Would you like this frame?
#1
we be rollin'
Thread Starter
Would you like this frame?
OK I'll try not to annoy you with too many questions but I was looking at a frame by State Bicycle and was wondering what you'd think about the same type of frame but in aluminum.
https://www.statebicycle.com/collect...t-pacific-gold
It says it has clearance for 45c in 700c and 50c (or 2 inches) in 650b.
I have 2 questions about this:
1. Would you prefer the same clearance or clearance for 2.4" tires in 650b?
2. Would you prefer disc-only with the option of using large caliper brakes or a model with V-brakes bosses that you can remove and replace with a plug and disc brake adapters at the same time?
https://www.statebicycle.com/collect...t-pacific-gold
It says it has clearance for 45c in 700c and 50c (or 2 inches) in 650b.
I have 2 questions about this:
1. Would you prefer the same clearance or clearance for 2.4" tires in 650b?
2. Would you prefer disc-only with the option of using large caliper brakes or a model with V-brakes bosses that you can remove and replace with a plug and disc brake adapters at the same time?
#3
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,987
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,087 Times
in
3,826 Posts
It's your bike. Only your opinion matters.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#4
we be rollin'
Thread Starter
I didn't really want to talk about "my bike". I meant if I make enough money to start a bike company it would be to find out what frames people like. I'd want external cabling for sure.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,485 Times
in
870 Posts
My description wasn't good enough I guess. I meant a frame that already has holes for disc brakes but also compatible with V-brakes. It's been done before on mountain bikes but I mean where you could just plug the area where the V-brakes are.
I didn't really want to talk about "my bike". I meant if I make enough money to start a bike company it would be to find out what frames people like. I'd want external cabling for sure.
I didn't really want to talk about "my bike". I meant if I make enough money to start a bike company it would be to find out what frames people like. I'd want external cabling for sure.
My own opinion here (and I'm not trying to hijack the thread on this topic) is that I don't understand why anyone would run v-brakes on a frame that was also designed to accommodate discs. This seems like a conversation that would've happened 10 years ago.
#6
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,543
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,433 Times
in
2,759 Posts
If you are planning to have a batch of frames built you should contact the owner of Black Mtn Cycles. Link He has been doing this for years. I think you'll find it hard to sell bikes that don't adhere to current standards. Flat mount discs, 100/142 through axle and threaded bb at a minimum. Not to say there is no place for other stuff, just that few shopping for inexpensive new frames would be interested. Of course if you are just noodling and not really in a position to do this it could all be different a few years down the road. Probably best to get the finances worked out before you settle on bike specs.
#8
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 2,015
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night, '89 Marinoni
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 317 Post(s)
Liked 853 Times
in
446 Posts
I bought an aluminum frame from Nashbar a long time ago that has bosses for disc and v brakes. I don't love seeing the unused v-brake bosses sitting there, even with the post removed.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,927
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,694 Times
in
975 Posts
OK I'll try not to annoy you with too many questions but I was looking at a frame by State Bicycle and was wondering what you'd think about the same type of frame but in aluminum.
https://www.statebicycle.com/collect...t-pacific-gold
https://www.statebicycle.com/collect...t-pacific-gold
https://t-lab-bikes.com/en-ca
Keep in mind that prices are in Canadian mini dollars
#10
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
OK I'll try not to annoy you with too many questions but I was looking at a frame by State Bicycle and was wondering what you'd think about the same type of frame but in aluminum.
https://www.statebicycle.com/collect...t-pacific-gold
It says it has clearance for 45c in 700c and 50c (or 2 inches) in 650b.
I have 2 questions about this:
1. Would you prefer the same clearance or clearance for 2.4" tires in 650b?
2. Would you prefer disc-only with the option of using large caliper brakes or a model with V-brakes bosses that you can remove and replace with a plug and disc brake adapters at the same time?
https://www.statebicycle.com/collect...t-pacific-gold
It says it has clearance for 45c in 700c and 50c (or 2 inches) in 650b.
I have 2 questions about this:
1. Would you prefer the same clearance or clearance for 2.4" tires in 650b?
2. Would you prefer disc-only with the option of using large caliper brakes or a model with V-brakes bosses that you can remove and replace with a plug and disc brake adapters at the same time?
2- I dont understand this. If its disc only, then there cant be an option to use caliper brakes.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,485 Times
in
870 Posts
Yeah, that one was hurting my brain a little bit too. I think the OP means larger rotors, not calipers? Most frames can work with 140mm or 160mm rotors by just using an adapter. I'm not sure anyone buying a frame like this would want 180mm.
#12
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,987
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,087 Times
in
3,826 Posts
My description wasn't good enough I guess. I meant a frame that already has holes for disc brakes but also compatible with V-brakes. It's been done before on mountain bikes but I mean where you could just plug the area where the V-brakes are.
I didn't really want to talk about "my bike". I meant if I make enough money to start a bike company it would be to find out what frames people like. I'd want external cabling for sure.
I didn't really want to talk about "my bike". I meant if I make enough money to start a bike company it would be to find out what frames people like. I'd want external cabling for sure.
So far, none of what you have said interests me.
- I highly prefer carbon fiber over metals for frame material.
- I don't have an interest in bikes with 650b tires.
- Based on current technology, I wouldn't buy a new bike that didn't have disc brakes. An option for v-brakes on the same bike is of zero interest to me, and would be a turn-off.
- Yes, internal cable routing is a maintenance pain, but it also protects most of the length of hydraulic brake lines. Personally, I prefer the look of hidden housing and hoses.
All that said, those are just my opinions. They are neither more or less important than anyone else's.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,485 Times
in
870 Posts
On the topic of cable routing, it's 2023. I'm going to run hydro discs, and externally routed hydro disc brake hoses look a bit silly. I would much prefer these to be routed inside the frame, though routing through the stem/headset isn't necessary.
As for shift cables, my next drivetrain is likely to be electronic. I'd want a frame that has Di2 routing in mind, and I wouldn't want a frame that has a bunch of bosses welded on for external shift cables.
I also have zero interest in 650b wheels on a drop-bar bike.
As for shift cables, my next drivetrain is likely to be electronic. I'd want a frame that has Di2 routing in mind, and I wouldn't want a frame that has a bunch of bosses welded on for external shift cables.
I also have zero interest in 650b wheels on a drop-bar bike.
#14
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
Nowadays, dual brake mounting options is the province of low-end hybrids. Either do one brake mount or the other
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,485 Times
in
870 Posts
I scrolled a few major manufacturer websites (Trek and Giant) and it looks like the rim and disc versions of their entry-level bikes all seem to use different frames for each version, so the disc version can only run discs, the rim version can only run rim brakes, etc.
#16
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
I'm trying to remember where I recently saw it on a new bike. Maybe at a big box store? I recall being a bit surprised. But there are still hybrids that come with vee brakes. Back when that was common, they often had disc brake mounts too.
#17
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,987
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,087 Times
in
3,826 Posts
Do you have examples of these bikes? This dual-mounting option is also what the OP alluded to, and I'm curious to see an example and somewhat skeptical that this setup actually exists in mass production.
I scrolled a few major manufacturer websites (Trek and Giant) and it looks like the rim and disc versions of their entry-level bikes all seem to use different frames for each version, so the disc version can only run discs, the rim version can only run rim brakes, etc.
I scrolled a few major manufacturer websites (Trek and Giant) and it looks like the rim and disc versions of their entry-level bikes all seem to use different frames for each version, so the disc version can only run discs, the rim version can only run rim brakes, etc.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#18
Resident PIA
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Oaks, NC
Posts: 848
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Look 765 Optimum, Spesh Aethos
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Liked 356 Times
in
186 Posts
Ummm
No.
.
No.
.
__________________
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,477 Times
in
1,836 Posts
As far as it goes .... an aluminum frame with a sturdy carbon fork which could accept 650b and 700c is a great idea ... I think there are probably companies building them already. Some forks have adjustable dropouts so that the bike's geometry stays the same with 700c and 650B wheels which i would find essential.
As for brakes, I see no reason to use V-brakes ... if I didn't want hydro discs I would just use mechanical discs. I mean, if the fork is already designed for discs there wouldn't be a lot of gain by using V-brakes that I can see, and cable discs work well in all environments and are a simple as V-brakes.
My question might be ... what would this frame be designed to do? Arte we talking road-bike geometry, gravel bike geometry? There is a bunch of great gravel within a hundred miles of me but I am not going to drive two hours to ride my bike often. It might make a great tourer or bikepacking bike, but I am covered on those fronts already. As for road riding,unless I was going to do urban commuting again, all that tire width would be wasted.
If you are planning to mimic the frame shown but in aluminum with a CF fork .... yeah, I actually really like the frame but have no use for another steel bike. My questions would be, how much will the frame weigh and who will design it? You cannot just swap in Al tubes for steel, and as far as I know Al might need heat-treating .... so does whoever is building this frame for you have a giant oven?
If you are giving away the frame for testing .... I unfortunately cannot afford to build another bike right now---or I can but choose not to, because I have built or bought enough bikes to meet my needs. If however, you are looking to hire people to build and test the bike, message me and we will work out the parts and labor and wages, and I will get right on it if we can reach a deal.
As for brakes, I see no reason to use V-brakes ... if I didn't want hydro discs I would just use mechanical discs. I mean, if the fork is already designed for discs there wouldn't be a lot of gain by using V-brakes that I can see, and cable discs work well in all environments and are a simple as V-brakes.
My question might be ... what would this frame be designed to do? Arte we talking road-bike geometry, gravel bike geometry? There is a bunch of great gravel within a hundred miles of me but I am not going to drive two hours to ride my bike often. It might make a great tourer or bikepacking bike, but I am covered on those fronts already. As for road riding,unless I was going to do urban commuting again, all that tire width would be wasted.
If you are planning to mimic the frame shown but in aluminum with a CF fork .... yeah, I actually really like the frame but have no use for another steel bike. My questions would be, how much will the frame weigh and who will design it? You cannot just swap in Al tubes for steel, and as far as I know Al might need heat-treating .... so does whoever is building this frame for you have a giant oven?
If you are giving away the frame for testing .... I unfortunately cannot afford to build another bike right now---or I can but choose not to, because I have built or bought enough bikes to meet my needs. If however, you are looking to hire people to build and test the bike, message me and we will work out the parts and labor and wages, and I will get right on it if we can reach a deal.
#20
QR-disc must die!!!
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703
Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 397 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 199 Times
in
147 Posts
If it has QR-skewers but doesn't facilitate rim-brakes, then, No, I would never be interested. If you want to facilitate disc brakes only, then do the right thing and design the frame/fork for thru-axles.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,485 Times
in
870 Posts
My point is that Trek and Giant aren't making these frames with "dual mounting" options. Trek's FX-1 is rim-brake only, and the FX-1 disc is disc-brake only. Both frames use 135mm QR so I assume it's identical otherwise, but I don't see any "dual mounting" options for brakes.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,477 Times
in
1,836 Posts
So ... @hybridbkrdr .... what are you actually planning here?
#23
we be rollin'
Thread Starter
So ... @hybridbkrdr .... what are you actually planning here?
Second, I'm not sure what I really want really exists. I mean when you look at the 650b hybrids with 2 inch tires, some have very wide handlebars with short stems. I'm pretty sure I know what that means, it's likely mountain bike geometry, not a "real" hybrid. I'd also like the frame to have front and rear eyelets for front and rear racks.
What I meant by disc brakes but also take caliper brakes is that if the holes on the frameset line up with the kind of caliper reach you need for a 584mm rim then large caliper brakes could be an option.
I figure a model with V-brakes would be a niche model so if I went ahead with this it would only be if a disc model would succeed. Anyway, I'd have to wait for at least a year to do anything. But eventually I may do something because I'm a bit fed up with the bike industry insisting on hidden cables. I can stand things like disc brakes etc. but when they push us that far in one weird direction, that's it.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,477 Times
in
1,836 Posts
You can pretty easily rig cable stops and run the cables any way you like.
If you want a frame for a bike you plan to sell, what does it matter if You like the frame. it is not for you.
If you want a frame for yourself then decide what brakes you want. Most forks either have a hole or could be safely drilled for a brake caliper. The tough part is the brake bridge ... either it is there or not.
I am sorry but what you are seeking is still not clear to me. If you bought a frame and a bike and plan to swap parts, then the frame would need to meet the needs of others ... Not yourself. Probably there is not a huge market for the kind of hybrid you personally seek, based on the fact that you cannot find one---if there was a sizeable market, companies would sell those bikes ... it is sort of what they do.
Also, you seem to be assuming that any bike with wide flat bars has MTB geometry .... why not actually read the geometry charts and see? And if that is what sells, then that would be the kind of frame to buy and build with your leftover parts .... because it is what many people actually want. If those frames do not have whatever kind of geometry you dislike ... then there is even less problem.
So ... is this frame for you, or for sale? Is it for sale as a bike built up with taken-off parts from your new build? Are you planning to make a lot of these frames?
If you want a frame for a bike you plan to sell, what does it matter if You like the frame. it is not for you.
If you want a frame for yourself then decide what brakes you want. Most forks either have a hole or could be safely drilled for a brake caliper. The tough part is the brake bridge ... either it is there or not.
I am sorry but what you are seeking is still not clear to me. If you bought a frame and a bike and plan to swap parts, then the frame would need to meet the needs of others ... Not yourself. Probably there is not a huge market for the kind of hybrid you personally seek, based on the fact that you cannot find one---if there was a sizeable market, companies would sell those bikes ... it is sort of what they do.
Also, you seem to be assuming that any bike with wide flat bars has MTB geometry .... why not actually read the geometry charts and see? And if that is what sells, then that would be the kind of frame to buy and build with your leftover parts .... because it is what many people actually want. If those frames do not have whatever kind of geometry you dislike ... then there is even less problem.
So ... is this frame for you, or for sale? Is it for sale as a bike built up with taken-off parts from your new build? Are you planning to make a lot of these frames?
#25
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
My point is that Trek and Giant aren't making these frames with "dual mounting" options. Trek's FX-1 is rim-brake only, and the FX-1 disc is disc-brake only. Both frames use 135mm QR so I assume it's identical otherwise, but I don't see any "dual mounting" options for brakes.