Cannondale HM Frame with Lab71 Paint - What's Up with That?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Cannondale HM Frame with Lab71 Paint - What's Up with That?
Evidently the EF Education "Lab71" bikes are HM (high mod) frames with Lab71 paint. What's up with that?
This "false advertising" might anger some folks, while others are agnostic or simply don't care. Personally, I find it curious. It's definitely an odd business decision by Cannondale, and I find it hard to dismiss as "innocent and clumsy". Whether it angers you or not, Cannondale is trying to sell something to the consumer that even their pro riders evidently don't need. The HM frame seems to be more than "good enough" if you're a world tour rider.
When Cannondale announced Lab71 it seemed they were trying to create a new "top tier" that represented the best in quality and innovation. It made for good marketing I suppose, but on the ground level I'm failing to understand the logic and strategy behind the whole Lab71 concept. It's looking like little more than a money grab.
This "false advertising" might anger some folks, while others are agnostic or simply don't care. Personally, I find it curious. It's definitely an odd business decision by Cannondale, and I find it hard to dismiss as "innocent and clumsy". Whether it angers you or not, Cannondale is trying to sell something to the consumer that even their pro riders evidently don't need. The HM frame seems to be more than "good enough" if you're a world tour rider.
When Cannondale announced Lab71 it seemed they were trying to create a new "top tier" that represented the best in quality and innovation. It made for good marketing I suppose, but on the ground level I'm failing to understand the logic and strategy behind the whole Lab71 concept. It's looking like little more than a money grab.
#2
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,548
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,441 Times
in
2,764 Posts
Are you able to return it, get your $ back?
Likes For shelbyfv:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,455
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
Looks like they are simply going for limited edition exclusivity here. What’s the problem? The plebs can just buy a standard bike.
Edit: Ignore this post, I misunderstood the issue here
Edit: Ignore this post, I misunderstood the issue here
Last edited by PeteHski; 01-12-24 at 02:45 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,114
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 989 Post(s)
Liked 586 Times
in
440 Posts
No one is forced to buy anything in this free country. Personally, I would never buy a team bike. The only one I kind of like is Pogacar's V4RS because it's sleeper.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,492
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
Not sure what the issue is here .... are you saying you bought a Lab 71 frames and have learned that it is better than the frames ridden by EF Education and are upset?
Likes For Maelochs:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
248 Posts
* The bikes EF Ed. are riding are badged as Lab 71.
* The bikes EF Ed are riding are actually HM frames.
* Why would the team ride the "lower" tier HM frames?
It doesn't seem necessary to explain Cannondale's reasons for giving the public the impression that the Pros are riding Lab 71 bikes (to sell more Lab 71 bikes, which are presumably higher in price and profit margin; and to enhance the image of the company). But, what's in it for the team? Lower cost? Other? Or, why would Pros prefer to ride the "lower" tier bike - is it actually "better" in some way?
Likes For noimagination:
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,617
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10969 Post(s)
Liked 7,495 Times
in
4,191 Posts
Evidently the EF Education "Lab71" bikes are HM (high mod) frames with Lab71 paint. What's up with that?
This "false advertising" might anger some folks, while others are agnostic or simply don't care. Personally, I find it curious. It's definitely an odd business decision by Cannondale, and I find it hard to dismiss as "innocent and clumsy". Whether it angers you or not, Cannondale is trying to sell something to the consumer that even their pro riders evidently don't need. The HM frame seems to be more than "good enough" if you're a world tour rider.
When Cannondale announced Lab71 it seemed they were trying to create a new "top tier" that represented the best in quality and innovation. It made for good marketing I suppose, but on the ground level I'm failing to understand the logic and strategy behind the whole Lab71 concept. It's looking like little more than a money grab.
This "false advertising" might anger some folks, while others are agnostic or simply don't care. Personally, I find it curious. It's definitely an odd business decision by Cannondale, and I find it hard to dismiss as "innocent and clumsy". Whether it angers you or not, Cannondale is trying to sell something to the consumer that even their pro riders evidently don't need. The HM frame seems to be more than "good enough" if you're a world tour rider.
When Cannondale announced Lab71 it seemed they were trying to create a new "top tier" that represented the best in quality and innovation. It made for good marketing I suppose, but on the ground level I'm failing to understand the logic and strategy behind the whole Lab71 concept. It's looking like little more than a money grab.
So it's a himod frame with cool paint?
OK then.
Spending an extra $2000 for lab71 to save 100g seems insane to me, but I guess others find value in it.
Personally, a himod with cool paint for half the increased cost of a lab71 would seem like more value...at least to me...if I wanted to spend $12-14,000 on a bike.
A quick Google found that this is hardly groundbreaking news. It's well documented on red-dit and weightweenies forums.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,455
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
Hmm, I thought the OP was pretty clear.
* The bikes EF Ed. are riding are badged as Lab 71.
* The bikes EF Ed are riding are actually HM frames.
* Why would the team ride the "lower" tier HM frames?
It doesn't seem necessary to explain Cannondale's reasons for giving the public the impression that the Pros are riding Lab 71 bikes (to sell more Lab 71 bikes, which are presumably higher in price and profit margin; and to enhance the image of the company). But, what's in it for the team? Lower cost? Other? Or, why would Pros prefer to ride the "lower" tier bike - is it actually "better" in some way?
* The bikes EF Ed. are riding are badged as Lab 71.
* The bikes EF Ed are riding are actually HM frames.
* Why would the team ride the "lower" tier HM frames?
It doesn't seem necessary to explain Cannondale's reasons for giving the public the impression that the Pros are riding Lab 71 bikes (to sell more Lab 71 bikes, which are presumably higher in price and profit margin; and to enhance the image of the company). But, what's in it for the team? Lower cost? Other? Or, why would Pros prefer to ride the "lower" tier bike - is it actually "better" in some way?
Maybe the LAB 71 frames were simply not available in time to supply the pro team. That would be the obvious reason.
#10
Senior Member
Obvious and correct. Cannondale and EF made no secret of it at the time. I should say it was more of an open secret.
Last edited by asgelle; 01-12-24 at 03:20 PM.
Likes For asgelle:
#11
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
So why is the advertising on the bicycle bothering you more than the advertising you see anywhere else?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times
in
338 Posts
That was my initial reaction except that it’s more analogous to seeing “Pirelli” on the side of an F1 tyre than a brand of bathroom fittings on a cycling team’s jersey. It’s more of an endorsement of the product being fit for purpose than a simple ad placement.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,455
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
Deleting the LAB 71 branding would have caused more confusion and certainly undermined the product. Cannondale are pretty open about LAB 71 being all about nth degree marginal gains. It's not as if the Hi-Mod frames are a totally different product. I don't get your analogy with Pirelli F1 tyres. They bear very little in common with Pirelli road tyres.
Likes For PeteHski:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,455
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
To me at least, advertising LAB 71 as part of a race team paint job is fair play, even if the frames are not actually the genuine article because of logistical issues. Cannondale are sponsoring the team specifically to advertise their brand, so it would be insane to delete the branding they are paying to promote.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,455
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,455
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
Meh, you could say the same thing if they had all their team bikes on 105 drivetrains. The pro team riders don't "need" DuraAce, but they will take the marginal gains when available. In this case they had to make do with 100g heavier frames.
Last edited by PeteHski; 01-13-24 at 07:48 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,492
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
First off one would need to prove that Cannondale wanted everyone to believe that the team was using Lab 71 frames, and that "Lab 71" on the frame wasn't just an advertisement for Lab 71. Then you would have to explain why the info about the availability (or lack) of Lab 712 frames is such common knowledge if Cannondale indeed intended deception.
Then one would have to make the leap to understand that professional road racing is not just marketing, nor street riding, nor much in any way associated with what most of us do with our bikes. Since a lot of pro Tour bikes need (or used to need) ballast to meet the minimum requirement, while no street rider is in any way bound by UCI rules ..... yeah, not much point is giving the teams frames which are lighter and also need ballasting. But for a person who can build a bike as light as s/he wants for road riding .... the extra hundred grams might give you that psychological edge.
The tome of the OP seems to me to be sort of aggrieved at being deceived .... "Cannondale is Lying to us" because obviously if Lab 71 is "better" the team would use it, and if the team doesn't use it, it must not be "better" ..... but the key point there is the definition of "better."
Better for a UCI race bike and better for a road bike bound by no restrictions but the rider's budget and imagination are not necessarily related.
However, being offended is the new international sport of choice, it seems, and who am I to interfere in others' emotional athletic entertainment?
Then one would have to make the leap to understand that professional road racing is not just marketing, nor street riding, nor much in any way associated with what most of us do with our bikes. Since a lot of pro Tour bikes need (or used to need) ballast to meet the minimum requirement, while no street rider is in any way bound by UCI rules ..... yeah, not much point is giving the teams frames which are lighter and also need ballasting. But for a person who can build a bike as light as s/he wants for road riding .... the extra hundred grams might give you that psychological edge.
The tome of the OP seems to me to be sort of aggrieved at being deceived .... "Cannondale is Lying to us" because obviously if Lab 71 is "better" the team would use it, and if the team doesn't use it, it must not be "better" ..... but the key point there is the definition of "better."
Better for a UCI race bike and better for a road bike bound by no restrictions but the rider's budget and imagination are not necessarily related.
However, being offended is the new international sport of choice, it seems, and who am I to interfere in others' emotional athletic entertainment?
Likes For Maelochs:
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Hmm, I thought the OP was pretty clear.
* The bikes EF Ed. are riding are badged as Lab 71.
* The bikes EF Ed are riding are actually HM frames.
* Why would the team ride the "lower" tier HM frames?
It doesn't seem necessary to explain Cannondale's reasons for giving the public the impression that the Pros are riding Lab 71 bikes (to sell more Lab 71 bikes, which are presumably higher in price and profit margin; and to enhance the image of the company). But, what's in it for the team? Lower cost? Other? Or, why would Pros prefer to ride the "lower" tier bike - is it actually "better" in some way?
* The bikes EF Ed. are riding are badged as Lab 71.
* The bikes EF Ed are riding are actually HM frames.
* Why would the team ride the "lower" tier HM frames?
It doesn't seem necessary to explain Cannondale's reasons for giving the public the impression that the Pros are riding Lab 71 bikes (to sell more Lab 71 bikes, which are presumably higher in price and profit margin; and to enhance the image of the company). But, what's in it for the team? Lower cost? Other? Or, why would Pros prefer to ride the "lower" tier bike - is it actually "better" in some way?
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
As for elitist tier frames, I have no issue with it. I own a few of those elitist frames myself.
Last edited by Turnin_Wrenches; 01-13-24 at 06:13 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Likes For asgelle:
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
First off one would need to prove that Cannondale wanted everyone to believe that the team was using Lab 71 frames, and that "Lab 71" on the frame wasn't just an advertisement for Lab 71. Then you would have to explain why the info about the availability (or lack) of Lab 712 frames is such common knowledge if Cannondale indeed intended deception.
Then one would have to make the leap to understand that professional road racing is not just marketing, nor street riding, nor much in any way associated with what most of us do with our bikes. Since a lot of pro Tour bikes need (or used to need) ballast to meet the minimum requirement, while no street rider is in any way bound by UCI rules ..... yeah, not much point is giving the teams frames which are lighter and also need ballasting. But for a person who can build a bike as light as s/he wants for road riding .... the extra hundred grams might give you that psychological edge.
The tome of the OP seems to me to be sort of aggrieved at being deceived .... "Cannondale is Lying to us" because obviously if Lab 71 is "better" the team would use it, and if the team doesn't use it, it must not be "better" ..... but the key point there is the definition of "better."
Better for a UCI race bike and better for a road bike bound by no restrictions but the rider's budget and imagination are not necessarily related.
However, being offended is the new international sport of choice, it seems, and who am I to interfere in others' emotional athletic entertainment?
Then one would have to make the leap to understand that professional road racing is not just marketing, nor street riding, nor much in any way associated with what most of us do with our bikes. Since a lot of pro Tour bikes need (or used to need) ballast to meet the minimum requirement, while no street rider is in any way bound by UCI rules ..... yeah, not much point is giving the teams frames which are lighter and also need ballasting. But for a person who can build a bike as light as s/he wants for road riding .... the extra hundred grams might give you that psychological edge.
The tome of the OP seems to me to be sort of aggrieved at being deceived .... "Cannondale is Lying to us" because obviously if Lab 71 is "better" the team would use it, and if the team doesn't use it, it must not be "better" ..... but the key point there is the definition of "better."
Better for a UCI race bike and better for a road bike bound by no restrictions but the rider's budget and imagination are not necessarily related.
However, being offended is the new international sport of choice, it seems, and who am I to interfere in others' emotional athletic entertainment?
It's fine if you disagree. I have no problem with that. Based on the responses so far I'm gaining some understanding as to why Cannondale might be engaging in such practices. As long as it's allowed to be an "open secret" then it's acceptable? Do I have that right?
Last edited by Turnin_Wrenches; 01-13-24 at 06:15 PM.
#22
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,548
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,441 Times
in
2,764 Posts
Given the level of concern, I assumed OP had paid big money for one and then been disappointed. Good to know there is no skin in the game.
#23
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
Well what about the branding of the other sponsors being on frames and kits that don't even make a product for cycling? Are we to assume that all the members of EF are using the services of Education First or that they use the Easy Post app or services to ship? And then there is Ag2r, Bora Hansgrohe and almost every other pro team out there.
Last edited by Iride01; 01-14-24 at 11:53 AM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times
in
338 Posts
Well what about the branding of the other sponsors being on frames and kits that don't even make a product for cycling? Are we to assume that all the members of EF are using the services of Education First or that they use the Easy Post app or services to ship? And then there is Ag2r, Bora Hansgrohe and almost every other pro team out there.
#25
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts