Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Is there a way to increase the spacing on an old Raleigh Competition?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Is there a way to increase the spacing on an old Raleigh Competition?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-23, 06:22 AM
  #1  
bikemikemi
Mike from Troy MI
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is there a way to increase the spacing on an old Raleigh Competition?

I got a hold of a Raleigh competition frame. The great news its my size, 25". My problem is i only have newer components in my spare parts bin. I have some older 10:spd campy laying around, Is there any way I can get the rear triangle to work(widen to 130 mm)?
bikemikemi is offline  
Old 02-10-23, 06:54 AM
  #2  
daverup 
Senior Member
 
daverup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 887

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 874 Times in 418 Posts
This might help,
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html
daverup is offline  
Likes For daverup:
Old 02-10-23, 07:34 AM
  #3  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Currently 120? I would recommend clamping the brake bridge before bending the stays.
Also be sure to check the dropout alignment after cold setting.
due ruote is offline  
Likes For due ruote:
Old 02-10-23, 09:32 AM
  #4  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,160
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,717 Times in 2,614 Posts
Short answer: yes. Medium answer: Results may vary. Longer answer: Going from 120 to 130mm is a lot--find a different frame for those parts (or one that's spaced 126mm from the start).
nlerner is offline  
Likes For nlerner:
Old 02-10-23, 10:08 AM
  #5  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,735
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,406 Times in 1,206 Posts
Or go Shimano. 6401 and 7700 rear hubs (among other 8-9-10 speed rear hubs) can be easily narrowed to 120 mm by installing a 7 speed HG freehub and replacing the NDS 6mm spacer with a 1mm spacer, shortening the axle, and using 8 cogs with 9 speed spacers (or 9 cogs with 10 speed spacers).

Can be friction shifted or indexed, use the same shifter type as the spacers used.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is online now  
Likes For rccardr:
Old 02-10-23, 10:37 AM
  #6  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times in 2,286 Posts
I do that often.

If you have to clamp the brake bridge to keep it from breaking, there's a problem with the brazing. I've stretched dozens and dozens of frames from 120 to 130. Do check dropouts for parallelism. I'd do that on a vintage Raleigh frame even if you don't spread it to 130!

For those that say you shouldn't do it, my counter arguement is two names: Peter Weigle and Brian Chapman. It's not something I'd recommend you do yourself without some training (I was taught by Ed Litton), but many have used the Sheldon Brown method successfully (see above). If you're in my area I'd do it for you in exchange for some adult beverage ;-)
@nlerner:
Big Red went from 120-130. If you sneak up on it I don't think there's much risk of creasing a chain stay.

__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 02-10-23, 10:42 AM
  #7  
reroll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
Short answer: yes. Medium answer: Results may vary. Longer answer: Going from 120 to 130mm is a lot--find a different frame for those parts (or one that's spaced 126mm from the start).
+1

Your longer answer is the right answer for a number of good reasons.
reroll is offline  
Old 02-10-23, 11:07 AM
  #8  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,933 Times in 2,558 Posts
Basic sophomore engineering here. If you have to distort a steel beam until it bends, 1) start with a skinny one. 2) stay away from very high strength steels with little margin between yield and breaking.

OP has a Raleigh Competition. 531 steel. Highish strength but nothing radical at all. Now his chainstays may be regular Reynolds chainstays for diameter but they may also be the butted chainstays the Competitions were known for (see Gugie's photo above). (Raleigh built those bikes with both.) Those butted chainstays are barely bigger than pencils. Between that and the 531 steel, I am quite confident you could stretch a 120 OLD to 140. 130? The bike's not even going to blink.

One caution - this Competition could be a bike boom Raleigh. Anything in the wide spectrum of quality control is possible. Mine came with so little braze in the lugs that the alignment was perfect. No heat distortion. A local framebuilder filled all the lugs like he was building a new bike. They drank the braze like they were dying of thirst.
79pmooney is offline  
Old 02-10-23, 01:37 PM
  #9  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,160
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,717 Times in 2,614 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
I do that often.

If you have to clamp the brake bridge to keep it from breaking, there's a problem with the brazing. I've stretched dozens and dozens of frames from 120 to 130. Do check dropouts for parallelism. I'd do that on a vintage Raleigh frame even if you don't spread it to 130!

For those that say you shouldn't do it, my counter arguement is two names: Peter Weigle and Brian Chapman. It's not something I'd recommend you do yourself without some training (I was taught by Ed Litton), but many have used the Sheldon Brown method successfully (see above). If you're in my area I'd do it for you in exchange for some adult beverage ;-)
@nlerner:
Big Red went from 120-130. If you sneak up on it I don't think there's much risk of creasing a chain stay.
I bolded the important part above--not something to try without some adult guidance. I can remember the first time I tried Sheldon Brown's 2 x 4 method; I think I took that poor frame to about 150mm rear end, then corrected, then widened, then corrected. It didn't fail under my ownership, but I have doubts about its current viability.
nlerner is offline  
Old 02-10-23, 03:13 PM
  #10  
bikingshearer 
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
 
bikingshearer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,658

Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 2,531 Times in 1,059 Posts
I've had a couple frames widened from 120mm to 130mm with no issues, so it is certainly doable. Note that I had it done by someone else (one by Ed Litton, one by a now-retired shop owner who spoke fluent C&V and 100% knew is stuff). I would trust gugie to do it right, but he lives 600 miles away. I would not try to do it myself on a frame I expected to be ridden, by me or anyone else. You want someone who has (1) the right tools, and I do not mean a 2x4, and (2) significant experience doing it successfully.

That's my opinion, and it's worth exactly what you're paying for it.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline  
Old 02-10-23, 03:40 PM
  #11  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,707

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,013 Times in 1,112 Posts
Use all thread, some washers, a couple of nuts, and a strap or clamp at the brake bridge for added piece of mind. Spread em some, then remove the all thread and measure. Repeat as necessary.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is offline  
Likes For Classtime:
Old 02-10-23, 04:23 PM
  #12  
Chuck M 
Happy With My Bikes
 
Chuck M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,187

Bikes: Hi-Ten bike boomers, a Trek Domane and some projects

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 884 Post(s)
Liked 2,308 Times in 1,118 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
I bolded the important part above--not something to try without some adult guidance.
Gugie did say he would do it for an adult beverage. So it checks one of the boxes.
__________________
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke

Chuck M is offline  
Likes For Chuck M:
Old 02-10-23, 04:23 PM
  #13  
tiger1964 
Senior Member
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,442

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 987 Post(s)
Liked 642 Times in 407 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
Use all thread, some washers, a couple of nuts, and a strap or clamp at the brake bridge for added piece of mind. Spread em some, then remove the all thread and measure. Repeat as necessary.
Not having tried it YET, I like how that solution sounds.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 02-10-23, 04:29 PM
  #14  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,472 Times in 2,079 Posts
I have nothing against modernizing an older bike but there's a lot to be said for hunting down older parts to make it work.

Do you have the original parts for that bike?

Also does this bike have huret drop outs?
bikemig is offline  
Likes For bikemig:
Old 02-10-23, 04:29 PM
  #15  
ehcoplex 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times in 757 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
Use all thread, some washers, a couple of nuts, and a strap or clamp at the brake bridge for added piece of mind. Spread em some, then remove the all thread and measure. Repeat as necessary.
That's how I've spread the triangle on a few of my bikes. It just seems more controlled than the 2x4 method..... A couple long carriage bolts and some washers & nuts make a cheap dropout alignment tool, too.
ehcoplex is offline  
Likes For ehcoplex:
Old 02-10-23, 04:39 PM
  #16  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,994
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times in 1,076 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
Use all thread, some washers, a couple of nuts, and a strap or clamp at the brake bridge for added piece of mind. Spread em some, then remove the all thread and measure. Repeat as necessary.
I know many people report success with that method, but I recommend against it. It's likely to result in all the bending happening on one side only, so the frame will be horribly out of alignment when done.

The Sheldon method only requires a 2x4 and is safer, more likely to result in a properly aligned frame when done. It does require patience and a bit of finesse.

Unless you're pretty handy, most people should bring it to a specialist. Seattle-area BF'ers can bring it to me, I charge a dollar a minute and it typically takes under a half-hour. Can be 10 minutes if you bring me just the frame, stripped of parts. Since I hold the frame by the BB in a vise, the cranks need to be off, but the spindle and cups can stay in. Of course I can remove the parts too, but you save some money by doing as much as you can by yourself first.

I'll strap the bridges if you want, but I agree with gugie that properly-brazed bridges don't pop from this procedure. Personally, if I had a frame with a bridge that poorly brazed, I'd want to know! Easy for me to say though, since I can re-braze a bridge that pops... but if it happens, it'll be a first for me. Of the thousand or more frames I've cold-set, many were top-quality frames that I built and which were getting only small adjustments, but I've also widened quite a few vintage frames of "variable" quality. Some pretty iffy-looking braze jobs, but none had the bridge break loose, that I can recall anyway. I think I'd remember.

If the Raleigh in question has Reynolds "rapid taper" chainstays, then this widening will be a breeze. They're small diameter (easy to bend) and without any indents, which makes it safer. Indents are not usually a problem, but they are a complication, one place that might kink or crack if the frame is borderline. I don't remember what year(s) of Competition got those stays, but I'll guess around 1970-71. Round-oval-round stays are the second safest, with indented ("dimpled") stays being maybe only 95% safe. I wouldn't let indents stop me from widening a frame though, it's just something to watch out for. Especially a chainring clearance indent on the outside of the right stay, which makes that side bend out much more easily than the left. Easy to bend too far if you aren't familiar with how much weaker the chainring indent makes it.

Mark B

Last edited by bulgie; 02-10-23 at 04:45 PM.
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 02-10-23, 05:32 PM
  #17  
Murray Missile 
Senior Member
 
Murray Missile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 700 Ft. above sea level.
Posts: 3,254

Bikes: More than there were awhile ago.

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 638 Post(s)
Liked 1,297 Times in 612 Posts
I use one of those small floor jacks to coldset frames. I lay the frame on its side on a raised surface or blocks so the lower dropout is off the ground and place a board under the jack and another on top between the rear dropouts with a support under the jack to support it's weight and hold it level and roughly centered between the dropouts. I measure the width before I start then SLOWLY pump it up until I reach the desired width. I release the jack and measure it to get an idea how much it's going to come back. That gives me a good idea how far I have to spread it with the jack to have it return to the desired width. I've done about a dozen or so this way with excellent results. I spent quite a few years working in metal fabrication shops though so I have a pretty good "feel" for it. I've had a lot of experience with Porta-powers, pry bars and BFH's and I have the scars to prove it.
__________________
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
Murray Missile is offline  
Old 02-10-23, 05:47 PM
  #18  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,849

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2339 Post(s)
Liked 2,830 Times in 1,545 Posts
Originally Posted by daverup
I used that method to go from 126 to 135 should work for going 120 to 130 (it was on a nishiki olympic 12 so not super highend, but not gas pipe) Just took it slow to get a feel for how much force and how much end movement i got.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)




Last edited by squirtdad; 02-10-23 at 05:53 PM.
squirtdad is offline  
Likes For squirtdad:
Old 02-10-23, 07:40 PM
  #19  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,396
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
I am going to interrupt this Kumbaya circle to once again state my objection to spreading frames. I will never buy a frame that's been jacked by somebody on his garage floor and I suspect most of you won't neither.
Especially not when there are known workarounds for adapting modern groupsets to old frames.
icemilkcoffee is online now  
Old 02-10-23, 08:23 PM
  #20  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times in 2,286 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
I am going to interrupt this Kumbaya circle to once again state my objection to spreading frames. I will never buy a frame that's been jacked by somebody on his garage floor and I suspect most of you won't neither.
Especially not when there are known workarounds for adapting modern groupsets to old frames.
Agreed! If you don't know who did the work, maybe walkaway. But a LOT of us want 8+ cogs in the back, and you need 130mm for that.

Meanwhile, I'm thinking of driving up to @bulgie's shop so I can hold hands and sing Kumbaya as we butcher a vintage frame...

And while we're at it, here are three, count 'em three vintage Raleigh Competitions spread to 130mm.
By Peter Weigle in 2014. Object if you like, won't hurt my feelings at all. I'm just posting this as a counterpoint for others reading this thread and possibly contemplating going to 130mm.


The one on the top is mine (see Big Red, above)
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Likes For gugie:
Old 02-11-23, 10:28 AM
  #21  
Mr. 66
Senior Member
 
Mr. 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,306
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1143 Post(s)
Liked 1,754 Times in 966 Posts

I think many people are updating the old steel for user friendly gears. I don't think of any different that me grabbing an old MTB mini groups for road bikes. I myself enjoy seeing the changes that Gugie does. I went out of the way and picked up (street finds) wasted steel of low value to push and play around with. I've practiced, and have just enough tooling to be able to do so.

I have here the bike I call the pretzel. True I did not respace, but I took that same knowledge to get the forks at spec. I took the bows out of the rear triangles, including the brake bridge side to side. This bike had looked like someone had a passenger on the rack and forks were pushed back.

Suntour mini group, I felt so good using this in a cyclocross manner.
Mr. 66 is offline  
Old 02-11-23, 10:42 AM
  #22  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,829

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2443 Post(s)
Liked 3,137 Times in 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
Agreed! If you don't know who did the work, maybe walkaway. But a LOT of us want 8+ cogs in the back, and you need 130mm for that.

Meanwhile, I'm thinking of driving up to @bulgie's shop so I can hold hands and sing Kumbaya as we butcher a vintage frame...

And while we're at it, here are three, count 'em three vintage Raleigh Competitions spread to 130mm.
By Peter Weigle in 2014. Object if you like, won't hurt my feelings at all. I'm just posting this as a counterpoint for others reading this thread and possibly contemplating going to 130mm.


The one on the top is mine (see Big Red, above)
Are those light fixture brazeons?
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super












jdawginsc is online now  
Old 02-11-23, 10:53 AM
  #23  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times in 2,286 Posts
Originally Posted by jdawginsc
Are those light fixture brazeons?
Yep, it's a Weigle signature feature. His are battery powered, Velo Lumino and Rene Herse sell wired versions. On the plus side, they're well protected since they're inside the rear triangle "envelope." If you have a large rear bag the light is blocked. Rene Herse sells the braze on bit as a kit, but I just buy M6 bosses from framebuilder supply and use a small piece of scrap tubing to miter the angle.

Pic from Rene Herse website
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 02-11-23, 02:15 PM
  #24  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,829

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2443 Post(s)
Liked 3,137 Times in 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
Yep, it's a Weigle signature feature. His are battery powered, Velo Lumino and Rene Herse sell wired versions. On the plus side, they're well protected since they're inside the rear triangle "envelope." If you have a large rear bag the light is blocked. Rene Herse sells the braze on bit as a kit, but I just buy M6 bosses from framebuilder supply and use a small piece of scrap tubing to miter the angle.

Pic from Rene Herse website
Interesting. I like the placement.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super












jdawginsc is online now  
Old 02-11-23, 03:55 PM
  #25  
fender1
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
Originally Posted by SurferRosa
In this buyer's market, is a 120mm Raleigh Competition frame really crying out for an idle set of Campy 10-speed?
If you want it too, sure. Looking at my local CL & FB Marketplace, the tide is out on vintage bikes. Given the popularity of e-bikes, anything without and engine and disc brakes will be seen as no longer viable.

Most of the frames people are talking about modifying are of no historical value and are quickly losing monetary value in the eyes of the general general public.

Us "old timers" ( I am 55) are seen as people who are stuck in the past and don't ride in a meaningful way. The reality is you can only ride one bike at a time, so why not make it something you enjoy?
fender1 is offline  
Likes For fender1:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.