Why are 32mm tires standard now on new bikes?
#76
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,543
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times
in
2,759 Posts
Likes For shelbyfv:
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 1,724
Bikes: 2022 Fuel EX 8, 2021 Domane SL6, Black Beta (Nashbar frame), 2004 Trek 1000C for the trainer
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Liked 447 Times
in
266 Posts
Just ride it for a bit. Upgrade tires and you’ll notice. For most tires the measured mounted width will be a little above the marked width. Don’t sweat it.
For road riding I’d go with 28mm Conti GP5000 either tube or tubeless. Or other better tire. Your preference and tools on hand. Later upgrade to a second set of wheels for road and put gravel type tires on the stock rims for mixed or comfortable riding. N+1 without two bikes.
For road riding I’d go with 28mm Conti GP5000 either tube or tubeless. Or other better tire. Your preference and tools on hand. Later upgrade to a second set of wheels for road and put gravel type tires on the stock rims for mixed or comfortable riding. N+1 without two bikes.
Last edited by biker128pedal; 05-26-23 at 08:13 AM.
#78
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,218
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2581 Post(s)
Liked 5,639 Times
in
2,921 Posts
Bought a used Orbea that had 23s which road like a truck except on very smooth surfaces. Swapped them for Conti GP5000 25s and it was a world of difference for the better. Probably could have gone with 28s, which I have on my tubeless ride which ride like magic.
If one gains comfort without a speed penalty, or even if you do, go for wider.
If one gains comfort without a speed penalty, or even if you do, go for wider.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
#79
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10425 Post(s)
Liked 11,899 Times
in
6,094 Posts
You know, if you can only fit 25s, but you want to feel more comfortable, do what I did - get an old racing bike with tubular rims, and run 22mm tires at 140 psi for a day. You'll feel real fast - AT FIRST. Then you'll get tired of feeling every single grain of sand on the road, and spending all your time trying to find the smoothest part of the bike lane.
When you go back to your 25s (in my case, at 90F/95R), they'll feel like a magic carpet.
When you go back to your 25s (in my case, at 90F/95R), they'll feel like a magic carpet.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#80
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10425 Post(s)
Liked 11,899 Times
in
6,094 Posts
Bought a used Orbea that had 23s which road like a truck except on very smooth surfaces. Swapped them for Conti GP5000 25s and it was a world of difference for the better. Probably could have gone with 28s, which I have on my tubeless ride which ride like magic.
If one gains comfort without a speed penalty, or even if you do, go for wider.
If one gains comfort without a speed penalty, or even if you do, go for wider.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#81
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,218
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2581 Post(s)
Liked 5,639 Times
in
2,921 Posts
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,432
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 4,860 Times
in
3,006 Posts
That’s a good way of putting it. Lots of useful pros and no significant cons.
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,038
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1278 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times
in
710 Posts
i'm about due for a new rear tire again, currently on 30mm. debating going to 28 or 32, just to see the difference again. i recall being very happy going from 26 -> 28 but can't remember if 28 -> 30 was as noticeable. at this point i would not go below 28.
__________________
#85
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
Fair enough. The OP was still incorrect, but yes they were using a broader definition of road bike than just racing.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#86
Senior Member
Giant still uses 25C tires on their TCR Advanced Disc 2 race bikes, But 32C tires on their Defy Advanced 2 Endurance bike. It may be to eek out that last 1 - 2% of performance on a perfect track a 25 - 28mm tire may be best. That might be enough to make the difference between placing 2'nd and 8'th or worse in an important race.
For most of us, for the street or in a cycling club ride the Defy Endurance road bike with it's 32mm tires might provide that perfect balance between efficiency and ride quality. But a 32mm tire may not fit on many older road bikes, So going as wide as you can might work well too.
For most of us, for the street or in a cycling club ride the Defy Endurance road bike with it's 32mm tires might provide that perfect balance between efficiency and ride quality. But a 32mm tire may not fit on many older road bikes, So going as wide as you can might work well too.
Last edited by xroadcharlie; 05-28-23 at 12:40 PM.
#87
Senior Member
Giant still uses 25C tires on their TCR Advanced Disc 2 race bikes, But 32C tires on their Defy Advanced 2 Endurance bike. It may be to eek out that last 1 - 2% of performance on a perfect track a 25 - 28mm tire may be best. That might be enough to make the difference between placing 2'nd and 8'th or worse in an important race.
For most of us, for the street or in a cycling club ride the Defy Endurance road bike with it's 32mm tires might provide that perfect balance between efficiency and ride quality. But a 32mm tire may not fit on many older road bikes, So going as wide as you can might work well too.
For most of us, for the street or in a cycling club ride the Defy Endurance road bike with it's 32mm tires might provide that perfect balance between efficiency and ride quality. But a 32mm tire may not fit on many older road bikes, So going as wide as you can might work well too.
Pros can often take advantages from switching to wider tires because they make much longer rides, on variable quality roads, and their bikes (including wheels) compensate for weight and aerodynamic losses by much more expensive setups that are not reachable by casual riders. I think that the general "necessity' of going wider to 28-32 mm does not exist; it is valid only for specific riding conditions.
Last edited by Redbullet; 05-28-23 at 03:32 PM.
#88
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
Many of us still make relatively short rides (60-80 km) on reasonable quality roads where 25 mm tires (or sometimes even 23 mm) would marginally harm (or not harm at all) the ride quality, but they perform a little better. In such cases, it would be nonsense to switch to wider tires with associated penalties in weight and aerodynamics, for a comfort that remains theoretical.
Pros can often take advantages from switching to wider tires because they make much longer rides, on variable quality roads, and their bikes (including wheels) compensate for weight and aerodynamic losses by much more expensive setups that are not reachable by casual riders. I think that the general "necessity' of going wider to 28-32 mm does not exist; it is valid only for specific riding conditions.
Pros can often take advantages from switching to wider tires because they make much longer rides, on variable quality roads, and their bikes (including wheels) compensate for weight and aerodynamic losses by much more expensive setups that are not reachable by casual riders. I think that the general "necessity' of going wider to 28-32 mm does not exist; it is valid only for specific riding conditions.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,479
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 966 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
1,045 Posts
It could be that the increase in tire width is related to the increase in abdominal girth of the riders...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,432
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 4,860 Times
in
3,006 Posts
Many of us still make relatively short rides (60-80 km) on reasonable quality roads where 25 mm tires (or sometimes even 23 mm) would marginally harm (or not harm at all) the ride quality, but they perform a little better. In such cases, it would be nonsense to switch to wider tires with associated penalties in weight and aerodynamics, for a comfort that remains theoretical.
Pros can often take advantages from switching to wider tires because they make much longer rides, on variable quality roads, and their bikes (including wheels) compensate for weight and aerodynamic losses by much more expensive setups that are not reachable by casual riders. I think that the general "necessity' of going wider to 28-32 mm does not exist; it is valid only for specific riding conditions.
Pros can often take advantages from switching to wider tires because they make much longer rides, on variable quality roads, and their bikes (including wheels) compensate for weight and aerodynamic losses by much more expensive setups that are not reachable by casual riders. I think that the general "necessity' of going wider to 28-32 mm does not exist; it is valid only for specific riding conditions.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,432
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 4,860 Times
in
3,006 Posts
How wide are your rims? If they are >20 mm I would give 32 mm tyres a try. But if they are narrower rims then maybe not. I have run 32 mm tyres on 17 mm rims and the profile was a bit bulbous. They were okay, but felt a bit squirmy under hard cornering. I currently have 30 mm tyres on 22 mm rims and they feel great. Maybe I’ll try 32 mm on these wider rims at some point.
Likes For PeteHski:
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,038
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1278 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times
in
710 Posts
How wide are your rims? If they are >20 mm I would give 32 mm tyres a try. But if they are narrower rims then maybe not. I have run 32 mm tyres on 17 mm rims and the profile was a bit bulbous. They were okay, but felt a bit squirmy under hard cornering. I currently have 30 mm tyres on 22 mm rims and they feel great. Maybe I’ll try 32 mm on these wider rims at some point.
25 inner on the gravel rig. that one seems to achieve the perfect aero profile with 32mm tires. the 21 inner do look a little light-bulbed to me with 30mm tires, but it rides great. corners far harder than my skill allows.
i may go with 32mm in black for a change of pace. the only thing i don’t like about the GP5000 S TR is that the “transparent” ones are kind of dark and the brown part is small. although - it’s summer… maybe 28 for summer and 32 for winter 😂
the rears last 3,000 ish miles for me, almost exactly 6 months.
Last edited by mschwett; 05-28-23 at 08:44 PM.
#93
I like bike
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Merry Land USA
Posts: 662
Bikes: Roubaix Comp 2020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
191 Posts
Many of us still make relatively short rides (60-80 km) on reasonable quality roads where 25 mm tires (or sometimes even 23 mm) would marginally harm (or not harm at all) the ride quality, but they perform a little better. In such cases, it would be nonsense to switch to wider tires with associated penalties in weight and aerodynamics, for a comfort that remains theoretical.
Pros can often take advantages from switching to wider tires because they make much longer rides, on variable quality roads, and their bikes (including wheels) compensate for weight and aerodynamic losses by much more expensive setups that are not reachable by casual riders. I think that the general "necessity' of going wider to 28-32 mm does not exist; it is valid only for specific riding conditions.
Pros can often take advantages from switching to wider tires because they make much longer rides, on variable quality roads, and their bikes (including wheels) compensate for weight and aerodynamic losses by much more expensive setups that are not reachable by casual riders. I think that the general "necessity' of going wider to 28-32 mm does not exist; it is valid only for specific riding conditions.
#94
Senior Member
I put a link to a study earlier in the thread which clearly shows the overall speed advantage of wider tires in actual bike tests on average roads: less power is needed to go the same speed. The comfort gains are just gravy on top. It has absolutely nothing to do with how long pros are riding compared to non pros.
I have no doubt that pros can obtain much better efficiency than me with wider tires, but they use 10000-15000 EUR optimized bikes, while I use mass production bikes below 1/3 of that price. Thus, it might not be a surprise that the old benchmark “skinnier and lighter – the better” is still suitable for my poorly optimized bikes. There is no efficiency in trying to mimic the gears of the professionals, if my pocket does not allow me to go full of their range.
Last edited by Redbullet; 05-29-23 at 03:02 PM.
#95
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,543
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times
in
2,759 Posts
I also saw studies reaching the conclusion that the best efficiency is obtained by the skinniest tires that can offer the minimum acceptable level of comfort you need for your typical rides, in conjunction with fit rims. But I rather go on feeling: 23 mm tires still have a thin edge over 28 mm for my typical rides.
I have no doubt that pros can obtain much better efficiency than me with wider tires, but they use 10000-15000 EUR optimized bikes, while I use mass production bikes below 1/3 of that price. Thus, it might not be a surprise that the old benchmark “skinnier and lighter – the better” is still suitable for my poorly optimized bikes. There is no efficiency in trying to mimic the gears of the professionals, if my pocket does not allow me to go full of their range.
I have no doubt that pros can obtain much better efficiency than me with wider tires, but they use 10000-15000 EUR optimized bikes, while I use mass production bikes below 1/3 of that price. Thus, it might not be a surprise that the old benchmark “skinnier and lighter – the better” is still suitable for my poorly optimized bikes. There is no efficiency in trying to mimic the gears of the professionals, if my pocket does not allow me to go full of their range.
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,038
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1278 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times
in
710 Posts
I also saw studies reaching the conclusion that the best efficiency is obtained by the skinniest tires that can offer the minimum acceptable level of comfort you need for your typical rides, in conjunction with fit rims. But I rather go on feeling: 23 mm tires still have a thin edge over 28 mm for my typical rides.
I have no doubt that pros can obtain much better efficiency than me with wider tires, but they use 10000-15000 EUR optimized bikes, while I use mass production bikes below 1/3 of that price. Thus, it might not be a surprise that the old benchmark “skinnier and lighter – the better” is still suitable for my poorly optimized bikes. There is no efficiency in trying to mimic the gears of the professionals, if my pocket does not allow me to go full of their range.
I have no doubt that pros can obtain much better efficiency than me with wider tires, but they use 10000-15000 EUR optimized bikes, while I use mass production bikes below 1/3 of that price. Thus, it might not be a surprise that the old benchmark “skinnier and lighter – the better” is still suitable for my poorly optimized bikes. There is no efficiency in trying to mimic the gears of the professionals, if my pocket does not allow me to go full of their range.
if you have a link to one, i would love to see it. remember that the energy to vibrate the bicycle on narrow, hard tires on a rough road has to come from somewhere....
__________________
#97
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10425 Post(s)
Liked 11,899 Times
in
6,094 Posts
I also saw studies reaching the conclusion that the best efficiency is obtained by the skinniest tires that can offer the minimum acceptable level of comfort you need for your typical rides, in conjunction with fit rims. But I rather go on feeling: 23 mm tires still have a thin edge over 28 mm for my typical rides.
I have no doubt that pros can obtain much better efficiency than me with wider tires, but they use 10000-15000 EUR optimized bikes, while I use mass production bikes below 1/3 of that price. Thus, it might not be a surprise that the old benchmark “skinnier and lighter – the better” is still suitable for my poorly optimized bikes. There is no efficiency in trying to mimic the gears of the professionals, if my pocket does not allow me to go full of their range.
I have no doubt that pros can obtain much better efficiency than me with wider tires, but they use 10000-15000 EUR optimized bikes, while I use mass production bikes below 1/3 of that price. Thus, it might not be a surprise that the old benchmark “skinnier and lighter – the better” is still suitable for my poorly optimized bikes. There is no efficiency in trying to mimic the gears of the professionals, if my pocket does not allow me to go full of their range.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#98
Senior Member
For example, look at their wheels. They have a reason to spend thousands eur for wheel sets that are aero in combination with the tires they need. And to switch setups for different purposes. My new "mushroomed" 28 mm on aluminum rims simply do not behave the same with theirs.
#99
should be more popular
I recently switched from riding 25mm and 28mm GP5ks on a 19.5 internal/27 external rim to riding 28mm on 21 internal/30 external.
Night and day in how the same tyre sits on the rims, how wide it looks and measures, and how the bike corners and feels at all pressures I run.
Consequently, I think that it is not ideal in terms of handling, and thus safety, to go wider than works with a given rim. If I had 19mm internals, I would personally stick to 25 as a concession. I say no to rubber mushrooms.
I think the improvements a wide tyre on a wide rim can bring over a narrow setup makes it an investment to consider. Many modern wheels now also particularly come with wide external dimensions in consideration of the interface, so better aero is just a given bonus.
Night and day in how the same tyre sits on the rims, how wide it looks and measures, and how the bike corners and feels at all pressures I run.
Consequently, I think that it is not ideal in terms of handling, and thus safety, to go wider than works with a given rim. If I had 19mm internals, I would personally stick to 25 as a concession. I say no to rubber mushrooms.
I think the improvements a wide tyre on a wide rim can bring over a narrow setup makes it an investment to consider. Many modern wheels now also particularly come with wide external dimensions in consideration of the interface, so better aero is just a given bonus.
#100
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,543
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times
in
2,759 Posts
For example, look at their wheels. They have a reason to spend thousands eur for wheel sets that are aero in combination with the tires they need. And to switch setups for different purposes. My new "mushroomed" 28 mm on aluminum rims simply do not behave the same with theirs.