picking a price point
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 84
Bikes: Trek 1000
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
picking a price point
I've decided I want to get a trek 29er but can't decide on a price point. I've decided that I want at least a Marlin for the lockout on the fork. I don't know how deep I'll delve into offroad riding, but I have a feeling that once I start I'll want to do more. I have a few trails nearby but I've never ridden them, but my LBS recommended a Marlin, or a Mamba for something more sturdy and nicer. I've also looked online at the Cobia and X-Cal. They all look to have the same frame, except the chainstays on the higher end have a different dropout. I think if I really wanted to I could save for an X-Cal but I figured its probably above what I need and the bike will get plenty of road / paved trail miles on it. I don't know what my LBS is asking for Cobia and X-Cal, but are they in a different league than the Mamba and Marlin that it wouldn't make sense to buy for recreational riding? As I said, I thino I could save for a +$1000 bike, but I do want to own a mountain bike this summer. So I was wondering if anyone thought might be able to help suggest where to draw that fine line. I originally just was going to get a Marlin and be done with it, but I got to thinking maybe I should spend a little more now than later. I think the biggest difference between each model is the fork, and then just higher level components with almost identical gearing. I'm open to all suggestions, hank you.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: fruita, co
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: rocky mountain SLAYER!!!! trek, voodoo, surly, spot, bianchi, ibis
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This isn't a bike question, it's an economics questions. Do you want instant satisfaction or long term satisfaction? Do you want to get something decent now or something super awesome later? Will the something decent be enough, will the something super awesome be overkill?
of all the bikes you mentioned, there isn't a bad bike in the lot of em. the lowest low level bike you mentioned is a far superior crazy awesome bike compared to the bicycles people rode all the time five years ago.
the higher end models have different grade frame and "better" components, you can ALWAYS get something "better," but is the "better" necessary or noticeable?
figure out what works best for you, being honest with yourself, and if you need more advice, i sincerely (i'm a serious about this) consult the I Ching.
https://flytrapinteractive.com/~complimentary/iching/
of all the bikes you mentioned, there isn't a bad bike in the lot of em. the lowest low level bike you mentioned is a far superior crazy awesome bike compared to the bicycles people rode all the time five years ago.
the higher end models have different grade frame and "better" components, you can ALWAYS get something "better," but is the "better" necessary or noticeable?
figure out what works best for you, being honest with yourself, and if you need more advice, i sincerely (i'm a serious about this) consult the I Ching.
https://flytrapinteractive.com/~complimentary/iching/
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Paradise CA
Posts: 442
Bikes: 13' Ragley Marley, 12' Pivot Firebird, 13' Pivot Point, 89' Bridgestone RB-1
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have 2 friends that ride mambas and i can safely say those are very capable bikes. If you upgrade the tires and brakes youll have yourself a runner. Even in stock form its still a pretty good bike especially for the money. One buddy has ridden that mamba everywhere I take my FS rig and he still beats me on the climbs.
#6
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vegas Valley, NV
Posts: 5,495
Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20
Liked 69 Times
in
58 Posts
I think that once you get some trail riding behind you that you will really enjoy this stuff.
__________________
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!
I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!
I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
Hmmm....The Mamba is nine-speed. That would clinch it for me. Nothing wrong with eight-speed per se, but when you go to upgrade components you'll be really glad for having nine-speed. Higher-end nine-speed parts like shifters and deraillers are readily available. There is much variety to choose from. Such is not the case with eight-speed. No one really makes high-end eight-speed parts anymore.
BTW, I believe the frames are the same across the line on up to the Superfly level. I don't see any differences called out in the catalog page descriptions on the Trek website. They are all "Alpha Gold, butted and so forth" until you reach the Superfly. So my take is that the frame on the Mamba is the same as on the Cobia and the X-Cal.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 84
Bikes: Trek 1000
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks Jonathan, I think for all the reasons you listed I want the Mamba. I didn't know about the lack of 8 speed replacement options though, but I do like that the 9 speed will have gearing closer together than the 8.