First time cassette installation
#1
blah blah blah
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First time cassette installation
I got a new Easton EA90TT wheelset and moved a 10 speed Shimano cassette over to it from my old wheel. The only concern I have is the generic instructions that came with the wheels say to ONLY use a cassette with an alloy carrier/body that holds the cogs together and not to use individual cogs on the freehub. My cassette had the first 3 largest cogs in one piece together, but the rest were individual cogs separated with spacers. I am a newbie to this, but isn't having the separate cogs the way most 10 speed cassettes are put on the freehub? Thanks...
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Some are, some aren't. Be sure to put enough torque into the lockring, this will help keep the individual cogs from digging into the freehub splines. And be sure to use the 1 mm Shimano spacer at the back of the cassette.
You'll be fine.
You'll be fine.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
The problem with individual cogs, particularly large ones, is that they can bite into the freehub body outer shell if it's aluminum. Putting the cogs on a carrier spreads the load over a wider area and protects the body. Smaller cogs develop less torque so they are less damaging.
Shimano uses Ti or steel freehub bodies for most of their hubs and their one venture into an aluminum body used taller splines to spread the force from the cogs over a wider area.
As Al1943 noted, get the lockring good and tight to keep the cogs from moving individually.
Shimano uses Ti or steel freehub bodies for most of their hubs and their one venture into an aluminum body used taller splines to spread the force from the cogs over a wider area.
As Al1943 noted, get the lockring good and tight to keep the cogs from moving individually.
#4
blah blah blah
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Does the spacer go on first before the group of three largest cogs or is it last before you put on the lockring? I took the cassette off a Shimano wheel, but I didn't find a 1mm spacer after the largest cog. There was a very thin metallic "spacer" stuck on the lockring, but it seems less than 1mm thick. Now I'm paranoid because when I tighten the quick release it looks like it is squeezing the rear dropouts together by a little bit...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
The 1 mm spacer goes onto the freehub body first before any of the cogs. If you removed a 10-speed cassette, the spacer may be stuck inside a slight recess behind the largest cog and not be obvious. The metal foil "spacer" that's part of the lockring is just to help keep it tight.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 2,896
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i have not found a tight lockring to be considerably helpful in preventing cogs from digging into a al freehub. loose cog sets are easier to remove(easy to remove one cog at a time with 2 whips). cassette that are pinned or riveted are harder.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
It is very important to keep plenty of torque on the lockring, usually 30 to 50 K&M depending on the brand and model, and shown on the lockring.
Last edited by Al1943; 07-16-11 at 02:46 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
On modern 8, 9, 10, 11 speed cassettes there should be no need to use a chain whip to remove cogs after the lockring has been removed.
It is very important to keep plenty of torque on the lockring, usually 30 to 50 K&M depending on the brand and model, and shown on the lockring.
It is very important to keep plenty of torque on the lockring, usually 30 to 50 K&M depending on the brand and model, and shown on the lockring.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Actually a torque 20-35 foot-pounds (40-50 N-m are the vendoor specs) is really quite tight as you can discover if you use a torque wrench to tighten the lockring. I've seen lockrings spontaneously loosen and let the cassette rattle if they aren't tightened sufficiently. "Snug" won't do.
Sheldon is correct but he was comparing the removal torque for a cassette to that for a freewheel which can be screwed on VERY tight and require a big wrench and a lot of force to remove.
Sheldon is correct but he was comparing the removal torque for a cassette to that for a freewheel which can be screwed on VERY tight and require a big wrench and a lot of force to remove.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Hillrider did not recommend using a carrier that locks all of the cogs in a cassette. Go back and read that again. The fact is that most of the upper end cassettes, Ultegra, Dura-Ace, Chorus, Record, and many more have some single cogs not connected to any other cogs in the cassette. The single cogs are held in place by only the splines and the lock ring compression. These are usually the smaller cogs which have less leverage on the freehub splines than the smaller cogs but can still damage the splines of aluminum hubs if the lockring was not set with enough torque. And there are exceptions, the 25 cog on an Ultegra 13-25 is a single cog. The lockring needs plenty of torque, as recommended by the hub or cassette manufacturer. Loose cogs can be noisy and if loose enough can cause poor indexing.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Hillrider did not recommend using a carrier that locks all of the cogs in a cassette. Go back and read that again. The fact is that most of the upper end cassettes, Ultegra, Dura-Ace, Chorus, Record, and many more have some single cogs not connected to any other cogs in the cassette. The single cogs are held in place by only the splines and the lock ring compression.
One cassette that does use all loose cogs is the Campy 10-speed Veloce even in 13x29 format. However, Campy uses deep splines on their aluminum freehub bodies and I've never had any notching from it. I do get the lockring as tight as Campy recommends.
#12
¡Senor Member!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It'll be fine. To remove just put the wheel between two sawhorses, cassette side down and just lightly tap the cogs loose from behind through the spokes.
#13
blah blah blah
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I did some more googling and also looked at the Easton website, and the freehub body that came on my new wheels is the red colored "R4 All Shimano 10 speed" listed here: https://www.eastoncycling.com/bike/wp...Body-Chart.pdf (not the SRAM/Shimano 9&10 speed compatible freehub body). In their FAQ (https://www.eastoncycling.com/en-us/r...qs/wheel-faqs/), it says this freehub body is Shimano 10 speed only, so I don't need the 1mm spacer behind the cassette.
The one thing that is weird to me is that the cassette came off a Shimano RS-10 wheel that came stock on my bike and was missing the 1mm spacer. All the sites that I've found selling this Shimano wheel say it is 8/9/10 speed compatible. Is this a rare mistake?
The one thing that is weird to me is that the cassette came off a Shimano RS-10 wheel that came stock on my bike and was missing the 1mm spacer. All the sites that I've found selling this Shimano wheel say it is 8/9/10 speed compatible. Is this a rare mistake?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
milkbaby:
Follow Al1943 and Hillrider's guidelines...especially regarding the lockring torque. They nail this issue down on a regular basis for folks. If you find yourself losing sleep regardless, just pop off the cassette after a few miles of use - post a pic of the freehub - I'm sure they'll be able to tell you if it's looking okay or not.
It's been done here before...
=8-)
Follow Al1943 and Hillrider's guidelines...especially regarding the lockring torque. They nail this issue down on a regular basis for folks. If you find yourself losing sleep regardless, just pop off the cassette after a few miles of use - post a pic of the freehub - I'm sure they'll be able to tell you if it's looking okay or not.
It's been done here before...
=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
BTW the 14-25 is shown to have a single 23 and single 25.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The problem with individual cogs, particularly large ones, is that they can bite into the freehub body outer shell if it's aluminum. Putting the cogs on a carrier spreads the load over a wider area and protects the body. Smaller cogs develop less torque so they are less damaging.
...
...
This is all related to what is considered a "LOT" of torque to put on the lock ring. And yes, compared to freewheels, the torque is not much, but in reality, the torque of just 25 ft-lbs is not very much. I can exert that much with the palm of my hand using a short rachet driver with extender on a spark plug. So it all depends on how much and for what purpose. Without the splines in place, such a light torque probably doesn't exert much face-pressure on the small portion of the cogs on a cassette. This means that steel cogs will necessarily dig into soft metal on an alloy body where it contacts the splines. And if the intent is to tighten down the lock-ring to minimize the digging into splines on the freehub body, then I'm saying that's not a good idea. It's not the purpose of the lockring and it likely won't stop the digging into splines because the torque by a big rider on 170+ mm cranks on a ring like that will exceed the lockring face pressure and slip.
So putting more torque into lock rings isn't the proper solution but may strip insides of freehubs or the lock ring itself. We need to look at the application of racing components and ask ourselves if they are designed around interchangeability and lightness as opposed to durability. And maybe it will work for racers who average sub 160lbs, and ride new stuff constantly. But I'd be wary about relying on snugging down a cassette lockring to put face pressure on cogs to avoid having them dig into the body.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
That's correct, i didn't recommend it, I just noted that most cassettes have their larger cogs grouped on carriers. Their smaller cogs are mostly individuals.
Are you sure about the 13x25 having a loose 25T cog? I had a 13x25 9-speed Shimano cassette and believe the 21,23 and 25 cogs were on a single carrier.
Are you sure about the 13x25 having a loose 25T cog? I had a 13x25 9-speed Shimano cassette and believe the 21,23 and 25 cogs were on a single carrier.
9 speed 13-23 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 23
9 speed 13-25 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 25
9 speed 14-25 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 23 followed by a loose 25
etc.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A lot of the Shimano cassettes which don't start with an 11 or 12 have a loose cog on the end.
9 speed 13-23 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 23
9 speed 13-25 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 25
9 speed 14-25 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 23 followed by a loose 25
etc.
9 speed 13-23 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 23
9 speed 13-25 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 25
9 speed 14-25 Ultegra cassettes end in a loose 23 followed by a loose 25
etc.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
The Shimano tech document for 6500 cassettes shows that the 13-25 and 13-23 cassettes both had single large cogs (25 or 23). I've assumed this was because they had no single 16 6500 cogs, the 16 is pinned together with the 17. The 19-21-23 or 18-19-21 cogs are mounted on common carriers. All of those sets were also used on other cassettes. It was probably more economical to use a single large cog on the 13-25 and 13-21. I have built a 13-25 using parts from a 12-25 and a single 16.
BTW the 14-25 is shown to have a single 23 and single 25.
BTW the 14-25 is shown to have a single 23 and single 25.
BTW, where did you get your single 16T 8 or 9-speed cog since either will do? I got one 9-speed from Branford Bike back before their fire and one was donated by another forumite. I've never been able to find them since.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Interesting and thanks for the correction. I built a custom 13x27 9-speed Shimano cassette from a 12x27 by discarding the 12 and 13T first two cogs, using a 13T first position cog (recovered from an older 13x25) and filling in with a single 16 and it's spacer. I LOVE the 16T cog!!!.
BTW, where did you get your single 16T 8 or 9-speed cog since either will do? .
BTW, where did you get your single 16T 8 or 9-speed cog since either will do? .
Last edited by Al1943; 07-19-11 at 11:39 AM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Sheldon Brown (Harris Cyclery) was my first contact when I was looking for a single 16T cog in early 2006 but even then, they no longer had them available and Harris wrote that even they didn't know where to get them.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR metro area
Posts: 984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
16T rules. Campy Chorus 12-25 has a 16T cog. When i switched to 11-25 I gave up the 16. I'm always switching between 15 and 17 to get comfortable. Is 11T worth giving up 16T? not sure. My front is 34-50. Campy lockring specs is 50Nm. How tight is that with a 12 inch cresent wrench?