same general principle. If you've tried it, how well did it turn out?
#15
Senior Member
As to doing some form of strength training, it's not about whether you're a cyclist or not. It applies to everyone and it has been long overlooked by mainstream health advice.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#17
☢
Cycling builds endurance. Only progressive resistance builds muscle. People don't cycle to increase mass, they have mass and take up cycling because they're good at it.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
People don't ride bikes to gain leg muscles because it's a sub-optimal way to do it. It's slower than squatting and DLing to build leg muscle. It still works, it's just the slow route, and people whose goal it is to build muscle want the faster routes.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 878
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
...A guy who is 250 lbs of muscle (like say a pro bodybuilder) is still going to have detrimental health effects from having too much mass. This will be offset somewhat by the fact that he's exercising regularly, but it still isn't the same as a 150 lb guy who is equally fit.
.....
.....
The 150lb guy, if he rides or runs for fitness, can obviously ride or run faster and farther than the bodybuilder, who can lift and throw the skinny guy across the room. Just because the big guy is big doesn't make him less healthy, he is way more healthy than most Americans and in some ways more healthy than the cardio guy.
Neither one is more "fit" than the other, though I would guess that the skinny guy can keep doing cardio when he is an old skinny guy and stay fairly fit, while the bodybuilder may have a harder time keeping his fitness.
Last edited by bikebreak; 06-11-18 at 08:15 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
A 150lb guy isn't "equally fit" with a 250lb pro bodybuilder. Apples and oranges.
The 150lb guy, if he rides or runs for fitness, can obviously ride or run faster and farther than the bodybuilder, who can lift and throw the skinny guy across the room. Just because the big guy is big doesn't make him less healthy, he is way more healthy than most Americans and in some ways more healthy than the cardio guy.
Neither one is more "fit" than the other, though I would guess that the skinny guy can keep doing cardio when he is an old skinny guy and stay fairly fit, while the bodybuilder may have a harder time keeping his fitness.
The 150lb guy, if he rides or runs for fitness, can obviously ride or run faster and farther than the bodybuilder, who can lift and throw the skinny guy across the room. Just because the big guy is big doesn't make him less healthy, he is way more healthy than most Americans and in some ways more healthy than the cardio guy.
Neither one is more "fit" than the other, though I would guess that the skinny guy can keep doing cardio when he is an old skinny guy and stay fairly fit, while the bodybuilder may have a harder time keeping his fitness.
#21
☢
That said, fat is not bio-active, and you can be skinny-fat and be unhealthy. Conversely, more muscle typically supplants the rate at which your body accumulates and stores fat. Only when it goes well beyond what is natural does it present a strain. Both can increase your metabolism, but from different directions.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,920
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4813 Post(s)
Liked 3,940 Times
in
2,562 Posts
Ben
#23
☢
Slow twitch vs fast twitch muscle. Yes, you will gain some muscle through cycling due to activation of the slow twitch endurance muscle fibers.
However, even under full-load climbs this is nowhere near the amount you gain from anaerobic training. Keeping them separate is safer and much more effective for each.
However, even under full-load climbs this is nowhere near the amount you gain from anaerobic training. Keeping them separate is safer and much more effective for each.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
It isn't running and lifting that makes some people 150 lbs and other people 250 lbs. It's how much they eat, mostly.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,478
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1751 Post(s)
Liked 1,282 Times
in
741 Posts
I will be happy when the BMI is tossed into the junk heap of history.