Carbon Seat Stays - Aluminum Frame??
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
Carbon Seat Stays - Aluminum Frame??
Hi all. In my search for an appropriate aluminum frame for a CRIT bike, I'm seeing several older aluminum frames (my preferred material) with carbon seat stays. I was unaware that some manufacturers built frames in this way. I imagine for the eight savings. But are these decent frames? Does the combination of carbon with aluminum at the seat stay cause problems over time? I watched a video on YouTube where an English gentleman who repairs carbon frames - he is obvioulsy an expert on all things carbon - was critical of combining carbon with anything aluminum. So, I thought I'd throw a query onto this forum to see what you experts think: is a good aluminum frame with carbon seat stays a wise investment? Or should I be weary? Thank you!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,382
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2490 Post(s)
Liked 2,958 Times
in
1,681 Posts
A few manufacturers offered aluminum frames with carbon seat stays back around 2005 to 2008, approximately. The claimed advantage, at least from what I remember reading, was that the inserted carbon sections would absorb road shock better than full-length aluminum. I suspect it would take a very sensitive instrument to detect any difference. A BS detector, on the other hand . . . .
I also read a suggestion that the real advantage was that it simplified the building process for constructing rear triangles for the various different sizes of a frame model.
There have been a few first-hand reports of the epoxy failing at the joins, so that's something to take into consideration.
In any event, bikes with inserted carbon stays vanished from manufacturers' catalogs almost as quickly as they arrived. Maybe because word spread that there was no performance or comfort advantage for the rider, maybe because manufacturers were having to replace frames under warranty at rates above their comfort level.
I also read a suggestion that the real advantage was that it simplified the building process for constructing rear triangles for the various different sizes of a frame model.
There have been a few first-hand reports of the epoxy failing at the joins, so that's something to take into consideration.
In any event, bikes with inserted carbon stays vanished from manufacturers' catalogs almost as quickly as they arrived. Maybe because word spread that there was no performance or comfort advantage for the rider, maybe because manufacturers were having to replace frames under warranty at rates above their comfort level.
Likes For Trakhak:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,881
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,486 Times
in
870 Posts
This was common on higher end bikes in the early-mid 2000's. There were also bikes in that era that that had carbon tubes on the main frame triangle, but still connected with aluminum lugs at the bottom bracket, head tube, etc.
I'm not sure there's anything inherently concerning about this. There are current bikes on the market that still combine aluminum and carbon on forks/steerers. I think bike manufacturers moved on from combining carbon/aluminum on frames because they figured out pretty quickly how to build the whole thing out of carbon.
I'm not sure there's anything inherently concerning about this. There are current bikes on the market that still combine aluminum and carbon on forks/steerers. I think bike manufacturers moved on from combining carbon/aluminum on frames because they figured out pretty quickly how to build the whole thing out of carbon.
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
There were definitely lugged carbon frames in the early years. I believe that's how the who carbon thing started out. The carbon top tubes, seat stays, and such were lugged into light aluminum. Wasn't Kestrel a pioneer in that field?
So, regarding my initial inquiry, I guess my main concern is whether older aluminum frames with carbon seat stays are SAFE nowadays to race at higher speeds, under some stress.
Thanks again!
So, regarding my initial inquiry, I guess my main concern is whether older aluminum frames with carbon seat stays are SAFE nowadays to race at higher speeds, under some stress.
Thanks again!
#6
Super-duper Genius
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 984 Times
in
508 Posts
The company made other products as well, such as antenna masts and windsurfer masts. They were trying to launch a line of snowboards at the time. But the Trek contract was their biggest money maker.
I enjoyed my time there and learned a lot, although it didn't develop into a career for me.
I still have a few carbon pieces from them. When a part did not pass QC inspection for whatever reason, it would be scrapped, and I got permission to take some of these home.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,881
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,486 Times
in
870 Posts
I think your main challenge with bikes from this era will be the extremely narrow tire clearances.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,955
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3957 Post(s)
Liked 7,310 Times
in
2,950 Posts
My wife had an aluminum Orbea with a carbon rear triangle and carbon fork. It was a nice bike for its day.
#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
Ah, tire clearance. I like running 28's. I'm wondering if most of the Italian frames, pre-2010 (post 1998) will allow that? Bianchi's in particular.
#10
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,064
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22607 Post(s)
Liked 8,929 Times
in
4,161 Posts
Likely depends on model and even rim width. But likely may only go to 25.
#11
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,099 Times
in
3,833 Posts
In some cases, your limitation might be the brakes rather than the frame or fork. I can't get a 28mm tire on my #1 road bike because there isn't enough clearance under the arch of the rear brake caliper (Campy Record).
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
I have a Masi Gran Criterium S (2005 or so) and it is AL with CF fork, seat stays and chain stays. it's a size 58 with Dura Ace 10 sp and it weighs a little over 17 lbs w/Speedplay pedals. I love this bike but unfortunately it is too big for me. I ride a 55 w/55TT. It was a present to me from my GF so I've kept it.
Last edited by bruce19; 07-20-23 at 07:55 AM.
Likes For bruce19:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 837
Bikes: Casati Laser, Colnago Tecnos, Ciöcc Exige, Black Mountain Cycles Road
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 177 Times
in
78 Posts
I have never owned a Bianchi, but I do have three Italian racing bikes from that time period (1995, 2001, 2008) and none of them will take anything close to a 28. Only one of them will even take 25s.
#14
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,305
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1450 Post(s)
Liked 730 Times
in
374 Posts
Carbon itself doesn't "wear out" over time, so the age is irrelevant in terms of structural integrity. I also don't recall inherent issues with the jointing of carbon/aluminum that caused failures, but someone with more expertise than me could weigh in on that topic. The main concern I'd have with any used bike (especially carbon) is ensuring that there is no damage. If it were me, I'd have a qualified shop inspect the bike before racing it. I'd recommend doing this for any bike regardless of age and material.
I think your main challenge with bikes from this era will be the extremely narrow tire clearances.
I think your main challenge with bikes from this era will be the extremely narrow tire clearances.
its not only the carbon fiber, but the matrix, and also how the carbon fiber was joined.
Most notable and catastrophic example is the titan sub that likely weakened and failed with repeated stresses.
I wouldn’t necessarily shy away from an older carbon frame, but that said, why buy an older technology, that proved to have no real advantages, and has the potential to have problems from joining the two different materials, and at this point may be just worn out. Unless someone was giving it to me, I’d look at a newer all aluminum frame that can be had pretty cheap, or all carbon for a bit more money.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#15
Newbie
I have a 2009 or 2010 Salsa Mamasita mountain bike with carbon seat stays. The connection point between the carbon and aluminum is painted over and totally seamless to where I can’t tell exactly where the two materials connect. If there was an issue I figured it would be easy to see as the paint would crack at the connection. I had the bike on the bike stand over the weekend washing it and it looks like new. No indication of any issues. This bike has not been abused but it is a mountain bike and takes more abuse than a road bike. As long as the frame was built properly it should not be a worry. I admit when I bought this bike I thought it was a cool feature but had the same concerns as you. Not so worried about it now given the age and the super hot TX summers in the garage.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,887
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 768 Post(s)
Liked 1,747 Times
in
1,017 Posts
I picked up a used 2006 Cannondale Six13 which had a carbon top tube, downtube and seat tube attached to Alum lugs. It was a nice bike, but It was just a bit too big no matter what I did, I could not make it fit, so I sold it and got a CAAD9, which was a much better fit. I actually found the CAAD9 a better riding bike than the Six13, the Carbon really did not reduce the road buzz that much, so to me it was all hype. I never had any issues with the joints where the carbon\lugs met, but I only owned the bike for about 18 months.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,692
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 432 Post(s)
Liked 461 Times
in
318 Posts
Since you're looking for a crit bike, I'd focus on frame geometry/handling characteristics and there really is plenty out there, vintage/used or modern, that will meet your needs. My perception is that alloy frames with carbon seat stays were designed for all-day comfort and not necessarily for crit racing, but that's just my perception.
#18
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
A few manufacturers offered aluminum frames with carbon seat stays back around 2005 to 2008, approximately. The claimed advantage, at least from what I remember reading, was that the inserted carbon sections would absorb road shock better than full-length aluminum. I suspect it would take a very sensitive instrument to detect any difference. A BS detector, on the other hand . . . .
To the OP, chances are this frame is very outdated, and for that reason I wouldn't consider it a top choice for building any kind of racing bike. That doesn't mean it won't work as one though. As for the materials as a consideration alone, six of one/half dozen of the other.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#19
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 365
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked 376 Times
in
156 Posts
My mid-90s Quattro Assi Team, aluminum with carbon seat stays. I got it and then promptly bought the blue QA Easton Elite behind it in the second photo which I rode all the time. A few years after that I got the QA Titanium and divided the mileage between the two but also put miles on other bikes (all steel) I had at the time and others to come over the years. I think I put only a few hundred miles on the Team with carbon seat stays. When my brother comes to town it used to be the only bike of mine that he could make fit since it was a compact frame. The QA Elite rode nicer even without carbon seat stays but that it probably due to the oversized tubing the Team has. It is too stiff for my liking, look at those chain stays! And when I got the Titanium frame, it ended up being even more comfortable.
#20
Junior Member
I love my 2009 Cannondale Six 5 with its carbon rear triangle and fork. I've got around 7,000 miles on it and it ride in all types of weather. I don't see any reason to upgrade.
#21
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
This was an economic compromise for a while. Then aluminum and carbon both evolved to a point where it no longer made sense (from a manufacturing standpoint) to continue mixing them. You could make a very good alloy frame that was as light as low-end carbon but less expensive and then make a full-carbon frame that was lighter than alloy but more expensive. So that's what manufacturers did.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,800
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,026 Times
in
723 Posts
My wife has a trek pilot aluminum with carbon stays and fork from around 2007, bought it for her knowing the ride quality vs cost at the time. I'd ridden a trek 2300 the year before they came out with carbon stays and were full aluminum, the bike was very rigid and I found it unsafe on bumpy corners, the next year's carbon stay 2300 was significantly better at riding through curves. However, cannondale at the same time was producing a very lively full aluminum frame that handled worlds better, and trek only ran the carbon stays a couple more years before going back to full aluminum frames that handled just as well as the carbon stayed version. Personally, unless you're finding one that's been through the wringer and has a wornout drivetrain, I'd have no qualms about racing one.
My Carrera from 2008 has no problems with 25c tires on velocity A23 rims, I suspect 28c would fit but don't usually run that big of a tire.
My Carrera from 2008 has no problems with 25c tires on velocity A23 rims, I suspect 28c would fit but don't usually run that big of a tire.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Great White North
Posts: 926
Bikes: I have a few
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 340 Post(s)
Liked 210 Times
in
104 Posts
I am using 28s on a 2002 master with a flash fork and 11 speed SR but I only have a couple mm in clearance. The SR brakes had no trouble clearing the tire as long as the release was used on the brake lever.