The truth about clearance between frame and crotch...?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 19
Bikes: 2014 Fuji Absolute 1.7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The truth about clearance between frame and crotch...?
Dear All:
I am currently shopping for a new bike -- my first in almost 30 years.
I am looking at hybrids, and have been trying bikes at a couple of different LBS in Los Angeles.
So far I have tried some Trek FX, Fuji Absolute and Schwinn.
I am 5'11.
At one store, I was told that one needs about 1" clearance between the top of the frame and one's crotch when not on the saddle. As a result, I was given a few 19" bikes to try. (Fuji)
At the other store, the guy told me that it was more about riding position, and that a 20" was better for me (no space between the frame and my crotch there). So therefore I tried a couple of 20" bikes (Trek).
Riding-wise, I did not feel any difference really, but I also only did two laps around the block...
Who is right? Does it matter?
Thanks for the advice.
EBZ
I am currently shopping for a new bike -- my first in almost 30 years.
I am looking at hybrids, and have been trying bikes at a couple of different LBS in Los Angeles.
So far I have tried some Trek FX, Fuji Absolute and Schwinn.
I am 5'11.
At one store, I was told that one needs about 1" clearance between the top of the frame and one's crotch when not on the saddle. As a result, I was given a few 19" bikes to try. (Fuji)
At the other store, the guy told me that it was more about riding position, and that a 20" was better for me (no space between the frame and my crotch there). So therefore I tried a couple of 20" bikes (Trek).
Riding-wise, I did not feel any difference really, but I also only did two laps around the block...
Who is right? Does it matter?
Thanks for the advice.
EBZ
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,968
Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ya, it will probably matter if for some reason you end up flat footed with the tires sitting on something higher than normal. Like smacking a curb or something and coming off the front seat. One shop I that I was checking my bike made a point that it is a safety issue. Find a bike with a sloping frame giving you the reach and I bet you will feel more comfortable about the bike. I sure would have if both of my road bikes were an inch lower.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.
Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.
Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Sort of depends on the definition of "crotch". An inch of clearance between the top tube and the pubic bone is the minimum I would recommend. This doesn't mean you can't be touching the top tube as you stand over the bike. But it does mean that if you can't lift the bike an inch before it hits something that won't "give", you probably want a smaller frame.
#4
Banned
Casual, JRA a taller frame, Less clearance, aggressive, particularly MTB off road you want more clearance.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 19
Bikes: 2014 Fuji Absolute 1.7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you all for your thoughts. I went to another LBS today to try some Giant and Specialized bikes. The guy seemed very knowledgeable and said I was in between two frame size (Medium/large) or around 19/20".
He felt for city riding in Los Angeles, I was better off with the slightly shorter frame an some clearance. The more I think about it the more I tend to agree.
While the larger frame was not uncomfortable, there was a little... should I say potential danger mounting and getting off the seat quickly...
I also remember in the past having to jump a curb to avoid some !#!*?! car not paying attention...
He felt for city riding in Los Angeles, I was better off with the slightly shorter frame an some clearance. The more I think about it the more I tend to agree.
While the larger frame was not uncomfortable, there was a little... should I say potential danger mounting and getting off the seat quickly...
I also remember in the past having to jump a curb to avoid some !#!*?! car not paying attention...
#6
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: NELA
Posts: 291
Bikes: Mostly '80s MIJ steel.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm 5'5" and am comfortable on 52cm/20.5" vintage bikes with straight top tubes. Depending on tire size there is generally at least 1" before I bottom out.
Last edited by ofgit; 07-22-14 at 11:51 AM.
#7
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,842
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12771 Post(s)
Liked 7,688 Times
in
4,081 Posts
I like flat handlebar bikes with a 56cm top tube.
My 15" Mongoose has 56cm ETT (effective top tube) as did a 1999 18" Trek 4000, so they both fit perfectly but the goose has about 1.5" more standover than the Trek.
Looks like both the Trek fx and Fuji Absolute have a nearly 55cm. I'd probably go with those personally and get a longer stem if necessary.
It might take you a while to figure out what ETT fits you best. You also need to figure out what back angle you'd like. 20 deg from horizontal for a racing posture, 80 degrees from horizontal for upright pleasure cruise, or somewhere in between. For upright you may want to go shorter ETT but you may need to swap stem or bars to get lost bar height back.
My 15" Mongoose has 56cm ETT (effective top tube) as did a 1999 18" Trek 4000, so they both fit perfectly but the goose has about 1.5" more standover than the Trek.
Looks like both the Trek fx and Fuji Absolute have a nearly 55cm. I'd probably go with those personally and get a longer stem if necessary.
It might take you a while to figure out what ETT fits you best. You also need to figure out what back angle you'd like. 20 deg from horizontal for a racing posture, 80 degrees from horizontal for upright pleasure cruise, or somewhere in between. For upright you may want to go shorter ETT but you may need to swap stem or bars to get lost bar height back.
Last edited by LesterOfPuppets; 07-22-14 at 12:17 PM.
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 19
Bikes: 2014 Fuji Absolute 1.7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
[SUB][/SUB]
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 19
Bikes: 2014 Fuji Absolute 1.7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like flat handlebar bikes with a 56cm top tube.
My 15" Mongoose has 56cm ETT (effective top tube) as did a 1999 18" Trek 4000, so they both fit perfectly but the goose has about 1.5" more standover than the Trek.
Looks like both the Trek fx and Fuji Absolute have a nearly 55cm. I'd probably go with those personally and get a longer stem if necessary.
It might take you a while to figure out what ETT fits you best. You also need to figure out what back angle you'd like. 20 deg from horizontal for a racing posture, 80 degrees from horizontal for upright pleasure cruise, or somewhere in between. For upright you may want to go shorter ETT but you may need to swap stem or bars to get lost bar height back.
My 15" Mongoose has 56cm ETT (effective top tube) as did a 1999 18" Trek 4000, so they both fit perfectly but the goose has about 1.5" more standover than the Trek.
Looks like both the Trek fx and Fuji Absolute have a nearly 55cm. I'd probably go with those personally and get a longer stem if necessary.
It might take you a while to figure out what ETT fits you best. You also need to figure out what back angle you'd like. 20 deg from horizontal for a racing posture, 80 degrees from horizontal for upright pleasure cruise, or somewhere in between. For upright you may want to go shorter ETT but you may need to swap stem or bars to get lost bar height back.
I will try them again in different size and talk to the LBS about posture.
#10
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: NELA
Posts: 291
Bikes: Mostly '80s MIJ steel.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Wheel size is 700c. Tire size makes a difference. Top tubes are 54-55cm. Bar height, stem length, saddle and crank length all factor into rider position/fit.
Last edited by ofgit; 07-22-14 at 08:35 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
terryl42659
Manufacturer, Retailer, Survey and Consumer Feedback
14
01-19-16 07:23 PM
xionchen4628
Hybrid Bicycles
30
10-26-15 06:19 AM