Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Rear bike camera

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-21, 10:48 AM
  #1  
Geo_Zegarra2016
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Hamilton, NY
Posts: 82

Bikes: Raleigh 2015 Revenio 1.0, 2021 Canyon Endurace AL Disc 6.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Rear bike camera

Hi Everyone,

Looking to buy a rear bike camera since two days ago some person almost hit me as they were about to pass me. Looking at AKASO Brave 4 4K 20MP WiFi Action Camera
Does anyone own this camera? Is it worth buying a GoPro instead? What other cameras does anyone suggest?

Thank you
Geo_Zegarra2016 is offline  
Old 05-26-21, 08:14 AM
  #2  
Geo_Zegarra2016
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Hamilton, NY
Posts: 82

Bikes: Raleigh 2015 Revenio 1.0, 2021 Canyon Endurace AL Disc 6.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
No one
Geo_Zegarra2016 is offline  
Old 05-26-21, 10:20 AM
  #3  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by Geo_Zegarra2016
Hi Everyone,

Looking to buy a rear bike camera since two days ago some person almost hit me as they were about to pass me. Looking at AKASO Brave 4 4K 20MP WiFi Action Camera
Does anyone own this camera? Is it worth buying a GoPro instead? What other cameras does anyone suggest?

Thank you
I feel the best solution is the Cycliq FLY6CE. It's both a taillight and a camera. They can be a little finicky to get configured but once they are, it's a set and forget thing and it's a decent taillight all at the same time. I've been using one for years and it's been instrumental in getting numerous drivers some good, quality, law enforcement contact. The quality is good enough, it's image stabilized, and you an capture faces and license plate number. What is also a good technique is that you can speak the license plate number as they pass and it's recorded in the audio.

If I get hit, it's going to be up to my heirs to deal with it. My goal in the meantime has been to aggressively pursue drivers who misbehave. The local law enforcement has been accepting of this and has made the necessary calls and citations if required. In general, I prefer (as does LE) that the contact is educational but if the driver is belligerent or "not getting it" (as put to me by a deputy), then they issue the citation. This works because drivers then hear by word of mouth that they are being filmed and are accountable.

The FLY6CE will split the video into 5 or 10 minute segments instead of one big giant file. This is useful when you need to find the incident. It also has the capability to lock a file by a button push. You also can configure it that it will stop after you crash and lock the file.

It comes with mounts and it has a battery life of 4-5 hours with video and lights running. While it's not my favorite bit of bike electronics, for it's function it's the best out there even though it could use some improvements. It's not a perfect solution by any stretch and it does have it's warts, but for what you describe, it's the best out there IMO. One problem is that it's an Australian or New Zealand company so if you buy it, buy through Amazon to make returns and warranty much easier.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 05-26-21, 08:36 PM
  #4  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
There are a zillion recent threads on video cameras for bike rides.

GoPro and knockoffs for short clips of action. But they're not so great for extended run videos of mundane traffic safety stuff.

But the best buy right now for traffic/safety documentation is the Drift Ghost video cameras. I have a pair of Drift Ghost X from 2019, front and rear. Basic camera included 5-hour batteries, and they really do run that long per charge. There were optional 8-hour battery packs.

The Drift cameras are rugged as-is without needing protective housings, reasonably weather and splash resistant. Very durable and compact. Not lightweight.

The only tricky bit is the mounts. Drift mounts are just oh-kay. But the cameras have standard threaded tripod sockets and there are dozens of mount options available online, including from photo specialists like B&H Photo in NYC.

I've described my experiences with the Drift and other cameras in other threads on this forum.

And you'll find some excellent demo videos for the Drift on YouTube, mostly from UK based motorcyclists, where the Drift cameras are made.

Regarding the Cycliqs, I've read too many complaints of quality control problems and indifferent response from customer support. Including from local friends. I wouldn't buy one until they clean up their act.
canklecat is offline  
Old 05-26-21, 08:52 PM
  #5  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by canklecat
There are a zillion recent threads on video cameras for bike rides.

GoPro and knockoffs for short clips of action. But they're not so great for extended run videos of mundane traffic safety stuff.

But the best buy right now for traffic/safety documentation is the Drift Ghost video cameras. I have a pair of Drift Ghost X from 2019, front and rear. Basic camera included 5-hour batteries, and they really do run that long per charge. There were optional 8-hour battery packs.

The Drift cameras are rugged as-is without needing protective housings, reasonably weather and splash resistant. Very durable and compact. Not lightweight.

The only tricky bit is the mounts. Drift mounts are just oh-kay. But the cameras have standard threaded tripod sockets and there are dozens of mount options available online, including from photo specialists like B&H Photo in NYC.

I've described my experiences with the Drift and other cameras in other threads on this forum.

And you'll find some excellent demo videos for the Drift on YouTube, mostly from UK based motorcyclists, where the Drift cameras are made.

Regarding the Cycliqs, I've read too many complaints of quality control problems and indifferent response from customer support. Including from local friends. I wouldn't buy one until they clean up their act.
I don't disagree, but mounting space on the back of a bike is getting pretty valuable these days, especially if you have a smallish frame.

It seems as if you get a working Cycliq unit they work without problem for a long time. And, if you get it from Amazon (hence the suggestion), returns are easy especially if it doesn't work right. Most of the problems I've seen and that people have are fixed with a system reset or they were infant life mortality (common among electronics). Unfortunately, Cycliq has kind of nailed the feature set but the company is not the greatest.

I tried adding cameras on the back of the bike and now I have probably a hundred dollars in GoPro style mounts, all of which are, at best, mediocre. Eventually it starts to look like a Christmas Tree full of ornaments back there by the time you add a camera, lights, and maybe a seat pack. For me, the mount issue was a showstopper.

And the editing of the long videos from my GoPro camera was a giant pain when I wanted to send a clip to law enforcement. So yeah, you can get something with battery life but at the expense of all the mount and editing problems. And that's where Cycliq has kind of found a niche.

In reality, I found a front mounted camera to be *much* better and more useful. If I'm hit from behind, I have bigger problems than the video. I'm interested in trying to get law enforcement in place to try and change driver behavior (that's another story but it's worthwhile and it works - especially with commercial drivers). The camera in front clearly shows the car, the spacing, and the outcome of their action as well as any dialog post incident. Also, if you have a computer mount out front many of them accept a camera mounted underneath the computer on a GoPro mount. Truth be told, that's the setup that I use the most and has been very successful for me. I probably have 10 or so successful submissions to law enforcement from my front camera and I don't think I've ever submitted one from the rear camera. It's to the point where I don't use the rear one much anymore.

So the question really becomes, what do you want to do with this and what is the outcome you want from your video.

Last edited by JohnJ80; 05-26-21 at 08:56 PM.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 05-26-21, 09:22 PM
  #6  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
I consider rear facing video essential. Every time I was hit riding my motorcycle, and a few times on my bicycle, it was from behind at intersections. And the drivers always said the same stupid damned thing: I didn't see you!

A fixed front facing camera on the bike is the least useful. A helmet mounted camera is more versatile, but heavy. I have neck injuries (yup, from behind hit by cars), so after a couple of hours even the extra few ounces of a video camera weighs heavily on my splintered C1-C2 vertebrae and permanently injured neck and shoulder.

And, yeah, agreed, most bike mounts are a kludge. But I find room on the seat post for my rear facing video. Sometimes it requires modifying the mount, including filing or grinding off the oversized thumbscrews so they don't chafe my thighs.

My hybrid has a rear rack and I stuck one of the standard Drift mounts on the top of the rear rack. Works perfectly. I usually use panniers if I'm carrying anything so the camera doesn't interfere with using the rack. I plan to add a front rack and video mount there as well.

On the road bikes I attach the mount upside down. The Drift cameras have rotating "lenses" -- actually it's the sensor that rotates -- so the videos are normally oriented, no need to use software to correct for upside down video later.

Even on my carbon fiber bikes I don't worry about the extra devices or weight. I've watched enough videos of pros training and some of them, including Froome, carry bigger wedge bags and more spares than I do. I'm not training for anything anymore so I don't care about an extra pound of weight from a pair of cameras and mounts. And we don't have any real mountains here, so even my old school 25 lb steel bike is plenty light enough. My sub-20 lb carbon bikes feel like nothing, even with a pair of cameras.
canklecat is offline  
Old 05-26-21, 09:45 PM
  #7  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by canklecat
I consider rear facing video essential. Every time I was hit riding my motorcycle, and a few times on my bicycle, it was from behind at intersections. And the drivers always said the same stupid damned thing: I didn't see you!

A fixed front facing camera on the bike is the least useful. A helmet mounted camera is more versatile, but heavy. I have neck injuries (yup, from behind hit by cars), so after a couple of hours even the extra few ounces of a video camera weighs heavily on my splintered C1-C2 vertebrae and permanently injured neck and shoulder.

And, yeah, agreed, most bike mounts are a kludge. But I find room on the seat post for my rear facing video. Sometimes it requires modifying the mount, including filing or grinding off the oversized thumbscrews so they don't chafe my thighs.

My hybrid has a rear rack and I stuck one of the standard Drift mounts on the top of the rear rack. Works perfectly. I usually use panniers if I'm carrying anything so the camera doesn't interfere with using the rack. I plan to add a front rack and video mount there as well.

On the road bikes I attach the mount upside down. The Drift cameras have rotating "lenses" -- actually it's the sensor that rotates -- so the videos are normally oriented, no need to use software to correct for upside down video later.

Even on my carbon fiber bikes I don't worry about the extra devices or weight. I've watched enough videos of pros training and some of them, including Froome, carry bigger wedge bags and more spares than I do. I'm not training for anything anymore so I don't care about an extra pound of weight from a pair of cameras and mounts. And we don't have any real mountains here, so even my old school 25 lb steel bike is plenty light enough. My sub-20 lb carbon bikes feel like nothing, even with a pair of cameras.
To my point - what do you want to do with the video? If you look the legal outcomes of bike vs car, it's almost always, to the point where "always" is accurate, written off as an "accident." As an example, I had a friend killed in a crosswalk last year by a 26yo driver. The most the driver could be charged with was" failure to yield to a pedestrian." Here, that's a max $300 fine and max of 90 days in county jail. The most he'd serve is 45 days. No personal injury attorney will take the case because the kid doesn't have anything to win and he'll just declare bankruptcy. It's largely the same with bike vs car. You want compensation? Get a life insurance policy. You will absolutely not get justice and the only real compensation you'll get is from life insurance. This experience with the death of my friend was a giant eye opener.

Me? I've decided to get militant and force educate drivers. I have seen the first hand benefits of that directly with drivers in my geography based on what I've been doing and it works (another long story at the risk of hijacking the thread). Rear view video has not been helpful. Oddly enough, forward looking video has been. Been there and it is working. If you want legal justice, you won't get it if you're hit by a car except up to the limits of the policy which are generally woefully inadequate. If you get hit by a commercial vehicle - who are generally better trained drivers anyhow - then you have a chance.

So it depends on what your goal is with the video. Thinking this through is a worthy exercise before one buys anything.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Likes For JohnJ80:
Old 06-03-21, 07:57 AM
  #8  
Bald Paul
Senior Member
 
Bald Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,704
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 1,655 Times in 782 Posts
I had a Rylo 360 degree camera mounted on the left end of my handlebar drop. It was fantastic at capturing vehicles as they approached, passed, and went on down the road. I did manage to capture a couple of "too close" passes, and an instance of some yahoo in a diesel pickup who thought rolling coal on me would be funny. Little did he know that is specifically against the law in my state, and the local sheriff paid him a rather expensive visit later on after reviewing my footage.
Unfortunately, Rylo was bought out by a software company that was only interested in the 360 video software. The hardware was discontinued (luckily I did have extra batteries) and I could still use the camera. That is, until my phone decided to turn itself into a brick. Got a replacement phone and tried to download the Rylo video editing app, only to find out that was no longer available. Now I have a very expensive paperweight.
Ended up going with two GoPro Hero 8 cameras, one mounted on the seat post facing rearward, the other on a forward facing helmet mount.
Bald Paul is offline  
Old 06-03-21, 11:44 AM
  #9  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times in 2,342 Posts
fwiw - I believe, cameras are great & I use them, but unless a driver sees the camera & thinks to themselves, "hmmm I guess I won't buzz this guy cuz I'll be recorded" then the camera itself won't increase your safety

I added a rear strobe to my left drop bar, thinking it would help reduce getting "buzzed", meaning when someone passes you but then cuts back in front of you, sooner than could be called courteous. I was right, the extra flash up front is still seen by drivers as they pass & no longer see the rear strobe. it absolutely gets me a little bit more courtesy room & I'm hard pressed to remember any "buzzing" after installing it

this is what I use. bought 1 new & 2 used. I like them cuz I can mount them anywhere & they are cheap. not sure I would recommend them for identification purposes tho. I don't think their quality is high enough for that
Polaroid XS100 Extreme Edition HD 1080p 16MP Waterproof Sports Action Video Camera With Full Mounting Kit Included

Last edited by rumrunn6; 06-03-21 at 11:51 AM.
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 06-03-21, 12:42 PM
  #10  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
FWIW, my reason for using cameras is insurance claims and law enforcement if I'm seriously injured and can't remember what happened, or killed. My family and friends know I run video on every ride so if I'm unconscious or killed they can tell law enforcement to check the cameras.

Cameras aren't deterrents. Criminals already know there are surveillance cameras everywhere. It doesn't deter idiots. If anything some criminals seem to revel in the brief moment of video infamy they enjoy before going to prison. Gives 'em bragging rights. It only makes it a bit easier to prosecute them.

In the split second it takes for bad stuff to happen, I doubt drivers would notice a bike-mounted camera. The Drift cameras I use are very low profile, as are some other traffic/safety documentation cameras. They *might* notice a blocky GoPro on a helmet, but I still doubt it would be a deterrent.

However, if you survive, and the driver stops and has insurance, it can speed up the settlement process. That's a big issue if you're among the many underpaid working stiffs who can't afford employment insurance or even the deductible for catastrophic medical insurance. Video evidence might prompt a satisfactory insurance settlement in months rather than years.
canklecat is offline  
Likes For canklecat:
Old 06-03-21, 02:10 PM
  #11  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times in 936 Posts
I'm so glad I got a camera for my bike. I've even managed to catch one close call on it already: I was coming up to a T intersection, car on left turning to go by me swung way out into the middle of the street and actually into the oncoming lane, forcing me to almost take the ditch. Too bad it was dark out so basically all you could see on the video was headlights, and my camera has no night vision capability.
Milton Keynes is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.