Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Does rear suspension make it less likely to break spokes?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Does rear suspension make it less likely to break spokes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-23, 03:30 AM
  #1  
MyRedTrek
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 27 Posts
Does rear suspension make it less likely to break spokes?

Someone in another forum has a Giant Fathom E+2 which has rear suspension. From what he's saying he's pretty hefty and the bike is heavy due to the motor hardware and battery but he hasn't had issues with spokes breaking even though his rear wheel is 32 spokes with straight gauge spokes and even though he goes through some trails - i.e. the bike doesn't get babied. My Trek kept breaking rear spokes riding on pavement exclusively until I went to a 36-spoke rim with triple-butted spokes.

Is it likely the suspension mitigates forces that break spokes?

Last edited by MyRedTrek; 10-10-23 at 06:29 AM.
MyRedTrek is offline  
Old 10-10-23, 07:36 AM
  #2  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
I say this as someone who hasn’t picked up a physics book in 30 years since Uni but I think yes. The suspension system will reduce the instantaneous impulse force impacting the wheel. As can sympathetic riding technique/handling.
choddo is offline  
Likes For choddo:
Old 10-10-23, 09:03 AM
  #3  
CrimsonEclipse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,098
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Liked 648 Times in 381 Posts
um... kinda?
As stated above, it changes the way that force is applied (over time instead of instantaneously)
But the rider might take less care for avoiding obstacles with suspension.
CrimsonEclipse is offline  
Likes For CrimsonEclipse:
Old 10-10-23, 09:27 AM
  #4  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times in 3,319 Posts
If you learn to unweight yourself from the saddle as you go over the bumps, then the bike itself becomes one big independent suspension unit and likely has pretty much the same reduction of forces for the wheel that you are imagining for a rear suspension.

Just lighten up the load on the saddle with your legs as you encounter bumpy areas. You'll get a much nicer ride and wonder why others think it was so terrible. Similarly if you just lightly hold the bars or hoods as you go over those same bumps, then you'll have less issue with numb hands and wrists.
Iride01 is offline  
Likes For Iride01:
Old 10-10-23, 01:45 PM
  #5  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,584 Times in 1,432 Posts
This is sort of a trick question because suspension WILL reduce peak vertical loads in the same way as lifting off the seat would.

The problem is that those peak vertical loads are not the most common cause of fatigue spoke failure. Spokes fatigue and ultimately break because of side loads rather than vertical loads which tend to be limited to narrow bands. So, if that suspension allows you to ride more aggressively, bouncing off obstacles, and landing with the bike off plumb then your wheels will likely suffer more not less.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 10-10-23, 09:01 PM
  #6  
maddog34
Senior Member
 
maddog34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975

Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times in 534 Posts
"trails" Surfaces allow the torque loading to be dissipated by traction reduction.
Going from dirt to pavement with the wheels spinning breaks more hardened automotive axles than any other loading.

it's the torque that snaps parts, not the bumps or amount of vertical loading... to a point, anyway...

when the suspension runs out of travel, a new sudden load increase is introduced... and the bike rider may discover what their medical insurance deductible is...

any avid off road rider quickly learns to ANTICIPATE bumps and de-couple their rump from the seat... same can be said for potholes, curbs, and the occasional cocker spaniel, etc... Keep those knees Bent, never straight leg.
and Flying W's suck.

Last edited by maddog34; 10-10-23 at 09:04 PM.
maddog34 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.