Crank and Chainrings Upgrade Advice
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Crank and Chainrings Upgrade Advice
My current setup is all Shimano 46/30 175 front crank 11-36 9 speed cassette . I'd like more top end . Just not sure how much to go with . The 30 chainring is fine It's the 46 that just isn't quite enough .
Also the current crank price checks at $45.00 . Is there any great advantage to putting on a more expensive crank? Would a $150 Crankset be way overkill ???
What about crank arm length . My current is 175 . I see those but also see shorter ones . I'm 6' tall . Around 33.5 inseam
Also the current crank price checks at $45.00 . Is there any great advantage to putting on a more expensive crank? Would a $150 Crankset be way overkill ???
What about crank arm length . My current is 175 . I see those but also see shorter ones . I'm 6' tall . Around 33.5 inseam
Last edited by Rick53; 08-04-22 at 07:33 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,837
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Tread, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
430 Posts
The 16-tooth jump in chainrings is close the the max for good shifting, and may be all your rear derailleur can take up. If you go bigger with the large, would you be okay losing the lower gears? And you'll need a new chain, of course.
You should be able to find the max chain wrap specs for your RD--look up the part number on the inside of the body.
175 cranks is probably right for your height.
It's hard for me to imagine the value in a $100 upgrade but I'm just a recreational rider.
You should be able to find the max chain wrap specs for your RD--look up the part number on the inside of the body.
175 cranks is probably right for your height.
It's hard for me to imagine the value in a $100 upgrade but I'm just a recreational rider.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
My current setup is all Shimano 46/30 175 front crank 11-36 9 speed cassette . I'd like more top end . Just not sure how much to go with . The 30 chainring is fine It's the 46 that just isn't quite enough .
Also the current crank price checks at $45.00 . Is there any great advantage to putting on a more expensive crank? Would a $150 Crankset be way overkill ???
What about crank arm length . My current is 175 . I see those but also see shorter ones . I'm 6' tall . Around 33.5 inseam
Also the current crank price checks at $45.00 . Is there any great advantage to putting on a more expensive crank? Would a $150 Crankset be way overkill ???
What about crank arm length . My current is 175 . I see those but also see shorter ones . I'm 6' tall . Around 33.5 inseam
Last edited by Litespud; 08-04-22 at 09:01 AM.
Likes For beng1:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
Likes For cxwrench:
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My bike has Deorge RD and Acera shifters . I just noticed that my riding partner has the same bike with 3 chainrings . Pretty sure the first 2 are 48-38 . He put a 9 speed cassette and upgraded his RD and Shifters . As it was an 8 speed to begin with . When we swap bikes I average roughly 1.4 miles faster with his bike . SO I figured getting larger rings would get me more speed . It's a hybrid . I rather doubt any average rider regardless of age could maintain 90 cadence . I just notice my bike feels like it has a dead spot where I'm in between . Just trying to eliminate that .
I only mentioned a NEW CRANK because I don't see where Shimano offers chainrings without the whole crank . AM I wrong ? Thanks
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: San Diego, California USA
Posts: 353
Bikes: 1974 Masi GC, 1982 Trek 728 (aka 720), 1992 Trek Multitrack 750
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Liked 222 Times
in
140 Posts
Speaking as a fellow geezer who is now gently entering the twilight phase of my storied cycling career, I would guess that, at least, a partial solution for your "need for speed" TM is not bigger gears but lighter (and more supple) tires and tubes. One example is the Rene Herse Snoqualmie Pass tires, there are other brands that I have heard good things about (in terms of performance). Perhaps moving down to 38c or 32c widths as well. I can almost guarantee that you are not spinning out, on level ground, your (46x11) 114 gear inch setup. Having lightish wheels will be a (big) positive step towards accomplishing your goal of higher performance.
There is a whole rabbit hole of things to do to be faster but light and supple tires are a fast and easy, but not necessarily cheap way to go.
There is a whole rabbit hole of things to do to be faster but light and supple tires are a fast and easy, but not necessarily cheap way to go.
Likes For HelpSingularity:
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Speaking as a fellow geezer who is now gently entering the twilight phase of my storied cycling career, I would guess that, at least, a partial solution for your "need for speed" TM is not bigger gears but lighter (and more supple) tires and tubes. One example is the Rene Herse Snoqualmie Pass tires, there are other brands that I have heard good things about (in terms of performance). Perhaps moving down to 38c or 32c widths as well. I can almost guarantee that you are not spinning out, on level ground, your (46x11) 114 gear inch setup. Having lightish wheels will be a (big) positive step towards accomplishing your goal of higher performance.
There is a whole rabbit hole of things to do to be faster but light and supple tires are a fast and easy, but not necessarily cheap way to go.
There is a whole rabbit hole of things to do to be faster but light and supple tires are a fast and easy, but not necessarily cheap way to go.
#9
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: San Diego, California USA
Posts: 353
Bikes: 1974 Masi GC, 1982 Trek 728 (aka 720), 1992 Trek Multitrack 750
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Liked 222 Times
in
140 Posts
One caveat I would make is to make sure that there is clearance for at least for a 28c or better yet a 32c tire. If you are not familiar with the supple/larger tire revolution please read up on it. This is a case where you can have your cake and eat it too. A supple, lightweight tire in the above mentioned sizes with the appropriate tire pressure will increase your comfort as well as your speed.
#10
Junior Member
Rick53
46/11 high gear with 700 X 45 tires is 20% higher than professional cyclists used until fairly recently. Is this the only gear you use? If you are averaging 12 mph it seems you would rarely use that gear for general riding.
The dead spot(s) you allude to are the drawback of wide range double drivetrains currently in vogue, particularly those with less than 12 rear cogs. Your average speed will most likely go UP if you get LOWER gearing with more evenly spaced gears in a range that is more useable for you. Your partner's triple drivetrain most likely has more useable gears in your 66 year old power range that you find comfortable. Shorter cranks can also help with this for someone with your inseam meaurement.
How do you know you are 1.4 mph faster on your friend's bike? And is your friend SLOWER on your bike? Same computer calibrated the same? Same tires? Are the saddle and handlebars identical and in the same relationships. A difference of a few millimeters in your riding position can make a surprising difference in power output.
46/11 high gear with 700 X 45 tires is 20% higher than professional cyclists used until fairly recently. Is this the only gear you use? If you are averaging 12 mph it seems you would rarely use that gear for general riding.
The dead spot(s) you allude to are the drawback of wide range double drivetrains currently in vogue, particularly those with less than 12 rear cogs. Your average speed will most likely go UP if you get LOWER gearing with more evenly spaced gears in a range that is more useable for you. Your partner's triple drivetrain most likely has more useable gears in your 66 year old power range that you find comfortable. Shorter cranks can also help with this for someone with your inseam meaurement.
How do you know you are 1.4 mph faster on your friend's bike? And is your friend SLOWER on your bike? Same computer calibrated the same? Same tires? Are the saddle and handlebars identical and in the same relationships. A difference of a few millimeters in your riding position can make a surprising difference in power output.
#11
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 678
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times
in
195 Posts
. I rather doubt any average rider regardless of age could maintain 90 cadence . I just notice my bike feels like it has a dead spot where I'm in between . Just trying to eliminate that .
I only mentioned a NEW CRANK because I don't see where Shimano offers chainrings without the whole crank . AM I wrong ? Thanks
I only mentioned a NEW CRANK because I don't see where Shimano offers chainrings without the whole crank . AM I wrong ? Thanks
13mph is very low speed and low-performance cycling, and the number-one factor in going faster at that speed is the rider, not the equipment. Until you get up to average speeds around 20mph the equipment does not make any difference at all. If you get to the point where you can average 16 to 18mph while sitting up pedaling, then getting a "road bike" with drop bars and the horizontal riding position it allows will get you close to 20mph. Today I was riding my mountain-bike with another rider on a paved flat route and I had no trouble going 20mph for a number of miles on it because I had the bars set very low so I could get down in a road-bike position, and I also put 80psi in the tires, which helps. You may gain a mph just by running high pressure in your tires.
You have a long, long way to go before it is the equipment that is holding you back for sure.
Likes For beng1:
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Yes, a road bike is part of the rabbit hole I was speaking of, with an almost infinite number of options available. I don't know what your inclinations are about acquiring another bicycle and/or your mechanical skills/abilities but to go fast and have a good time you don't need the latest and greatest. There are hundreds of thousands of bikes that were once state of the art and a total kick to ride then and are a total kick to ride now, but are now 'obsolete' and almost discarded like an old shoe and so can be had for a decent price.
One caveat I would make is to make sure that there is clearance for at least for a 28c or better yet a 32c tire. If you are not familiar with the supple/larger tire revolution please read up on it. This is a case where you can have your cake and eat it too. A supple, lightweight tire in the above mentioned sizes with the appropriate tire pressure will increase your comfort as well as your speed.
One caveat I would make is to make sure that there is clearance for at least for a 28c or better yet a 32c tire. If you are not familiar with the supple/larger tire revolution please read up on it. This is a case where you can have your cake and eat it too. A supple, lightweight tire in the above mentioned sizes with the appropriate tire pressure will increase your comfort as well as your speed.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2483 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times
in
1,678 Posts
How much would better wheels play in things . I have a Specialized Vado 4 that I picked up at an insurance auction very cheap because someone had stolen the battery , seat /tube . I ordered a battery 4 months ago. That bike weighs 12lbs more without the battery . I believe it's 48 with 10 speed cassette . I've ridden it on 20 mile rides . It is heavy so uphills it's harder . But on flats that thing rolls like it's on glass . I have to assume being a 4,000 Bike the wheels play a large part in that . It also has solid thru axles vs QD Skewers so I suppose that makes a difference as well .
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
No it's not . And to clarify so there's no mistake : I have no battery for it at the present time . When I get one I plan to sell the bike for profit . I bid $100 and got it for that and delivery taxes of 47.00 . It's costing me $1000 for a battery . And it's basically a brand New machine . I've hooked up juice to check the computer which shows just 214 miles . I was just in the right place at the right time . . I've sold another E-Bike already -So don't see me keeping this either . You have to really like long rides to get any exercise: I don't