Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Motobecane and Vitus 888 experts please.

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Motobecane and Vitus 888 experts please.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-22, 12:49 PM
  #1  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
Thread Starter
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
Motobecane and Vitus 888 experts please.

I have been looking at an 80s grand touring that has 888 frame and fork. My reading on it suggests straight guage .8mm walls on the frame tubes and something I think a bit thicker on the fork tubes. The bike is extremely reasonably priced considering the components alone but I was wondering if someone could offer insight on what the frame might feel like? I have a slightly too small 888 grand touring with a lesser fork that does ride really nice. I also know you guys will enable me from here to the moon. Just wanting a word of experience if any of you have any.
52telecaster is offline  
Old 07-20-22, 12:49 PM
  #2  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
Thread Starter
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
Vitus..... Damn autocorrect
52telecaster is offline  
Old 07-20-22, 12:52 PM
  #3  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
Thread Starter
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
52telecaster is offline  
Likes For 52telecaster:
Old 07-20-22, 06:27 PM
  #4  
ZudeJammer
Full Member
 
ZudeJammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 170

Bikes: Fuji Touring Series V 1985, Motobecane Grand Touring 1982, Specialized Stumpjumper 1993, Raleigh International 1972, Raleigh Grand Prix 1972, Kuwahara Count 1983, Trek Cirrus 1987, Shogun 2001 1983, Cannondale SM700 1990

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times in 96 Posts
Really like mine, a lively ride and planes nicely. Interesting gearing, its a triple but faster than other touring bikes which is a plus unless you are loaded down with gear. The frame can take 32mm gatorskins with enough clearance in the back. I like the wheels too, the convex rims are strong, never had an issue with them being hookless.


Since this picture the levers were upgraded with new gum hoods and the removal of the safety levers.

Last edited by ZudeJammer; 07-20-22 at 06:40 PM.
ZudeJammer is offline  
Likes For ZudeJammer:
Old 07-20-22, 07:41 PM
  #5  
bertinjim 
Senior Member
 
bertinjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Niagara Region, Canada
Posts: 1,455

Bikes: 1970s Alex Singer, 1960s Peugeot PX 10, 1960s Bertin C37, 1973 Carre Bertin C 37, 1972 Carlton Kermesse, 1981 Peugeot PX 14 Super Competition

Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times in 157 Posts
52telecaster-

Vitus 888 specs: https://www.yellowjersey.org/vitus4.jpg




I had a Vitus 888 framed Motobecane and it was surprising light.
bertinjim is offline  
Likes For bertinjim:
Old 07-20-22, 07:53 PM
  #6  
Kabuki12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,449
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 874 Post(s)
Liked 2,288 Times in 1,278 Posts

This is how I set it up initially , I have since replaced the tires with Panaracer gum wall


I have a 1980 Motobecane Grand Sprint that is Vitus 888 and it seems light and a pleasure to ride . It was purchased as a bike but didn’t have wheels. I paid $20 for it but I put quite a bit into it including a powder paint job and decals. I am currently setting it up as a touring bike due to the longer chain stays(fenders are on the list). I have heard from some that say there is some flex to the 888 tubing but I sure don’t feel it.

Last edited by Kabuki12; 07-20-22 at 08:01 PM.
Kabuki12 is offline  
Likes For Kabuki12:
Old 07-20-22, 08:31 PM
  #7  
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times in 1,874 Posts
I'd want to know if this is the metric of imperial version of 888.The metric version is lighter and more compliant but the tradeoff is decreased stiffness that results in less efficient power transfer and less precise steering. I've never been fond of metric standard tubesets for these reasons, though the vast majority of cyclists probably couldn't tell the difference.
T-Mar is offline  
Likes For T-Mar:
Old 07-20-22, 10:17 PM
  #8  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
Thread Starter
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Mar
I'd want to know if this is the metric of imperial version of 888.The metric version is lighter and more compliant but the tradeoff is decreased stiffness that results in less efficient power transfer and less precise steering. I've never been fond of metric standard tubesets for these reasons, though the vast majority of cyclists probably couldn't tell the difference.
Pretty sure it's metric. The grand record I have is metric 531 and it's lovely. I really don't need another bike but I am tempted.
52telecaster is offline  
Old 07-20-22, 10:18 PM
  #9  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
Thread Starter
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
Thanks everyone.
52telecaster is offline  
Old 07-21-22, 01:37 PM
  #10  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,704

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 2,010 Times in 1,109 Posts
Late but: 888 is heavy compared to 172. My current 1978 172 GJ will be hard to part with and I miss my 1978 172 GT. I built a smaller 888 GT for my daughter and it rode nice for such a heavy bike.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is offline  
Old 07-21-22, 02:54 PM
  #11  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
Thread Starter
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
Late but: 888 is heavy compared to 172. My current 1978 172 GJ will be hard to part with and I miss my 1978 172 GT. I built a smaller 888 GT for my daughter and it rode nice for such a heavy bike.
The later 888 bikes have 888 forks where the 172 bikes have high tensil. At least in the grand touring line. I think there is a bit of weight penalty tube for tube for sure.
52telecaster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.