Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Raleigh New Team replica

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Raleigh New Team replica

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-23, 11:01 PM
  #26  
Chombi1 
Senior Member
 
Chombi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,486
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1639 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 829 Times in 538 Posts
One of the big "issues" with the Raleigh Team bike replica was the slight back sloping top tube that gave it a more modern appearance.
I'm sure Raleigh had a good reason for not having a level top tube, but when cyclists see the word "replica", majority will hold the maker to it.....
Chombi1 is offline  
Old 03-05-23, 11:41 PM
  #27  
P!N20
Senior Member
 
P!N20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times in 931 Posts
Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
I'm a little disappointed that Neil McGowran's blog doesn't discuss his impressions of the frame. Goodness knows that he's got plenty of original frames to compare it to!
https://raleigh-sb4059.com/2020/09/1...-753-frameset/
P!N20 is offline  
Likes For P!N20:
Old 03-06-23, 01:45 AM
  #28  
Drillium Dude 
Banned.
 
Drillium Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times in 1,709 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888


Geez, are those some big vent holes, or what?!

Also: yuck

DD
Drillium Dude is offline  
Old 03-06-23, 01:50 AM
  #29  
Drillium Dude 
Banned.
 
Drillium Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times in 1,709 Posts
That's the vid I remember, and yeah - he trashed it, too. With good reason.

Fail with a capital "F". Even the 'keeper of the flame' excuse trotted out by some doesn't hold water. This is a shadow - not to mention an outright sham - compared to its predecessor. Hands down a completely misguided endeavor, which appears to have been designed by committee and executed by chimpanzees.

IMHO, of course

DD
Drillium Dude is offline  
Likes For Drillium Dude:
Old 03-06-23, 02:57 AM
  #30  
georges1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
 
georges1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,956

Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 670 Post(s)
Liked 973 Times in 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Drillium Dude
Geez, are those some big vent holes, or what?!

Also: yuck

DD
Yes and worse than that this supposed 753 frame is supposed to be light but 1.9 kilos is definitely not what a real 753 frame should weight more like 1.5-1.7 kilos frame alone. Since the 753 is not a TIG weldable steel ,it is certainly a 631 brazed and tig welded frame rebaged as a 753. Another thing if you are nitpicking to details, the rear brake mount is TIG welded instead of being brazed unlike on the genuine 753 reynolds frames.
georges1 is online now  
Old 03-06-23, 06:38 AM
  #31  
embankmentlb
Senior Member
 
embankmentlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401

Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times in 162 Posts
Another attempt to play on people’s emotions and sentiments just to make money. Not often can you find this type thing in the vintage bike industry but here it is a great example.
On course Raleigh did fill the instant gratification gap some are looking for. I imagine the hunt for the real thing would take a bit of time, effort and not just money.

Last edited by embankmentlb; 03-06-23 at 06:44 AM.
embankmentlb is offline  
Likes For embankmentlb:
Old 03-06-23, 06:54 AM
  #32  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
I agree that the stays are unlikely to be 753 tubing. The dropouts and bridge appear to be TIG-welded (and look nothing at all like the dropouts, stay ends, and bridges of the original Team Pro), and welding would not be compatible with the heat treating benefits of 753 steel. The dropouts look like they were water-jet cut out of steel plate rather than forged. Whether the rest of the frame is actually 753 tubing is anybody's guess.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 03-06-23, 06:54 AM
  #33  
tiger1964 
Senior Member
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,435

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times in 404 Posts
Originally Posted by P!N20
Thanks. Reading that, as an odd-car guy, I was interested to read the Swallow Doretti connection (never seen one!)

Anyway, I would have preferred the jersey and the bidon to have the old "bird" logo instead, but I got what I could. I'm sure a little research would should when the TI logo became prominent on Ralieghs; I'll guess well after my bike's manufacture date.

Now -- back to the actual topic...
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 03-06-23, 07:26 AM
  #34  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,376 Times in 1,580 Posts
I was thinking of the differences in the rides, but this review of the construction differences is certainly an excellent summary of the complaints. He has the resources to provide examples of the right way to build it.

I haven't searched his blog to see if Raleigh ever responded with some sort of rationale for the shortcomings... it seems unlikely that they'd want to tackle the difficult job of defending their choices, or even admitting that it was a disappointment to those expecting a faithful reproduction.
edit: the end of that blog post has a response from Raleigh:
The project was indeed to create a like for like replica of the original TI that Joop used back in 1980 when he won the tour, and you’re absolutely right – detail is key.
... although that's really not an explanation for why the results were so poor.

Steve in Peoria

Last edited by steelbikeguy; 03-06-23 at 07:32 AM.
steelbikeguy is offline  
Likes For steelbikeguy:
Old 03-06-23, 08:10 AM
  #35  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by Drillium Dude
Geez, are those some big vent holes, or what?!
They remind me of Wal-Mart bikes

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
I agree that the stays are unlikely to be 753 tubing. The dropouts and bridge appear to be TIG-welded (and look nothing at all like the dropouts, stay ends, and bridges of the original Team Pro), and welding would not be compatible with the heat treating benefits of 753 steel. The dropouts look like they were water-jet cut out of steel plate rather than forged. Whether the rest of the frame is actually 753 tubing is anybody's guess.
In the Raleigh SBDU page review, there's a comment by Neil McGowran that states:

"Hi Dan

I asked Raleigh UK that specific question about the ends. Their reply was word for word the same as I got from Reynolds. Keith at Reynolds gave this reply… “TIG welding does work with the 753 and 531 tubesets (and of course many other steel alloys including our 725/525 and 853/631) as the heat input is concentrated in a small area around the joint. So that would be acceptable when done by experienced builders capable of welding thin wall tubing
-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Likes For cudak888:
Old 03-06-23, 08:40 AM
  #36  
georges1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
 
georges1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,956

Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 670 Post(s)
Liked 973 Times in 646 Posts
Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
I was thinking of the differences in the rides, but this review of the construction differences is certainly an excellent summary of the complaints. He has the resources to provide examples of the right way to build it.

I haven't searched his blog to see if Raleigh ever responded with some sort of rationale for the shortcomings... it seems unlikely that they'd want to tackle the difficult job of defending their choices, or even admitting that it was a disappointment to those expecting a faithful reproduction.
edit: the end of that blog post has a response from Raleigh:
... although that's really not an explanation for why the results were so poor.

Steve in Peoria
not to mention a frame weighting 250-300grams more than the original
georges1 is online now  
Old 03-06-23, 02:53 PM
  #37  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
They remind me of Wal-Mart bikes



In the Raleigh SBDU page review, there's a comment by Neil McGowran that states: I asked Raleigh UK that specific question about the ends. Their reply was word for word the same as I got from Reynolds. Keith at Reynolds gave this reply… “TIG welding does work with the 753 and 531 tubesets (and of course many other steel alloys including our 725/525 and 853/631) as the heat input is concentrated in a small area around the joint. So that would be acceptable when done by experienced builders capable of welding thin wall tubing
I stand corrected! The welding does look competent, at least, but the overall look is that of a mass-production frame, not a limited production/custom build.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Likes For JohnDThompson:
Old 03-06-23, 04:22 PM
  #38  
P!N20
Senior Member
 
P!N20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times in 931 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
In the Raleigh SBDU page review, there's a comment by Neil McGowran that states:

"Hi Dan

I asked Raleigh UK that specific question about the ends. Their reply was word for word the same as I got from Reynolds. Keith at Reynolds gave this reply… “TIG welding does work with the 753 and 531 tubesets (and of course many other steel alloys including our 725/525 and 853/631) as the heat input is concentrated in a small area around the joint. So that would be acceptable when done by experienced builders capable of welding thin wall tubing


Would be interested in what @bulgie and @Doug Fattic think about that.
P!N20 is offline  
Old 03-06-23, 04:53 PM
  #39  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1176 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times in 1,074 Posts
Originally Posted by P!N20

Would be interested in what @bulgie and @Doug Fattic think about that.
I don't remember why Reynolds used to say you cannot weld 531 or 753, nor do I know why they've conveniently changed their tune now. I'm not a metallurgist, and not that great a welder tbh, so I'll leave the finer engineering points to my betters. All I can say is that frame is FUGLY and a capital-F Fail if they really were trying to "create a like for like replica of the original". Raleigh is dead to me now. I'd have more respect for them if they stuck to selling Chinese plastic frames like everyone else, it'd be more honest.
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 03-06-23, 05:22 PM
  #40  
chain_whipped
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 486
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 452 Times in 232 Posts
Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
There seems to be a small local nexus of SBDU's here...




Steve in Peoria
Outstanding bike and condition!

The replica whatever is an insult compared to the original. I'm surprised 'Rally' china hadn't given it disc brakes but think of the money they've saved!
chain_whipped is offline  
Likes For chain_whipped:
Old 03-06-23, 10:08 PM
  #41  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by chain_whipped
The replica whatever is an insult compared to the original. I'm surprised 'Rally' china hadn't given it disc brakes but think of the money they've saved!
Now that's an interesting idea that might have saved the whole thing. Imagine a lugged steel replica not trying to be completely faithful, other than paint job, lugs, and a diamond frame.

I wouldn't mind seeing discs on a modern interpretation. Perhaps mated with some other unique details that'd look cool, but not necessarily accurate to any original. Now that sounds interesting.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 03-07-23, 11:52 AM
  #42  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,376 Times in 1,580 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
Now that's an interesting idea that might have saved the whole thing. Imagine a lugged steel replica not trying to be completely faithful, other than paint job, lugs, and a diamond frame.
....
-Kurt
although that's getting perilously close to the Raleigh Record when sold in team colors...
but I don't think they had the same seat tube logos as the Team did.



I recall seeing various Team replicas sold in Europe that were actually good bikes, albeit not up to the Team level. That was in the era when the Team bike/frame was in production.

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Old 03-07-23, 11:54 AM
  #43  
Bad Lag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
I hate to seem dumb but, are these new replicas of the "Team" bikes or are they replicas of the "New Team" bikes (as opposed to old team)?
Bad Lag is offline  
Old 03-07-23, 01:24 PM
  #44  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,376 Times in 1,580 Posts
Originally Posted by Bad Lag
I hate to seem dumb but, are these new replicas of the "Team" bikes or are they replicas of the "New Team" bikes (as opposed to old team)?
The glory days of Raleigh's team sponsorship are all back in the '80's, to my knowledge. A shame.
As such, the replicas are of the Team bikes that are from the '80's.

I wonder if they ever did replicas of bikes ridden by much earlier Raleigh sponsored riders, such as Reg Harris??


Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Old 03-07-23, 01:40 PM
  #45  
georges1
Steel is real
Thread Starter
 
georges1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,956

Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 670 Post(s)
Liked 973 Times in 646 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
I stand corrected! The welding does look competent, at least, but the overall look is that of a mass-production frame, not a limited production/custom build.
Originally Posted by P!N20

Would be interested in what @bulgie and @Doug Fattic think about that.
Originally Posted by bulgie
I don't remember why Reynolds used to say you cannot weld 531 or 753, nor do I know why they've conveniently changed their tune now. I'm not a metallurgist, and not that great a welder tbh, so I'll leave the finer engineering points to my betters. All I can say is that frame is FUGLY and a capital-F Fail if they really were trying to "create a like for like replica of the original". Raleigh is dead to me now. I'd have more respect for them if they stuck to selling Chinese plastic frames like everyone else, it'd be more honest.
Agreed ,finish of the welds on this replica leaves a lot to be desired and one can doubt if those are real 753 tubes that were used inthe frame , because the replica frame is 300 grams heavier than an original Reynolds 753 frame.If it was custom build it would be at least at the level of Waterford 753 frames or Paramount 753 frames where the craftsmanship is incredible. Paying 2000$ for a frame that has poor finish is a definite no for me . The rear drop outs are hideous and ugly and not what you find on a high end frame
georges1 is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.