WTB: 55-56cm frame (650b conversion candidate)
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
WTB: 55-56cm frame (650b conversion candidate)
All of your 650b conversions are giving me sleepless nights, help me scratch my itch!
I'm in search if a 650b conversion candidate, something that I can squeeze 42-48s in. Requirements are: steel, lugged, 1" steerer, Vertical drop outs and nice lugs are a bonus. I'm willing to add the necessary braze-ons and do a full paint refinish, so it doesn't need to be in great shape.
Treks, Raleighs, etc. Let me know what you've got! TIA
I'm in search if a 650b conversion candidate, something that I can squeeze 42-48s in. Requirements are: steel, lugged, 1" steerer, Vertical drop outs and nice lugs are a bonus. I'm willing to add the necessary braze-ons and do a full paint refinish, so it doesn't need to be in great shape.
Treks, Raleighs, etc. Let me know what you've got! TIA
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Although it would be sweet, 48s and vertical dropouts might be a tall order. I generally think of earlier frames as having more clearance, and associate later frames with vertical dropouts as having less. If you're not planning on fenders, that gives more wiggle room. I'd be prepared to do some chainstay dimpling no matter what.
#3
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
I agree with above statement. Most bikes that fit a 48 were built to fit that. A 42-43mm tires would be more doable on a conversion frame.
I have a 55cm Raleigh record ace that I'm about to list. Modern lugged frameset with a threadless 1 1/8th front end. PM me if interested and I'll send details and measure for tire clearance.
I have a 55cm Raleigh record ace that I'm about to list. Modern lugged frameset with a threadless 1 1/8th front end. PM me if interested and I'll send details and measure for tire clearance.
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
#4
2k miles from the midwest
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: ~'75 Colin Laing, '80s Schwinn SuperSport 650b, ex-Backroads ti project...
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 525 Post(s)
Liked 931 Times
in
446 Posts
Even 42s are somewhat tough to fit in most bikes with the right BB drop. I strongly suspect the only frames you'll find that will hold 48s will have the bb too low or unusable canti-bosses.
#5
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,733
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
Check out late 80's Schwinn Voyageurs. They come with 27" wheels, so conversion to 650B gives you room for 44's, easy. Semi-vertical rear dropouts.
Gugie did this conversion for me about five years ago, required moving the canti mounts around a bit to accommodate the MAFACs, but it worked fine.
Gugie did this conversion for me about five years ago, required moving the canti mounts around a bit to accommodate the MAFACs, but it worked fine.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Likes For rccardr:
#6
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,733
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
Looking back, would do this a little differently today: high quality cantilevers (like Paul or similar) or Tektro 559 sidepulls. Hated those MAFACs, despite info & advice from experts they never really worked all that well at speed. Different levers, too- 6400’s or 1050’s, still non aero but SLR for more leverage. Would have it wet painted by Jack Trumbull, the only painter/powdercoater who’s ever done a good job with making sure those Schwinn lugs don’t get surface rust on the edges. Start with a 48/36/24 triple instead of ending up there. Dump the Concors saddle, which looked good but felt bad after 100 miles in a day.
Other than that, would do it abain in a heartbeat. Gugie’s a prince to deal with and the end result:sublime.
Other than that, would do it abain in a heartbeat. Gugie’s a prince to deal with and the end result:sublime.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Likes For rccardr:
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
Although it would be sweet, 48s and vertical dropouts might be a tall order. I generally think of earlier frames as having more clearance, and associate later frames with vertical dropouts as having less. If you're not planning on fenders, that gives more wiggle room. I'd be prepared to do some chainstay dimpling no matter what.
I agree with above statement. Most bikes that fit a 48 were built to fit that. A 42-43mm tires would be more doable on a conversion frame.
I have a 55cm Raleigh record ace that I'm about to list. Modern lugged frameset with a threadless 1 1/8th front end. PM me if interested and I'll send details and measure for tire clearance.
I have a 55cm Raleigh record ace that I'm about to list. Modern lugged frameset with a threadless 1 1/8th front end. PM me if interested and I'll send details and measure for tire clearance.
Looking back, would do this a little differently today: high quality cantilevers (like Paul or similar) or Tektro 559 sidepulls. Hated those MAFACs, despite info & advice from experts they never really worked all that well at speed. Different levers, too- 6400’s or 1050’s, still non aero but SLR for more leverage. Would have it wet painted by Jack Trumbull, the only painter/powdercoater who’s ever done a good job with making sure those Schwinn lugs don’t get surface rust on the edges. Start with a 48/36/24 triple instead of ending up there. Dump the Concors saddle, which looked good but felt bad after 100 miles in a day.
Other than that, would do it abain in a heartbeat. Gugie’s a prince to deal with and the end result:sublime.
Other than that, would do it abain in a heartbeat. Gugie’s a prince to deal with and the end result:sublime.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,671
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,988 Times
in
1,776 Posts
My conversion was done with a 1981 Fuji S-12s. Lot's of space for wide tires but it did need some long reach brakes. I put 650b x 42 tires on it with fenders and had room still.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...e-i-think.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...e-i-think.html
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
Likes For jamesdak:
#9
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
My conversion was done with a 1981 Fuji S-12s. Lot's of space for wide tires but it did need some long reach brakes. I put 650b x 42 tires on it with fenders and had room still.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...e-i-think.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...e-i-think.html
#10
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
I agree with above statement. Most bikes that fit a 48 were built to fit that. A 42-43mm tires would be more doable on a conversion frame.
I have a 55cm Raleigh record ace that I'm about to list. Modern lugged frameset with a threadless 1 1/8th front end. PM me if interested and I'll send details and measure for tire clearance.
I have a 55cm Raleigh record ace that I'm about to list. Modern lugged frameset with a threadless 1 1/8th front end. PM me if interested and I'll send details and measure for tire clearance.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#11
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
Mine is the modern reproduction, came out in 2011 I believe.
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
Likes For Cynikal: