700 x 19 or 20 Tires
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,716 Times
in
2,613 Posts
I always enjoy riding my skinny high-pressure tires on smooth roads 10 miles to the cafe and back.
Likes For nlerner:
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
Harshness? I think you're too sensitive. Might want to look into gel saddles and foam comfy grips to go with those squishy tires. And maybe think about buying a touring bike. Racing bikes don't seem to be your cup of tea.
Last edited by smd4; 05-13-22 at 08:50 AM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,716 Times
in
2,613 Posts
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
HEY! This is C&V! why are you guys running wider tires than the period of your bike? Don't answer that!
I am limitied in what will mount on my Italian bikes so 25 is the max. I keep saying this but here it is anyway. I have found the Vittoria G+ tires perform better at 130 ish than 110 or 100. It might just be me but that is what it is all about anyway, me.
I am limitied in what will mount on my Italian bikes so 25 is the max. I keep saying this but here it is anyway. I have found the Vittoria G+ tires perform better at 130 ish than 110 or 100. It might just be me but that is what it is all about anyway, me.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Likes For SJX426:
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,707
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,013 Times
in
1,112 Posts
From, "where are the 19 and 20mm tires?" to "everyone should ride at least 28s". IMO, anything more than 25mm looks pretty stupid on most any classic road racing bike with 28.6+/- main tubes and 25 is borderline stupid. Of course there are exceptions for the super rare wood rimmed "balloon" tired racers. Continental 22mm tubulars are the sweet spot for my bikes and for clinchers -- GP4000s in 23mm. (If I ever wear out my 4000s I'll give the 5000s a try.)
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Likes For Classtime:
#34
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
336 Posts
Wider tires seem to be the train everyone is jumping on. Is there anyone out there, like me, who used to use 19c or 20c clinchers and never had a problem?
I have searched, but is anyone making a 19 or 20c skinwall-type tire anymore? I think I had Trek and Panaracers "back in the day". It seems "the man" is forcing everyone into blackwall wide tires!
I have searched, but is anyone making a 19 or 20c skinwall-type tire anymore? I think I had Trek and Panaracers "back in the day". It seems "the man" is forcing everyone into blackwall wide tires!
Some of them had screened 700x19 and embossed 700x18 on the same tire.
They were very hard, and not really confidence builders, but on smooth roads, seemed fast.
Combined with lighter rims, they certainly felt light, but the wheels were going out of true frequently.
I switched to 21's and may have noticed a difference, may have not, because it didn't matter at the time.
A bike shop gave me some free 700x18 Hutchison Fusions because a customer brought them back.
At 125 psi, they were rock hard, but they gripped better than the Panaracers.
As my tire inventory built up through maintenance, building, repairs, I didn't give it much thought.
My racer friends (not me), really liked the skinnies, and 130-135 psi was normal for them.
#35
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
336 Posts
From, "where are the 19 and 20mm tires?" to "everyone should ride at least 28s". IMO, anything more than 25mm looks pretty stupid on most any classic road racing bike with 28.6+/- main tubes and 25 is borderline stupid. Of course there are exceptions for the super rare wood rimmed "balloon" tired racers. Continental 22mm tubulars are the sweet spot for my bikes and for clinchers -- GP4000s in 23mm. (If I ever wear out my 4000s I'll give the 5000s a try.)
They are the little black dress of C&V tires.
#36
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times
in
216 Posts
So I shouldn't pump my tires to the maximum? Why not?
Harshness? I think you're too sensitive. Might want to look into gel saddles and foam comfy grips to go with those squishy tires. And maybe think about buying a touring bike. Racing bikes don't seem to be your cup of tea.
Harshness? I think you're too sensitive. Might want to look into gel saddles and foam comfy grips to go with those squishy tires. And maybe think about buying a touring bike. Racing bikes don't seem to be your cup of tea.
It's just that I've learned from personal experience AND manufacturers' reccomendations, there is no advantage to doing so - you're just pretending that tires with no deflection is the same as tires that roll fast, and that's not generally true. Tires are filled with air because it compresses, and the goal should be to find the correct amount of deflection, not to treat tire carcass deflection as an enemy to be completely eliminated.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
Maybe I should have my frame and fork widened to accommodate some P225s at 35 psi. Sounds like I'd be lightening fast with those! And comfy, to boot! Woot!
Oh...and your "personal experience" means very little to me.
Oh...and your "personal experience" means very little to me.
#38
Senior Member
To each his own. I have nothing invested in what size tires someone else likes, or what their reasons are. I do have a couple of observations though.
1. The default tire size in the pro peloton isn’t 23 anymore, and if those tires were faster, it makes sense that they would be.
2. Otoh, part of the rationale that I have read for #1 is that the frames and rims are stiffer than ever, so resilience from the tire is especially important. We on our steel frames and classic profile rims are not quite in the same lab. But some of the findings no doubt still apply.
1. The default tire size in the pro peloton isn’t 23 anymore, and if those tires were faster, it makes sense that they would be.
2. Otoh, part of the rationale that I have read for #1 is that the frames and rims are stiffer than ever, so resilience from the tire is especially important. We on our steel frames and classic profile rims are not quite in the same lab. But some of the findings no doubt still apply.
Likes For due ruote:
#39
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times
in
216 Posts
Quite the opposite! You are so certain that maximum tire hardness makes you a harder man or whatever, you should take the tires off altogether... stretch a 26" innertube over the rim sidewalls for traction and enjoy the super-fast fun of riding directly on the rim.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
Quite the opposite! You are so certain that maximum tire hardness makes you a harder man or whatever, you should take the tires off altogether... stretch a 26" innertube over the rim sidewalls for traction and enjoy the super-fast fun of riding directly on the rim.
Last edited by smd4; 05-13-22 at 09:52 AM.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
#43
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,802 Times
in
2,286 Posts
Neal doesn't even need tires to ride his bike as long as caffeine is involved.
pix cause it happened
pix cause it happened
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#44
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
336 Posts
Quite the opposite! You are so certain that maximum tire hardness makes you a harder man or whatever, you should take the tires off altogether... stretch a 26" innertube over the rim sidewalls for traction and enjoy the super-fast fun of riding directly on the rim.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,716 Times
in
2,613 Posts
I have found that it's pretty impossible to convince those in either camp to give up what they like best, whether it's the skinny or the fat-tire crowd (fwiw, I'm in the latter camp). It seems a matter of ideology given the gazillion variables that would affect perceptions of how a bike rides. I'm just glad the tires I like to ride are readily available (really an explosion of availability in 700 x 32mm; I'm riding some new Continental GP 5000s on the road bike I use most often, and they are terrific).
Likes For nlerner:
#46
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,802 Times
in
2,286 Posts
From, "where are the 19 and 20mm tires?" to "everyone should ride at least 28s". IMO, anything more than 25mm looks pretty stupid on most any classic road racing bike with 28.6+/- main tubes and 25 is borderline stupid. Of course there are exceptions for the super rare wood rimmed "balloon" tired racers. Continental 22mm tubulars are the sweet spot for my bikes and for clinchers -- GP4000s in 23mm. (If I ever wear out my 4000s I'll give the 5000s a try.)
The issue on a lot of classic road racing bikes is there isn't room for bigger han 25mm tires.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
I don't know what style of bike(s) you ride, but for the conditions you describe, a mountain, gravel or cyclocross bike would be better than a racing bike.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,716 Times
in
2,613 Posts
Fwiw, I can remember putting 700 x 19mm tires on my late 70s Raleigh SuperCourse (this was around 1988), which, along with brown-anodized aero rims just made me feel like greased lightening. Of course, I was in my 20s then, which helped.
#49
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
336 Posts
I really don't care what any one else rides, but I'm happy looking stupid on all of my bikes. In the past 10 years the skinniest tire I've ridden is 32mm. Roads in rural Oregon can be rough, some aren't even paved, wider tires make riding on them much more comfortable, and safer. YMMV.
I deplored GatorSkin 25's and 28's as "combat boots" for bikes.
Then I rode in St. Louis.
Necessary.
#50
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,802 Times
in
2,286 Posts
When in doubt, show a picture. Is this a racing bike?
700c x 35 tires on a 1974 Raleigh International
Maybe this one?
Motobecane Le Champion
700c x 32 tires
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.