Racer Tech Thread
#5126
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
was at the LBS yesterday for some new socks (super-pro white Specialized), and they showed me a new “ultra-light” Tarmac. Maybe it’s not new but I hadn’t heard of it.
It weighs like 13 lbs - they said the new paint job saves 1.5 lbs?? Anyway, not something I need, I’d still go slow up hills. But it felt like a paperweight!
It weighs like 13 lbs - they said the new paint job saves 1.5 lbs?? Anyway, not something I need, I’d still go slow up hills. But it felt like a paperweight!
He info they gave you is incorrect, though. The Ultralight's minimal paint job saves 60g (max) vs the standard Tarmac.
There are other reasons the new (complete) bike dropped weight, but i's not 1.5# of paint.
#5127
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Squirrelly-ness (assuming you mean affected by gusts) has more to do with where the wheel stalls than anything else.
I haven't had the same experience as you. Both wheels are fine for me (I have 10s of 1000s of miles on 404s), and I would not say one has been appreciably easier or harder to handle than the other.
#5128
Rides too much bike
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Keep in mind this is very subjective because it is "feel". But the 50s seemed to have been a little more unpredictable vs. the 64s in gusts. 64s seem to have this "gentle pressure" feeling and the 50s seemed to snap a bit more with the gusts. I have a friend who has mentioned the same thing when riding a newer set of semi-deep rims similar to the 50s. All anecdote but that is just my experience.
They do roll quite fast though. There were times I was impressed at the speeds I was hitting with cross/head winds the other day.
They do roll quite fast though. There were times I was impressed at the speeds I was hitting with cross/head winds the other day.
#5129
Senior Member
i'm really short, like 5'2", but have always run 170mm cranks because that's just what came on my bike. but i'm starting to think I'd be better suited to 165s. i'm going to try borrow a crank for the fall and seeing if i like it.
related - if i make the jump i'll need a new pwoermeter. don't really have funds for a quarq. does anyone have experience with the pioneer single leg meter?
related - if i make the jump i'll need a new pwoermeter. don't really have funds for a quarq. does anyone have experience with the pioneer single leg meter?
#5130
Tyrannosaurus Rexitis
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 934
Bikes: Scott Addict 6870
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i'm really short, like 5'2", but have always run 170mm cranks because that's just what came on my bike. but i'm starting to think I'd be better suited to 165s. i'm going to try borrow a crank for the fall and seeing if i like it.
related - if i make the jump i'll need a new pwoermeter. don't really have funds for a quarq. does anyone have experience with the pioneer single leg meter?
related - if i make the jump i'll need a new pwoermeter. don't really have funds for a quarq. does anyone have experience with the pioneer single leg meter?
That being said, I also read that moving your cleats around would make more of a difference than a change in crank length (so I moved the cleats back and kept the 172.5s).
We have 2 Pioneer 6800 left side meters and can't complain. No crazy spikes in power (definitely get a cadence spike almost every ride) and it seems reliable. If you display instantaneous power you can tell it just updates every left stroke and if you were used to a dual sided before you might be miffed if you were staring at it during some really hard intervals. Obviously an edge case.
#5131
Senior Member
oh yeah, i think we've talked about this. I ride a stages now and use 3s smoothing anyway so am totally fine with the pros/cons of one sided power. i would get another stages but I can get the pioneer slightly cheaper and also hoping it doesn't suffer the same data dropout issues as stages. they're relatively intermittent for me, but annoying nonetheless.
#5132
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,570
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1852 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times
in
430 Posts
Rotor makes really short crank arms - all the way down to 150 or 155, if I remember correctly. And you can put Rotor arms on SRMs - pricey I know, but I've seen used ones going for $800. (In fact, there is a 170 Rotor SRM on Online Swap Meet this morning.)
I also saw a DA 165 SRM on either Slowtwitch recently.
You can also get a Quarq in those sizes, and if you don't like the arms, just swap them out for longer ones.
I also saw a DA 165 SRM on either Slowtwitch recently.
You can also get a Quarq in those sizes, and if you don't like the arms, just swap them out for longer ones.
#5133
Senior Member
Yeah I thought about the quarq option but I'm seriously trying to do this as cheaply as possible. I've been using a stages and it's fine for my purposes.
#5136
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
i'm really short, like 5'2", but have always run 170mm cranks because that's just what came on my bike. but i'm starting to think I'd be better suited to 165s. i'm going to try borrow a crank for the fall and seeing if i like it.
related - if i make the jump i'll need a new pwoermeter. don't really have funds for a quarq. does anyone have experience with the pioneer single leg meter?
related - if i make the jump i'll need a new pwoermeter. don't really have funds for a quarq. does anyone have experience with the pioneer single leg meter?
#5139
Senior Member
wait i'm confused is it a powermeter or a quarq branded non-PM crank? didn't even think those existed. anyway, I appreciate the offer!
#5140
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
you can get quarqs with quarq-branded cranks. I think they are shimano, but again, uncertain. When I went back to 175 I didn't want to pull the thing apart to check the bolt pattern so I just send quarq the serial number and had them send me the right cranks.
#5143
Senior Member
FSA Gossamer 165mm $600
Rotor 3D+ $800
I'm 99% sure I'll be giving this a try in the off season so I should probably jump on this sale now. I just can't decide which to go for
#5145
W**** B*
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Central IL (Chambana)
Posts: 992
Bikes: Several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Power2Max NG ECO spider for SRAM cranks will be around $490 when they come out in September.
BYO Cranks/Rings.
BYO Cranks/Rings.
#5146
Senior Member
#5148
Rides too much bike
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I will admit that while I am a whole-hearted lover of aero (aero bikes, aero wheels, aero helmet, etc.) the new Tarmac is kind of tugging at my heart strings...Can I tell myself that since it is supposedly kind of aero it is okay for me to want it?