Frame size from frame serial number.
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Frame size from frame serial number.
Can anyone help with determining frame size from frame serial number.
From what I've been able to find, the bike is a 2013 build Bianchi.
Frame number is te0134826v.
Any help is appreciated.
From what I've been able to find, the bike is a 2013 build Bianchi.
Frame number is te0134826v.
Any help is appreciated.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,877
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3566 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,806 Posts
I’m not a Bianchi expert, but I suspect sizing information won’t be found in a serial number.
Likes For smd4:
#3
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,532
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2751 Post(s)
Liked 3,409 Times
in
2,064 Posts
No, no correlation with serial number. .
Likes For dedhed:
#4
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,714
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4433 Post(s)
Liked 4,079 Times
in
2,719 Posts
You can tell what size it is by using a measuring tape it will give you accurate sizing and help way more than a serial number which usually doesn't have that info and if it does have data encoded it is usually date codes.
Likes For veganbikes:
#5
Senior Member
Do a Google search for the make, model and year. That should bring up a geometry chart. Frame size numbers or letters have become meaningless. Look at stack and reach values, if comparing the size to another brand.
#6
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,415
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6243 Post(s)
Liked 4,262 Times
in
2,387 Posts
If we are only to consider stack and reach, how are we to apply those numbers to what bike size we need? Stack and reach are meaningless without some context on how to use them. Frame sizes aren’t “meaningless”. A 58cm frame is still comparable to a frame that is marked “58cm” today. The seat tube may no longer be 58cm but the other parameters…like reach and stack… haven’t radically changed. The proportions are still similar enough to be comparable.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,133
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6278 Post(s)
Liked 4,864 Times
in
3,353 Posts
If the top tube is horizontal then just measure from the BB center along the seat tube to where the extended line from the top of the top tube intersect. If it doesn't have a horizontal top tube then imagine one coming from the headtube as being horizontal. That'll be close enough. You might be off by a centimeter or a tad more.
If you can come up with geometry and tube length charts and match to your frame, you might get a more accurate idea. Still, if you like the fit, it doesn't matter what size it is. If you are wanting to compare it to other bikes so you will know whether they fit the same or not, then go by the geometry and tube lengths. Size doesn't tell you if you will like the fit of any bike.
If you can come up with geometry and tube length charts and match to your frame, you might get a more accurate idea. Still, if you like the fit, it doesn't matter what size it is. If you are wanting to compare it to other bikes so you will know whether they fit the same or not, then go by the geometry and tube lengths. Size doesn't tell you if you will like the fit of any bike.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,857
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 515 Post(s)
Liked 669 Times
in
394 Posts
If we are only to consider stack and reach, how are we to apply those numbers to what bike size we need? Stack and reach are meaningless without some context on how to use them. Frame sizes aren’t “meaningless”. A 58cm frame is still comparable to a frame that is marked “58cm” today. The seat tube may no longer be 58cm but the other parameters…like reach and stack… haven’t radically changed. The proportions are still similar enough to be comparable.
#9
Senior Member
If we are only to consider stack and reach, how are we to apply those numbers to what bike size we need? Stack and reach are meaningless without some context on how to use them. Frame sizes aren’t “meaningless”. A 58cm frame is still comparable to a frame that is marked “58cm” today. The seat tube may no longer be 58cm but the other parameters…like reach and stack… haven’t radically changed. The proportions are still similar enough to be comparable.
If you have an older bike, made before stack and reach became a standard listing, there are websites that can calculate the values. Once you've owned a bike with known stack and reach, it's simple to select a different brand that will fit. A lot of new bikes use letters like XD, S,M,L,XL and no numbers. Which one is a 58cm? My frames all have size numbers that are just.the seat tube length. Two are 47cm and one is a 46cm. Their actual size is more like a 52cm with a traditional frame with horizontal TT. That's why the size numbers are meaningless.
When I look at a new frame geometry chart to determine the fit, all I need is the stack, reach and the seat tube angle. I only use the seat tube angle to be certain what seat post setback is needed. I look for 74 to 75 degrees, but if the frame has a proprietary seat post, it must have enough setback. I wouldn't buy a frame with a 75 degree STA and only 20mm of setback.
Similarly, I want a stack of 505-525mm. Once again, a special integrated handlebar requires the right combination of stem angle and stack to avoid excessive steering tube spacers. My frames with 505mm stack have a -6 stem angle and the minimum 20mm headset top cover. With a 525mm stack, I'd want a -17 stem to get the same bar height.
#10
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,415
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6243 Post(s)
Liked 4,262 Times
in
2,387 Posts
Yes, but that applies to any way you want to measure the bike and label it, you still need to know what "size" will fit. In the old days, a single number did it, now you need something more discriptive, hence the geometry/size charts with all the columns. I liked it when bikes came in 1 cm increments, stems came in .5 cm increments and were easily adjusted for height to 1 mm, but now we live in a world were a lot of folks fall between sizes and we just adjust accordingly, per sloped top tubes and reaches and stacks.
As to size charts we have always had geometry charts since I started riding bikes seriously….almost 50 years ago now. I don’t recall bicycles ever coming in 1cm increments but more like 2” (or closer to 4 cm) increments. Common sizes were 19” (48cm), 21” (53cm), 23” (58cm), and 25” (63cm), perhaps even a 27” (68cm). Sizes now are 44cm, 48, 51, 54, 56, and 58 cm. Thankfully many manufacturers are offering smaller bike now days instead of sticking small people with a bike that is far too big.
As to stems, Thomson, to pick on example, offers 13 different stems ranging from 40 mm to 130 mm of which 3 are 0.5mm. And if you don’t stick with a single manufacturer, there are hundreds of stems from 31 to 130mm. There are far more lengths available now than even 20 years ago.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,877
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3566 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,806 Posts
Many Italian bikes came in 1 cm increments,
#13
Senior Member
I can remember frames sizes listed in 2 inch increments and shops always recommended a 23 inch to fit my legs, but a 21 would be have worked too. High level Italian frame like Colnago were offered in 1cm increments. I had a 54cm and a 53cm C-40, 20 years ago.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,726
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked 1,680 Times
in
789 Posts
I recently purchased a used Scott bicycle. Wasn't sure of the year, so I sent a message to Scott customer service with the serial number of the bike. They came back with the year (2013), model, and frame size (which I already knew.)
Possibly Bianchi has the same capability?
Possibly Bianchi has the same capability?
#16
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,415
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6243 Post(s)
Liked 4,262 Times
in
2,387 Posts
...and were a very small part of the bicycle market. And for the bike in question...a 2013 Bianchi...the frame comes in 7 sizes in 30mm increments
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,857
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 515 Post(s)
Liked 669 Times
in
394 Posts
There is still pretty much one “size” that fits. My wife’s Sirrus 2.0 is an extra small. It would be an inappropriate bike for someone who needs a small just as a “small” would be an inappropriate size for her. The proportions of a small are all wrong for her…a problem that we have had for 40 years.
As to size charts we have always had geometry charts since I started riding bikes seriously….almost 50 years ago now. I don’t recall bicycles ever coming in 1cm increments but more like 2” (or closer to 4 cm) increments. Common sizes were 19” (48cm), 21” (53cm), 23” (58cm), and 25” (63cm), perhaps even a 27” (68cm). Sizes now are 44cm, 48, 51, 54, 56, and 58 cm. Thankfully many manufacturers are offering smaller bike now days instead of sticking small people with a bike that is far too big.
As to stems, Thomson, to pick on example, offers 13 different stems ranging from 40 mm to 130 mm of which 3 are 0.5mm. And if you don’t stick with a single manufacturer, there are hundreds of stems from 31 to 130mm. There are far more lengths available now than even 20 years ago.
As to size charts we have always had geometry charts since I started riding bikes seriously….almost 50 years ago now. I don’t recall bicycles ever coming in 1cm increments but more like 2” (or closer to 4 cm) increments. Common sizes were 19” (48cm), 21” (53cm), 23” (58cm), and 25” (63cm), perhaps even a 27” (68cm). Sizes now are 44cm, 48, 51, 54, 56, and 58 cm. Thankfully many manufacturers are offering smaller bike now days instead of sticking small people with a bike that is far too big.
As to stems, Thomson, to pick on example, offers 13 different stems ranging from 40 mm to 130 mm of which 3 are 0.5mm. And if you don’t stick with a single manufacturer, there are hundreds of stems from 31 to 130mm. There are far more lengths available now than even 20 years ago.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,877
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3566 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,806 Posts