Solid axle options?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
Solid axle options?
I'm temporarily putting the wheels from my touring bike on a Peugeot TH-8 tandem I'm rehabbing. Yes, I know it's not ideal and I plan to build up some more suitable wheels over the winter, but I'd like to get a little riding in this season with my significant other/hopeful stoker to see how we do with riding a tandem. We're not a particularly heavy team and she's not (yet!) much of a cyclist, so we'll be taking it easy. But I do think it would be wise to stick a solid axle in the rear hub (it's a Shimano..... Deore or Altus... can't remember and it's not nearby..)- is Wheels Manufacturing pretty much it? $40 seems a little steep for an axle, but if that's what it is, then I suppose that's what it is.. Other options?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
So, the wheels from your touring bike have quick-release axles and you want to swap just the axles? If that's the case, you'll need new cones as well because the cones are not interchangeable between solid and QR. Solid axles are slightly smaller in diameter than QR axles.
Also, if you get new cones, they may not be compatible with the cups of your hub.
.
.
Also, if you get new cones, they may not be compatible with the cups of your hub.
.
.
Last edited by branko_76; 08-31-22 at 03:55 PM.
Likes For branko_76:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,707 Times
in
2,613 Posts
Stick with a quick release and use a DT Swiss ratcheting skewer:
https://www.dtswiss.com/en/component...d-rws/rws/5-mm
https://www.dtswiss.com/en/component...d-rws/rws/5-mm
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
So, the wheels from your touring bike have quick-release axles and you want to swap just the axles? If that's the case, you'll need new cones as well because the cones are not interchangeable between solid and QR. Solid axles are slightly smaller in diameter than QR axles.
Also, if you get new cones, they may not be compatible with the cups of your hub.
.
.
Also, if you get new cones, they may not be compatible with the cups of your hub.
.
.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
Stick with a quick release and use a DT Swiss ratcheting skewer:
https://www.dtswiss.com/en/component...d-rws/rws/5-mm
https://www.dtswiss.com/en/component...d-rws/rws/5-mm
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,707 Times
in
2,613 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 1,007
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 332 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
385 Posts
So, the wheels from your touring bike have quick-release axles and you want to swap just the axles? If that's the case, you'll need new cones as well because the cones are not interchangeable between solid and QR. Solid axles are slightly smaller in diameter than QR axles.
Also, if you get new cones, they may not be compatible with the cups of your hub.
.
.
Also, if you get new cones, they may not be compatible with the cups of your hub.
.
.
Likes For bboy314:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
#9
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,624
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 6,488 Times
in
3,211 Posts
I don't understand this advice. I've "upgraded" several bikes from solid rear axles to new hollow ones (from Wheels Manufacturing) and reused the cones.
Likes For SurferRosa:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...geability.html
#11
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,624
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 6,488 Times
in
3,211 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
#14
Abuse Magnet
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,870
Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
89 Posts
I'm in the same boat. Had some wheels built for a Burley tandem I'm (still) working on, based on Deore hubs with QRs. It didn't occur to me until afterwards that there was a reason the original rear axle was solid.
...I am a fool.
...I am a fool.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
Or if I want to get fancy......
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,820
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,328 Times
in
784 Posts
Several points here:
Axle diameters and threads vary; yes some hollow cones will fit some solid axles, but the curves of the races determine the angle between contact points, which must remain between narrow limits for the bearing to have a good service life. For this change get the best match you can.
You don't get a lot of extra strength from a 3/8" solid axle compared to a 10mm hollow one - about 15%. I suspect that unless you get a high-quality solid one, any good quality hollow one will be of stronger steel and better finished sufficient to outweigh that 15%. It's the outermost portions of the section that contribute most; hence Increasing the diameter makes a relatively bigger difference - the Atom front hub that uses a solid rear axle has almost double the strength of the normal front axle, this just going from .3125 to .375. Common solid rear axles are smaller than QR ones (they are .3937...); you lose a little of this disadvantage as a 26 TI thread is a little shallower than a 1mm thread. If possible use an axle without a slot.
Axles fail by buckling. The compressive force necessary to fix the locknuts against the dropout faces is not enough to cause buckling by itself, but it will reduce the size of the side-load imposed by the bearings required to initiate buckling. QR's should be tightened enough to keep the wheel from slipping, and no more.
Axle diameters and threads vary; yes some hollow cones will fit some solid axles, but the curves of the races determine the angle between contact points, which must remain between narrow limits for the bearing to have a good service life. For this change get the best match you can.
You don't get a lot of extra strength from a 3/8" solid axle compared to a 10mm hollow one - about 15%. I suspect that unless you get a high-quality solid one, any good quality hollow one will be of stronger steel and better finished sufficient to outweigh that 15%. It's the outermost portions of the section that contribute most; hence Increasing the diameter makes a relatively bigger difference - the Atom front hub that uses a solid rear axle has almost double the strength of the normal front axle, this just going from .3125 to .375. Common solid rear axles are smaller than QR ones (they are .3937...); you lose a little of this disadvantage as a 26 TI thread is a little shallower than a 1mm thread. If possible use an axle without a slot.
Axles fail by buckling. The compressive force necessary to fix the locknuts against the dropout faces is not enough to cause buckling by itself, but it will reduce the size of the side-load imposed by the bearings required to initiate buckling. QR's should be tightened enough to keep the wheel from slipping, and no more.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times
in
757 Posts
Hm. OK, well as I said in the original post, this would be temporary. I do not want to source new cones, etc, etc, and a larger diameter axle, just swap out the hollow axle for a solid one. It seem fair to assume that since most tandems (at least that I've looked at...) come with a solid rear axle there is at least some strength advantage to it. I don't really understand the claim that a solid axle is smaller than a hollow one- isn't 10x1 the same, whether it's solid or hollow? Or am I missing something here?
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
422 Posts
Risk the $6.99.