BioPace alternative
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
BioPace alternative
Can you replace just the chainrings on a biopace crank? If not, what are good options for an 87 of the same vintage?
Likes For shoota:
#3
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,446 Times
in
1,557 Posts
I put round rings on a touring Biopace crankset, using the sizes I selected for the 110/74 BCD. You can so the same with the 130 BCD road Biopace cranks.
Likes For thumpism:
#4
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times
in
937 Posts
BTW- make sure you make note of the orientation of how your Biopace rings are installed- just in case you decide to put them back on (for whatever reason and however doubtful that may be )
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#5
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,800
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,331 Times
in
837 Posts
Been there ... done that. One of the first changes I made to my mountain bike was to replace the 38T biopace middle ring with a 40T round one (110mm BCD). I recently replaced the 48T outer ring with a 46 (both round), so I am ironically now back to 38T (round this time) for the middle ring, to maintain my favored 1.5-step 8-tooth drop.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#6
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Yup. Standard cranks and spider. You can mix Biopace and standard round rings too, although some combos work well and others don't. It can be tricky to adjust the front derailleur to get reliable shifts without dropping the chain.
It's easy to return the Biopace double to the default configuration -- the locator pin is intended to go one way. However you can reorient/index the oblong chainrings however you like, within the limits of the five available positions. I found some alternate orientations I liked, while others felt weird. Eventually I returned the Biopace 52/42 rings to the default position. Suited me well when I used 'em a couple of years ago.
FWIW, subjectively speaking, the 42T small Biopace ring felt "smaller" to me, more like a 39T. On climbs it didn't feel like mashing with a 42T standard round ring.
I also preferred shorter cranks with Biopace. Usually I'm not picky about crank length. I ride 170, 172.5 and 175. But longer cranks felt weird to me with Biopace, very herky-jerky. Switching to 170 cranks resolved that issue and my cadence felt "right" again.
It's very subjective but I liked Biopace when I used it for a year in 2019. Only reason I'm not using it at the moment is I disassembled that bike to rebuild it and still haven't finished the rebuild. I plan to switch that bike ('93 Trek 5900) to Dura Ace cranks, 53/39 to match the Ultegra 53/39 cranks on my 2014 Diamondback Podium. But I might swap the Biopace over to my Ironman, with 170 cranks.
It's easy to return the Biopace double to the default configuration -- the locator pin is intended to go one way. However you can reorient/index the oblong chainrings however you like, within the limits of the five available positions. I found some alternate orientations I liked, while others felt weird. Eventually I returned the Biopace 52/42 rings to the default position. Suited me well when I used 'em a couple of years ago.
FWIW, subjectively speaking, the 42T small Biopace ring felt "smaller" to me, more like a 39T. On climbs it didn't feel like mashing with a 42T standard round ring.
I also preferred shorter cranks with Biopace. Usually I'm not picky about crank length. I ride 170, 172.5 and 175. But longer cranks felt weird to me with Biopace, very herky-jerky. Switching to 170 cranks resolved that issue and my cadence felt "right" again.
It's very subjective but I liked Biopace when I used it for a year in 2019. Only reason I'm not using it at the moment is I disassembled that bike to rebuild it and still haven't finished the rebuild. I plan to switch that bike ('93 Trek 5900) to Dura Ace cranks, 53/39 to match the Ultegra 53/39 cranks on my 2014 Diamondback Podium. But I might swap the Biopace over to my Ironman, with 170 cranks.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
If you like the concept, other companies made oval rings. Check the Bay for Sakae Ovaltech or Sugino Cycloid.
#8
Senior Member
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/biopace.html
All my bikes have been equipped with round chainrings since new, but I have to admit that Biopace rings do sound interesting. I've picked up a couple of sets of Biopace rings along the way (and am debating picking up another I've got my eye on). A set may end up on the oldest bike the next time it needs a new chain so I can give them a try.
Likes For Hondo6:
#9
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,800
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,331 Times
in
837 Posts
One size does not fit all. I tried the 38T Biopace middle ring that came with my mountain bike and never got used to the pedaling cadence.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#11
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,994
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10447 Post(s)
Liked 11,932 Times
in
6,106 Posts
I have kept the Biopace chainrings on my 1989 Schwinn Circuit, because like the Sante groupset on it, it's part of the bike's original equipment. I tried it in the original configuration, and I noticed a 'surge-y' feeling when going up a 2-3% grade. I currently have both rings rotated one spider arm clockwise, which makes the orientation more like the current thinking on oval chainrings, and I don't notice the same feeling, though of course this is totally subjective. But I'm leaving it like this.
I just picked up a 1985 Centurion Ironman that also has Biopace chainrings, so I'll experiment more when I'm finished with the rebuild.
I just picked up a 1985 Centurion Ironman that also has Biopace chainrings, so I'll experiment more when I'm finished with the rebuild.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#12
Death fork? Naaaah!!
The late Sheldon Brown was a big fan of Biopace rings. Per his website, seems that's to be expected - according to him, Biopace is "easier on your knees" and allows "healthy, efficient pedaling at slower cadences than is possible with round chainwheels".
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/biopace.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/biopace.html
Always been a fanboy. Much easier on my old, beat-up knees. Whenever possible I include them in a build, most recently a early/mid '80s Klein Performance built with Shimano 6204 cranks and 50/38/28 Biopace rings. Even got them to index with brifters. Wasn't easy and I do not recommend it, but it works for me and it can be done.
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#13
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
I have kept the Biopace chainrings on my 1989 Schwinn Circuit, because like the Sante groupset on it, it's part of the bike's original equipment. I tried it in the original configuration, and I noticed a 'surge-y' feeling when going up a 2-3% grade. I currently have both rings rotated one spider arm clockwise, which makes the orientation more like the current thinking on oval chainrings, and I don't notice the same feeling, though of course this is totally subjective. But I'm leaving it like this.
I just picked up a 1985 Centurion Ironman that also has Biopace chainrings, so I'll experiment more when I'm finished with the rebuild.
I just picked up a 1985 Centurion Ironman that also has Biopace chainrings, so I'll experiment more when I'm finished with the rebuild.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,387
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2490 Post(s)
Liked 2,962 Times
in
1,683 Posts
All of the other eccentric chainring designs, starting in the 1930s, if not earlier, and continuing to the present day, were designed for high-cadence, racer-oriented use.
#15
Senior Member
Added: turns out that the older Shimano docs covering Biopace installation are harder to find than I remembered. If anyone's interested in having a copy of those instructions for future reference, do an internet search for "SI-T-30A-000-00-ENG" and choose the entry from "si.shimano.com" covering a number of FC-M### cranksets. That document explains how Shimano recommended orienting Biopace chainwheels during installation.
Last edited by Hondo6; 09-25-21 at 09:44 AM. Reason: Add second para.
#16
Senior Member
My late’80s Schwinn LeTour is equipped with the SunTour “Blaze” groupset and has OvalTech chainrings. I assumed that the designers consulted with kinesiologists RE: the best / most effective orientation of the ovalized chainrings so I’ve always made sure to note the position whenever I’ve done any disassembly.
#17
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
BioPace Experiments
In 2006 I picked up a 1st generation Colnago Technos frame. It was so gaudy (to me) that I went full tilt bozo on the build.
I had an NOS 1987 Shimano Deore M730 MTB gruppo that I'd gotten dirt cheap on eBay so I used the 175mm cranks with 28-38-48T BioPace chainrings, the derailleurs plus I had as set of road wheels built using the Deore hubs. It was intended to be an old man's climbing bike and it did the job. It felt better climbing than my other triples but I wasn't sure whether it was the BioPace rings, the 175mm cranks or both.
In 2010 I got an almost NOS 1988 Peugeot Biarritz with a Shimano 600 Ultegra gruppo. It came with 42-52T BioPace chainrings. (eBay photo with speedo wires and Nitto Technomics tall boy stem which were immediately removed)
In researching BioPace chainrings back then I put together this Flickr album with photos I lifted from the internet. It shows various generation Shimano BioPace rings plus Sugino, SR and Stronglight versions. Some of the info may not be correct but that was 11 years ago.... No 2nd editions or editing!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...57625130627294
On a subjective note, I've been riding 48T, 49T or 50T large chainrings with 38T or 39T small rings for years. I found that the climbing effort on that Peugeot with the 42T BioPace ring and 24T or 28T rear sprockets had the same feel as a 38T round ring! Better comparison than with my Deore MTB cranks.
BTW, BITD I could spin 90 rpm all day! For the past 15 years, I'm happy to hit 60 rpm. The suggestions that BioPace rings were designed for "average" riders seems to hold true as most complaints that I've read were by more aggressive riders.
verktyg
I had an NOS 1987 Shimano Deore M730 MTB gruppo that I'd gotten dirt cheap on eBay so I used the 175mm cranks with 28-38-48T BioPace chainrings, the derailleurs plus I had as set of road wheels built using the Deore hubs. It was intended to be an old man's climbing bike and it did the job. It felt better climbing than my other triples but I wasn't sure whether it was the BioPace rings, the 175mm cranks or both.
In 2010 I got an almost NOS 1988 Peugeot Biarritz with a Shimano 600 Ultegra gruppo. It came with 42-52T BioPace chainrings. (eBay photo with speedo wires and Nitto Technomics tall boy stem which were immediately removed)
In researching BioPace chainrings back then I put together this Flickr album with photos I lifted from the internet. It shows various generation Shimano BioPace rings plus Sugino, SR and Stronglight versions. Some of the info may not be correct but that was 11 years ago.... No 2nd editions or editing!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/282672...57625130627294
On a subjective note, I've been riding 48T, 49T or 50T large chainrings with 38T or 39T small rings for years. I found that the climbing effort on that Peugeot with the 42T BioPace ring and 24T or 28T rear sprockets had the same feel as a 38T round ring! Better comparison than with my Deore MTB cranks.
BTW, BITD I could spin 90 rpm all day! For the past 15 years, I'm happy to hit 60 rpm. The suggestions that BioPace rings were designed for "average" riders seems to hold true as most complaints that I've read were by more aggressive riders.
verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
#19
Senior Member
Had to run out to the garage to be sure my LeTour hadn’t “gone missing” ! I’m neither here nor there RE: elliptical chainrings. If the bike came with them, I leave them on. If I’m building from the parts bin, I’d use whatever brand elliptical chainring that had the number of teeth that I wanted and fit the crank spider. If a round chainring better met the needs, I’d use it. Not being a competitive rider, I’m not so sure I’m realizing the “benefit” of ellipticals but I certainly don’t notice any detriment.