Santa Ana PD tickets cyclist
#1
de oranje
Thread Starter
Santa Ana PD tickets cyclist
Friday night in the Artsy District of Santa Ana, a person on riding his bike was ticketed because he should have been walking his bike. Perhaps just a warning would of sufficed? It sort of ticked me off, because of the recent cyclist muggings on the SART. The two officers who ticketed the guy were on HORSES and sort of looked like dudes from the 7th cavalry in full regalia. What posers!
Perhaps they would have been better served on bicycles, cause the expense of horse maintenance.....one officer look quite fat, poor horse.
Perhaps they would have been better served on bicycles, cause the expense of horse maintenance.....one officer look quite fat, poor horse.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Was he on the sidewalk? If so, were there signs? If there were they were in the right. A lot of "art districts" and what not have no cycling signs for the safety of the pedestrians.
Also, if there were signs and he was given a ticket, the cyclist was clearly in the wrong and has absolutely has nothing to do with the SART muggings.
On the other hand, if there were no signs and he wasn't on the sidewalk—DAMN THOSE COPS!!!!
Also, if there were signs and he was given a ticket, the cyclist was clearly in the wrong and has absolutely has nothing to do with the SART muggings.
On the other hand, if there were no signs and he wasn't on the sidewalk—DAMN THOSE COPS!!!!
Last edited by CbadRider; 02-19-12 at 03:36 PM. Reason: Edited inappropriate comment
#3
de oranje
Thread Starter
Was he on the sidewalk? If so, were there signs? If there were they were in the right. A lot of "art districts" and what not have no cycling signs for the safety of the pedestrians.
Also, if there were signs and he was given a ticket, the cyclist was clearly in the wrong and has absolutely has nothing to do with the SART muggings.
On the other hand, if there were no signs and he wasn't on the sidewalk—DAMN THOSE COPS!!!!
Also, if there were signs and he was given a ticket, the cyclist was clearly in the wrong and has absolutely has nothing to do with the SART muggings.
On the other hand, if there were no signs and he wasn't on the sidewalk—DAMN THOSE COPS!!!!
Last edited by CbadRider; 02-19-12 at 03:37 PM. Reason: Removed inappropriate comment
#5
de oranje
Thread Starter
Perhaps these cops should be patrolling the SART on their horses!
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: so cal
Posts: 132
Bikes: older model Raleigh & a beach cruiser
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
de oranje
Thread Starter
#9
de oranje
Thread Starter
#10
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
I'm glad you have a wife to collar you, for your and all our sakes.
Your righteous indignation will not win us any friends among the SAPD:
~This has NOTHING to do with the recent SART muggings.
~The recent SART muggings do not give us cyclists license to flaunt laws and inconvenience innocent motorists in Santa Ana who also had nothing to do with the recent SART muggings.
~The weight of the citing officers has NOTHING to do with either the SART muggings, or the guilt or innocence of the violating cyclist.
~What are the specifics? Should the cyclist have been walking his bike because he was in a crosswalk? Or because he was drunk? Or because of generally douchy riding?
Your righteous indignation will not win us any friends among the SAPD:
~This has NOTHING to do with the recent SART muggings.
~The recent SART muggings do not give us cyclists license to flaunt laws and inconvenience innocent motorists in Santa Ana who also had nothing to do with the recent SART muggings.
~The weight of the citing officers has NOTHING to do with either the SART muggings, or the guilt or innocence of the violating cyclist.
~What are the specifics? Should the cyclist have been walking his bike because he was in a crosswalk? Or because he was drunk? Or because of generally douchy riding?
#11
de oranje
Thread Starter
I'm glad you have a wife to collar you, for your and all our sakes.
Your righteous indignation will not win us any friends among the SAPD:
~This has NOTHING to do with the recent SART muggings.
~The recent SART muggings do not give us cyclists license to flaunt laws and inconvenience innocent motorists in Santa Ana who also had nothing to do with the recent SART muggings.
~The weight of the citing officers has NOTHING to do with either the SART muggings, or the guilt or innocence of the violating cyclist.
~What are the specifics? Should the cyclist have been walking his bike because he was in a crosswalk? Or because he was drunk? Or because of generally douchy riding?
Your righteous indignation will not win us any friends among the SAPD:
~This has NOTHING to do with the recent SART muggings.
~The recent SART muggings do not give us cyclists license to flaunt laws and inconvenience innocent motorists in Santa Ana who also had nothing to do with the recent SART muggings.
~The weight of the citing officers has NOTHING to do with either the SART muggings, or the guilt or innocence of the violating cyclist.
~What are the specifics? Should the cyclist have been walking his bike because he was in a crosswalk? Or because he was drunk? Or because of generally douchy riding?
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
All police departments I know of are responsible for traffic enforcement, most do parking enforcement too, in addition to regular crime/violent crime. Check the area again and see if there really are signs prohibiting bicycle riding, the City's municipal code to make sure it doesn't prohibit bikes on sidewalks unless specifically allowed, or if bicycle riding is prohibited in the 'plaza' area. Also, was there a special event going on on Friday evening where they prohibited bicycles for the duration of the event?; cops on horses kinda lead me to believe that might be the situation.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The "cyclist" was really just a person on a beach cruiser, getting from here to there. The area is sort of a plaza type setting, it was not crowded. No, he was not drunk. And of course I know it has nothing to do with the recent SART muggings. However, it seemed to me, that the SAPD should concentrate on real crime, rather than ticket a person on a bike for something really minor, IMO.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's easier to get a cyclist for no lights, etc. Than a driver on a phone.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: so cal
Posts: 132
Bikes: older model Raleigh & a beach cruiser
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
aka Jerome
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado Again
Posts: 1,080
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#19
de oranje
Thread Starter
So if the SAPD patrolled the "mugger section' of the SART, they could keep us safe AND ticket us for going faster than the posted speed limit of 10 mph! Looks like a win/win to me!