cheap tires vs expensive tires
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
ok. i've seen lots of posts about tires making a difference in speed on here. i can't wrap my head around that. one pedal stroke gets you so far, so fast. as fast as you pedal. so why does a 50 dollar tire go faster than a 20 dollar tire, or am i way off base as to what tire speed even means, as regards to pedal stroke, resistance? i know size can make a difference, as can tread as to the amount of energy used to make a pedal stroke, but as for speed, someone smart explain to me how two of the same size tires, say 700x 25, with same tread , do different things, be it a 20 dollar dept store tire or a 50 dollar bike shop tire.
#78
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
The difference between a cheap set of $20 tires and a set of Rene Herse Superlights is anything but subtle. Massive difference.
Best bang for the buck for a road/gravel bike, IMO.
Best bang for the buck for a road/gravel bike, IMO.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
771 Posts
Being that I'm not familiar with Rene Herse tires...what do you think would be their advantage over the Conti tires?
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 478
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
147 Posts
I've turned my hard tail into a gravel bike. I chose some Continental Race Kings 29 x 2.0 for my tires...mostly because I got a good deal on them ($50 for a a pair delivered to my house).
Being that I'm not familiar with Rene Herse tires...what do you think would be their advantage over the Conti tires?
Being that I'm not familiar with Rene Herse tires...what do you think would be their advantage over the Conti tires?
I kinda assume you are riding a little chunky gravel since you converted a hard tail.
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,880
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,964 Times
in
4,689 Posts
I've turned my hard tail into a gravel bike. I chose some Continental Race Kings 29 x 2.0 for my tires...mostly because I got a good deal on them ($50 for a a pair delivered to my house).
Being that I'm not familiar with Rene Herse tires...what do you think would be their advantage over the Conti tires?
Being that I'm not familiar with Rene Herse tires...what do you think would be their advantage over the Conti tires?
Likes For Koyote:
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
771 Posts
I live in an area where the gravel changes depending which direction I go. If go 20 miles south of where I live it's more like gravement. If I go 20-30 miles east it's sandy gravel. If I go 20 miles north it's chunk gravel, very loose marble gravel and some sand sections.
Not being familiar with Rene Herse tires I was just curious.
Not being familiar with Rene Herse tires I was just curious.
#83
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
So, in sum, the answer to the question is a $50 tire really worth that much more than a $20 tire is "it depends".
Maybe it would be a better thread for an OP to lay out what tires they think are the best values for particular purposes. I'd start it, but I think my choices are rather boring.
Maybe it would be a better thread for an OP to lay out what tires they think are the best values for particular purposes. I'd start it, but I think my choices are rather boring.
Likes For livedarklions:
#84
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
An knobby tire in 700 x 45 mm size should be able to handle all those different types of conditions.
#85
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
315 Posts
I always seem to try out 20-25$ tires based on what I find on sale and feel that I am able to optimize them to run quite well approaching the performance of the much worshipped "GP5K's" . Full disclosure: I have used Conti GP4000's but never the GP5000's.
As far as 20 -25$ tires that are pretty decent - the last couple ones I got on sale were both quite good : Tufo Calibra's and Challenge Strada. Now the TUFO's were just 23 mm but I managed to make the ride fairly supple with latex tubes and moderate (not high) tire pressures. The 25mm Challenge Strada and Criterium tires that I got from Pro's Closet for ~$25 were even more supple and run very nice on my road bike with mid 70's PSI front and mid 80's PSI in the rear. These "cheap" tires don't seem to last all that long with the rear tire sometimes being done in as little as 1,500 miles that is the main down side for me.
PS: I have seen Vredestein tires for cheap prices and also Schwalbe “One” tires for cheap prices. Low cost does not equate to heavy and bloated. Some of these tires only weigh 205 to 270 grams.
As far as 20 -25$ tires that are pretty decent - the last couple ones I got on sale were both quite good : Tufo Calibra's and Challenge Strada. Now the TUFO's were just 23 mm but I managed to make the ride fairly supple with latex tubes and moderate (not high) tire pressures. The 25mm Challenge Strada and Criterium tires that I got from Pro's Closet for ~$25 were even more supple and run very nice on my road bike with mid 70's PSI front and mid 80's PSI in the rear. These "cheap" tires don't seem to last all that long with the rear tire sometimes being done in as little as 1,500 miles that is the main down side for me.
PS: I have seen Vredestein tires for cheap prices and also Schwalbe “One” tires for cheap prices. Low cost does not equate to heavy and bloated. Some of these tires only weigh 205 to 270 grams.
Last edited by masi61; 03-12-22 at 05:30 AM. Reason: Remembered more high quality 20$ tires
#87
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,836 Times
in
2,229 Posts
Is a $50.00 tire expensive?
Does it depend on the price of the bike?
I've been called a 'hard ass', can I ride Gatorskins comfortably?
Does it depend on the price of the bike?
I've been called a 'hard ass', can I ride Gatorskins comfortably?
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 700
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 406 Post(s)
Liked 389 Times
in
219 Posts
And I am unfit and need every bit of help I can get!
#89
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
This is like those threads on "what do you ____ on long bike rides?" and it turns out after about 15 posts that everybody figures out that they don't agree on what distance constitutes a long bike ride or even if distance vs,. time is the right measure.
I usually buy tires in pairs, so I have to multiply by two. $50/tire is tight on the line for me between what I consider expensive vs. inexpensive. Don't know why, $100 a pair just seems like about the right number.
For me, what I paid for the bike is largely irrelevant, it's more what I use the bike for. I also might think that if I paid less for the bike, I'm justified in splurging a bit on the tires.
I don't know, ask your ass. (Kidding)
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
771 Posts
Majority of the gravel I ride (mostly to the north) my hard tail conversion will work way better than any drop bar gravel bike. I put some 700 x 40s on my Trek Domane for the easier gravel stuff.
#92
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I wouldn't make the argument at all. How the heck would we know what other people are going to notice? People need to try things for themselves to know the answer to that. If you tell me you feel a difference and it helps, why would I doubt that?
I suspect that people are "unfit" in about as many different ways as people are "fit", so whether you're going to notice it is going to depend on a lot of things that vary from person to person.
I like that "every bit of help" attitude, makes sense to me--if it's just a little bit more fun and just a little less frustrating, you might be way more willing to keep doing it.
#93
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,991
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6194 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
Then maybe those unfit people should always buy the $12,000 plus bikes. After all, they'll benefit more.... <grin>
#94
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
You can make the case that reducing tire resistance, which can be done at relatively low cost IS actually something that is more likely to be noticed by an "unfit" rider than a lot of more expensive upgrades. Unlike drag, tire resistance doesn't increase with speed, so you're actually feeling it as you accelerate from zero up through your top speed. Reduction in drag is probably not something you're going to actually feel until you hit some moderately high speed. Also, assuming that unfit riders tend to be significantly heavier than "fit" riders, they're also less likely to feel as much of a benefit in reducing the weight of the bicycle as that reduction is going to be a smaller percentage of the gross vehicle weight (rider+bike) than if they had lighter bodies.
#96
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Not so fast, riders on bikes are not objects dropping freely in a vacuum, and weight trumps aerodynamics:
https://www.cyclist.co.uk/in-depth/2...20Fonda%20says.
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,290 Times
in
743 Posts
Not so fast, riders on bikes are not objects dropping freely in a vacuum, and weight trumps aerodynamics:
https://www.cyclist.co.uk/in-depth/2...20Fonda%20says.
https://www.cyclist.co.uk/in-depth/2...20Fonda%20says.
Discounting rider weight, where the weight is on the bike changes how it affects speed. If the weight is on the wheels, the bike may be slower to accelerate down a hill, but it will hold speed better. Of course the person on the bike is not rotational mass. It's just interesting to me.
Frontal area will still come into play, but the smaller person won't have the same mass to fuel momentum so the drag from the air can slow them quicker, the same way they can brake quicker. In that regard, the heavier person has an advantage as they descend. If the smaller person can remain aerodynamic, and maintain a more aero position, and not have any other influence, bumps, or anything else that can disrupt a clean descent, I am not sure the heavier person will always descend faster. Of course the parger person may have a more rounded butt which would smooth out the airflow in the back. Joking aside, the airflow at the rear of a bike accounts for a lot of drag. Smoothing that airflow gi es a huge benefit.
Anyway, bored on the deck of a ship today. Carry on.
#98
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I was waiting for that response. There is of course much more to the action of a bicycle descending. Of course his famous experiment was not conducted in a vacuum though. Yes, there is more to it, but still, you cannot assume the heavier person will descend faster. I have read that article before and still am not convinced of their results.
Discounting rider weight, where the weight is on the bike changes how it affects speed. If the weight is on the wheels, the bike may be slower to accelerate down a hill, but it will hold speed better. Of course the person on the bike is not rotational mass. It's just interesting to me.
Frontal area will still come into play, but the smaller person won't have the same mass to fuel momentum so the drag from the air can slow them quicker, the same way they can brake quicker. In that regard, the heavier person has an advantage as they descend. If the smaller person can remain aerodynamic, and maintain a more aero position, and not have any other influence, bumps, or anything else that can disrupt a clean descent, I am not sure the heavier person will always descend faster. Of course the parger person may have a more rounded butt which would smooth out the airflow in the back. Joking aside, the airflow at the rear of a bike accounts for a lot of drag. Smoothing that airflow gi es a huge benefit.
Anyway, bored on the deck of a ship today. Carry on.
Discounting rider weight, where the weight is on the bike changes how it affects speed. If the weight is on the wheels, the bike may be slower to accelerate down a hill, but it will hold speed better. Of course the person on the bike is not rotational mass. It's just interesting to me.
Frontal area will still come into play, but the smaller person won't have the same mass to fuel momentum so the drag from the air can slow them quicker, the same way they can brake quicker. In that regard, the heavier person has an advantage as they descend. If the smaller person can remain aerodynamic, and maintain a more aero position, and not have any other influence, bumps, or anything else that can disrupt a clean descent, I am not sure the heavier person will always descend faster. Of course the parger person may have a more rounded butt which would smooth out the airflow in the back. Joking aside, the airflow at the rear of a bike accounts for a lot of drag. Smoothing that airflow gi es a huge benefit.
Anyway, bored on the deck of a ship today. Carry on.
Likes For livedarklions:
#99
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
To address the weight and descending thing........I'd like you to show me a 100kg rando wannabe trying to descend the same pass as a pro that weighs 65 kg. They're not in the same planet in terms of both bike fit and aero tuck, nor skill. Not many mountain passes have nice 6% perfectly straight descents. Most have some hairpins, fast sections, and even small rises to hammer over to descend more. More to it than just "out of control semi truck with no brakes".
Next up, the watt difference alone on some expensive versus cheap tires on almost any "use" from gravel, cross, commuting, or racing can be so large for a pair it could be 5-10% of a person's threshold power. And even higher a % of their day in and day out zone 2 cruising power. Average schmuck has a true hour ftp of 240w and cheapo versus bling bling for a pair is 24w.......that's 10%. That 240w ftp is likely like 160w of zone 2. So a massive % of that power difference.
Even if you don't care to go faster to race around. Perhaps it means you get to see more on your ride in the same amount of time. More smiles due to more miles. Or, it makes your commute a minute or two faster everyday for years. So 200 days a year commuting for 5 years times a minute a day gets you back a whole day of your life. That's nice also.
Then just the road feel being worth a lot.
I get not everyone can afford bling tires. That is A OK. I'm just saying, bling tires can benefit folks in many ways other than "being racy". Shoot, some expensive car tires aren't racy at all. They last longer, ride smoother, ride quieter, and get better fuel mileage during their life. All while being on a minivan. Same thing exists for bikes also. Just because the vehicle is different, the idea applies.
Next up, the watt difference alone on some expensive versus cheap tires on almost any "use" from gravel, cross, commuting, or racing can be so large for a pair it could be 5-10% of a person's threshold power. And even higher a % of their day in and day out zone 2 cruising power. Average schmuck has a true hour ftp of 240w and cheapo versus bling bling for a pair is 24w.......that's 10%. That 240w ftp is likely like 160w of zone 2. So a massive % of that power difference.
Even if you don't care to go faster to race around. Perhaps it means you get to see more on your ride in the same amount of time. More smiles due to more miles. Or, it makes your commute a minute or two faster everyday for years. So 200 days a year commuting for 5 years times a minute a day gets you back a whole day of your life. That's nice also.
Then just the road feel being worth a lot.
I get not everyone can afford bling tires. That is A OK. I'm just saying, bling tires can benefit folks in many ways other than "being racy". Shoot, some expensive car tires aren't racy at all. They last longer, ride smoother, ride quieter, and get better fuel mileage during their life. All while being on a minivan. Same thing exists for bikes also. Just because the vehicle is different, the idea applies.
Likes For burnthesheep:
#100
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,290 Times
in
743 Posts
This much is undeniable, however: "‘When you increase the mass the speed increases by cubic function, whereas if you increase the aerodynamic drag the speed decreases by a square function" It doesn't mean that you can't compensate for the advantages of weight by decreasing your drag, it just means that it's very, very hard to do so. If the heavy guy is wearing a parachute, maybe not so hard.
If course this thread is about tires... I was just furthering the deviation from the topic.
Good response though, and good real info. Physics is fun.