Litespeed Tuscany
07-11-21, 12:52 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 436 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
999 Posts
I have a 2000 Litespeed Tuscany. Here's a photo from a couple of days ago: https://www.bikeforums.net/22136087-post17464.html
It's one of my favorite daily riders, handles predictably in most situations (not a strong criterium race bike), and fueled my desire for more than one Litespeed.
It's very comfortable and quiet. Long rides are wonderful. You can feel the road, but not any fatiguing vibrations.
And how can anyone not like a bike made in Chattanooga, TN, USA!
All of the Tuscanys through 2001 are solid bikes that handle well.
I've refurbished and sold 4 other Tuscanys through 2003 and have a 55cm in the queue now.
The only downside to this bike was in 2002 - 2004 (2005?) when Litespeed sold that model with an integrated head tube design that served as headset cups for the bearings.
Some, but certainly not all, of those bikes had headset adjustment issues. Buyer beware those years.
It's one of my favorite daily riders, handles predictably in most situations (not a strong criterium race bike), and fueled my desire for more than one Litespeed.
It's very comfortable and quiet. Long rides are wonderful. You can feel the road, but not any fatiguing vibrations.
And how can anyone not like a bike made in Chattanooga, TN, USA!
All of the Tuscanys through 2001 are solid bikes that handle well.
I've refurbished and sold 4 other Tuscanys through 2003 and have a 55cm in the queue now.
The only downside to this bike was in 2002 - 2004 (2005?) when Litespeed sold that model with an integrated head tube design that served as headset cups for the bearings.
Some, but certainly not all, of those bikes had headset adjustment issues. Buyer beware those years.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
07-11-21, 01:13 PM
#3
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,378 Times
in
891 Posts
I had a 1999 Tuscany (purchased new) that had an alignment issue with the rear triangle. It was noticibly off center and verified by a shop - ended up with a refund. I liked the ride quality and it fit me perfectly. I felt that the fame was a little soft and didn't transfer as well power well as steel. But it was comfy.
07-11-21, 01:17 PM
#4
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
I also had a Tuscany, until it was sadly stolen. Mine was the standard headset type, not the integrated which to me was a downgrade. In the 55cm size like I had the tube sizes were nice and made for a firm ride but not jarring, with a fairly firm bottom bracket when sprinting. Some other Litespeeds of the era had more bells and whistles but to me the Tuscany was the best do-all frame of the lot.
Likes For Nessism:
07-11-21, 01:20 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
"Power transfer" is a myth. If frame flex wasted power, your frame would get hot when you sprint. It doesn't.
Unless it affects handling, which can happen at either extreme, frame stiffness is not a factor in bicycle performance. It's a matter of preference, nothing more.
--Shannon
NB: Preferences are fine and good things, and there's no arguing about matters of taste. But that's all it is.
Unless it affects handling, which can happen at either extreme, frame stiffness is not a factor in bicycle performance. It's a matter of preference, nothing more.
--Shannon
NB: Preferences are fine and good things, and there's no arguing about matters of taste. But that's all it is.
07-11-21, 01:30 PM
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
To each their own but to me a flexy bottom bracket detracts from the enjoyment of sprinting on a particular frame. No comment on "power transfer."
07-11-21, 01:44 PM
#7
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,378 Times
in
891 Posts
Perhaps an incorrect word choice on my part.
Since I couldn't detect any heat coming off the frame, I'll just say it was sluggish.
Since I couldn't detect any heat coming off the frame, I'll just say it was sluggish.
07-11-21, 08:05 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
The "frame flex wastes energy" thing is kind of a windmill for me. It's not true, it's never made any sense, and the bike industry has been flogging that equine corpse for most of my life. Those few who have ever dared to question it have been ruthlessly defenestrated by the rest of the industry... Keith Bontrager being the canonical example.
If it sounded like I was calling you out, that wasn't my intention, and I apologize.
--Shannon
