Tire Pressure
#101
The Wheezing Geezer
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Española, NM
Posts: 1,060
Bikes: 1976 Fredo Speciale, Jamis Citizen 1, Ellis-Briggs FAVORI, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 414 Post(s)
Liked 923 Times
in
447 Posts
No, the proof that removing weight from wheels makes a trivial difference compared to removing the weight from anywhere else in the system came from direct field testing (the earliest I'm aware of is Kraig Willett's from 2001). The model just explains the empirical finding.
#102
Senior Member
#103
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,891
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6973 Post(s)
Liked 10,975 Times
in
4,695 Posts
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,456
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4420 Post(s)
Liked 4,873 Times
in
3,017 Posts
But what makes me far more qualified to weigh in on this kind of thread is my engineering degree and several decades working in F1 motor racing development - where details (like tyre pressure) seriously matter.
Likes For PeteHski:
#105
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Mavic GEL280s with 15/16 spokes and Setas always seemed to jump out of corners better than GP4's with 14 straight gage with Wober tubies. I ain't never done the maths on it but I would guess a foot difference. Could someone do some of that physics stuff? Am I far off or was I just imagining it?
#106
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,456
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4420 Post(s)
Liked 4,873 Times
in
3,017 Posts
Mavic GEL280s with 15/16 spokes and Setas always seemed to jump out of corners better than GP4's with 14 straight gage with Wober tubies. I ain't never done the maths on it but I would guess a foot difference. Could someone do some of that physics stuff? Am I far off or was I just imagining it?
K = 1/2 M v^2 + 1/2 m v^2 where M is the total mass of the bike (including the wheels) and m is the wheel mass only.
So in terms of accelerating the bike to a velocity v, wheel rim mass requires double the kinetic energy as frame mass. Or put another way 100g wheel mass saving is roughly equivalent to 200g frame mass when accelerating (and only when accelerating).
In your real-world example, you could then use F=Ma and simply double the weight saving in those wheels when calculating the difference in acceleration. So if your lighter wheel set saves 0.5 kg, then simply substitute 1 kg into F=Ma and then calculate the distance required to accelerate from v1 to v2 out of the corner. It would get you pretty close. Is it going to make much difference when M = 80,90,100+ kg? I don't know about you, but my own bodyweight varies by +/- 1-2 kg throughout the day.
It's also worth noting that you only lose energy from the system when actively braking. If you are coasting, the extra kinetic energy it took to accelerate those heavier wheels is returned through momentum. Basically you have a couple of flywheels.
This kind of puts it all into perspective:-
https://pedalchile.com/blog/light-wheels
Last edited by PeteHski; 06-09-22 at 08:40 AM.
#107
Senior Member
#108
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
So, racers can save another foot by taking a good one in the morning?
Similarly in terms of extreme marginal gains, the optimum tire pressure for racers depends on the tire, road surface, temperatures, and the rider's weight.
The only real mistake is going too high in pressure. I was running 90 psi on 25 mm GP5000 TR S yesterday on good roads. Then, I got to some nasty chip seal that was rattling my feeble brain. So, I recursively let out a little air until it felt comfortable. What a difference. I got home and measured 75 psi rear and 65 psi front. Normally on crappy roads, I just do 75 psi.
Similarly in terms of extreme marginal gains, the optimum tire pressure for racers depends on the tire, road surface, temperatures, and the rider's weight.
The only real mistake is going too high in pressure. I was running 90 psi on 25 mm GP5000 TR S yesterday on good roads. Then, I got to some nasty chip seal that was rattling my feeble brain. So, I recursively let out a little air until it felt comfortable. What a difference. I got home and measured 75 psi rear and 65 psi front. Normally on crappy roads, I just do 75 psi.
#109
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
176 Posts
I'm not going to argue physics, but I will argue aesthetics. Wide tires on a road bike are a lot like driving fast in a new model Mustang or Dodge Charger. You may go faster, but you look like a neanderthal doing it.
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Likes For WhyFi:
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Likes For 70sSanO:
Likes For krakhaus:
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#115
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,456
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4420 Post(s)
Liked 4,873 Times
in
3,017 Posts
Entirely subjective of course, but I've got used to seeing 28 or 30 mm road tyres on nice wide carbon aero rims. Maybe would look out of place on a vintage bike, but horses for courses.
#116
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Likes For WhyFi:
#117
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Speaking of that picture, Here is an update on the Fall Line Trail. Some people voicing opposition.
https://www.virginiadot.org/projects...line-trail.asp
https://www.wric.com/news/local-news...tral-virginia/
https://www.virginiadot.org/projects...line-trail.asp
https://www.wric.com/news/local-news...tral-virginia/
#118
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,955
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3957 Post(s)
Liked 7,310 Times
in
2,950 Posts
I'm a technician, today I spent most of my time helping a relatively inexperienced PHD student with some orbital welds (a machine that does welds for you, if you set it up properly.) I live in the bay area where people are still terrified of covid, so there is a severe lack of the normal student labor.
#119
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,955
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3957 Post(s)
Liked 7,310 Times
in
2,950 Posts
#120
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Likes For seypat:
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,955
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3957 Post(s)
Liked 7,310 Times
in
2,950 Posts
The most puzzling part of the tire pressure debate is why so many cyclists can't seem to deal with "it depends." They want or need to believe that X is always better.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#122
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
#123
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
When these threads start to go sideways and devolve into old vs new, I wonder what happened to those kids who used to drool over the latest showroom offerings.
Those kids weren't looking back when they saw their first Stingray or 911 Turbo or Viper, but somewhere along the way they became old and lost an appreciation for something new and cool.
It is truly an odd phenomenon.
John
Those kids weren't looking back when they saw their first Stingray or 911 Turbo or Viper, but somewhere along the way they became old and lost an appreciation for something new and cool.
It is truly an odd phenomenon.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#124
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
When these threads start to go sideways and devolve into old vs new, I wonder what happened to those kids who used to drool over the latest showroom offerings.
Those kids weren't looking back when they saw their first Stingray or 911 Turbo or Viper, but somewhere along the way they became old and lost an appreciation for something new and cool.
It is truly an odd phenomenon.
John
Those kids weren't looking back when they saw their first Stingray or 911 Turbo or Viper, but somewhere along the way they became old and lost an appreciation for something new and cool.
It is truly an odd phenomenon.
John
#125
The Wheezing Geezer
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Española, NM
Posts: 1,060
Bikes: 1976 Fredo Speciale, Jamis Citizen 1, Ellis-Briggs FAVORI, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 414 Post(s)
Liked 923 Times
in
447 Posts
I agree that a person's cycling experience does not influence the laws of physics. But we're not talking about the laws of physics. We're talking about the accuracy of a model, loaded with assumptions. If it contradicts decades, no, generations of lived experience and wisdom, then it is to be questioned. Models are not 'authorities'. I think those who parrot so-called 'scientists' going against such lived experience might not have that lived experience as a common-sense check on their opinions. When they assert "facts" as "proven", it looks really dumb, frankly. It reminds me of people on an audio forum who judge equipment by test results, quite literally without any listening. Their opinions are worthless.
When a current racer tells me he thinks his aero wheels make more difference than light ones in a criterium, I'll credit that opinion highly. However, my own explanation for his opinion is that he has not tried competing on heavy wheels, so has no experience to really make the comparison.
The model is too crude, with too many simplifying assumptions. That it can be used to "prove" that weight off the wheels is no better than weight off of anywhere else is evidence of its need for refinement, rather than evidence of its accuracy.