Shimano triple chainring on double chainring same BCD?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
Shimano triple chainring on double chainring same BCD?
Can I put this chainring on meant for tripple that has the same 96mm BCD as the double crankset
Shimano Deore M6000 40T Chainring - 10 Speed, BCD 96mm, for 40-30-22T Set
https://bike.shimano.com/en-US/produ...Y1WC98020.html
https://www.modernbike.com/product-2...kaAsqUEALw_wcB
On this 2x mtb crankset?
DEORE_M6000_m FC-M6000-2 BCD 96/64
https://bike.shimano.com/en-US/produ...C-M6000-2.html
or is there something preventing this ( bolt pattern, cutout , notches, 3mm offset to one side etc..... )
Shimano Deore M6000 40T Chainring - 10 Speed, BCD 96mm, for 40-30-22T Set
https://bike.shimano.com/en-US/produ...Y1WC98020.html
https://www.modernbike.com/product-2...kaAsqUEALw_wcB
On this 2x mtb crankset?
DEORE_M6000_m FC-M6000-2 BCD 96/64
https://bike.shimano.com/en-US/produ...C-M6000-2.html
or is there something preventing this ( bolt pattern, cutout , notches, 3mm offset to one side etc..... )
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,984
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1300 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times
in
537 Posts
well... i'd give it a try... have you Tried it yet? What's the small chainring's tooth count?
step away from the keyboard, grab a 5mm allen, and go for it.
step away from the keyboard, grab a 5mm allen, and go for it.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
I own a praxis 2x. the smallest I can get is 32 that's why I was looking into a MTB crankset.
https://praxiscycles.com/product/zayante-carbon/
Before I buy the shimano mtb crankset I want to make sure this would work. You can get 28, 26, 24 for the inner ring and they are cheap.
https://praxiscycles.com/product/zayante-carbon/
Before I buy the shimano mtb crankset I want to make sure this would work. You can get 28, 26, 24 for the inner ring and they are cheap.
#4
Full Member
#6
Full Member
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,265
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
702 Posts
But to answer your question, it should work, barring any spacing issues or ramping between chainrings. The 96mm bcd of the outer ring is the same between the two cranks.
Shimano stuff is so product specific these days that I have no idea if it will actually work, because typically the ramps are aligned to allow specific jumps, and the triple vs. double crank may use different bolt spacers. Unless someone else has tried it and documented it somewhere, or unless Shimano has noted cross-compatibility, there's only one way to find out.
Shimano stuff is so product specific these days that I have no idea if it will actually work, because typically the ramps are aligned to allow specific jumps, and the triple vs. double crank may use different bolt spacers. Unless someone else has tried it and documented it somewhere, or unless Shimano has noted cross-compatibility, there's only one way to find out.
Likes For noobinsf:
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
I have also been looking at old ( 2009 ish ) 2x MTB cranksets. Some of those come with 104 bcd / 64 bcd. With that bolt spacing I can get a 40T and 28T which would be nice for my gravel bike.
I would prefer to buy a new crankset instead of something that's 10+ years old if I can help it.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,190 Times
in
1,334 Posts
My initial thought would be yes, but if you look at the Tech Doc I don't think so.
The mounting surface for the triple is different than the double. You would have to buy the parts and see if the spacing between the chianrings would work. There are also ramp and pin considerations, but generally a shift is possible even if it not at the highest level.
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/ev/FC...M6000-4187.pdf
John
The mounting surface for the triple is different than the double. You would have to buy the parts and see if the spacing between the chianrings would work. There are also ramp and pin considerations, but generally a shift is possible even if it not at the highest level.
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/ev/FC...M6000-4187.pdf
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
My initial thought would be yes, but if you look at the Tech Doc I don't think so.
The mounting surface for the triple is different than the double. You would have to buy the parts and see if the spacing between the chianrings would work. There are also ramp and pin considerations, but generally a shift is possible even if it not at the highest level.
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/ev/FC...M6000-4187.pdf
John
The mounting surface for the triple is different than the double. You would have to buy the parts and see if the spacing between the chianrings would work. There are also ramp and pin considerations, but generally a shift is possible even if it not at the highest level.
https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/ev/FC...M6000-4187.pdf
John
I guess back to looking at 2010 MTB double cranksets.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,190 Times
in
1,334 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
I am thinking about one of these. I am not sure how good they are. Going to try and find a shimano crank if possible.
These both have the 104 BCD for the outer ring. I don't 'think' there's anything special (notches, offsets, pins, funky bolt pattern ) about there outside ring.
FSA K-Force Light ATB MTB Crankset 170mm 24/38t Double 4 Bolt
https://www.ebay.com/itm/19477171067...Cclp%3A2047675
SRAM X9 BB30 Crankset42/28T BB30
https://www.ebay.com/itm/27537296764...Bk9SR7rUj7iZYQ
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,190 Times
in
1,334 Posts
You are kind of in no man's land. Any mtb 2x will probably be an issue if you want to swap the outer 2x ring with an outer 3x ring.
The SRAM X9 would probably work since it is a 42t and it is possible to get a 26t, but there are some issues. The BCD is 120/80 not 104/64. It looks like 120/80 is used on the 42t and 39t cranks and the 104/64 is used on smaller chainring offerings. I'm not sure anyone else uses that BCD so when replacement rings are gone, they are gone.
I'm not up to speed on the BB30 and the threaded work arounds, but that is a consideration.
If I were to go back to a 10+ year old mtb 2x, I'd probably look at an M785 or M985. As far as an FD, I would guess that an FD that will work with a 38t could be squeezed to go to 40t or 42t.
John
The SRAM X9 would probably work since it is a 42t and it is possible to get a 26t, but there are some issues. The BCD is 120/80 not 104/64. It looks like 120/80 is used on the 42t and 39t cranks and the 104/64 is used on smaller chainring offerings. I'm not sure anyone else uses that BCD so when replacement rings are gone, they are gone.
I'm not up to speed on the BB30 and the threaded work arounds, but that is a consideration.
If I were to go back to a 10+ year old mtb 2x, I'd probably look at an M785 or M985. As far as an FD, I would guess that an FD that will work with a 38t could be squeezed to go to 40t or 42t.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
You are kind of in no man's land. Any mtb 2x will probably be an issue if you want to swap the outer 2x ring with an outer 3x ring.
The SRAM X9 would probably work since it is a 42t and it is possible to get a 26t, but there are some issues. The BCD is 120/80 not 104/64. It looks like 120/80 is used on the 42t and 39t cranks and the 104/64 is used on smaller chainring offerings. I'm not sure anyone else uses that BCD so when replacement rings are gone, they are gone.
I'm not up to speed on the BB30 and the threaded work arounds, but that is a consideration.
If I were to go back to a 10+ year old mtb 2x, I'd probably look at an M785 or M985. As far as an FD, I would guess that an FD that will work with a 38t could be squeezed to go to 40t or 42t.
John
The SRAM X9 would probably work since it is a 42t and it is possible to get a 26t, but there are some issues. The BCD is 120/80 not 104/64. It looks like 120/80 is used on the 42t and 39t cranks and the 104/64 is used on smaller chainring offerings. I'm not sure anyone else uses that BCD so when replacement rings are gone, they are gone.
I'm not up to speed on the BB30 and the threaded work arounds, but that is a consideration.
If I were to go back to a 10+ year old mtb 2x, I'd probably look at an M785 or M985. As far as an FD, I would guess that an FD that will work with a 38t could be squeezed to go to 40t or 42t.
John
the older fsa is BCD: 104/64mm. I am thinking the Shimano M785 might be more trouble in the long run even if it's about 200 grams more though.
$295
FSA K-Force Light ATB MTB Crankset 170mm 24/38t Double 4 Bolt
Length: 170 mm
BB30 Spindle
BCD: 104/64mm
Weight: 560 grams
https://www.ebay.com/itm/19477171067...Cclp%3A2047675
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,190 Times
in
1,334 Posts
I was looking at M785 just the other day. I the M985 uses a proprietary big ring for some reason.
the older fsa is BCD: 104/64mm. I am thinking the Shimano M785 might be more trouble in the long run even if it's about 200 grams more though.
$295
FSA K-Force Light ATB MTB Crankset 170mm 24/38t Double 4 Bolt
Length: 170 mm
BB30 Spindle
BCD: 104/64mm
Weight: 560 grams
https://www.ebay.com/itm/19477171067...Cclp%3A2047675
the older fsa is BCD: 104/64mm. I am thinking the Shimano M785 might be more trouble in the long run even if it's about 200 grams more though.
$295
FSA K-Force Light ATB MTB Crankset 170mm 24/38t Double 4 Bolt
Length: 170 mm
BB30 Spindle
BCD: 104/64mm
Weight: 560 grams
https://www.ebay.com/itm/19477171067...Cclp%3A2047675
What 2x outer ring, or possibly a 3x middle ring, do you plan to use to get to 40t/42t?
John
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
104 bcd is common, I can get 40T + chain ring. It's difficult to find 40T + on the 96 BCD and next to impossible on the modern direct mount 2x MTB cranks.
https://www.amazon.com/DECKAS-Chainr...934&th=1&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/Truvativ-Chai.../dp/B004SHE5WK
https://www.ebay.com/itm/22428986919...Bk9SR4j03_-ZYQ
I think I am going to skip the FSA crankset though after watching Hambini video.
https://www.amazon.com/DECKAS-Chainr...934&th=1&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/Truvativ-Chai.../dp/B004SHE5WK
https://www.ebay.com/itm/22428986919...Bk9SR4j03_-ZYQ
I think I am going to skip the FSA crankset though after watching Hambini video.
In this video I marry a Time Scylon with an FSA crank. The Scylon is one of the best bikes I've come across, it is well made and the fit and tolerances are excellent.
The FSA Crank has some of the worst machining I've ever seen.
The FSA Crank has some of the worst machining I've ever seen.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,190 Times
in
1,334 Posts
104 bcd is common, I can get 40T + chain ring. It's difficult to find 40T + on the 96 BCD and next to impossible on the modern direct mount 2x MTB cranks.
https://www.amazon.com/DECKAS-Chainr...934&th=1&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/Truvativ-Chai.../dp/B004SHE5WK
https://www.ebay.com/itm/22428986919...Bk9SR4j03_-ZYQ
I think I am going to skip the FSA crankset though after watching Hambini video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwiVlLfqG1M
https://www.amazon.com/DECKAS-Chainr...934&th=1&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/Truvativ-Chai.../dp/B004SHE5WK
https://www.ebay.com/itm/22428986919...Bk9SR4j03_-ZYQ
I think I am going to skip the FSA crankset though after watching Hambini video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwiVlLfqG1M
The Deckas is a narrow-wide.
Have no idea if the steel Truative will work. Generally steel is usually lower end and I would guess for a triple, but didn't look into it.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
this might be usefull for anyone else that might come accross this thread that is looking for a wide range 2x crankset.
Path Less Pedaled
My Favorite Crankset That No One Knows About
Best Modern Alternative Cranks!
Nerd Crank Database
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...duk/edit#gid=0
#19
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,133
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1797 Post(s)
Liked 1,654 Times
in
948 Posts
It wasn't. For brevity, the engineering of the rings for a double are a package. The engineering of the rings for the triple is a package deal too. A triple outer is designed to fall on a triple middle. Mating it to a double inner leaves a gap large enough the chain will fall between the rings, skate & jam.
The solution for shifting perfection was a Wheels Manufacturing 1.2mm spacer between the outer ring and the crank spider to move the ring inboard to eliminate the gap.
Chainring spacer by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
The result was 19-109 gear inches with an XT 11-40 cassette.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
that's good to know, thanks.
How did you like the 28T? :-)
My current setup is front 32T with back 36T for the road wheel set and front 32T with back 40T for the gravel wheel set.
Do you sprint much or pedal down hill a lot? I had 1x 40T on the front for a little while there was only one hill I spun out on because it was just a slight down grade, arrow straight and smooth. Most hills between the turns, cars, ruts I tend to just coast or even use my brakes. I don't tend to not go much faster than 30 mph downhill unless the conditions are really good.
front 40T / back 11T should be good for 23 mph to 29 mph which is plenty for me.
https://www.bikecalc.com/speed_at_cadence
How did you like the 28T? :-)
My current setup is front 32T with back 36T for the road wheel set and front 32T with back 40T for the gravel wheel set.
Do you sprint much or pedal down hill a lot? I had 1x 40T on the front for a little while there was only one hill I spun out on because it was just a slight down grade, arrow straight and smooth. Most hills between the turns, cars, ruts I tend to just coast or even use my brakes. I don't tend to not go much faster than 30 mph downhill unless the conditions are really good.
front 40T / back 11T should be good for 23 mph to 29 mph which is plenty for me.
https://www.bikecalc.com/speed_at_cadence
#21
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,133
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1797 Post(s)
Liked 1,654 Times
in
948 Posts
For unladen smooth road use. I found that with the riding I did, I mostly stayed in the 44 & I was mostly in cog 10 through about 5 or 6 on the small end of the cassette. Position 11, the 11 tooth wasn't used very often but it was very nice to have. I didn't really use the 28 all that much.
Now for fully loaded panniers or gravel riding the situation was well reversed. The availability of the 28,40 combination was nearly ideal. The whole cassette was used for the duration.
I have found that for non-paved surfaces anything lower than about 15 gear inches, it's hard to pedal fast enough to stay upright. The balance between traction, strength & speed becomes unworkable for me.
So, 19-ish gear inches afforded by the 28 tooth ring (for me) is about the bottom of the useable range anyway. Enough purchase per pedal stroke to maintain balance, a low enough cadence to stand & jockey weight around for traction, & enough strength to keep the whole situation moving forward. In short, anything steeper/looser & I'd be walking anyway.
FWIW: A 0.7:1 drive ratio is wicked low. If you have individual cogs like with Shimano 11 speed cassettes, the torque can bite aluminum freehub bodies pretty hard. It would be best to stick with steel or titanium in that case. Otherwise, pinned/riveted cassettes or monoblock designs like XD start becoming good ideas.
Now for fully loaded panniers or gravel riding the situation was well reversed. The availability of the 28,40 combination was nearly ideal. The whole cassette was used for the duration.
I have found that for non-paved surfaces anything lower than about 15 gear inches, it's hard to pedal fast enough to stay upright. The balance between traction, strength & speed becomes unworkable for me.
So, 19-ish gear inches afforded by the 28 tooth ring (for me) is about the bottom of the useable range anyway. Enough purchase per pedal stroke to maintain balance, a low enough cadence to stand & jockey weight around for traction, & enough strength to keep the whole situation moving forward. In short, anything steeper/looser & I'd be walking anyway.
FWIW: A 0.7:1 drive ratio is wicked low. If you have individual cogs like with Shimano 11 speed cassettes, the torque can bite aluminum freehub bodies pretty hard. It would be best to stick with steel or titanium in that case. Otherwise, pinned/riveted cassettes or monoblock designs like XD start becoming good ideas.
Last edited by base2; 12-04-22 at 05:38 PM.
Likes For base2: