Carbon with the feel of steel??
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,628
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2980 Post(s)
Liked 1,185 Times
in
772 Posts
I have a 2021 Domane. It's an awesome bike.
1: Bikes can't be slow. A bike is an inanimate object. How fast a bike can go is all in the rider and nothing to do with the bike. That you feel the bike is slow is all in your head.
2. My Domane weighs a little over 20 lbs. Not sure what what you are looking for in bike weight.
3. The stock Bontrager Hardcase Lite tires that come on the bike are junk and feel like crap when riding. A tire upgrade (I got Conti GP5000s) does wonders for that bike.
4. The bike has 32 mm tires. Because of the wider tires you can run less pressure than your 23/25 tires and it smooths out the bumps.
5.) The Domane has the front and rear isospeed that also smooths out the bumps.
Items 4 and 5 are maybe why the bike feels dead to you. You are are used to a steel bike with narrow tires that are run at higher pressure and you feel every single road bump through your arms and legs. Maybe you like that? I know I don't. I prefer the smoother ride.
1: Bikes can't be slow. A bike is an inanimate object. How fast a bike can go is all in the rider and nothing to do with the bike. That you feel the bike is slow is all in your head.
2. My Domane weighs a little over 20 lbs. Not sure what what you are looking for in bike weight.
3. The stock Bontrager Hardcase Lite tires that come on the bike are junk and feel like crap when riding. A tire upgrade (I got Conti GP5000s) does wonders for that bike.
4. The bike has 32 mm tires. Because of the wider tires you can run less pressure than your 23/25 tires and it smooths out the bumps.
5.) The Domane has the front and rear isospeed that also smooths out the bumps.
Items 4 and 5 are maybe why the bike feels dead to you. You are are used to a steel bike with narrow tires that are run at higher pressure and you feel every single road bump through your arms and legs. Maybe you like that? I know I don't. I prefer the smoother ride.
#27
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,621
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10975 Post(s)
Liked 7,504 Times
in
4,198 Posts
Wheelbase, fork trail, chainstay length, bottom bracket drop, tire size and quality- all of these for sure play a large role in how a bike feels. You can take two otherwise identical bikes but one with less trail and higher quality tires will feel 'snappier' vs 'planted' and 'faster' rather than 'sluggish'.
Sure, frame material plays a role in feel. But I am convinced that a wide tire(40mm for example) almost totally negates frame material feel. At that point, the frame either simply feels firm or soft, quick or slow and thats all geometry.
The Domane you tried could feel sluggish due to heavy wheels, slow tires, and relaxed geometry(wheelbase and chainstays in particular) compared to your Seven.
A Domane SL6 is a $4200 bike so yeah if you arent fully happy with it then it totally makes sense to get something different.
The 62cm Domane has a stack height of 656mm and reach of 386mm. Its pretty upright and short reach. I am 6'5 and my road bikes have slightly lower stack reach and a good bit more reach.
It may be tough to find something thats mass produced that will feel snappy or fast and has stack/reach numbers similar to the Domane.
What are all the geometry details of your Seven?
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,957
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3959 Post(s)
Liked 7,314 Times
in
2,951 Posts
There is a lot more to 'feel' than just material.
Wheelbase, fork trail, chainstay length, bottom bracket drop, tire size and quality- all of these for sure play a large role in how a bike feels. You can take two otherwise identical bikes but one with less trail and higher quality tires will feel 'snappier' vs 'planted' and 'faster' rather than 'sluggish'.
Sure, frame material plays a role in feel. But I am convinced that a wide tire(40mm for example) almost totally negates frame material feel. At that point, the frame either simply feels firm or soft, quick or slow and thats all geometry.
The Domane you tried could feel sluggish due to heavy wheels, slow tires, and relaxed geometry(wheelbase and chainstays in particular) compared to your Seven.
A Domane SL6 is a $4200 bike so yeah if you arent fully happy with it then it totally makes sense to get something different.
The 62cm Domane has a stack height of 656mm and reach of 386mm. Its pretty upright and short reach. I am 6'5 and my road bikes have slightly lower stack reach and a good bit more reach.
It may be tough to find something thats mass produced that will feel snappy or fast and has stack/reach numbers similar to the Domane.
What are all the geometry details of your Seven?
Wheelbase, fork trail, chainstay length, bottom bracket drop, tire size and quality- all of these for sure play a large role in how a bike feels. You can take two otherwise identical bikes but one with less trail and higher quality tires will feel 'snappier' vs 'planted' and 'faster' rather than 'sluggish'.
Sure, frame material plays a role in feel. But I am convinced that a wide tire(40mm for example) almost totally negates frame material feel. At that point, the frame either simply feels firm or soft, quick or slow and thats all geometry.
The Domane you tried could feel sluggish due to heavy wheels, slow tires, and relaxed geometry(wheelbase and chainstays in particular) compared to your Seven.
A Domane SL6 is a $4200 bike so yeah if you arent fully happy with it then it totally makes sense to get something different.
The 62cm Domane has a stack height of 656mm and reach of 386mm. Its pretty upright and short reach. I am 6'5 and my road bikes have slightly lower stack reach and a good bit more reach.
It may be tough to find something thats mass produced that will feel snappy or fast and has stack/reach numbers similar to the Domane.
What are all the geometry details of your Seven?
"Frankly, I'm wondering why carbon bikes are so popular if the ride quality cannot hold a candle to steel."
Likes For tomato coupe:
#29
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,621
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10975 Post(s)
Liked 7,504 Times
in
4,198 Posts
Good advice, but I think you're wasting your time. The OP isn't really interested in a carbon bike. He started an identical thread on another forum, and quickly posted the following:
"Frankly, I'm wondering why carbon bikes are so popular if the ride quality cannot hold a candle to steel."
"Frankly, I'm wondering why carbon bikes are so popular if the ride quality cannot hold a candle to steel."
The tough thing is that if the OP gets a steel frame and the geometry isnt what they want, itll feel slow/dead too.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#30
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,339
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3902 Post(s)
Liked 4,847 Times
in
2,235 Posts
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Likes For Wildwood:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,500
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,485 Times
in
1,840 Posts
How does steel feel?
I sort of thought that stuff depended on frame design .......
I sort of thought that stuff depended on frame design .......
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,387
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2490 Post(s)
Liked 2,962 Times
in
1,683 Posts
#33
Senior Member
You like Seven, stick with Seven. Tell Rob what you want. Let him choose steel again, or Ti, or Ti plus carbon. I don’t even like Sevens but you do, why argue with success? Rob Vandermarks strongest suit is that he is really good at talking with the customers. If he made you happy before he can do it again.
#34
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,068
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22610 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times
in
4,164 Posts
#35
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
OK, I see that I've phrased my dilemma all wrong. Yes, I posted the same question on another forum and got some pretty rude replies. (I love the internet!) Yes, I know that wheels, tires, etc effect ride "quality", and that ride quality can mean different things to different people. I'm certainly not a Noob. I don't wan to buy a bike only to spend another $1000 changing wheels/tires etc to make it a better ride. What I should have said is.....
My experience with carbon bikes is that they have a "dead" feel to them. My experience with steel bikes is that they have a lively feel. My experience with Aluminum bikes is that they have a very harsh feel (old Cannondale 3.0 frame and Cannondale Tandem - my wife HATED the ride of the tandem) . I understand that tube diameters and construction design, etc., etc. can have a effect on ride quality so that the differences to some may not be apparent. But they certainly are to me.
I guess when it comes down to it my question is, as a general rule, do carbon frames have a dead feeling ride quality? I suppose if you've never had experience riding anything other than carbon you wouldn't be familiar with what I mean. I would like to try another carbon bike other than the Domane I had, but simply test riding a variety of bikes is impossible, especially in today's supply crunch and because frankly shops don't normally stock my size. I don't want to go to a shop and say please order me a Roubaix or a BMC Road Machine and then be disappointed with what I end up with.
As far as I'm concerned, I appreciate the thoughtful replies, but this discussion can end. It's up to me just to decide on way or the other. As some have pointed out, I said I prefer the ride of steel, so I will either do that or go for a titanium frame, but I just wanted to know if my impression of carbon frames and being dead and uninspiring is more typical.
Thank you.
I also really don't like the fact that I can only post a certain number to replies on this forum over a 24 hour period. Seems like an odd rule.
My experience with carbon bikes is that they have a "dead" feel to them. My experience with steel bikes is that they have a lively feel. My experience with Aluminum bikes is that they have a very harsh feel (old Cannondale 3.0 frame and Cannondale Tandem - my wife HATED the ride of the tandem) . I understand that tube diameters and construction design, etc., etc. can have a effect on ride quality so that the differences to some may not be apparent. But they certainly are to me.
I guess when it comes down to it my question is, as a general rule, do carbon frames have a dead feeling ride quality? I suppose if you've never had experience riding anything other than carbon you wouldn't be familiar with what I mean. I would like to try another carbon bike other than the Domane I had, but simply test riding a variety of bikes is impossible, especially in today's supply crunch and because frankly shops don't normally stock my size. I don't want to go to a shop and say please order me a Roubaix or a BMC Road Machine and then be disappointed with what I end up with.
As far as I'm concerned, I appreciate the thoughtful replies, but this discussion can end. It's up to me just to decide on way or the other. As some have pointed out, I said I prefer the ride of steel, so I will either do that or go for a titanium frame, but I just wanted to know if my impression of carbon frames and being dead and uninspiring is more typical.
Thank you.
I also really don't like the fact that I can only post a certain number to replies on this forum over a 24 hour period. Seems like an odd rule.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,275
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18432 Post(s)
Liked 15,592 Times
in
7,342 Posts
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,275
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18432 Post(s)
Liked 15,592 Times
in
7,342 Posts
Likes For indyfabz:
#38
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,574
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3685 Post(s)
Liked 5,455 Times
in
2,772 Posts
Likes For shelbyfv:
#39
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,339
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3902 Post(s)
Liked 4,847 Times
in
2,235 Posts
but
I only highly recommend the Calfee based on 20 years of ownership experience. Frame now sports compact rings and longer rd cage -- which suit my aging frame.
edit: Carbon frame with a dead feel? That was true many years ago and steered me away from early Trek, Aegis, other monocoque designs. And yes, early aluminum road frames tig welded with oversized tubing from Cannondale, Klein and others were tremendously stiff, especially if your tires were 20 or 23mm pumped hard.
Not sure it is a valid question today with fat tires and decoupled frames (seatpost suspension) and headset suspension models being offered on road bikes.
Really - with low psi, 32mm tires or wider - who cares about frame material?
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 09-02-21 at 07:26 PM.
Likes For Wildwood:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,809
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,170 Times
in
1,324 Posts
The only issue you have is owning a bike no one has ridden, or will ride. Plus steel is 30+ years past its prime, so you’ll be hard pressed to get a lot of comparable input. Even though BF has a large steel contingent.
I would imagine a number of C&V people have ridden carbon but you need to be able to point to an 80’s bike that is similar enough to your Seven to have any chance of a valid suggestion.
If you want to move on, hang the Seven up, try out bikes, and adjust. A good frame, wheels, and components go a long way regardless what it’s made of.
John
I would imagine a number of C&V people have ridden carbon but you need to be able to point to an 80’s bike that is similar enough to your Seven to have any chance of a valid suggestion.
If you want to move on, hang the Seven up, try out bikes, and adjust. A good frame, wheels, and components go a long way regardless what it’s made of.
John
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,481
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4434 Post(s)
Liked 4,885 Times
in
3,025 Posts
OK, I see that I've phrased my dilemma all wrong. Yes, I posted the same question on another forum and got some pretty rude replies. (I love the internet!) Yes, I know that wheels, tires, etc effect ride "quality", and that ride quality can mean different things to different people. I'm certainly not a Noob. I don't wan to buy a bike only to spend another $1000 changing wheels/tires etc to make it a better ride. What I should have said is.....
My experience with carbon bikes is that they have a "dead" feel to them. My experience with steel bikes is that they have a lively feel. My experience with Aluminum bikes is that they have a very harsh feel (old Cannondale 3.0 frame and Cannondale Tandem - my wife HATED the ride of the tandem) . I understand that tube diameters and construction design, etc., etc. can have a effect on ride quality so that the differences to some may not be apparent. But they certainly are to me.
I guess when it comes down to it my question is, as a general rule, do carbon frames have a dead feeling ride quality? I suppose if you've never had experience riding anything other than carbon you wouldn't be familiar with what I mean. I would like to try another carbon bike other than the Domane I had, but simply test riding a variety of bikes is impossible, especially in today's supply crunch and because frankly shops don't normally stock my size. I don't want to go to a shop and say please order me a Roubaix or a BMC Road Machine and then be disappointed with what I end up with.
As far as I'm concerned, I appreciate the thoughtful replies, but this discussion can end. It's up to me just to decide on way or the other. As some have pointed out, I said I prefer the ride of steel, so I will either do that or go for a titanium frame, but I just wanted to know if my impression of carbon frames and being dead and uninspiring is more typical.
Thank you.
I also really don't like the fact that I can only post a certain number to replies on this forum over a 24 hour period. Seems like an odd rule.
My experience with carbon bikes is that they have a "dead" feel to them. My experience with steel bikes is that they have a lively feel. My experience with Aluminum bikes is that they have a very harsh feel (old Cannondale 3.0 frame and Cannondale Tandem - my wife HATED the ride of the tandem) . I understand that tube diameters and construction design, etc., etc. can have a effect on ride quality so that the differences to some may not be apparent. But they certainly are to me.
I guess when it comes down to it my question is, as a general rule, do carbon frames have a dead feeling ride quality? I suppose if you've never had experience riding anything other than carbon you wouldn't be familiar with what I mean. I would like to try another carbon bike other than the Domane I had, but simply test riding a variety of bikes is impossible, especially in today's supply crunch and because frankly shops don't normally stock my size. I don't want to go to a shop and say please order me a Roubaix or a BMC Road Machine and then be disappointed with what I end up with.
As far as I'm concerned, I appreciate the thoughtful replies, but this discussion can end. It's up to me just to decide on way or the other. As some have pointed out, I said I prefer the ride of steel, so I will either do that or go for a titanium frame, but I just wanted to know if my impression of carbon frames and being dead and uninspiring is more typical.
Thank you.
I also really don't like the fact that I can only post a certain number to replies on this forum over a 24 hour period. Seems like an odd rule.
#42
Owner
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2
Bikes: Frames only: 1953 Armstrong consort 26", Restored. 1952 Rotrax Super Course 24", restored. 1964 AS Gillott by Ron Cooper, 25", original paintwork but well worn!.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well, I have a 1953 Armstrong frame, a 1952 Rotrax and a 1964 Gillott. All well used, two repainted, one in original but well worn paint.
I wonder how many 'Carbon' and aluminium frames will last that long, certainly I won't be round to know if my 2021 Émonda 5 does. I'm 66.
I wonder how many 'Carbon' and aluminium frames will last that long, certainly I won't be round to know if my 2021 Émonda 5 does. I'm 66.
#44
Full Member
It sounds like titanium is worth exploring or really high end steel like Reynolds 953. Since you're willing to buy custom get exactly what you want, as long as you can clearly convey that to your frame builder. I can't speak from direct experience since the only carbon frames I have ever ridden were 6" travel mountain bikes.
#45
Member
Thanks for the response. However, the geometry that works for me is the reason I go custom. A comparable stock bike would be a 61-62cm "endurance" frame, and I'm not necessarily looking for the endurance fit. Even when there aren't supply issues virtually no bike shop stocks frames that large. The only reason the shop had a Domane in a 62cm was because they got it in for someone else and THAT person ended up returning it for the same reason I did. Slow, heavy, and dead.
So, my advice is not to judge all carbon by the example of one bike.
#48
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I own a bike shop specializing in used, refurbished bikes. We always recommend that the potential customer keep & update a bike that they are familiar with and comfortable on rather than buying a new one - even a cheap used one from us! The things you long for compact gearing and wider tires would involve trivial changes to a bike you are basically happy with. Swap the crankset and derailleurs for the compact versions & get a fork with a few more millimeters of clearance so you can use a 25 mm or better yet, a 28 mm front tire, and you have your cake and eat it too. The change in geometry and therefore handling induced by the slightly longer fork blades be unnoticable, but a mullet set-up (larger tire in front) will improve comfort. I have altered front forks much more than this recommendation, and although I could feel a difference in handling with the most extreme changes, in no case was the bike unmanageable with the longer fork. If you want even more witdth than 28 mm, and are willing to sacrifice some, you could always switch to 650B wheels. As for the n + 1 theory, I prefer the marriage theory: "Why a man would marry a woman is a mystery; why a man would marry two women is bigamystery.
Likes For justkeepspinnin:
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,475
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1748 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
Which is why all the pros ride 25 lb steel bikes?
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18385 Post(s)
Liked 4,516 Times
in
3,356 Posts
Just pick out your favorite Carbon frame and fill all the tubes with concrete!!!