3-Cross or 4-Cross for 36h 650b Wheels?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
3-Cross or 4-Cross for 36h 650b Wheels?
It's been at least 10 years since I built a wheel, and I've forgotten most of what little I knew.
I'm accumulating parts for a 650b conversion on my '85 League Fuji, because Humboldt County roads suck, so wide tires are good things, and also it rains a lot, so fenders are a must.
Rims: Velocity A23s, with the offset center rear.
Hubs: Velo-Orange Grand Cru high-flange. 126mm freewheel rear. (I bought the closeout with the old logo, cuz for 45 bucks, why wouldn't I?)
Spokes: 14/15 double butted, not committed to a brand. The three sets of wheels I've built all used 14g DTs.
The thing is, I'm having some analysis paralysis when it comes to lacing pattern. I think I remember that 4-cross is considered correct for a 36-spoke, 700C wheel on a low-flange hub, due to the spokes being as close to tangential to the hub flange, but I don't know how or if that changes with rim diameter and/or hub flange diameter. Another consideration is that QBP's spoke calculator gives 266 right / 267 left for 3-cross and 278/276 for 4-cross... and spokes come in even lengths. How much does 1mm matter, especially with an off-center drilled rim?
--Shannon
I'm accumulating parts for a 650b conversion on my '85 League Fuji, because Humboldt County roads suck, so wide tires are good things, and also it rains a lot, so fenders are a must.
Rims: Velocity A23s, with the offset center rear.
Hubs: Velo-Orange Grand Cru high-flange. 126mm freewheel rear. (I bought the closeout with the old logo, cuz for 45 bucks, why wouldn't I?)
Spokes: 14/15 double butted, not committed to a brand. The three sets of wheels I've built all used 14g DTs.
The thing is, I'm having some analysis paralysis when it comes to lacing pattern. I think I remember that 4-cross is considered correct for a 36-spoke, 700C wheel on a low-flange hub, due to the spokes being as close to tangential to the hub flange, but I don't know how or if that changes with rim diameter and/or hub flange diameter. Another consideration is that QBP's spoke calculator gives 266 right / 267 left for 3-cross and 278/276 for 4-cross... and spokes come in even lengths. How much does 1mm matter, especially with an off-center drilled rim?
--Shannon
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I've only done 3-cross with my 36-spoke wheels, and they've held up great. I doubt it makes a huge difference. Consider skinnier spokes for the NDS, maybe DT Revs or Sapim Lasers.
#3
Senior Member
3 cross should be fine. With the minimal dish of this combo of OS rim/hub, 3 cross should be plenty strong.
1mm in spoke length should be no problem. You are using brass nipples, correct?
Don't know where QBP targets for spoke end/nipple location, but assuming bottom of screwdriver slot or top of nipple head, 1mm short is fine.
1mm in spoke length should be no problem. You are using brass nipples, correct?
Don't know where QBP targets for spoke end/nipple location, but assuming bottom of screwdriver slot or top of nipple head, 1mm short is fine.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,096
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4210 Post(s)
Liked 3,878 Times
in
2,315 Posts
Agreed that 3x vs 4x is a minor difference in ride "quality". Tire air pressures, their suppleness and spoke tensions paly bigger roles. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 248
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 90 Times
in
64 Posts
3x .... 4x
Pay attention to the angle of the nipple as it exits the I.D. of the rim ....you probably do not want the nipple to be 'cocked' anymore than needed
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
What are you doing to make the rim brakes reach the new smaller diameter rims? It's pretty certain your '85 Fuji doesn't have disc brakes.
#8
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,790
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3590 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
1,935 Posts
3x ought to be fine. Depending on the hub flange diameter, 4x might be difficult with 650B diameter rims.
#9
Really Old Senior Member
You know 3X will NOT cause ANY kind of problem.
4X has that element of doubt. (as small as it may be)
I'm in the same boat as you. I haven't built enough wheels to experience the little nuances that might bite ya re: larger hub diameters/small dia. rims.
I don't see any reason that 4X would be "enough better", if at all, over 3X. Especially if you are going to fatter tires which will absorb a lot of peak impacts.
3X would probably save the weight of a spoke or so vs 4X.
Build it right and you won't have a problem.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
That said... the Velo-Orange / Dia-Compe 610s are really, really pretty...
--Shannon