Bob Jackson is done again
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,671
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,988 Times
in
1,776 Posts
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#52
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Road bikes can be ridden on rocky rooted singletrack. Should we consider them mountain bikes though?
Or can we all just accept that gravel existed long before the currently well established category became popular, recognize that bike specialization isnt always needed but is often beneficial, and then collectively move on?
Likes For mstateglfr:
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Road bikes can be used to tour on. Should we consider them touring bikes though?
Road bikes can be ridden on rocky rooted singletrack. Should we consider them mountain bikes though?
Or can we all just accept that gravel existed long before the currently well established category became popular, recognize that bike specialization isnt always needed but is often beneficial, and then collectively move on?
Road bikes can be ridden on rocky rooted singletrack. Should we consider them mountain bikes though?
Or can we all just accept that gravel existed long before the currently well established category became popular, recognize that bike specialization isnt always needed but is often beneficial, and then collectively move on?
I will brush that aside and almost ALL Colnago road bikes did not have eyelets, no racks of fenders anticipated.
Likes For adamrice:
#55
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,800 Times
in
2,284 Posts
Road bikes can be used to tour on. Should we consider them touring bikes though?
Road bikes can be ridden on rocky rooted singletrack. Should we consider them mountain bikes though?
Or can we all just accept that gravel existed long before the currently well established category became popular, recognize that bike specialization isnt always needed but is often beneficial, and then collectively move on?
Road bikes can be ridden on rocky rooted singletrack. Should we consider them mountain bikes though?
Or can we all just accept that gravel existed long before the currently well established category became popular, recognize that bike specialization isnt always needed but is often beneficial, and then collectively move on?
I have a few bikes (don't we all ;-) ), and each has an optimal use, but I've ridden my narrower tired bikes on gravel roads, and fat ones on asphalt.
There is a rough, general concensus over what we mean by road, touring, gravel, etc., but that's driven more by marketing.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,376 Times
in
1,580 Posts
Well said! Jobst Brandt would agree.
I have a few bikes (don't we all ;-) ), and each has an optimal use, but I've ridden my narrower tired bikes on gravel roads, and fat ones on asphalt.
There is a rough, general concensus over what we mean by road, touring, gravel, etc., but that's driven more by marketing.
I have a few bikes (don't we all ;-) ), and each has an optimal use, but I've ridden my narrower tired bikes on gravel roads, and fat ones on asphalt.
There is a rough, general concensus over what we mean by road, touring, gravel, etc., but that's driven more by marketing.
... man, that is one big frame!...
Steve in Peoria
#57
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Trends are fun to look back at.
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 4,870
Bikes: A few too many
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 2,181 Times
in
1,183 Posts
https://losangeles.craigslist.org/sf...260720166.html
just posted..... no affiliation
Large frame but nice color and patina.
Best, Ben
just posted..... no affiliation
Large frame but nice color and patina.
Best, Ben
__________________
"EVERY PERSON IS GUILTY OF ALL THE GOOD THEY DID NOT DO"
Voltaire
Voice recognition may sometimes create odd spelling and grammatical errors
"EVERY PERSON IS GUILTY OF ALL THE GOOD THEY DID NOT DO"
Voltaire
Voice recognition may sometimes create odd spelling and grammatical errors
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
#60
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,656
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1026 Post(s)
Liked 2,528 Times
in
1,058 Posts
Since its from the front, each time I see that pic, I immediately think about how narrow those bars are. As a user of comically large frames, I cant imagine pairing the frame to comically narrow bars and then saying- let's ride some animal paths thru the Santa Cruz mountains!
Trends are fun to look back at.
Trends are fun to look back at.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
Likes For bikingshearer:
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,043
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,382 Times
in
3,669 Posts
Note that Jobst's shoulders are not much wider than the bars; the proportions look about right to my untrained eye.. He was quite tall and rather thin, hence the frame and bars. He is also one of those people who gave so much to the cycling community that he gets a pass on pretty much quirky or dated fit thing he chose to do.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
Since its from the front, each time I see that pic, I immediately think about how narrow those bars are. As a user of comically large frames, I cant imagine pairing the frame to comically narrow bars and then saying- let's ride some animal paths thru the Santa Cruz mountains!
Trends are fun to look back at.
Trends are fun to look back at.
#63
Senior Member
There's been some thread drift here, but I thought I'd point out that the news as of a couple days ago is that Woodrup Cycles and another investor did successfully purchase the Bob Jackson name, rights and framebuilding machinery/supplies. The news comes from Kevin Sayles, Woodrup's Master Builder, who's already checked out some of the framebuilding stuff, so barring any weird corporate shenanigans it seems that BoJack may live on. There's not a whole lot more detail yet, but this means there's the possibility that Woodrup may continue building Bob Jackson frames.
I posted this in a separate thread a couple days back, but there's not really any more detail there. We haven't heard much yet other than that it's a done deal.
I posted this in a separate thread a couple days back, but there's not really any more detail there. We haven't heard much yet other than that it's a done deal.
__________________
Fuggedaboutit!
Fuggedaboutit!
Likes For pcb:
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,043
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,382 Times
in
3,669 Posts
@pcb
Corporate shenanigans seems to be even more of an artform now days, hopefully this goes through despite that and the consternation discussed here earlier on.
At this point in history, any name that can live on is a stroke of luck.
Corporate shenanigans seems to be even more of an artform now days, hopefully this goes through despite that and the consternation discussed here earlier on.
At this point in history, any name that can live on is a stroke of luck.
#65
Hoards Thumbshifters
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,157
Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Liked 335 Times
in
192 Posts
There's been some thread drift here, but I thought I'd point out that the news as of a couple days ago is that Woodrup Cycles and another investor did successfully purchase the Bob Jackson name, rights and framebuilding machinery/supplies. The news comes from Kevin Sayles, Woodrup's Master Builder, who's already checked out some of the framebuilding stuff, so barring any weird corporate shenanigans it seems that BoJack may live on. There's not a whole lot more detail yet, but this means there's the possibility that Woodrup may continue building Bob Jackson frames.
I posted this in a separate thread a couple days back, but there's not really any more detail there. We haven't heard much yet other than that it's a done deal.
I posted this in a separate thread a couple days back, but there's not really any more detail there. We haven't heard much yet other than that it's a done deal.
#66
Senior Member
Bob Jackson didn't close down due to financial difficulties, at least going from what they publicly announced and comments from local folks with knowledge. The principals are senior citizens, they've been running BoJack for decades, their building/land was worth quite a lot of money, and they decided it was time to unwind the business and enjoy life. They did mention that continuing in the long term would be difficult simply because they had trouble finding young people willing to learn framebuilding, and their builders were aging out. Seemed like the right time to retire.
The story became complex when it went from "sorry, we're shutting down, bye" to "good news, we have a buyer to continue the business," to "sorry, that deal fell through" to "Woodrup/investor bought the name/rights/stuff." But all of that potential/lost/rediscovered buy-out news was unrelated to the apparent fact that Jacksons was profitable and solvent when the decision was made to shutter the business.
There may be a larger story and other ways to look at this. Is it difficult to find young people who want to get their hands dirty building frames, or is it difficult to find them willing to do that for bike-biz salaries when they could be brazing/welding industrially, or in plumbing, for more dosh? I don't know how the trades look in the UK these days, are they having trouble in general getting younger tradespeople, and is that workforce aging out?
And/or would Jacksons have had an easier time attracting younger workers if they sold their frames for more money, and could afford to pay them more? But how many fewer frames would they have sold at higher prices? Etc?
Anyhow, I was partly saddened to see the name end because I have warm/fuzzies for them, and because I had long thought about getting one built for me, but never did. But I'm also aware that British bicycle manufacturing history is full of brands that died, or were absorbed by other brands. My '71 Raleigh Pro Track frame also has Carlton decals. The Carlton decals disappeared not long after '71.
I'm glad what's left of Bob Jackson landed at Woodrup, much better there than some non-mfr corporate entity that would source cheap frames and slap on Jackson decals. And I'm looking forward to seeing what Woodrup does with the brand. Maintaining it as a lower-cost alternative to Woodrup would be cool, IMHO.
I have a quite illogical desire to see a British-made bicycle with a barber-pole seat tube in my basement.
The story became complex when it went from "sorry, we're shutting down, bye" to "good news, we have a buyer to continue the business," to "sorry, that deal fell through" to "Woodrup/investor bought the name/rights/stuff." But all of that potential/lost/rediscovered buy-out news was unrelated to the apparent fact that Jacksons was profitable and solvent when the decision was made to shutter the business.
There may be a larger story and other ways to look at this. Is it difficult to find young people who want to get their hands dirty building frames, or is it difficult to find them willing to do that for bike-biz salaries when they could be brazing/welding industrially, or in plumbing, for more dosh? I don't know how the trades look in the UK these days, are they having trouble in general getting younger tradespeople, and is that workforce aging out?
And/or would Jacksons have had an easier time attracting younger workers if they sold their frames for more money, and could afford to pay them more? But how many fewer frames would they have sold at higher prices? Etc?
Anyhow, I was partly saddened to see the name end because I have warm/fuzzies for them, and because I had long thought about getting one built for me, but never did. But I'm also aware that British bicycle manufacturing history is full of brands that died, or were absorbed by other brands. My '71 Raleigh Pro Track frame also has Carlton decals. The Carlton decals disappeared not long after '71.
I'm glad what's left of Bob Jackson landed at Woodrup, much better there than some non-mfr corporate entity that would source cheap frames and slap on Jackson decals. And I'm looking forward to seeing what Woodrup does with the brand. Maintaining it as a lower-cost alternative to Woodrup would be cool, IMHO.
I have a quite illogical desire to see a British-made bicycle with a barber-pole seat tube in my basement.
Good, I keep having the thought that how could a reputable bike manufacturing name go bankrupt this last year. I am not naive either, last year was a great year for bikes and it should be another one this year, so either not delivering on promised orders or business shenanigans or bad debt, you'd think they would have been able to pull it off. Woodrup cycles + new investor sounds like a solid way forward to me, hopefully it caries on.
__________________
Fuggedaboutit!
Fuggedaboutit!
Likes For pcb:
#67
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,656
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1026 Post(s)
Liked 2,528 Times
in
1,058 Posts
Bob Jackson didn't close down due to financial difficulties, at least going from what they publicly announced and comments from local folks with knowledge. The principals are senior citizens, they've been running BoJack for decades, their building/land was worth quite a lot of money, and they decided it was time to unwind the business and enjoy life. They did mention that continuing in the long term would be difficult simply because they had trouble finding young people willing to learn framebuilding, and their builders were aging out. Seemed like the right time to retire.
The story became complex when it went from "sorry, we're shutting down, bye" to "good news, we have a buyer to continue the business," to "sorry, that deal fell through" to "Woodrup/investor bought the name/rights/stuff." But all of that potential/lost/rediscovered buy-out news was unrelated to the apparent fact that Jacksons was profitable and solvent when the decision was made to shutter the business.
There may be a larger story and other ways to look at this. Is it difficult to find young people who want to get their hands dirty building frames, or is it difficult to find them willing to do that for bike-biz salaries when they could be brazing/welding industrially, or in plumbing, for more dosh? I don't know how the trades look in the UK these days, are they having trouble in general getting younger tradespeople, and is that workforce aging out?
And/or would Jacksons have had an easier time attracting younger workers if they sold their frames for more money, and could afford to pay them more? But how many fewer frames would they have sold at higher prices? Etc?
Anyhow, I was partly saddened to see the name end because I have warm/fuzzies for them, and because I had long thought about getting one built for me, but never did. But I'm also aware that British bicycle manufacturing history is full of brands that died, or were absorbed by other brands. My '71 Raleigh Pro Track frame also has Carlton decals. The Carlton decals disappeared not long after '71.
I'm glad what's left of Bob Jackson landed at Woodrup, much better there than some non-mfr corporate entity that would source cheap frames and slap on Jackson decals. And I'm looking forward to seeing what Woodrup does with the brand. Maintaining it as a lower-cost alternative to Woodrup would be cool, IMHO.
I have a quite illogical desire to see a British-made bicycle with a barber-pole seat tube in my basement.
The story became complex when it went from "sorry, we're shutting down, bye" to "good news, we have a buyer to continue the business," to "sorry, that deal fell through" to "Woodrup/investor bought the name/rights/stuff." But all of that potential/lost/rediscovered buy-out news was unrelated to the apparent fact that Jacksons was profitable and solvent when the decision was made to shutter the business.
There may be a larger story and other ways to look at this. Is it difficult to find young people who want to get their hands dirty building frames, or is it difficult to find them willing to do that for bike-biz salaries when they could be brazing/welding industrially, or in plumbing, for more dosh? I don't know how the trades look in the UK these days, are they having trouble in general getting younger tradespeople, and is that workforce aging out?
And/or would Jacksons have had an easier time attracting younger workers if they sold their frames for more money, and could afford to pay them more? But how many fewer frames would they have sold at higher prices? Etc?
Anyhow, I was partly saddened to see the name end because I have warm/fuzzies for them, and because I had long thought about getting one built for me, but never did. But I'm also aware that British bicycle manufacturing history is full of brands that died, or were absorbed by other brands. My '71 Raleigh Pro Track frame also has Carlton decals. The Carlton decals disappeared not long after '71.
I'm glad what's left of Bob Jackson landed at Woodrup, much better there than some non-mfr corporate entity that would source cheap frames and slap on Jackson decals. And I'm looking forward to seeing what Woodrup does with the brand. Maintaining it as a lower-cost alternative to Woodrup would be cool, IMHO.
I have a quite illogical desire to see a British-made bicycle with a barber-pole seat tube in my basement.
This is not a slam on the bikes sold by such operations. Mass produced and mass marketed is not inherently bad, and they fill a viable niche, albeit not one I am interested in. But I rebel at the idea of building a Honda Civic (a very good car for its intended purpose) and calling it a Stutz Bearcat. The same idea applies here. Yes the parallel is not perfect - a Bob Jackson is not the equivalent of a Stutz and was not intended to be - but you get the idea.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
Likes For bikingshearer:
#68
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,800 Times
in
2,284 Posts
At this point I'll believe it when I click on their web page and find an order form.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,376 Times
in
1,580 Posts
Have I just been more exposed to Mercian marketing than B.J. marketing, or is Mercian better known as the company who uses barber pole stripes?
... but I'm still very happy with my B.J. made Hetchins!
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#70
mosquito rancher
There was a bike shop here in Austin that was popular among roadies. Lots of square footage, and a seemingly endless supply of weird old parts. I started shopping there in the 80s, when I was in college, and they had, among other things, three Mercian frames hanging on the wall. The shop closed about five years ago, and I'm pretty sure two of those were still on the wall when they closed (I have to wonder if their unwillingness to mark down old stock was part of the problem). One of them had that barber-pole seat tube.
__________________
Adam Rice
Adam Rice
#71
Senior Member
Has anyone heard anything new on this Bob Jackson situation? What is the bottom line as it stands now?
#72
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 463
Bikes: 02 Litespeed Ultimate, 84 & 85 Raleigh Grand Prix, '84 Raleigh Prestige, 85 Raleigh 555 RSL, '20 Raleigh Tamland, 38 Raleigh, 85 Landshark "Raleigh", '84 Marinoni Levi's Raleigh, SB4484, SB7979, Raleigh SSCXWC, 87 Raleigh USA 531 Prototype
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 147 Times
in
79 Posts
I was under the impression that everything had been liquidated months ago.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,043
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,382 Times
in
3,669 Posts
Their homepage has an enquiries tab and 2021 copyright at the bottom.
https://www.bobjacksoncycles.co.uk/
Hopefully they get/have it sorted soon.
https://www.bobjacksoncycles.co.uk/
Hopefully they get/have it sorted soon.
#74
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
I love mine.