Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Square Taper to Hollowtech II Spacers?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Square Taper to Hollowtech II Spacers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-23, 10:31 PM
  #1  
themp
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 319

Bikes: Specialized Crosstrail

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 44 Posts
Square Taper to Hollowtech II Spacers?

I ordered the following crank and bottom bracket:

https://bike.shimano.com/en-US/produ...-RX600-10.html
with 175 mm crank arm length.

https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ.../BB-RS501.html
shell with of 68 mm

The bottom bracket came with no spacers.

This article says I need: A 68mm or 83mm bottom bracket shell needs two of the 2.5mm spacers on the drive (chainring) side and one 2.5mm spacer on the non-drive side.

https://off.road.cc/how-many-spacers...wtech-sram-gxp

My chain line is 47mm

I guess I need to buy some spacers, but can someone explain what the spacers do actually. Drive I understand for chain line, non drive is confusing, other than it moves the crank out.
themp is offline  
Old 10-04-23, 12:43 AM
  #2  
maddog34
Senior Member
 
maddog34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975

Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times in 534 Posts
the NDS moves the CUP out,to meet the NDS crankarm at the proper place.

i swap spacers back and forth until the crank is both aligned at the proper Chainline, Both arms are equa-distant from the chainstays at the pedal area, and the crankset is also firmly in place against the bearings.

the combination isn't always as the directions state.

and there SHOULD have been three spacers in the box with the BB assy. 1mm, 1.5mm, 2.5mm, if the BB was a "68 or 73mm" type... if not, slap that sucker in and see if it all fits well..

I, and i'd guess, many other mechanics save the spacers when not needed... your local shop should have some, if actually required for your frame.

Last edited by maddog34; 10-04-23 at 12:57 AM.
maddog34 is offline  
Likes For maddog34:
Old 10-04-23, 06:49 AM
  #3  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,067
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times in 1,028 Posts
Why are you taking advice from a MTB article to install gravel cranks on a gravel bike? MTBs have different chainline and spindle lengths than gravel bikes.

Here's the exploded view for your crank and that BB:
https://dassets.shimano.com/content/...X600-4579B.pdf

No spacers.
Kontact is offline  
Old 10-04-23, 12:14 PM
  #4  
themp
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 319

Bikes: Specialized Crosstrail

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 44 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
Why are you taking advice from a MTB article to install gravel cranks on a gravel bike? MTBs have different chainline and spindle lengths than gravel bikes.

Here's the exploded view for your crank and that BB:
https://dassets.shimano.com/content/...X600-4579B.pdf

No spacers.
Thanks for the diagram. My first attempt at this for my hybrid bicycle. The new crank matches what I have for chain rings and the chain line was correct also. I started watching YouTube videos on the conversion and many talked about spacers. Even the Park manual I have vaguely mentions spacers. I will just go with no spacers and see what I get.
themp is offline  
Old 10-04-23, 01:54 PM
  #5  
alcjphil
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1820 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times in 976 Posts
Here is my take on this:
You are planning on installing a GRX crank. However the bottom bracket you have chosen is designed for a Tiagra road crank. GRX cranks have a lot in common with mountain bike cranks in terms of chainline. They have longer spindles to allow a wider chainline than a road crank. The bottom bracket you chose is incorrect for the crank you bought. The correct bottom bracket would have included the spacers you will need
alcjphil is online now  
Old 10-04-23, 02:34 PM
  #6  
sch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mountain Brook. AL
Posts: 4,002
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 136 Times in 104 Posts
FWIW I recently installed a GRX 46/30 11 spd crank on a road bike with 68mm BB. I had a Di2 FD and the FD was both
too high on the 'braze-on' mount and would not extend out far enough to reach the 46t ring. Solution was to use an FD dropper which lowers the
FD about 6mm or so on the built in FD mount ( available from either FSA or Amazon) and machine a solid $12 5/8"
diameter 6061 aluminum bar (Home Depot) into 8 2.5mm thick washers to put between the chainrings and the DS spider. This moved
the chainrings inboard enough for the FD to reach the 46t ring. Mods worked perfectly.
sch is offline  
Likes For sch:
Old 10-04-23, 05:40 PM
  #7  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,067
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times in 1,028 Posts
Originally Posted by alcjphil
Here is my take on this:
You are planning on installing a GRX crank. However the bottom bracket you have chosen is designed for a Tiagra road crank. GRX cranks have a lot in common with mountain bike cranks in terms of chainline. They have longer spindles to allow a wider chainline than a road crank. The bottom bracket you chose is incorrect for the crank you bought. The correct bottom bracket would have included the spacers you will need
No, he picked the BB specified by Shimano for his GRX cranks, as it clearly states in the links the OP provided.

WHY ARE YOU POSTING FALSE INFORMATION WHEN THE RIGHT INFORMATION IS UNDER YOUR FINGERTIPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kontact is offline  
Likes For Kontact:
Old 10-04-23, 07:14 PM
  #8  
maddog34
Senior Member
 
maddog34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975

Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times in 534 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
No, he picked the BB specified by Shimano for his GRX cranks, as it clearly states in the links the OP provided.

WHY ARE YOU POSTING FALSE INFORMATION WHEN THE RIGHT INFORMATION IS UNDER YOUR FINGERTIPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See: item #5 (x2), in the diagram you posted a link to.

and not everyone knows that GRX cranksets are intended for wider frames with 73mm BB width.... or can be fitted to a 68mm frame by using the included Crank Spindle spacers...... OR by using the Included Spacers that come with a new 68-73mm HTII BB, and fit between the frame and cup(s).

calm down.. sheesh.

i'd guess that item #5 is 2.5mm thick.... times two.
maddog34 is offline  
Old 10-04-23, 07:43 PM
  #9  
zukahn1 
Senior Member
 
zukahn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,527

Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 1,769 Times in 635 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
No, he picked the BB specified by Shimano for his GRX cranks, as it clearly states in the links the OP provided.

WHY ARE YOU POSTING FALSE INFORMATION WHEN THE RIGHT INFORMATION IS UNDER YOUR FINGERTIPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+1 you can force It a bit with this setup using a couple 1-2 mm crank spacers, 1mm petal space either for tread line and a couple 1mm axel spacers and be good. End of the day It's a 1-4mm drive total 1-2mm offset pretty easy to correct for on nearly any bike.
zukahn1 is offline  
Old 10-05-23, 02:08 AM
  #10  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
Originally Posted by maddog34
See: item #5 (x2), in the diagram you posted a link to.

and not everyone knows that GRX cranksets are intended for wider frames with 73mm BB width.... or can be fitted to a 68mm frame by using the included Crank Spindle spacers...... OR by using the Included Spacers that come with a new 68-73mm HTII BB, and fit between the frame and cup(s).

calm down.. sheesh.

i'd guess that item #5 is 2.5mm thick.... times two.
isn’t item 5 a protective cover / something to prevent contact with the outer race for the bearing (at 26 seconds in this massively irritatingly TikTok style blipvert) ?

Last edited by choddo; 10-05-23 at 02:12 AM.
choddo is offline  
Old 10-05-23, 06:40 AM
  #11  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,067
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times in 1,028 Posts
Originally Posted by maddog34
See: item #5 (x2), in the diagram you posted a link to.

and not everyone knows that GRX cranksets are intended for wider frames with 73mm BB width.... or can be fitted to a 68mm frame by using the included Crank Spindle spacers...... OR by using the Included Spacers that come with a new 68-73mm HTII BB, and fit between the frame and cup(s).

calm down.. sheesh.

i'd guess that item #5 is 2.5mm thick.... times two.
They aren't intended for 73mm frames, and that little washer is not 2.5mm wide.

Sheesh, so much misinformation.
Kontact is offline  
Old 10-05-23, 12:55 PM
  #12  
maddog34
Senior Member
 
maddog34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975

Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times in 534 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
They aren't intended for 73mm frames, and that little washer is not 2.5mm wide.

Sheesh, so much misinformation.
ok then.. how thick is the 24mm ID "little washer" that's not a washer?

and no one has mentioned facing the bottom bracket of the 73mm width frame.... it has been done to other folks' bikes.

the seals in the "tik-Tube" video increase "bearing drag" and trap grit on the bearing's seals,... they are on many GXP cranks...they fail to prevent water or grit intrusion, and , once removed, the bearings last longer.... the rider noticed the reduced drag even in a short test blast through the neighborhood...the "GXP grunge" took three more months to appear.. Scott CX Team bike... bike was never pressure washed, and regularly ridden in wet/muddy conditions, AKA: Oregon Cyclocross Events and rough gravel roads, some trails, and a linear trail with lousy pavement.

Last edited by maddog34; 10-05-23 at 12:58 PM.
maddog34 is offline  
Likes For maddog34:
Old 10-05-23, 01:38 PM
  #13  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,067
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times in 1,028 Posts
Originally Posted by maddog34
ok then.. how thick is the 24mm ID "little washer" that's not a washer?

and no one has mentioned facing the bottom bracket of the 73mm width frame.... it has been done to other folks' bikes.

the seals in the "tik-Tube" video increase "bearing drag" and trap grit on the bearing's seals,... they are on many GXP cranks...they fail to prevent water or grit intrusion, and , once removed, the bearings last longer.... the rider noticed the reduced drag even in a short test blast through the neighborhood...the "GXP grunge" took three more months to appear.. Scott CX Team bike... bike was never pressure washed, and regularly ridden in wet/muddy conditions, AKA: Oregon Cyclocross Events and rough gravel roads, some trails, and a linear trail with lousy pavement.
The "washer" is an oring retained in the left crank arm

Who said that the OPs bike is 73?

GRX is road spec, 68mm bikes.
Kontact is offline  
Old 10-05-23, 07:58 PM
  #14  
well biked
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 163 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact

GRX is road spec, 68mm bikes.
This is correct.
well biked is offline  
Old 11-21-23, 10:36 AM
  #15  
themp
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 319

Bikes: Specialized Crosstrail

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 44 Posts
Finally did the conversion. The square taper actually seized and forced me to replace. After looking at the bottom bracket at 68mm and my frame at 68mm it would make no sense to add any spacers as the the plastic sleeve inside the bottom bracket would not have engaged on the non-drive side. Had to move the front derailleur up and re-adjust. Only did a test ride as the weather has been bad for cycling. What has changed is that I used to have to use the third ring on the cassette from the smallest gear to back pedal to oil or clean the chain. Otherwise, the chain would want to shift to a higher gear. Now I have to use the fourth for that not to happen when back pedaling on the bicycle stand.
themp is offline  
Likes For themp:
Old 12-19-23, 08:41 PM
  #16  
themp
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 319

Bikes: Specialized Crosstrail

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 44 Posts
Wanted to add one more outcome. In purchasing the crank I made the mistake of selecting the 170mm crank length. After noticing this I did some internet searching and found various methods which include measuring your inseam to get the best crank length for your body. The calculation for me was 170mm or a little smaller. So, I installed the 170mm and gave it a try. I ride at least 30 miles or more each ride and after two days of 35 and 40 miles my right knee started aching. I even upped my saddle 5mm because of the shorter length. After a few more rides, the knee was not liking it, so I bit the bullet and purchased the same crank in 175mm length. Installed that and noticed the relief in my knee during the second ride. I never thought 5mm shorter would affect my comfort, but it did.

"Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." - Archimedes

Last edited by themp; 12-19-23 at 08:47 PM.
themp is offline  
Old 12-20-23, 01:28 AM
  #17  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
Originally Posted by themp
Finally did the conversion. The square taper actually seized and forced me to replace. After looking at the bottom bracket at 68mm and my frame at 68mm it would make no sense to add any spacers as the the plastic sleeve inside the bottom bracket would not have engaged on the non-drive side. Had to move the front derailleur up and re-adjust. Only did a test ride as the weather has been bad for cycling. What has changed is that I used to have to use the third ring on the cassette from the smallest gear to back pedal to oil or clean the chain. Otherwise, the chain would want to shift to a higher gear. Now I have to use the fourth for that not to happen when back pedaling on the bicycle stand.
That shouldn’t happen should it? I can back pedal on the stand in most cogs on all my bikes, I’m sure.
choddo is offline  
Old 12-20-23, 05:32 PM
  #18  
themp
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 319

Bikes: Specialized Crosstrail

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 44 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
That shouldn’t happen should it? I can back pedal on the stand in most cogs on all my bikes, I’m sure.
https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-m...-pedaling.html
themp is offline  
Old 12-21-23, 02:26 AM
  #19  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
So similar story there - someone has this issue, some don’t, might be component related, might be chainline, but no definite conclusion?
choddo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.