Catastrophic Vintage Parts and Frames
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Catastrophic Vintage Parts and Frames
Still a newbie to BF, so if this has already been done, or suggested, my apologies.
I would love to have a master list of known components, frames and bikes that are known to fail, and which cause catastrophic accidents. It seems to me that this should be a "sticky thread" so nobody falls victim to a C & V part that may cause a serious injury.
I would love to have a master list of known components, frames and bikes that are known to fail, and which cause catastrophic accidents. It seems to me that this should be a "sticky thread" so nobody falls victim to a C & V part that may cause a serious injury.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 3,333
Bikes: '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '72 Gitane tandem, '72 Raleigh Super Course, '73 Raleigh Gran Sport, '73 Colnago Super, '76 Fiorelli Coppi, '78 Raleigh SBDU Team Pro, '78 Trek 930, '81 Holdsworth Special 650B, '86 Masi GC, ’94 Bridgestone RB-T
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 787 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
282 Posts
Interesting topic. I think there could be a short list of mostly forks and a few stems that could be listed:
Forks:
Ishiwata fork crowns on some early 80's Treks
Viscount Aerospace aluminum forks
Bianchi Randonneurs had a fork recall
Stems:
AVA - not sure exact model
Forks:
Ishiwata fork crowns on some early 80's Treks
Viscount Aerospace aluminum forks
Bianchi Randonneurs had a fork recall
Stems:
AVA - not sure exact model
__________________
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
Likes For jeirvine:
#3
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,800
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3594 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,937 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,482
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1830 Post(s)
Liked 3,391 Times
in
1,586 Posts
The quill stems with cone expanders can be problematic.
Here's a shot of an AVA stem of this type:
The real problem, as I understand it, are the slots near the cone expander...
the slots appear to be cut with a saw, leaving sharp corners at the top of the slot. The sharp corners concentrate the stress, making it easier for cracks to start there when the cone (at the bottom of the quill) is tightened. Cracks in the stem are obviously (I hope) not a good thing, leading to the stem being loose in the fork or breaking entirely.
An interesting detail of these stems is that the extension is often hollow, as shown below:
This is an interesting detail, and kind of neat, but this sort of non-circular hole was made by casting the aluminum in a mold, which means that the stem was not forged like many of our favorite stems. Cast aluminum has less stength and a shorter fatigue life than forged aluminum, partly from the increased porosity and poorer grain structure.
A side effect is that the stem is quite flexible! That's why I got rid of this particular stem. ... plus.. it was a 22.0 quill, and the bike needed 22.2mm.
Steve in Peoria
Here's a shot of an AVA stem of this type:
The real problem, as I understand it, are the slots near the cone expander...
the slots appear to be cut with a saw, leaving sharp corners at the top of the slot. The sharp corners concentrate the stress, making it easier for cracks to start there when the cone (at the bottom of the quill) is tightened. Cracks in the stem are obviously (I hope) not a good thing, leading to the stem being loose in the fork or breaking entirely.
An interesting detail of these stems is that the extension is often hollow, as shown below:
This is an interesting detail, and kind of neat, but this sort of non-circular hole was made by casting the aluminum in a mold, which means that the stem was not forged like many of our favorite stems. Cast aluminum has less stength and a shorter fatigue life than forged aluminum, partly from the increased porosity and poorer grain structure.
A side effect is that the stem is quite flexible! That's why I got rid of this particular stem. ... plus.. it was a 22.0 quill, and the bike needed 22.2mm.
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My software security would not allow access to pardo.net.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 4,530
Bikes: Indeed!
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1508 Post(s)
Liked 3,482 Times
in
1,133 Posts
Likes For obrentharris:
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Yup, dropping the "s" worked - wow, that is quite a collection. I am amazed at what people have time to do. Great resource no doubt. Still think it would be helpful to hear from the brain trust here in BF's!
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,988
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26437 Post(s)
Liked 10,399 Times
in
7,223 Posts
...most older aluminum alloy stems and bars (the ones without reinforcing sleeves, made from less sophisticated alloys) will eventually sag, and then fail. There are some aluminum alloy cranks that have something of a reputation for breaking at the pedal eye, or cracking at the spider, like Campy NR.
We still use them, because the failure rates are smaller, as a percentage of those made and used. But yes, the AVA stems were especially problematic at a certain spot in time, due to both design and the thinning of the castings down near the expansion wedge.
I take a close look at anything aluminum I'm reusing on a bike build. Here is a photo of bar and stem taken off a PX-10 that was rode hard and put away wet.
We still use them, because the failure rates are smaller, as a percentage of those made and used. But yes, the AVA stems were especially problematic at a certain spot in time, due to both design and the thinning of the castings down near the expansion wedge.
I take a close look at anything aluminum I'm reusing on a bike build. Here is a photo of bar and stem taken off a PX-10 that was rode hard and put away wet.
Likes For 3alarmer:
#11
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,804
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,334 Times
in
840 Posts
First-generation Sugino Mighty Compe cranks. (Been there ... done that. I broke one across the pedal eye during an out-of-saddle climb. Minor injuries only, but definitely not fun!)
Significantly, the 1973 and later versions had another mm of material on both sides of the pedal eye, an increase of about almost 20 percent.
I have broken frames, rear axles, front hub flanges, cottered steel cranks (non-drive side, across the cotter eye), pedal cages, and spokes, but without any danger of injury.
Significantly, the 1973 and later versions had another mm of material on both sides of the pedal eye, an increase of about almost 20 percent.
I have broken frames, rear axles, front hub flanges, cottered steel cranks (non-drive side, across the cotter eye), pedal cages, and spokes, but without any danger of injury.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,990
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 502 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
Some cranks are prone to very small cracks at the juncture between drive side arm and spider, like this one (Specialized “Flag”) below that can lead to eventual failure. The always popular Campagnolo Record is known for this issue.
Good news is that it can be corrected if caught early enough by carefully filing that location below the depth of the crack. Here’s the same crank after that treatment:
Good news is that it can be corrected if caught early enough by carefully filing that location below the depth of the crack. Here’s the same crank after that treatment:
Likes For Dfrost:
#13
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,636
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3895 Post(s)
Liked 6,497 Times
in
3,216 Posts
Likes For SurferRosa:
#14
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,800
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3594 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,937 Posts
Weird.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Well, I guess the BF can decide which items are worthy to be stuck. Personally, I think rider safety would be a worthwhile, if not essential, stick. If just one person avoids a catastrophic event on a CV ride it would be worth it. There are a lot of parts and frames floating around out there and it would be a shame if someone was injured or killed simply because they were unaware of a part that was potentially a hazard - especially considering these items are nearly 30-60+ years old!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
The first- and second-gen Phil Wood BBs are known for breaking. We have one in my family that my dad bought very early (first gen) and he broke it so then he got it warranteed and updated to second-gen and passed it on to me, and I broke the second-gen and got it warranteed for a third-gen and now I'm probably safe because I don't think the third-gen ones have a bad rep.
Many BB axles have known stress-risers in silly places. The old Viscount ones with the snap-ring grooves, and I think there's some FSA ones like that too. The Phils I think start to crack at the tool marks on the roughly-machined flats of the square taper. The ones that don't have these marks and have a more gradual lead-in to the taper are much less susceptible to cracking.
Many BB axles have known stress-risers in silly places. The old Viscount ones with the snap-ring grooves, and I think there's some FSA ones like that too. The Phils I think start to crack at the tool marks on the roughly-machined flats of the square taper. The ones that don't have these marks and have a more gradual lead-in to the taper are much less susceptible to cracking.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,988
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26437 Post(s)
Liked 10,399 Times
in
7,223 Posts
Well, I guess the BF can decide which items are worthy to be stuck. Personally, I think rider safety would be a worthwhile, if not essential, stick. If just one person avoids a catastrophic event on a CV ride it would be worth it. There are a lot of parts and frames floating around out there and it would be a shame if someone was injured or killed simply because they were unaware of a part that was potentially a hazard - especially considering these items are nearly 30-60+ years old!
I know you mean well, but even if a list of stuff goes up here, and is maintained in great detail, people are gonna use stuff, just because it's old and original. That's how people are.
#18
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,848
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2298 Post(s)
Liked 2,056 Times
in
1,256 Posts
Well, I guess the BF can decide which items are worthy to be stuck. Personally, I think rider safety would be a worthwhile, if not essential, stick. If just one person avoids a catastrophic event on a CV ride it would be worth it. There are a lot of parts and frames floating around out there and it would be a shame if someone was injured or killed simply because they were unaware of a part that was potentially a hazard - especially considering these items are nearly 30-60+ years old!
There's really a very short list of parts that are considered dangerous by this vintage group and they've been mentioned. Fortunately, most bike problems give notice when things start to go south. Catastrophic failures are mostly rare.
The mods here have good judgment and run a great forum. Go with it for awhile before asking for changes?
Likes For clubman:
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I am not arguing or insisting anything from BF or its members. Just suggesting. I won't make that mistake again.
#20
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,848
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2298 Post(s)
Liked 2,056 Times
in
1,256 Posts
No flags on the play. You were polite in asking and no mistakes were made. It's hard to get a sticky...
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,882
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1860 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Still a newbie to BF, so if this has already been done, or suggested, my apologies.
I would love to have a master list of known components, frames and bikes that are known to fail, and which cause catastrophic accidents. It seems to me that this should be a "sticky thread" so nobody falls victim to a C & V part that may cause a serious injury.
I would love to have a master list of known components, frames and bikes that are known to fail, and which cause catastrophic accidents. It seems to me that this should be a "sticky thread" so nobody falls victim to a C & V part that may cause a serious injury.
If you think there is a probability threshold that is useful to draw a line, how do you set that threshold and how do you know if the set of all example is in the "death" category?
I would just like to know how you see this working.
Likes For Road Fan:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,398
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2496 Post(s)
Liked 2,975 Times
in
1,687 Posts
Maohaus makes a good point. Some of us who have been around bikes for many decades know about Viscount forks and Pivo stems and '60s/early '70s small-diameter French and Italian stems and Campy Record cranks and so on. (And at that, when a photo of a sagging French drop bar was posted a few years ago, the majority of C&V regulars refused to believe that it hadn't left the factory in that condition.)
Some of the veteran posters haven't been C&Vers long enough to have learned all there is to know on that topic, though, and there are frequently newcomers to C&V bikes who visit the Classic and Vintage forum for the first time. A sticky on the topic could, indeed, literally be a lifesaver, as Maohaus says.
There are currently 11 stickies in this subforum. Seems the bar to get a sticky stickied might not be impossibly high. But if 11 is the limit, I think it's possible that we would all survive the jettisoning of the "Post pics of you and your bike!" sticky.
Some of the veteran posters haven't been C&Vers long enough to have learned all there is to know on that topic, though, and there are frequently newcomers to C&V bikes who visit the Classic and Vintage forum for the first time. A sticky on the topic could, indeed, literally be a lifesaver, as Maohaus says.
There are currently 11 stickies in this subforum. Seems the bar to get a sticky stickied might not be impossibly high. But if 11 is the limit, I think it's possible that we would all survive the jettisoning of the "Post pics of you and your bike!" sticky.
Last edited by Trakhak; 01-27-22 at 05:14 PM.
Likes For Trakhak:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,882
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1860 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
The quill stems with cone expanders can be problematic.
Here's a shot of an AVA stem of this type:
The real problem, as I understand it, are the slots near the cone expander...
the slots appear to be cut with a saw, leaving sharp corners at the top of the slot. The sharp corners concentrate the stress, making it easier for cracks to start there when the cone (at the bottom of the quill) is tightened. Cracks in the stem are obviously (I hope) not a good thing, leading to the stem being loose in the fork or breaking entirely.
An interesting detail of these stems is that the extension is often hollow, as shown below:
This is an interesting detail, and kind of neat, but this sort of non-circular hole was made by casting the aluminum in a mold, which means that the stem was not forged like many of our favorite stems. Cast aluminum has less stength and a shorter fatigue life than forged aluminum, partly from the increased porosity and poorer grain structure.
A side effect is that the stem is quite flexible! That's why I got rid of this particular stem. ... plus.. it was a 22.0 quill, and the bike needed 22.2mm.
Steve in Peoria
Here's a shot of an AVA stem of this type:
The real problem, as I understand it, are the slots near the cone expander...
the slots appear to be cut with a saw, leaving sharp corners at the top of the slot. The sharp corners concentrate the stress, making it easier for cracks to start there when the cone (at the bottom of the quill) is tightened. Cracks in the stem are obviously (I hope) not a good thing, leading to the stem being loose in the fork or breaking entirely.
An interesting detail of these stems is that the extension is often hollow, as shown below:
This is an interesting detail, and kind of neat, but this sort of non-circular hole was made by casting the aluminum in a mold, which means that the stem was not forged like many of our favorite stems. Cast aluminum has less stength and a shorter fatigue life than forged aluminum, partly from the increased porosity and poorer grain structure.
A side effect is that the stem is quite flexible! That's why I got rid of this particular stem. ... plus.. it was a 22.0 quill, and the bike needed 22.2mm.
Steve in Peoria
So is it a death stem without an added radius and a safe stem with a radiusing?
Similarly Campy crank arms which have had some failures on sharp edges near where the arm transitions into the socket eye that contains the square taper: an commonly discussed fix was to make a radius with a mill file, Dremel cutter, or a strip of emery cloth, to de-focus the stress concentration.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,398
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2496 Post(s)
Liked 2,975 Times
in
1,687 Posts
By the way, Mauhaus, I suggest posting your suggestion here, where it will be considered by the people who are in a position to act on it:
https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sug...er-assistance/
https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sug...er-assistance/
#25
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,344
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3907 Post(s)
Liked 4,853 Times
in
2,239 Posts
Swaged cranksets reportedly not as strong as forged.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.