Yet another conversion question ...
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yet another conversion question ...
Hi,
I have a 1990s Trek 820 (Chromoly) which I'm thinking about converting to a tourer/bike packing.
(I know that there are more designated bikes out there but I'm not into buying another bike)
Anyway,
The 1990s frame comes with a 65mm suspension fork which I'm thinking about converting to a 430mm (axle to crown) rigid fork with eyelets for front rack that I own.
According to Trek (https://www.vintage-trek.com/Trek-Fis...manualTrek.pdf) , I can run up to 430mm rigid fork but I would appreciate someone's own experience
I have a 1990s Trek 820 (Chromoly) which I'm thinking about converting to a tourer/bike packing.
(I know that there are more designated bikes out there but I'm not into buying another bike)
Anyway,
The 1990s frame comes with a 65mm suspension fork which I'm thinking about converting to a 430mm (axle to crown) rigid fork with eyelets for front rack that I own.
According to Trek (https://www.vintage-trek.com/Trek-Fis...manualTrek.pdf) , I can run up to 430mm rigid fork but I would appreciate someone's own experience
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
194 Posts
I had a 1992 ? Trek 820 that I used for touring for several years but it came with a non-shock hard tail fork to begin with. It seems to me, you have the fork, why not just slip it in place and see how you like it. Is there that much difference if your shock fork is locked out vs the cro moly fork? I say go for it.