V Brakes for older, narrow touring fork
#1
dumps like a truck
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 49
Bikes: bridgestone 400 fixed conversion, khs aero track, specialized crossroads rebuilt with ultegra 105 and xt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
V Brakes for older, narrow touring fork
Hey all. Looking for advice for a set of v brakes that will work on an older touring fork with narrow set brake bosses -- specifically a Miyata 1000. I've had luck with the rear brake, but on the front, the brake pads hit the fork blades when released, thus making wheel removal impossible without deflating the tire. Tried using shorter brake pads to no avail (i.e. Kool Stop Cross pads.) Most v brakes I've tried have the pads attatched directly from the brake arm or behind them. I think a set of Paul Motolites might work if I reversed the pad holders to move the brake pads in front of the brake arms, but looking for a cheaper option if possible.
Note: not looking for arguments about using cantilevers. Specifically interested in v brakes that will work with narrow canti bosses.
Note: not looking for arguments about using cantilevers. Specifically interested in v brakes that will work with narrow canti bosses.
#2
Banned
Too Narrow is to narrow. Since you shut your ears to hearing out using cantilever brakes from experienced mechanics with bikes like that..
Consider having the brake bosses removed and new ones relocated further apart , .. get it done by a Competent frame builder , then repaint the fork .
....
Consider having the brake bosses removed and new ones relocated further apart , .. get it done by a Competent frame builder , then repaint the fork .
....
Last edited by fietsbob; 03-06-17 at 02:19 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,076
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Won't cantilevers have this same problem? (The problem, as I understand it: the brakes can't open enough because the pads hit the fork when opening the brake to remove wheel.)
#4
Banned
Nope, I have 2 bikes . post centers are 6cm apart.. Brakes I used Mafac, & Modolo cross , new ones , Shimano CX 70 brakes (CX50 for less $)
BR-CX70
Pivots are offset to the center, as you can see, and by using thinner washers between the arm and the pad they can be adapted successfully..
Just dont use long tail pads and they wont interfere with the fork blades..
...
BR-CX70
Pivots are offset to the center, as you can see, and by using thinner washers between the arm and the pad they can be adapted successfully..
Just dont use long tail pads and they wont interfere with the fork blades..
...
Last edited by fietsbob; 03-06-17 at 02:18 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 3,783
Bikes: Bianchi San Mateo and a few others
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
9 Posts
Dia Compe 960's were also common on bikes with narrowly spaced posts and their pads are situated similarly. Come to think of it, I'd guess that most cantilever brakes using smooth post pads would have sufficient clearance.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,545
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 179 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5933 Post(s)
Liked 3,617 Times
in
2,146 Posts
To the OP: why not post this question in C&V? Maybe someone has tried v brakes on the narrower posts found on vintage bikes. Worth a shot.
#7
dumps like a truck
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 49
Bikes: bridgestone 400 fixed conversion, khs aero track, specialized crossroads rebuilt with ultegra 105 and xt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No some cantilevers work fine with older and narrower posts (as Feitsbob pointed out). V brakes though are designed around a wider post setting so this could be a tough one for the OP.
To the OP: why not post this question in C&V? Maybe someone has tried v brakes on the narrower posts found on vintage bikes. Worth a shot.
To the OP: why not post this question in C&V? Maybe someone has tried v brakes on the narrower posts found on vintage bikes. Worth a shot.
Thanks for the replies, all!
#8
Banned
Maybe the thin cupped washer closest to the pad will work , put the thick one on the outside..
being made by the zillions the V brakes are pretty cheap..
to try and toss if you are not pleased.
being made by the zillions the V brakes are pretty cheap..
to try and toss if you are not pleased.
#9
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,991
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 989 Post(s)
Liked 537 Times
in
368 Posts
Perhaps the Kool Stop Thinline pads would give you a little more clearance.
My mini-V brakes didn't work very well with my wide HED rims, but these thinline pads let the brake arms stay vertical instead of angling outward to accomodate my very wide rims. And the braking is a lot better--the original pads were pretty grabby, but these have good modulation.
You might even be able to grind down the short end where it contacts the fork, and not affect the pad's adhesion to the pad body. I'd want to have a spare set, and do some careful slower speed braking tests to make sure it was okay, and check it frequently!
My mini-V brakes didn't work very well with my wide HED rims, but these thinline pads let the brake arms stay vertical instead of angling outward to accomodate my very wide rims. And the braking is a lot better--the original pads were pretty grabby, but these have good modulation.
You might even be able to grind down the short end where it contacts the fork, and not affect the pad's adhesion to the pad body. I'd want to have a spare set, and do some careful slower speed braking tests to make sure it was okay, and check it frequently!
Last edited by rm -rf; 03-06-17 at 03:59 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,846
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1956 Post(s)
Liked 2,201 Times
in
1,339 Posts
I would think a Surly Cross Check fork with a 1" steerer would work. May be easier to just swap out the fork. Keep your original in case you want to switch back.
John
John
#11
dumps like a truck
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 49
Bikes: bridgestone 400 fixed conversion, khs aero track, specialized crossroads rebuilt with ultegra 105 and xt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Banned
# 9 shows the kind of brake pad that the long end (that is the way they install, properly) will 'trail' inside the fork blades, but you could always saw that part off.
It actually is the leading end of the pad in the rotation of the wheel..
....
It actually is the leading end of the pad in the rotation of the wheel..
....
Last edited by fietsbob; 03-07-17 at 10:13 AM.
#13
Senior Member
I had the same issue with one of my tandems. The Koolstop Thinline as in post #9 did the trick. I used the thinnest combination of washers to maximize clearance.
#14
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times
in
1,559 Posts
Here's my '80-ish Trek 510 (Ishiwata tubing, sport-touring geometry) with braze-ons by a local builder. The front canti posts are spaced at 65mm and cause the SRAM linear brake arms to splay outward. This could probably be corrected by moving the innermost pairs of nesting spacers outboard of the brake arms to make them look more normal, but they work fine. The rear posts are spaced at about 85mm and the arms are much closer to parallel than the front.
brake1.JPG
brake2.JPG
brake1.JPG
brake2.JPG
Last edited by thumpism; 03-07-17 at 07:27 PM.
#16
Newbie
I am going to resuscitate this thread as I think I have found an unconventional solution cringey work-around for the "Narrow Cantis Conundrum". MUQZI produces a V brake that due to its curvature can be mounted on narrow cantilever bosses...you just have to reverse the legs. They are about 91mm long which makes them not suitable for ergopowers or STIs. For mounting a travel agent you need to replace that thing on top of the right lever which holds the noodle as it is too small to hold the travel agent. And of course, the routing of the brake cable housing is awkward. I thought I post it anyways...hope somebody finds this useful.