Seeking out first bike advice
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Seeking out first bike advice
Hi all. Just some background: I am 21 years old, 185lbs, 62, and run or lift weights 6 times a week. I was told by a bike shop my size is 58-60cm. I am interested in doing a triathlon at some point.
I am currently deciding between two bikes: a 2013 Supersix 6 Tiagra or a 2013 Synapse (Alloy) 5 105.
I tried posting links to the specs but its not letting me. From what I have read, it seems like the major differences are the endurance fit of the synapse vs the racing fit of the supersix, the higher quality 105 components vs the lower quality tiagra components, and the lighter carbon frame vs heavier aluminum frame.
I just want to make sure I dont feel like I need another bike after a year or two of experience. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. I look forward to learning all there is to know about this sport.
I am currently deciding between two bikes: a 2013 Supersix 6 Tiagra or a 2013 Synapse (Alloy) 5 105.
I tried posting links to the specs but its not letting me. From what I have read, it seems like the major differences are the endurance fit of the synapse vs the racing fit of the supersix, the higher quality 105 components vs the lower quality tiagra components, and the lighter carbon frame vs heavier aluminum frame.
I just want to make sure I dont feel like I need another bike after a year or two of experience. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. I look forward to learning all there is to know about this sport.
#3
Junior Member
Go with the nicer/lighter/racier carbon frame if it fits you well. You can upgrade components later piecemeal if you want.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Central Io-way
Posts: 2,673
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1221 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times
in
472 Posts
I'd go with the Synapse if you're getting into biking. It'll have the nicer drivetrain, and you're right about the race fit vs endurance. I'd choose endurance first to get used to the position. Then you can work towards a more aggressive fit. If you enjoy it and get serious you'll end up buying either an actual TT bike or a more modern race bike.
You can get the Synapse to fit as aggressively as the super six, but not vice versa without it looking goofy or compromising ride quality.
What's the prices?
You can get the Synapse to fit as aggressively as the super six, but not vice versa without it looking goofy or compromising ride quality.
What's the prices?
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd go with the Synapse if you're getting into biking. It'll have the nicer drivetrain, and you're right about the race fit vs endurance. I'd choose endurance first to get used to the position. Then you can work towards a more aggressive fit. If you enjoy it and get serious you'll end up buying either an actual TT bike or a more modern race bike.
You can get the Synapse to fit as aggressively as the super six, but not vice versa without it looking goofy or compromising ride quality.
What's the prices?
You can get the Synapse to fit as aggressively as the super six, but not vice versa without it looking goofy or compromising ride quality.
What's the prices?
#6
Junior Member
I'd go with the Synapse if you're getting into biking. It'll have the nicer drivetrain, and you're right about the race fit vs endurance. I'd choose endurance first to get used to the position. Then you can work towards a more aggressive fit. If you enjoy it and get serious you'll end up buying either an actual TT bike or a more modern race bike.
You can get the Synapse to fit as aggressively as the super six, but not vice versa without it looking goofy or compromising ride quality.
What's the prices?
You can get the Synapse to fit as aggressively as the super six, but not vice versa without it looking goofy or compromising ride quality.
What's the prices?
#7
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Go for a test ride and choose whichever bike fits you best and whichever bike you like.
#8
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,002
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6199 Post(s)
Liked 4,816 Times
in
3,323 Posts
I don't have much to add..... well I really do..... but I'm not going to.
But...
What will you do when you look at a manufacturer that specs their bikes by XS, S, M, ML, L and XL or other?
And do you know if they were referring to seat tube length or effective top tube length? Most think the former and that is one of the worst way to size a bike, IMO.
If you have no other thing to go by, then go with the manufacturers suggested sizing for that model bike. Some will actually be different sizes for different bike models of the same brand.
If you can, then simply riding different sizes of the bike for as long as they'll let you helps determine what's best for you in your current state of cycling fitness.
But...
I was told by a bike shop my size is 58-60cm
And do you know if they were referring to seat tube length or effective top tube length? Most think the former and that is one of the worst way to size a bike, IMO.
If you have no other thing to go by, then go with the manufacturers suggested sizing for that model bike. Some will actually be different sizes for different bike models of the same brand.
If you can, then simply riding different sizes of the bike for as long as they'll let you helps determine what's best for you in your current state of cycling fitness.