Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Tires: Tufo Gravel Thundero 48

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Tires: Tufo Gravel Thundero 48

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-24, 03:03 PM
  #1  
Eric F 
Habitual User
Thread Starter
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,061

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5006 Post(s)
Liked 8,176 Times in 3,868 Posts
Tires: Tufo Gravel Thundero 48

I've been very happy with my 40mm Thundero/Swampero combination, but I'm always interested to expand my knowledge base. The current trend on the gravel race scene is heading towards bigger tires, with folks like Adam Roberge finishing 2nd at BWR Utah on Pirelli H 50s, and Dylan Johnson finishing 5th at Midsouth on Conti RaceKing 2.2 MTB tires. As I have previously posted about, I did try Schwalbe Thunder Burt 2.1s on my gravel bike, and they were interesting, but didn't leave enough room in my chain stays for them to be a viable option on my bike. Curious to give fatties another try, I picked up a pair of Thundero 48s.

First ride impressions...
On pavement, they felt like a big, old Cadillac - smooth, soft, and not very sporty. Being a little heavier than what I'm used to on this bike, they felt a little slower to spin up, but rolled fairly well once at a decent speed. I didn't get the sense that they are particularly fast, but also not drearily slow. The increased frontal area of the wider tire will have some impact on speed. That said, they don't feel as fast as the Thunder Burt 2.1s (which also test very well on BRR). On the dirt, the big Thunderos are at home. On a long climb with multiple rough and rocky sections, they didn't get bumped around as much as narrower ties, and floated through rough spots very similar to my MTB. On smoother sections of the climb, I didn't get a feeling of a weight penalty when rolling at a steady effort. Descending a twisty, rutted singletrack, with multiple spots of sand over hardpack, the cornering grip was confident enough that I don't think going with a knobbier front tire (like a Swampero) is necessary. Same as my experiment with the Thunder Burts, I didn't feel like I needed to be as picky about my line choice to avoid rocks and roughness.

For my typical local rides, which always include a mixture of surfaces and terrain, the bigger tires will be a lot of fun, especially if there is a lot of rough descending involved. For racing, I think I'm going to stick with 40s, for now. That said, I could see that some people would find their happy place racing on Thundero 44s.


__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions

Last edited by Eric F; 04-24-24 at 03:09 PM.
Eric F is offline  
Old 04-25-24, 10:14 AM
  #2  
Caliwild
Senior Member
 
Caliwild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,277
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 416 Post(s)
Liked 699 Times in 290 Posts
Meaty! Even going from 40s to 45s seemed like a big jump for me...
Caliwild is offline  
Likes For Caliwild:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.