Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1988 Schwinn Voyageur 27" to 700c conversion (cantilevers)

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

1988 Schwinn Voyageur 27" to 700c conversion (cantilevers)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-12, 10:25 AM
  #1  
rsacilotto
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
rsacilotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saugus, Massachusetts, United States
Posts: 244

Bikes: 1983 Trek 760, 2000 Fuji Team, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
1988 Schwinn Voyageur 27" to 700c conversion (cantilevers)

I've searched through the forums for advice, but didn't quite find any specific advice, wondering if someone has done the same thing. I had spare wheels, bar-end shifters, etc... for a 9-speed conversion with little cost. I know from previous discussions that the cantis would be an iffy proposition. Sure enough, the pads are angled enough so that only the top part of the pad contacts the rim, and I'm not getting enough braking power.

It seems like my main options (in order of expense) are to a) let the pads wear in, b) get new brakes with vertical adjustability, c) get a new 700c fork with stem and maybe bars, and d) get new 27" 9-speed wheels.

I could just go back to the original wheels and drivetrain, but only if d) is the only viable option.

I use this bike mainly as a commuter, and I'm really more concerned about function and not spending a ton of money than period-correctness (I, know - heresy!)

Questions:

1) Could I drill some adjustment into the current dia-compe brake arms? would I be risking brake arm failure?

2) If option b) is reasonable, what is a good specific option for replacement brakes?

Thanks for any advice

By the way, I tried the bar-end shift cable routing method of running the housing all the way around the bars to come out with the brake cable housing. It did require long shift cables, but so far the shift action is fine and I like the look better than my previous method of looping the cable housing from the drops.

rsacilotto is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 10:41 AM
  #2  
FrenchFit 
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Well, I will make a irrelevant post and say I have a '90 Voyageur and wouldn't think of changing out the stock configuration. My God, if you want all those changes just buy a bike with those components; the Voyageur is meant to be a light heavyweight tourer and works great with its stock equipment. The 'heresy' is the bike works great for 100 miles rides with a load; trying to turn it a sprint bike is trying to makeover a minivan into a sportscar.
FrenchFit is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 10:51 AM
  #3  
Henry III
is just a real cool dude
 
Henry III's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Thumb, MI
Posts: 3,165
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times in 14 Posts
You just have to find an arm with a lot of adjustability. I absolutey hate 27 wheels so it's one reason I changed my Schwinn Sports Tourer I had and converted it to 700c. That had calipers though so it was a little easier to convert. I have a set of cantilevers that allow the mounts for the pads to slide up and down the arms. There are no slots just a round tubular arms. The Paul Motolites have the same concept as my cantilevers but are v brakes but use the same idea.
Henry III is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 10:55 AM
  #4  
fender1
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
These:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Shimano-XT-M...#ht_500wt_1202

or these:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/SHIMANO-DEOR...ht_6356wt_1185

Both will work. I have done 27" to 700c conversions with these on 86/87 Schwinn Passages.
fender1 is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 11:00 AM
  #5  
rsacilotto
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
rsacilotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saugus, Massachusetts, United States
Posts: 244

Bikes: 1983 Trek 760, 2000 Fuji Team, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by FrenchFit
Well, I will make a irrelevant post and say I have a '90 Voyageur and wouldn't think of changing out the stock configuration. My God, if you want all those changes just buy a bike with those components; the Voyageur is meant to be a light heavyweight tourer and works great with its stock equipment. The 'heresy' is the bike works great for 100 miles rides with a load; trying to turn it a sprint bike is trying to makeover a minivan into a sportscar.
Hardly a sprint bike, the conversion has nothing to do with lightness. I like having more options with a 700c configuration (cassettes, tires mostly) and I like a wider range of gearing while keeping smaller steps - the 9-speed gives me that. I have a 11-32 mountain cassette with Deore long-cage derailer and a triple in front. Here's a picture (pardon the fredly reflectors)...

rsacilotto is offline  
Likes For rsacilotto:
Old 02-12-12, 11:00 AM
  #6  
FrenchFit 
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Henry III
I absolutey hate 27 wheels so it's one reason I changed my Schwinn Sports Tourer I had and converted it to 700c.
Love 27" wheels and 29ers. Big wheels for big guys.
FrenchFit is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 11:14 AM
  #7  
ColonelJLloyd 
Senior Member
 
ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Louisville
Posts: 8,343
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Here's my 1988 Voyageur with the original Dia Compe 983s. They work great for me with 700c wheels. Try Kool Stop Thinlines and I'll bet you'll be in business soon.





VO Grand Cru cantilevers also worked.

__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
ColonelJLloyd is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 11:23 AM
  #8  
rsacilotto
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
rsacilotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saugus, Massachusetts, United States
Posts: 244

Bikes: 1983 Trek 760, 2000 Fuji Team, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by ColonelJLloyd
Here's my 1988 Voyageur with the original Dia Compe 983s. They work great for me with 700c wheels. Try Kool Stop Thinlines and I'll bet you'll be in business soon.
The VO set is gorgeous, but a little pricey for this project. Looking at your second photo, the angle of the pad seems a lot more level than mine - perhaps the bosses on my frame are situated a little differently. Do you think drilling the brake arms to provide a vertical slot is hazardous?
rsacilotto is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 11:41 AM
  #9  
rsacilotto
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
rsacilotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saugus, Massachusetts, United States
Posts: 244

Bikes: 1983 Trek 760, 2000 Fuji Team, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by ColonelJLloyd
Here's my 1988 Voyageur with the original Dia Compe 983s. They work great for me with 700c wheels. Try Kool Stop Thinlines and I'll bet you'll be in business soon.
On further inspection, my rear brakes are fine, it's only the front that has an issue. It seems that there is enough room to get 2-3mm of adjustment by drilling, that may cover it unless it's just a bad idea mechanically.
rsacilotto is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 11:45 AM
  #10  
ColonelJLloyd 
Senior Member
 
ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Louisville
Posts: 8,343
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
I would try the Thinlines before I modified the brakes.
__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
ColonelJLloyd is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 12:11 PM
  #11  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
some brake calipers have more adjustment, than others,

as shown in #7 bottom picture,
with a longer post on a brake shoe. the pad can meet the rim lower..
as the caliper is rotated outwards.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 12:14 PM
  #12  
ColonelJLloyd 
Senior Member
 
ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Louisville
Posts: 8,343
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
^ Yes, that's why the Thinlines help.
__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
ColonelJLloyd is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 12:35 PM
  #13  
Drakonchik
Senior Member
 
Drakonchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Shimano Deore LX BR-M454 will get the pads lower than anything already mentioned with the possible exception of the Pauls.

Or any other Shimano canti with a series number from M454 to M550.
Drakonchik is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 12:49 PM
  #14  
rsacilotto
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
rsacilotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saugus, Massachusetts, United States
Posts: 244

Bikes: 1983 Trek 760, 2000 Fuji Team, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
light bulb just went off... Colonel and fietsbob, thanks for the suggestions - sorry for being so dense, I didn't think of using the post to fix the angle, I was more focused on the angle of the arm relative to the frame. I'm new to cantis, and haven't fully learned how they work yet. The Jagwire pads have a long enough post that they now are more or less lined up correctly. Just for curiosity, is there any potential brake force issues with the calipers rotated outward? Also, I only got the Jagwire pads because LBS had no other options - I have KoolStop on my other bikes, will probably buy some and swap them if I don't feel that I'm getting enough performance.

rsacilotto is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 12:54 PM
  #15  
Drakonchik
Senior Member
 
Drakonchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Hate to be negative but that's a very sub-optimal attack angle between the brake arm and the cable.

Ideally you want 90 degrees or approaching 90 at the moment the pads contact the rim walls..

Last edited by Drakonchik; 02-12-12 at 01:13 PM.
Drakonchik is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 12:56 PM
  #16  
Standalone 
The Drive Side is Within
 
Standalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Haven, CT, USA
Posts: 3,334

Bikes: Road, Cargo, Tandem, Etc.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 28 Posts
I prefer 6/7/8 speed for touring. It's more durable.

I had a lot of trouble converting my '84 620 canti to 700c so I bought new 27" wheels for it.
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
Standalone is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 01:05 PM
  #17  
rsacilotto
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
rsacilotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saugus, Massachusetts, United States
Posts: 244

Bikes: 1983 Trek 760, 2000 Fuji Team, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Drakonchik
Hate to be negative but that's a very sub-optimal attack angle between the brake arm and the cable.
That's what I'm not sure about. I could split the difference, is that enough?
rsacilotto is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 01:55 PM
  #18  
ColonelJLloyd 
Senior Member
 
ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Louisville
Posts: 8,343
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
You're getting closer, but you don't want your straddle cable interfering with the cantilevers themselves. You need to choke up on the brake posts and shorten your straddle cable. The reason I suggested the Thinlines is that they will allow you to choke up even further. I'll try and snap a clear photo later.

Edit: Here ya go.



__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com

Last edited by ColonelJLloyd; 02-12-12 at 04:56 PM.
ColonelJLloyd is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 02:41 PM
  #19  
that_guy_zach
Senior Member
 
that_guy_zach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: omicron persei 8
Posts: 785
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I had Dia Compes on mine with 700s. I think they were the 980s?
that_guy_zach is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 05:59 PM
  #20  
rsacilotto
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
rsacilotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saugus, Massachusetts, United States
Posts: 244

Bikes: 1983 Trek 760, 2000 Fuji Team, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Thanks to all for advice, I think I got the brakes set up decently now, looks about like Justin's setup (beautiful, by the way!!). I don't know if it's just me, but cantis are a pain in the neck to adjust -lots of variables and not easy to get everything lined up while tightening the nuts on the pad retaining bolts.

I will likely look around for some Thinline pads when I get the chance.
rsacilotto is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 06:04 PM
  #21  
IndianaShawn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Very good looking bicycle........congratz
IndianaShawn is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 06:39 PM
  #22  
Creme Brulee
Senior Member
 
Creme Brulee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 360

Bikes: koga miyata road gentleman, raleigh crested butte, raleigh comp 650b

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
what size tires are those on that voyageur? i have one i haven't built up yet and i want to put the largest tires possible on there in addition to fenders... those look pretty good!
Creme Brulee is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 06:43 PM
  #23  
Drakonchik
Senior Member
 
Drakonchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Ditto what the Colonel said about Thinlines.
Drakonchik is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 06:58 PM
  #24  
rsacilotto
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
rsacilotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Saugus, Massachusetts, United States
Posts: 244

Bikes: 1983 Trek 760, 2000 Fuji Team, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Creme Brulee
what size tires are those on that voyageur? i have one i haven't built up yet and i want to put the largest tires possible on there in addition to fenders... those look pretty good!
The tires are Panaracer Pasela 700cx32, but I had 35s on the original 27" wheels. The fenders are SKS P45 Chromoplastic with Planet Bike Cascadia mudflaps.

To be honest, I got the Paselas for cost, and have no idea how well they will hold up to road use. I use the bike for a 32-mile round trip commute over mostly decent pavement, hopefully they will be okay.
rsacilotto is offline  
Old 02-12-12, 07:27 PM
  #25  
ColonelJLloyd 
Senior Member
 
ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Louisville
Posts: 8,343
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by rsacilotto
I don't know if it's just me, but cantis are a pain in the neck to adjust -lots of variables and not easy to get everything lined up while tightening the nuts on the pad retaining bolts.
It's not just you. Cantilevers are lightweight and very effective brakes, but they are tedious to setup well.

I'm running Panaracer Jack Brown tires that measure right around 35mm. The tightest spot is the fork crown.
__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com

Last edited by ColonelJLloyd; 02-12-12 at 07:31 PM.
ColonelJLloyd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.