Hit by car, insurance tries to pay depreciated value for the bike
#101
Full Member
I doubt any attorney--bike oriented or not--would be interested in taking a case with so little potential for payoff. Even if you were injured, (and bicycle replacement costs weighed against virtually any medical costs is chicken feed) your injuries would have to go beyond the realm of the trivial for it to be "worth it" to a lawyer.
Any one year old bicycle I own will be worth far more to me than any buyer in a "arms length" transaction. For instance, I wouldn't sell my five year old Cervelo for blue book + 50% even if offered that because I expect the bike to be fully functional for several more years (unless damaged in an accident of course). In my mind a bicycle depreciates very slowly under normal usage.
While I wouldn't expect any insurance company to replace a 15 year old Accord with a brand new one, a bicycle accident not involving an injury is a different kettle of fish. It's a trivial amount of money not matter how you look at it. Basically, the insurance company position is petty, absurd and infuriating. This is what gives them a bad name.
Any one year old bicycle I own will be worth far more to me than any buyer in a "arms length" transaction. For instance, I wouldn't sell my five year old Cervelo for blue book + 50% even if offered that because I expect the bike to be fully functional for several more years (unless damaged in an accident of course). In my mind a bicycle depreciates very slowly under normal usage.
While I wouldn't expect any insurance company to replace a 15 year old Accord with a brand new one, a bicycle accident not involving an injury is a different kettle of fish. It's a trivial amount of money not matter how you look at it. Basically, the insurance company position is petty, absurd and infuriating. This is what gives them a bad name.
#103
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Martinsburg WV Area
Posts: 1,704
Bikes: State 4130 Custom, Giant Trance 29
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 422 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times
in
123 Posts
Insurance has given us money to replace my Son's stolen bike. Their depreciated value of his 1.5 year old bike, was less $50 from the original value.
So $700, minus my deductible of $250 and minus the depreciated value of $50.
I find it strange the insurance is saying your more expensive bike loses that much value. In my opinion they are ripping you off, BUT, that is a U.S. opinion. Not sure how Canada does things.
So $700, minus my deductible of $250 and minus the depreciated value of $50.
I find it strange the insurance is saying your more expensive bike loses that much value. In my opinion they are ripping you off, BUT, that is a U.S. opinion. Not sure how Canada does things.
#104
Cycle Year Round
No. As others have noted, you need to go onto craigslist and e-bay to compare what similar year, model and condition bicycles are selling for, to establish current value.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#105
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 121
Bikes: Surly Krampus, Salsa Vaya, Specialized AWOL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I ended up filing a Small Claims Court claim. I got a free 30-minute consult with a lawyer, who helped me write the claim.
An interesting takeaway from the conversation with the lawyer is that, once a court claim is filed, this is no longer an insurance claim. It is now a court claim under the Law of Negligence, so the insurance policies no longer apply. Especially since there was no contract between me and the driver's insurance company.
The lawyer's advice was to keep insurance terms out of the claim and to not even discuss the replacement value vs. cash value disagreement in the court claim. Keep the arguments about that for later, in case the defendant's side tries to argue that. The lawyer advised to keep the claim as short as possible, and to not try to foresee and counter any arguments with which the insurance company is likely to come back.
Overall, filing a court claim was quite easy, but did take some time to prepare.
An interesting takeaway from the conversation with the lawyer is that, once a court claim is filed, this is no longer an insurance claim. It is now a court claim under the Law of Negligence, so the insurance policies no longer apply. Especially since there was no contract between me and the driver's insurance company.
The lawyer's advice was to keep insurance terms out of the claim and to not even discuss the replacement value vs. cash value disagreement in the court claim. Keep the arguments about that for later, in case the defendant's side tries to argue that. The lawyer advised to keep the claim as short as possible, and to not try to foresee and counter any arguments with which the insurance company is likely to come back.
Overall, filing a court claim was quite easy, but did take some time to prepare.
#106
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Along the Rivers of Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,255
Bikes: 2011 Novara Forza Hybrid, 2005 Trek 820, 1989 Cannondale SR500 Black Lightning, 1975 Mundo Cycles Caloi Racer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
157 Posts
So in Ontario, is your claim against the insurance carrier or the driver? How does the other party get served?
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,509
Bikes: 3 good used ones
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
My bike was damaged in a collision with a car, in which the driver was at fault. The frame and wheels are bent and a bunch of components are damaged. I have three estimates from three different bike shops, each of them totalling over $3,000 in replacement parts and labour (a new bike plus the cost of all the upgrades that were damaged, plus labour to transfer some of the upgrades and accessories that survived the crash).
I am talking to the driver's car insurance, and their position is that the bike's depreciated value is about $750, so that's how much they are offering to pay for my damages. This is totally nuts because the bike is just over a year old, and a 2016 version of the same model retails for $1,750 without the upgrades I made.
Guys at every bike shop where I've gone to talk about this say that the insurance companies always pay replacement value for bikes, not depreciated value. However, the insurance adjuster who is talking to me is dead set that they are only going to pay depreciated value.
Has anyone fought an insurance company on this issue?
I am talking to the driver's car insurance, and their position is that the bike's depreciated value is about $750, so that's how much they are offering to pay for my damages. This is totally nuts because the bike is just over a year old, and a 2016 version of the same model retails for $1,750 without the upgrades I made.
Guys at every bike shop where I've gone to talk about this say that the insurance companies always pay replacement value for bikes, not depreciated value. However, the insurance adjuster who is talking to me is dead set that they are only going to pay depreciated value.
Has anyone fought an insurance company on this issue?
Sometimes, you gotta fight...and, be sure to fight smart.
#108
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 121
Bikes: Surly Krampus, Salsa Vaya, Specialized AWOL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There is an online FAQ on serving the documents, more like a tractatus. The bottom line is that it is possible to send by registered mail and then print out the delivery confirmation page that shows the recipient's signature. If the recipient decides to dodge service of the documents, there are some elaborate methods to still serve them.
Last edited by agenkin; 06-15-16 at 08:51 AM. Reason: Answered the second question.
#109
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 121
Bikes: Surly Krampus, Salsa Vaya, Specialized AWOL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I hear that Canadian court system is different from American in that here the judges are very unwilling to award punitive damages. That said, I am asking for some things on top of the replacement value.
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
I ended up filing a Small Claims Court claim. I got a free 30-minute consult with a lawyer, who helped me write the claim.
An interesting takeaway from the conversation with the lawyer is that, once a court claim is filed, this is no longer an insurance claim. It is now a court claim under the Law of Negligence, so the insurance policies no longer apply. Especially since there was no contract between me and the driver's insurance company.
The lawyer's advice was to keep insurance terms out of the claim and to not even discuss the replacement value vs. cash value disagreement in the court claim. Keep the arguments about that for later, in case the defendant's side tries to argue that. The lawyer advised to keep the claim as short as possible, and to not try to foresee and counter any arguments with which the insurance company is likely to come back.
Overall, filing a court claim was quite easy, but did take some time to prepare.
An interesting takeaway from the conversation with the lawyer is that, once a court claim is filed, this is no longer an insurance claim. It is now a court claim under the Law of Negligence, so the insurance policies no longer apply. Especially since there was no contract between me and the driver's insurance company.
The lawyer's advice was to keep insurance terms out of the claim and to not even discuss the replacement value vs. cash value disagreement in the court claim. Keep the arguments about that for later, in case the defendant's side tries to argue that. The lawyer advised to keep the claim as short as possible, and to not try to foresee and counter any arguments with which the insurance company is likely to come back.
Overall, filing a court claim was quite easy, but did take some time to prepare.
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
Just a general thought, not aimed at anyone specific: considering you have an emotional attachment to your bike, and are likely to overvalue it (especially when asking for compensation), wouldn't a better way of determining a fair value be how much you would pay for that same bike from someone else? Would you buy a bike that was a year old and ridden daily for only a 10% discount off this years model, brand new, sitting next to it? Also, just because one particular claim may seem to be trivial to you, when dealing with thousands of claims a day, trivial things add up in a hurry, and are not likely to just be given out. Especially so, to someone who is not a customer that they are trying to retain.
Anyways, interested to hear how this turns out!
Anyways, interested to hear how this turns out!
#112
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
here's an update on my property damage claim.
took the bike to a high-end shop and got a repair estimate. submitted the estimate and photos of damage.
the adjuster kept asking questions about the age of the bike as an apparent prelude to the 'depreciation' discussion. I attempted to explain that the frame/fork were from the late '90s but I wasn't seeking any money for them as they were not damaged. the damaged components were purchased from 2012-2014.
before we had a conversation regarding a settlement, I hired an atty.
a week later, the adjuster contacted me and said they would be issuing a check in the amount of the repair estimate. also notable was there was no demand to surrender damaged parts.
now, this is very interesting because the shop spec'd out all new 11-spd DA stuff at current full retail, but I had purchased mostly used 10-spd pieces for the re-build and had provided receipts for all expenses (which were considerably less than the repair estimate).
not sure what their line of reasoning for the settlement was, but not complaining.
my atty's advice was to wait 48 hrs to see if they claimed an error in the settlement offer and then cash the check. followed that plan and have heard nothing since.
took the bike to a high-end shop and got a repair estimate. submitted the estimate and photos of damage.
the adjuster kept asking questions about the age of the bike as an apparent prelude to the 'depreciation' discussion. I attempted to explain that the frame/fork were from the late '90s but I wasn't seeking any money for them as they were not damaged. the damaged components were purchased from 2012-2014.
before we had a conversation regarding a settlement, I hired an atty.
a week later, the adjuster contacted me and said they would be issuing a check in the amount of the repair estimate. also notable was there was no demand to surrender damaged parts.
now, this is very interesting because the shop spec'd out all new 11-spd DA stuff at current full retail, but I had purchased mostly used 10-spd pieces for the re-build and had provided receipts for all expenses (which were considerably less than the repair estimate).
not sure what their line of reasoning for the settlement was, but not complaining.
my atty's advice was to wait 48 hrs to see if they claimed an error in the settlement offer and then cash the check. followed that plan and have heard nothing since.
#113
Cycle Year Round
hbefore we had a conversation regarding a settlement, I hired an atty.
a week later, the adjuster contacted me and said they would be issuing a check in the amount of the repair estimate. also notable was there was no demand to surrender damaged parts.
now, this is very interesting because the shop spec'd out all new 11-spd DA stuff at current full retail, but I had purchased mostly used 10-spd pieces for the re-build and had provided receipts for all expenses (which were considerably less than the repair estimate).
not sure what their line of reasoning for the settlement was, but not complaining.
a week later, the adjuster contacted me and said they would be issuing a check in the amount of the repair estimate. also notable was there was no demand to surrender damaged parts.
now, this is very interesting because the shop spec'd out all new 11-spd DA stuff at current full retail, but I had purchased mostly used 10-spd pieces for the re-build and had provided receipts for all expenses (which were considerably less than the repair estimate).
not sure what their line of reasoning for the settlement was, but not complaining.
PS You should have rented a bicycle and charged them for that as well. It is always nice to test out a different bicycle on their dollar and you should not have to do without while they piddle around.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#114
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
You had an atty. Giving you the shop estimate was the least risky method to close the case quickly. They did not want to give your atty time to come up with more cost.
PS You should have rented a bicycle and charged them for that as well. It is always nice to test out a different bicycle on their dollar and you should not have to do without while they piddle around.
PS You should have rented a bicycle and charged them for that as well. It is always nice to test out a different bicycle on their dollar and you should not have to do without while they piddle around.
I could have easily claimed a bunch of small stuff (there was a micro tear on my jersey, etc), but the atty advised against blatantly padding the bill because the money for the medical claim will more than cover the cheaper property items. and I had a back-up bike to ride, so didn't need to rent one and I'm def not in the market for a third bike.
maybe I'm a sap, but I'm really not trying to gouge the ins company. I wanted to get my bike back to the same standard as prior to the crash, have medical costs covered, and pocket some money for the inconvenience and pain the driver caused.
so far, things are working out in my favor. will report back after the med claim is settled.
#116
Senior Member
When I was hit by a car the driver's insurance company paid the full replacement cost of the bike, no depreciation. The bike was a custom. All I had to do was take the parts list to a bike shop, which verified the stated values and signed off on my claim. The insurance clerk wasn't happy when he saw the total, but didn't say much. They did take the wrecked bike. Why I don't know.
Not USA, so may not apply to the OP's situation.
Not USA, so may not apply to the OP's situation.
#117
Senior Member
now, this is very interesting because the shop spec'd out all new 11-spd DA stuff at current full retail, but I had purchased mostly used 10-spd pieces for the re-build and had provided receipts for all expenses (which were considerably less than the repair estimate).
not sure what their line of reasoning for the settlement was, but not complaining.
not sure what their line of reasoning for the settlement was, but not complaining.
I work in a shop and absolutely love working up damage estimates for bikes involved in bike/car collisions...
#118
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1968 Cinelli Model B, 2008 Cinelli Supercorsa Pista, Cannondale CAAD12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
2 Posts
here's an update on my property damage claim.
took the bike to a high-end shop and got a repair estimate. submitted the estimate and photos of damage.
the adjuster kept asking questions about the age of the bike as an apparent prelude to the 'depreciation' discussion. I attempted to explain that the frame/fork were from the late '90s but I wasn't seeking any money for them as they were not damaged. the damaged components were purchased from 2012-2014.
before we had a conversation regarding a settlement, I hired an atty.
a week later, the adjuster contacted me and said they would be issuing a check in the amount of the repair estimate. also notable was there was no demand to surrender damaged parts.
now, this is very interesting because the shop spec'd out all new 11-spd DA stuff at current full retail, but I had purchased mostly used 10-spd pieces for the re-build and had provided receipts for all expenses (which were considerably less than the repair estimate).
not sure what their line of reasoning for the settlement was, but not complaining.
my atty's advice was to wait 48 hrs to see if they claimed an error in the settlement offer and then cash the check. followed that plan and have heard nothing since.
took the bike to a high-end shop and got a repair estimate. submitted the estimate and photos of damage.
the adjuster kept asking questions about the age of the bike as an apparent prelude to the 'depreciation' discussion. I attempted to explain that the frame/fork were from the late '90s but I wasn't seeking any money for them as they were not damaged. the damaged components were purchased from 2012-2014.
before we had a conversation regarding a settlement, I hired an atty.
a week later, the adjuster contacted me and said they would be issuing a check in the amount of the repair estimate. also notable was there was no demand to surrender damaged parts.
now, this is very interesting because the shop spec'd out all new 11-spd DA stuff at current full retail, but I had purchased mostly used 10-spd pieces for the re-build and had provided receipts for all expenses (which were considerably less than the repair estimate).
not sure what their line of reasoning for the settlement was, but not complaining.
my atty's advice was to wait 48 hrs to see if they claimed an error in the settlement offer and then cash the check. followed that plan and have heard nothing since.
Would love to chat with either FullGas or agenkin (not sure how to tag people) as I'm also in Toronto and dealing with a similar issue. I expect to receive a settlement offer today and I expect to hate it as they're spending a lot of time talking about depreciation. I'll try to DM and see if that works and if not, maybe shoot me a text using Toronto's OG area code and 888-1942? Would be appreciated
#120
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3966 Post(s)
Liked 7,375 Times
in
2,970 Posts
Why are newbies are always reviving zombie threads?
Likes For tomato coupe:
#121
Senior Member
Likes For Daniel4:
#122
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3966 Post(s)
Liked 7,375 Times
in
2,970 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#123
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
My bike was damaged in a collision with a car, in which the driver was at fault. The frame and wheels are bent and a bunch of components are damaged. I have three estimates from three different bike shops, each of them totalling over $3,000 in replacement parts and labour (a new bike plus the cost of all the upgrades that were damaged, plus labour to transfer some of the upgrades and accessories that survived the crash).
I am talking to the driver's car insurance, and their position is that the bike's depreciated value is about $750, so that's how much they are offering to pay for my damages. This is totally nuts because the bike is just over a year old, and a 2016 version of the same model retails for $1,750 without the upgrades I made.
Guys at every bike shop where I've gone to talk about this say that the insurance companies always pay replacement value for bikes, not depreciated value. However, the insurance adjuster who is talking to me is dead set that they are only going to pay depreciated value.
Has anyone fought an insurance company on this issue?
I am talking to the driver's car insurance, and their position is that the bike's depreciated value is about $750, so that's how much they are offering to pay for my damages. This is totally nuts because the bike is just over a year old, and a 2016 version of the same model retails for $1,750 without the upgrades I made.
Guys at every bike shop where I've gone to talk about this say that the insurance companies always pay replacement value for bikes, not depreciated value. However, the insurance adjuster who is talking to me is dead set that they are only going to pay depreciated value.
Has anyone fought an insurance company on this issue?
#125
Senior Member
My forty-two year old bike is probably worth $10 on the market. To me, it's not the material value that matters. It's the utilitarian value. If I were compensated with $10, it'd be too much effort looking for a replacement at that same price.