Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

130 to 123 spacing: ever tried it? Results?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

130 to 123 spacing: ever tried it? Results?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-23, 12:02 PM
  #26  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,068
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4410 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times in 1,028 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
Actually the 7 speed freehub body is 4.5mm wider than the 8 speed freehub body. In order to do what you are suggesting, you would have to move the end of the freehub 2.5mm closer to the locknut. And there simply isn't 2.5mm to spare on most road bikes on that end before the chain rubs the seat stay or the small cog rubs the chainstay.
You forgot that the axle got 2mm longer on the right and the feeehub shoulder moved left. 8 speed is only 3 to 3.5mm wider than 7.
And the chain got narrower, making more clearance for the dropouts.

Last edited by Kontact; 01-03-23 at 12:05 PM.
Kontact is offline  
Old 01-03-23, 01:35 PM
  #27  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
You forgot that the axle got 2mm longer on the right
Axle got 2mm longer on the right while the freehub body got 4.5mm longer on the right. That is the whole crux of the matter.
Originally Posted by Kontact
and the feeehub shoulder moved left. 8 speed is only 3 to 3.5mm wider than 7.
But the 9 sp cassette is fully 4.6mm wider. So there is simply no spare room for you to take up.
As to the freehub body shoulder- Shimano made several different styles of freehubs- some with deeper shoulders and some with shallower. The 6500 hub you showed above may have a shallower shoulder, but it has a spacer shim behind the freehub body, so it's probably a wash.
Originally Posted by Kontact
And the chain got narrower, making more clearance for the dropouts.
From 7 to 8 speed, the chain got narrower by 0.2mm, which is 0.1mm per side.
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Old 01-03-23, 02:51 PM
  #28  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,068
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4410 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times in 1,028 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
Axle got 2mm longer on the right while the freehub body got 4.5mm longer on the right. That is the whole crux of the matter.

But the 9 sp cassette is fully 4.6mm wider. So there is simply no spare room for you to take up.
As to the freehub body shoulder- Shimano made several different styles of freehubs- some with deeper shoulders and some with shallower. The 6500 hub you showed above may have a shallower shoulder, but it has a spacer shim behind the freehub body, so it's probably a wash.

From 7 to 8 speed, the chain got narrower by 0.2mm, which is 0.1mm per side.
The wheels are exactly as I described. Where does it say the freehub is 4.5 longer between 7 and 8? Are you thinking of 11?

Haven't you noticed the left axle end is 2mm longer?

Last edited by Kontact; 01-03-23 at 04:54 PM.
Kontact is offline  
Old 01-03-23, 03:10 PM
  #29  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
The wheela are exactly as I described. Where does it say the freehub is 4.5 longer between 7 and 8? Are you thinking of 11?
Sheldon Brown says you need a 4.5mm spacer behind a 7s cassette if you want to run it on a 8sp freehub body:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/k7-7.shtml#stay
The 11 speed body is 1.8mm longer than the 8-10 speed
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Old 01-03-23, 07:34 PM
  #30  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,068
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4410 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times in 1,028 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
Sheldon Brown says you need a 4.5mm spacer behind a 7s cassette if you want to run it on a 8sp freehub body:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/k7-7.shtml#stay
The 11 speed body is 1.8mm longer than the 8-10 speed
Sheldon also tells us that the 8 speed cassettes are 3.5mm wider than 7 speed HG cassettes. But an extra 1mm certainly insures your locking won't bottom out. Here's a 7 speed adapter that is 3.5mm:
https://www.performancebike.com/prob...hoCgNAQAvD_BwE

What you also seem to not understand is that there is plenty of extra room between the high sprocket and the dropouts. On several of my bikes I've added a 1mm spacer to give an odd derailleur spoke clearance. It isn't a problem. (Though, technically 7 on an 8 freehub is off chainline to the right. Ideally you'd have two spacers sandwiching the 7 sprockets, but putting a spacer under the lockring doesn't work.)

So, are 8 speed freehubs 4.5mm longer than 7? Absolutely not. That's just another bizarre factoid you've manufactured off a spacer reference. They are around 2.5mm longer, and have the low sprocket's shoulder pushed back about 1mm closer to the spokes.


As I've said from decades of experience swapping freehubs and building wheels starting in the 7 speed era, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 all have the same double crank chainline. This had been accomplished by moving cogs closer to the spokes while moving both sides of the rear axle out equally. 3mm per side for 126, 2mm per side for 130. 11 speed doesn't have the same chainline, because it is only larger on the spoke side, so 11 speed cassette center is 0.9mm left of chainline.

Last edited by Kontact; 01-03-23 at 07:57 PM.
Kontact is offline  
Old 01-03-23, 10:27 PM
  #31  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
As I've said from decades of experience swapping freehubs and building wheels starting in the 7 speed era, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 all have the same double crank chainline. This had been accomplished by moving cogs closer to the spokes while moving both sides of the rear axle out equally. 3mm per side for 126, 2mm per side for 130. 11 speed doesn't have the same chainline, because it is only larger on the spoke side, so 11 speed cassette center is 0.9mm left of chainline.
If there was so much space on the right then how come the earlier generation of cyclists didn't space the hub over to the right to improve dishing? Why on earth would they leave so much on the table? I just looked up Shimano's document for FH61** rear hubs, which was made for both 120mm and 126mm:
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/ev/HB...0%20R-0667.pdf
Look at item 11. This is a spacer on the right side. What does it say?
"Axle spacer 4.5mm for 5 speed"
"Axle spacer 10.5mm for 6 speed"
Exactly as I said - the entire 6mm was added to the right side when they went from 5 speed/120mm to 6 speed/126mm.
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Old 01-03-23, 11:19 PM
  #32  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,068
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4410 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times in 1,028 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
If there was so much space on the right then how come the earlier generation of cyclists didn't space the hub over to the right to improve dishing? Why on earth would they leave so much on the table? I just looked up Shimano's document for FH61** rear hubs, which was made for both 120mm and 126mm:
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/ev/HB...0%20R-0667.pdf
Look at item 11. This is a spacer on the right side. What does it say?
"Axle spacer 4.5mm for 5 speed"
"Axle spacer 10.5mm for 6 speed"
Exactly as I said - the entire 6mm was added to the right side when they went from 5 speed/120mm to 6 speed/126mm.
Why on earth did they use long reach brakes on old racing bikes? Why high flange hubs? Why make bikes with Italian BBs that unscrew themselves? The history of bicycles shows very slow and conservative development of just about everything - because bike riders are conservative. In specific, people probably were afraid of shifting too close to spokes at one time. They got over it.

That old Shimano hub shows that some hubs were converted that way. I'm not an expert in every historical component. Here's a good discussion about the wide variation in 120mm hub standards:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...s-126-hub.html

However, I am an expert in 7 and 8 speed hub conversions from Shimano, since I have converted a ton of them. And I just did the job I described above this past year. So you coming around to tell me that the 8 speed Shimano is 4mm wider on the right side is just plain insulting. If you held the hubs in your hand you immediately note the longer left axle. And, I actually got all the hub dimensions before I did my project from Shimano manuals and wheelbuilding databases.

You appear to have come across an idea that bothers you and then misinterpreted minor clues to suit your bias. But your bias that hubs just keep getting more and more dish is wrong. Shimano has lead all of these standards and have been very consistent in maintaining chainline and flange location. MTBs went to 135 hubs and 73mm BBs simultaneously because that added 2.5mm to both sides, crank and hub, preserving a consistent chainline. Campy did the same, with 130, but they started with a wider spaced 8 so they had room to go to 11 without screwing with dish like Shimano had to. Clearly they could have gone 8 with no trouble back in 1989, (like I just did with all Shimano parts) but they chose to create 130 instead, just to keep dish the same on the Dura Ace, Ultegra and 105 hubs they converted.
Kontact is offline  
Old 01-04-23, 07:16 PM
  #33  
mrrabbit 
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by rccardr
Have acquired a new mid 80’s frame orignally intended for a five speed rear hub,so dropouts spaced at 122mm. Played around with a 130mm DA freehub style hub and got it down to 123mm-close enough. I know this will wreak havoc with dishing the wheel and put more strain on the NDS spokes. Question is, has anyone actually tried this and,if so, what were the results?
If it is mid-80s, it's likely intended for 6sp at 126mm.

It's not uncommon for a 126mm frames with hub removed to "shrink" down to 122-124mm.

What makes you certain it's a 5 sp / 122mm frame?
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 01-04-23, 08:51 PM
  #34  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Thread Starter
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,735
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,406 Times in 1,206 Posts
It’s an 84, and the manufacturer’s catalog specs it as ‘spaced for five speed at 121mm’. My caliper says 122.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Old 01-06-23, 02:45 PM
  #35  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Thread Starter
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,735
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,406 Times in 1,206 Posts
UPDATE!
I obtained a 7 speed HG freehub and installed in on a DA7700 rear hub with the supplied spacer. Both freehub bases looked and measured up pretty much the same.
The 9 speed freehub was 4.5mm wider.
By removing a 6mm spacer on the NDS and replacing it with a spacer slightly over 1mm, the result is a 121OLD rear hub that will accept 8 cogs using 9 speed spacers and has the same centerline as the original hub.
Which I'm pretty sure means that it will build up into a wheel that is as strong as any other DA7700 rear wheel.
Feel free to correct me if I've missed something here.

Original 130mm DA7700 hub:

Note center line marked with sharpie

121 OLD rear hub with 7 speed freehub installed, Note center line is in the same place. I'll use a shortened axle when this is fully assembled.


No change in center line.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Likes For rccardr:
Old 01-06-23, 04:56 PM
  #36  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 320 Times in 234 Posts
Originally Posted by rccardr
UPDATE!
I obtained a 7 speed HG freehub and installed in on a DA7700 rear hub with the supplied spacer. Both freehub bases looked and measured up pretty much the same.
The 9 speed freehub was 4.5mm wider.
By removing a 6mm spacer on the NDS and replacing it with a spacer slightly over 1mm, the result is a 121OLD rear hub that will accept 8 cogs using 9 speed spacers and has the same centerline as the original hub.
Which I'm pretty sure means that it will build up into a wheel that is as strong as any other DA7700 rear wheel.
Feel free to correct me if I've missed something here.

Original 130mm DA7700 hub:

Note center line marked with sharpie

121 OLD rear hub with 7 speed freehub installed, Note center line is in the same place. I'll use a shortened axle when this is fully assembled.


No change in center line.
That looks good. Do you know what model the 7 speed body came from? Looks like it is HG Compact (11 tooth capable), that's kind of unusual. Does it have the deeper mounting penetration into the hub shell?

Let us know what the smallest cog to frame clearance is like when you get it finished.

Looks like it will build up to wheel with a reasonable L/R tension balance, a little over 50%.
KCT1986 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.