Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Anyone here who is 5'10.5 and rides a 60cm?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Anyone here who is 5'10.5 and rides a 60cm?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-15, 04:59 PM
  #76  
link0
Senior Member
 
link0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 794

Bikes: '11 Merlin Extralight, '98 Dean Castanza, '89 Schwinn Prologue

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'10 and ride a 54 and a 52. I consider anything with longer than a 55cm effective-top-tube to be way too big for me.
link0 is offline  
Old 09-02-15, 05:19 PM
  #77  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times in 1,470 Posts
And a 60cm frame likely means a very short stem in the 50 range
StanSeven is offline  
Old 09-02-15, 05:27 PM
  #78  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
And a 60cm frame likely means a very short stem in the 50 range
I wonder how that would handle.
caloso is offline  
Old 09-02-15, 05:44 PM
  #79  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times in 4,160 Posts
In this era of compact frames, the whole notion of frame "size" in cm is practically irrelevant. Sorry if you think I am irreverent.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 09-02-15, 06:18 PM
  #80  
MZilliox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: S Oregon
Posts: 801

Bikes: Berthoud Randoneusse, Curt Goodrich steel road, Zanconato Minimax road, Jeff Lyon steel all road,

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
have we beat this one to death yet? i actually learned a few things, hopefully the OP did as well.
MZilliox is offline  
Old 09-02-15, 06:59 PM
  #81  
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
In this era of compact frames, the whole notion of frame "size" in cm is practically irrelevant. Sorry if you think I am irreverent.
Well it is and it isn't. When you consider that every frame size in cm corresponds to a fairly narrow range of top tube and head tube lengths, the nominal size does take on some meaning. True, not because of the length of the seat tube that the nominal size generally corresponds to, but instead because of the top tube and head tube lengths that the nominal size normally correspond to .
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 09-02-15, 07:11 PM
  #82  
hokie cycler
Senior Member
 
hokie cycler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 392

Bikes: 2018 Giant Stance 1, 2011 Trek Madone 3.1, 2004 LeMond Nevada City, 1980 Peugeot Course single speed, 1978 Peugeot AO-8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by bananabacon
Figured that 60cm was to big for me from the first post. Didn't like the condicending delivery as it seems routine for me...

Also there wasn't enough explanation as to why 60cm was to big for me other then "dude are you stupid! I'm way smarter then you"

The grammar is the fault of a bad cell phone. Really bad cell phone. I feel that id be compensating when I say that most if not all my English teachers passed me with A's for being an amazing writer. But the grammar part is consistent unfortunately.

If you want to make a 20 question terminology test for me to speak in universal bike language go ahead ;-)

Oh and yes. I sometimes would enjoy explanations as to why something's are bad choices. Even if the answer is way over my head. Which I believe only 31% of the posters could do.
Don't blame an innocent cell phone.
hokie cycler is offline  
Old 09-02-15, 10:27 PM
  #83  
gaucho777 
Senior Member
 
gaucho777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 7,244

Bikes: '72 Cilo Pacer, '72 Gitane Gran Tourisme, '72 Peugeot PX10, '73 Speedwell Ti, '74 Peugeot UE-8, '75 Peugeot PR-10L, '80 Colnago Super, '85 De Rosa Pro, '86 Look Equipe 753, '86 Look KG86, '89 Parkpre Team, '90 Parkpre Team MTB, '90 Merlin

Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 834 Post(s)
Liked 2,127 Times in 555 Posts
Originally Posted by MZilliox
have we beat this one to death yet? i actually learned a few things, hopefully the OP did as well.
I'm not to optimistic about that.
gaucho777 is offline  
Old 09-02-15, 11:24 PM
  #84  
halfspeed
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Ya know, with old school geometry measured C-T, 60cm is not at all unreasonable for a 5'10" rider with long legs. Especially on a "sport" geometry model with a short TT.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 05:07 AM
  #85  
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
Ya know, with old school geometry measured C-T, 60cm is not at all unreasonable for a 5'10" rider with long legs. Especially on a "sport" geometry model with a short TT.
With a short top tube, yes that would work. Otherwise, a shorter seat tube bike in order to get the shorter top tube is the better solution.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 05:29 AM
  #86  
TK LP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 128
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by bassjones
I'm 6'4" and ride a 60. I don't see any conceivable way that bike wouldn't be too big for you
I'm 6'-4", and ride 66cm frames, from a GURU fit. Everyone is different.
TK LP is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 03:08 PM
  #87  
bananabacon
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 69chevy
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycli...e-you-buy.html

I took a bit of time and wrote a pretty lengthy post on a simple method of choosing the proper bike size.

It also explains how to fit it once you have it.
Much appreciated. There are many others I'd like to thank as well. The information I got from this was awesome. I just had to hack threw the jungle with a machete in hand to get it. I'm still scratching my head as to why so many riders here got so defensive. its ironic when you look up the definition of troll.
bananabacon is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 05:49 PM
  #88  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times in 1,470 Posts
Originally Posted by bananabacon
Wicked tired of negative responses. It reminds me of a bike shop keep that I respected at first. Took his **** because I was learning new things. But after his son sold me a wrong sized helmet because he couldn't take a second to fit it. I had enough. Contacted the brother shop and transferred my store credit and dealt with new people. He sold me a helmet that was not fit for me.. A ****ing helmet!; you know the thing that protects you from life or death.!!

The point is. No matter how right you might be. I'm going to ignore this for now. Tired of negative responses.
Originally Posted by bananabacon
I'm still scratching my head as to why so many riders here got so defensive. its ironic when you look up the definition of troll.
Hmmm. The above quote is your response after two posts. I wonder why?
StanSeven is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 05:52 PM
  #89  
Mumonkan
Brown Jersey Winner
 
Mumonkan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Bad Woods.
Posts: 8,797
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
welcome to the internet. everyone here is a dick.
Mumonkan is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 05:56 PM
  #90  
halfspeed
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
With a short top tube, yes that would work. Otherwise, a shorter seat tube bike in order to get the shorter top tube is the better solution.
That's generally how geometry used to work. Top tubes didn't lengthen nearly as much as seat tubes so you'd have a 62cm C-T with a 57-58cm TT.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 05:56 PM
  #91  
hokie cycler
Senior Member
 
hokie cycler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 392

Bikes: 2018 Giant Stance 1, 2011 Trek Madone 3.1, 2004 LeMond Nevada City, 1980 Peugeot Course single speed, 1978 Peugeot AO-8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by bananabacon
Much appreciated. There are many others I'd like to thank as well. The information I got from this was awesome. I just had to hack threw the jungle with a machete in hand to get it. I'm still scratching my head as to why so many riders here got so defensive. its ironic when you look up the definition of troll.
Through.
hokie cycler is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 05:57 PM
  #92  
halfspeed
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 69chevy
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycli...e-you-buy.html

I took a bit of time and wrote a pretty lengthy post on a simple method of choosing the proper bike size.

It also explains how to fit it once you have it.
I stopped reading after the recommendation of the Competitive Cyclist fit calculator.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 06:00 PM
  #93  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times in 4,160 Posts
Originally Posted by Mumonkan
welcome to the internet. everyone here is an expert.
fixed
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 06:54 PM
  #94  
69chevy
wears long socks
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,614
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
I stopped reading after the recommendation of the Competitive Cyclist fit calculator.
Your choice.

It's based on simple geometry and if you measure accurately, it is a great tool.

I have a friend who owns my local lbs who has a pro fitter on staff. I was fitted by the shop fitter and the calculator was spot on. I've helped about ten other riders tweak their bikes based on it's recommendations and no complaints...
69chevy is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 07:05 PM
  #95  
halfspeed
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 69chevy
Your choice.

It's based on simple geometry and if you measure accurately, it is a great tool.

I have a friend who owns my local lbs who has a pro fitter on staff. I was fitted by the shop fitter and the calculator was spot on. I've helped about ten other riders tweak their bikes based on it's recommendations and no complaints...
It worked reasonably well when seat tube length was a decent proxy for front end height. That's not true any more. You can use CC as a start, but the margin of error is a whole lot bigger than all those precise measurements would imply.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 08:05 PM
  #96  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times in 1,470 Posts
Originally Posted by hokie cycler
Through.
Don't be so critical. Maybe that was caused by a bad cell phone. It never was poor grammar
StanSeven is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 08:06 PM
  #97  
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
Don't be so critical. Maybe that was caused by a bad cell phone. It never was poor grammar
Without a doubt.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 09-03-15, 11:22 PM
  #98  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times in 3,354 Posts
I'm 5'10"... or maybe it is (5'7¼ + e)

I think my bike is a 60. Someone in one of the forums commented that it looked like a "French Fit".

I have no idea if it is the "perfect fit" or not. I'll ride anything that I can get the seat adjusted to the right height. But, I've been riding the old Colnago since I was 16.... many moons ago. Nope, haven't been castrated yet. The standover is tight, but not uncomfortable. And, once I'm up on the seat, I could care less where the top tube is at. I don't get much bar drop, but still use the drops on occasion (that is what they're there for).

I do have a fairly tall torso... which also means that I have relatively short legs.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 09-04-15, 05:03 AM
  #99  
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
I'm 5'10"... or maybe it is (5'7¼ + e)

I think my bike is a 60. Someone in one of the forums commented that it looked like a "French Fit".

I have no idea if it is the "perfect fit" or not. I'll ride anything that I can get the seat adjusted to the right height. But, I've been riding the old Colnago since I was 16.... many moons ago. Nope, haven't been castrated yet. The standover is tight, but not uncomfortable. And, once I'm up on the seat, I could care less where the top tube is at. I don't get much bar drop, but still use the drops on occasion (that is what they're there for).

I do have a fairly tall torso... which also means that I have relatively short legs.
What you ride, because it is what you have had since you were a teen and didn't know any better is one thing. What you should buy given a full selection is quite another. What sense does it make to buy a brand new bike in the wrong size just because you could kinda-sorta make it work when the right size is equally available? Nada!
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 09-04-15, 07:43 AM
  #100  
UnfilteredDregs
Senior Member
 
UnfilteredDregs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC, duh Bronx.
Posts: 3,578

Bikes: Salsa Ti Warbird- 2014/ November RAIL52s

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
OP...I'd suggest reading quite a bit more about fit until you really have your head wrapped around it or you'll end up just wasting quite a bit of money. Don't worry so much about headstack spacers and such, the bottom line is unless you're quite lucky or flexible no production frame is perfect for everyone.

Spacers, stem length, setback, all of that is about getting your contact points where they belong...your contact points is what's missing from your puzzle. You need that info so that you can see whether or not a frame will accommodate how best to seat you on your machine. Knowing what effective top tube length works for you will really narrow things down but, things like head tube angle do vary the reach. You don't want to end up on a frame which marginally fits you where you end up having to play with all sorts of components in order to get the reach right. Lastly, seat height and setback is critical...think of it as akin to motor mounting and how the engine is coupled to the drivetrain, as much as it's about comfort it is also about your ability to most efficiently transmit your power to the bike under all scenarios.

So, hold onto your cash, don't be in such a rush, find out what shop really knows fitting in your area, and don't settle until you're absolutely sure.
UnfilteredDregs is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.