Stronglight toothed headset 'washer/spacer' grind-down...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
Stronglight toothed headset 'washer/spacer' grind-down...
OK, besides the sacrilegious aspect to this idea......
I'd like to use a V-O decaleur (because it's what I have, it's simple, etc etc), but there isn't quite enough threading on the steerer tube to add it to the stack. The toothed spacer is quite thick and I'm wondering about grinding a mm or two off the top to give me room in the stack for the decaleur. Other than the aesthetic horror of permanently altering a (not so rare) vintage component, are there reasons I shouldn't do this?
I'd like to use a V-O decaleur (because it's what I have, it's simple, etc etc), but there isn't quite enough threading on the steerer tube to add it to the stack. The toothed spacer is quite thick and I'm wondering about grinding a mm or two off the top to give me room in the stack for the decaleur. Other than the aesthetic horror of permanently altering a (not so rare) vintage component, are there reasons I shouldn't do this?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,381
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
Rather than ruin the toothed one, I'd ask a mechanic at my local bike shop for a flat headset washer. Chances are that, at worst, you'd have to pay a few bucks for a complete used headset.
Likes For Trakhak:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,716 Times
in
2,613 Posts
I found those steerer-mounted decaleurs to be really problematic. No amount of tightening would prevent them from moving around, particularly if I had any kind of weight in my front bag. V-O also made a stem-bolt mounted version, which works much better or up your game and ask @gugie to make you one of his custom models.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
I found those steerer-mounted decaleurs to be really problematic. No amount of tightening would prevent them from moving around, particularly if I had any kind of weight in my front bag. V-O also made a stem-bolt mounted version, which works much better or up your game and ask @gugie to make you one of his custom models.
Wow, Gugie's are nice looking. One of them may be in my future......
Last edited by ehcoplex; 04-06-22 at 11:32 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,990
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 502 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
…up your game and ask @gugie to make you one of his custom models.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 913 Post(s)
Liked 515 Times
in
344 Posts
OK, besides the sacrilegious aspect to this idea......
I'd like to use a V-O decaleur (because it's what I have, it's simple, etc etc), but there isn't quite enough threading on the steerer tube to add it to the stack. The toothed spacer is quite thick and I'm wondering about grinding a mm or two off the top to give me room in the stack for the decaleur. Other than the aesthetic horror of permanently altering a (not so rare) vintage component, are there reasons I shouldn't do this?
I'd like to use a V-O decaleur (because it's what I have, it's simple, etc etc), but there isn't quite enough threading on the steerer tube to add it to the stack. The toothed spacer is quite thick and I'm wondering about grinding a mm or two off the top to give me room in the stack for the decaleur. Other than the aesthetic horror of permanently altering a (not so rare) vintage component, are there reasons I shouldn't do this?
#7
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,802 Times
in
2,286 Posts
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Last edited by gugie; 04-06-22 at 04:44 PM.
#8
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,994
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,076 Posts
Honestly though the effects will probably be minuscule unless your headset threads are extra sloppy. Parallelism is much more important for the lower race, which carries more of the load from your weight and dynamic loads from road irregularities. You can usually get away with some imprecision in the upper race. Just something to be aware of.
When I need some more steerer length, I'm more inclined to mill down the head tube. There's almost always some extra room to shorten the amount of headtube above the toptube joint. I mill the top of the HT preferentially (as opposed to the bottom of the tube) since that doesn't change the frame geo, but I'll mill the bottom too if needed, since frame geo is not very sensitive to small changes in the length of the HT.
But then that's easy for me since I have the HT milling/facing cutter. Most people have to bring the frame to a specialist to have that done, and lots of people don't even live near anyone equipped to do it. (If any Seattle folks need that done, you can PM me.) Oh and some "specialists" have the tool but don't know how to use it, and consequently they can ruin the frame. So make sure your guy knows his potatoes. Milling the frame with a Campy cutter might make your existing headset no longer fit, if your headset expects a smaller inside diameter on the HT. I suspect Campy settled on a larger diameter there expressly to prevent people from putting any other brand of headset on a frame that had been reamed for Campy. Ac ompetitive advantage that only lasted until so many other headset makers adopted the larger Campy size. There are still lot of headsets out there that need a smaller headtube ID though, so beware, and measure twice before cutting.
If I had to thin a headset washer I would do it on a belt sander (aka belt grinder) with a flat platen. As opposed to a bench grinder, that likes to make curved shapes matching the grinding wheel, the platen on the sander likes to make flat shapes, or keep flat things flat. You just need to take off the same amount all the way around.
Use a fresh belt since that requires the least force, and cuts without putting as much heat into the part. I would hold the part against the belt by hand (no gloves), which guarantees you won't get the part too hot — you'll need to dunk it in water quite frequently to keep from burning your fingers. Maybe that's dangerous though? I've been doing it so long I forget what it's like to be a beginner. Maybe most people should push that part against the belt with a pusher stick, wood or what-have-you. Less sensitive, but no doubt safer.
I know ehcoplex has moved on from the washer-thinning idea, but being moot never stopped me from flapping my gums...
gugie's decaleurs are a thing of beaty, and practical to boot, but another interesting one to check out is Tom Matchak's "Dock-it". Super clever. With the B2B (barrel-to-bike) kit, you can make a custom decaleur to fit most any size of bag to most any size bike (with certain limits of course). No brazing rquired. Bag detaches with a slight roation of a knurled ring, but it's held securely while riding. OK, maybe it's not very "C&V looking". He did sorta throw tradition out the window with this design.
Mark B
Likes For bulgie: