Tiagra 4700 rear derailleur B screw not effective
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Tiagra 4700 rear derailleur B screw not effective
I recently found an offer for new Tiagra 4700 (10 sp.) right shifter and rear derailleur, which I used to replace an older 8 sp. mechanism from Microshift (triple).
All good, the new system has better progression (12:26), it is quieter and works ok, apart from “B screw adjustment”. It leaves a large gap between the pulley and the cogs, even if totally unscrewed (1.5 cm to large cog with small ring, or 2 cm from large cog with large ring). This results in noisy and long time shifting. In fact, there is not much difference with “B” totally screwed or totally unscrewed. It is like a weak spring leaves the derailleur to far back, despite B screw adjustment. Being a SRAM user, I never saw such behavior: B screw has a very clear and effective impact on SRAM derailleur position.
Photo with derailleur position (B screw totally unscrewed).
Photo with a normal position of the derailleur if I gently push it forward by hand:
How can I make this derailleur to keep a normal position of 3-5 mm distance from cogs?
All good, the new system has better progression (12:26), it is quieter and works ok, apart from “B screw adjustment”. It leaves a large gap between the pulley and the cogs, even if totally unscrewed (1.5 cm to large cog with small ring, or 2 cm from large cog with large ring). This results in noisy and long time shifting. In fact, there is not much difference with “B” totally screwed or totally unscrewed. It is like a weak spring leaves the derailleur to far back, despite B screw adjustment. Being a SRAM user, I never saw such behavior: B screw has a very clear and effective impact on SRAM derailleur position.
Photo with derailleur position (B screw totally unscrewed).
Photo with a normal position of the derailleur if I gently push it forward by hand:
How can I make this derailleur to keep a normal position of 3-5 mm distance from cogs?
#2
Senior Member
Hard to tell based on the pics, but is the RD hanger longer than usual?
Here is Shimano's recommended measurements for road & MTB. L measurement.
Here is Shimano's recommended measurements for road & MTB. L measurement.
#3
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,126
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 855 Post(s)
Liked 1,448 Times
in
824 Posts
Is the derailleur in the mounting hole at the proper angle? If not, that would affect the adjustment of the b screw.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The hanger worked very well with the original Microshift 8 speeds derailleur.
But Tiagra B adjustment looks strange to me: between fully screwed and fully unscrewed you hardly can see a difference of a few mm. This might be a result of the fact that the B axle spring appears to have very low tension: I can move the derailleur forth and back with a very gentle push of a finger. By contrast, I need a much bigger force to move a Sram Force derailleur to change the wheel, and even a bigger one for a Rival axs.
Tiagra feels very easily to move, regardless B screw adjustment. It seems to have more than enough room for B adjustment, but no force in the spring to apply the adjustment.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Or, is there another subtle thing I did not observe?
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'll have hard time to measure that angle on the hanger, there are no tools for that...
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,709
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 855 Post(s)
Liked 1,088 Times
in
758 Posts
Is the chain length correct? If horizontal dropouts with adjusters try moving the wheel to the recommended position in KCT1986's post #2
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,272
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4539 Post(s)
Liked 1,676 Times
in
1,098 Posts
Redbullet
Okay, you are confusing some of how this derailleur works, which is not like a SRAM.
SRAM derailleur B screws simply pushes the derailleur back and forth directly. This Shimano derailleur B screw adjusts the spring tension between the mounting bolt and the body. So the screw does not set a position - it just opposes the tension in the pulley cage pivot.
The picture appears to be of a bike in a crossover gear, with the bottom of the pulley cage angled forward toward the crank. If not, the chain is too short. In either case, the chain tension is pulling the derailleur and pulley cage forward, overwhelming the B screw spring tension but also causing the upper pulley to pivot back and down. And that's okay, because it will still shift, but it is optimized for shifting the low cassette gears with the low inner chainring - which will cause that upper pulley to pivot up on the cage pivot.
Additionally, if this is the GS version with the medium cage, the derailleur has capacity for up to a 34t cog, and you appear to have a 25t low cog. That capacity comes from having a lower positioned upper jockey pulley. The SS version is 28t max, which would run closer - but in either case the chain length and gear selection needs to match what you are trying to do.
Post a photo of the derailleur in the small chainring and largest cassette cog.
Okay, you are confusing some of how this derailleur works, which is not like a SRAM.
SRAM derailleur B screws simply pushes the derailleur back and forth directly. This Shimano derailleur B screw adjusts the spring tension between the mounting bolt and the body. So the screw does not set a position - it just opposes the tension in the pulley cage pivot.
The picture appears to be of a bike in a crossover gear, with the bottom of the pulley cage angled forward toward the crank. If not, the chain is too short. In either case, the chain tension is pulling the derailleur and pulley cage forward, overwhelming the B screw spring tension but also causing the upper pulley to pivot back and down. And that's okay, because it will still shift, but it is optimized for shifting the low cassette gears with the low inner chainring - which will cause that upper pulley to pivot up on the cage pivot.
Additionally, if this is the GS version with the medium cage, the derailleur has capacity for up to a 34t cog, and you appear to have a 25t low cog. That capacity comes from having a lower positioned upper jockey pulley. The SS version is 28t max, which would run closer - but in either case the chain length and gear selection needs to match what you are trying to do.
Post a photo of the derailleur in the small chainring and largest cassette cog.
Last edited by Kontact; 01-26-24 at 08:25 PM.
Likes For Kontact:
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It is GS version, because the short version had not enough capacity and it is not recommended for triple crankset. Chainring min/max is 50/30. Cassette is SRAM 12/26, with SRAM chain. The chain is rather too long. If one pair longer, then the derailleur reaches its limit in “small-small” position. I can remove one more pair of links and it will still have reserve in “big-big” position.
I attach here a photo with small ring and large cog position.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
To me, this is very strange: I can't see how B screw can make a difference in such a design.
#14
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,163
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6292 Post(s)
Liked 4,885 Times
in
3,364 Posts
Your close up pics show the issue, but they don't show enough of the possible causes for that issue.
Normally, I'd suggest a pic from the drive side of the bike showing both the crankset and RD. One pic with the chain in the big/big combo and another pic with the chain in the small/small combo. But since Shimano's chain sizing for a 3x front is different than 2x, Perhaps just a pic from the side showing it in the big front and small rear cog will do. Here is their chain sizing for 3x with a 30tooth or less rear sprocket.
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/dm/RD...003-09-ENG.pdf
Is the RD and it's shifter the only thing that changed or did cassettes or rings get changed too?
Normally, I'd suggest a pic from the drive side of the bike showing both the crankset and RD. One pic with the chain in the big/big combo and another pic with the chain in the small/small combo. But since Shimano's chain sizing for a 3x front is different than 2x, Perhaps just a pic from the side showing it in the big front and small rear cog will do. Here is their chain sizing for 3x with a 30tooth or less rear sprocket.
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/dm/RD...003-09-ENG.pdf
Is the RD and it's shifter the only thing that changed or did cassettes or rings get changed too?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,417
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 520 Post(s)
Liked 454 Times
in
341 Posts
I'll bet your chain is so long that it's not pulling any tension on the B spring. Show us what what big-big looks like.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,272
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4539 Post(s)
Liked 1,676 Times
in
1,098 Posts
No, it is the opposite. The first picture in my first post shows the position of the derailleur in "big-big" gear: the derailleur body is far back and the distance to cogs is too big. The second picture (the same "big-big) in my first post shows that I can very easily push the derailleur body (not cage) forward by hand, toward the position which is closer to the cogs - but when released, it goes back.
To me, this is very strange: I can't see how B screw can make a difference in such a design.
To me, this is very strange: I can't see how B screw can make a difference in such a design.
Adjust your chain gap in the small chainring.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Here is their chain sizing for 3x with a 30tooth or less rear sprocket.
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/dm/RD...003-09-ENG.pdf
Is the RD and it's shifter the only thing that changed or did cassettes or rings get changed too?
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/dm/RD...003-09-ENG.pdf
Is the RD and it's shifter the only thing that changed or did cassettes or rings get changed too?
The problem is the following:
The manual says (page 14) “Mount the chain on the smallest chainring and the largest sprocket and turn the crank arm backward. Turn the B-tension adjust bolt to adjust the guide pulley to be as close to the sprocket as possible but not so close that it touches”.
But it looks that that the derailleur was designed (then manufactured) in such a way that it is impossible for B screw to have any effect, thus, the above instruction can never be performed, and the upper pulley will always remain far from the cogs regardless B screw position. See this, taken in requested “Small ring – Large cog position):
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#19
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,163
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6292 Post(s)
Liked 4,885 Times
in
3,364 Posts
If your chain is too long, you can't expect the b-screw adjustment to do anything. Get the chain length correct first.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Can we be sure of that? If I remove 1 more pair of links, it will not be 90 degrees, but maybe 2-3 degrees on the "right side", which will also mean that "big - big" position will stretch the derailleur around maximum. I shall not be able to go back, because chain links can not be added back...
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
P.S.: When I say "90 degrees" I mean the angle made by the line that passes the centers of the pulleys to the ground. But this line can not go up to the center of the cogs. To do that, a specially tailored hanger for each bike and each cassette would be needed, but I think this is not what Shimano wanted to say...
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,272
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4539 Post(s)
Liked 1,676 Times
in
1,098 Posts
Yes, I did. I attached then, as an answer, a picture with derailleur position Small ring / Large cog. But even so, B screw has no impact at all on the derailleur position. That is because the body of the derailleur moves freely a long distance backward (and forward), thus, can not "touch" B adjustment. It can be better seen in a clip that I posted to Iride01's answer above:https://youtu.be/odkmLqNNkkQ
It appears that, by design, this derailleur does not allow B screw adjustment to set upper pulley closer to the cogs, although B screw exists. I wonder whether this is only Tiagra 4700 issue, or also the other Shimano tiers...
It appears that, by design, this derailleur does not allow B screw adjustment to set upper pulley closer to the cogs, although B screw exists. I wonder whether this is only Tiagra 4700 issue, or also the other Shimano tiers...
And there is only so close you can get GS derailleur designed for 30t cogs to a 25t low.
But we won't know if that is a factor until you understand the basics of this 45 year old Shimano derailleur design.
#23
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,163
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6292 Post(s)
Liked 4,885 Times
in
3,364 Posts
P.S.: When I say "90 degrees" I mean the angle made by the line that passes the centers of the pulleys to the ground. But this line can not go up to the center of the cogs. To do that, a specially tailored hanger for each bike and each cassette would be needed, but I think this is not what Shimano wanted to say...
Generally, your chain is too long if in the small/small combo there is a sag in the bottom run of your chain and the RD is at it's limits for taking up any more slack. Somewhere between too long and not long enough to allow the RD to go into the big/big combo is your chain length that will give you the best shifting and probably allow you to see some difference with the b-screw.
But understand that the only thing the b-screw is for is to change that jockey wheel position with respect to the rear sprockets. And it can't do that if your chain is too long. So get the chain length and everything else correct first. B-screw is about the last thing that needs to be looked at before taking the bike off the stand and going for a ride.
If you are doing this stuff with the bike upside down, then turn it over!
Also, you seem resistant at giving us a picture where we can see the crankset and RD at the same time. As I said earlier, usually seeing what the RD looks like when in the big/big and then when in the small/small can tell a lot. Right now you have some of us doubting your chain length. Once you get us beyond that, we might come up with other suggestions. IE: your new DR is buggered up and needs to be returned.
Last edited by Iride01; 01-27-24 at 04:08 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Again, you aren't reading. The B screw doesn't directly position the derailleur. It changes the spring tension, so it will move the position indirectly.
And there is only so close you can get GS derailleur designed for 30t cogs to a 25t low.
But we won't know if that is a factor until you understand the basics of this 45 year old Shimano derailleur design.
And there is only so close you can get GS derailleur designed for 30t cogs to a 25t low.
But we won't know if that is a factor until you understand the basics of this 45 year old Shimano derailleur design.
Shimano manual says that B screw is designed to adjust the distance between upper pulley and the cassette: "Turn the B-tension adjust bolt to adjust the guide pulley to be as close to the sprocket as possible but not so close that it touches" - see page 14. However, B screw is useless: the big distance between the guide pulley does not change regardless B screw adjustment, although GS variant is advertised as fully compliant to my setup (triple 50 to 30 chain rings, 12-26 cassette).
The above results in poor (late and noisy) shifting performance, although it finally shifts all way of the cassette. I could accept a small drop in performance versus SRAM Force 22 or Rival AXS, but in fact it is much lower, even much lower than low end Microshift 8 speeds. 45 years worth nothing if shifting performance is so poor...
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter