Advice needed. Time trial climbing
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
Advice needed. Time trial climbing
Hello. The countdown has been started, this race is important because if the last of the regional championship. I need to archive at least 3rd position of category.
I need any kind of advice how to deal with a 10km climb done with full power.
- should i keep myself for about half way and the go full power?
- how you guys handle the shifting?
- wich cadence should i keep?
I need any kind of advice how to deal with a 10km climb done with full power.
- should i keep myself for about half way and the go full power?
- how you guys handle the shifting?
- wich cadence should i keep?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,456
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4419 Post(s)
Liked 4,873 Times
in
3,017 Posts
How steep is the climb? Do you have a profile of it? 10 km is a major climb. That could be anything up to an hour depending on the elevation gain. Basically an effort close to your FTP.
First thing I would do is take a look at the profile to see how the gradient varies. You want to put more power down on the steeper parts and a little less on the shallower gradients.
Gearing may be important too, again depending on the gradient and your power output.
First thing I would do is take a look at the profile to see how the gradient varies. You want to put more power down on the steeper parts and a little less on the shallower gradients.
Gearing may be important too, again depending on the gradient and your power output.
Likes For PeteHski:
#3
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,539
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3891 Post(s)
Liked 1,940 Times
in
1,385 Posts
As above, but answering what I understand is your particular question, you could use the same power on the same gradient all the way up. However it's not easy to decide on how much power! That's why folks try to ride other, similar ascents if they can't pre-ride the course well in advance. Preferably pre-ride it like 3 times. Or just try to do a better job of it next year. My theory however is to hold the same HR all the way up, meaning that my power will decrease over a climb that long, but my physical stress will remain about the same. There's still the issue of figuring out what that HR should be. Cadence should be your conventional climbing cadence, whatever that is. Most folks are in the 75-85 range but there are wide variations. I prioritize cadence and shift as necessary to hold about the same cadence, assuming no wide variations in slope. Steeper slopes are usually better at slightly lower cadences since cadence uses oxygen. IMO.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,692
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 432 Post(s)
Liked 461 Times
in
318 Posts
Hard to answer without knowing full profile. If assuming consistent grade throughout, agree with the above: keep it near threshold and consistent effort throughout. At my weight there's no way I can keep 80rpm on a sustained climb even in my 34x32 low gear. Do what you can manage in terms of cadence but try to keep your HR consistent just under threshold. Shift as needed to maintain steady HR and cadence.
*corrected a typo
*corrected a typo
Last edited by tFUnK; 08-17-23 at 09:36 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
Hard to answer without knowing full profile. If assuming consistent grade throughout, agree with the above: keep it near through and consistent effort throughout. At my weight there's no way I can keep 80rpm on a sustained climb even in my 34x32 low gear. Do what you can manage in terms of cadence but try to keep your HR consistent just under threshold. Shift as needed to maintain steady HR and cadence.
As above, but answering what I understand is your particular question, you could use the same power on the same gradient all the way up. However it's not easy to decide on how much power! That's why folks try to ride other, similar ascents if they can't pre-ride the course well in advance. Preferably pre-ride it like 3 times. Or just try to do a better job of it next year. My theory however is to hold the same HR all the way up, meaning that my power will decrease over a climb that long, but my physical stress will remain about the same. There's still the issue of figuring out what that HR should be. Cadence should be your conventional climbing cadence, whatever that is. Most folks are in the 75-85 range but there are wide variations. I prioritize cadence and shift as necessary to hold about the same cadence, assuming no wide variations in slope. Steeper slopes are usually better at slightly lower cadences since cadence uses oxygen. IMO.
How steep is the climb? Do you have a profile of it? 10 km is a major climb. That could be anything up to an hour depending on the elevation gain. Basically an effort close to your FTP.
First thing I would do is take a look at the profile to see how the gradient varies. You want to put more power down on the steeper parts and a little less on the shallower gradients.
Gearing may be important too, again depending on the gradient and your power output.
First thing I would do is take a look at the profile to see how the gradient varies. You want to put more power down on the steeper parts and a little less on the shallower gradients.
Gearing may be important too, again depending on the gradient and your power output.
the most hard trait is 6.3% 0.53kms 36m DIA
first trait seems to be in flatland , probably I'll go with full speed in that flat part.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern NY...Brownville
Posts: 2,575
Bikes: Specialized Aethos, Specialized Diverge Comp E5
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times
in
266 Posts
Ideally you will practice the climb in order to find your ideal cadence and power level. Or a similar climb in your area if you can't practice on the actual climb.
One can't maintain 'full power' for that long a time.
Cadence depends on training, practice, etc. to find the ideal cadence for your body and level of ability.
Generally a higher cadence and riding on the saddle is the most efficient but getting out of the saddle periodically changes muscle use and allows for more blood flow to the butt area and gives the chance to stretch but only for brief periods of time.
One can't maintain 'full power' for that long a time.
Cadence depends on training, practice, etc. to find the ideal cadence for your body and level of ability.
Generally a higher cadence and riding on the saddle is the most efficient but getting out of the saddle periodically changes muscle use and allows for more blood flow to the butt area and gives the chance to stretch but only for brief periods of time.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,820
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 636 Times
in
376 Posts
Competition day is not the time to try to figure out what you are going to be doing. You want to ride as fast as you can with little or no fading in the last couple of kilometers, and leave nothing for the locker room, The hard part is not to go over the line, that comes from experience. It's a bit macabre, but I always found motivation the limiting factor on the TT, so I pictured a loved one on one of those magician burning rope saw thing at the finish line, and I had to get there in time to save them,
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,692
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 432 Post(s)
Liked 461 Times
in
318 Posts
To clarify, is this a hill climb TT or is this a hill climb section that's part of a longer route/race?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,456
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4419 Post(s)
Liked 4,873 Times
in
3,017 Posts
At 10 km you are going to want to target your FTP as an average power for the course, but target over FTP on the steeper parts and under FTP on the flatter parts. It doesn't sound like a particularly hard climb. More like a false flat with a short medium gradient section.
Likes For PeteHski:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
Don't go full power on the opening near flat! That's doing a lot of work for very little gain. You want to use your precious resources gaining altitude, not just disturbing air. Think of the hillclimb as an altitude gain challenge, not race for 8 km. You want to save your strength for those places where you gain altitude fast - the steepest stuff.
When I did the Mt Washington hill climb, I quite purposefully geared my bike with a ridiculously low high gear. When I got to the start of the clime after 0.8 km of flat, my starting partner was out of sight up the hill.
#13
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,227
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2587 Post(s)
Liked 5,649 Times
in
2,924 Posts
If you do not know, the FTP PeteHski is referring to is the highest power you can maintain for one hour. This does not mean going full gas at maximum power except as Pete says on the steeper parts. FTP is your sustainable highest power measured in Watts. If you don’t have a power meter for FTP, then use a heart rate monitor, they are cheap in comparison. Use an app like Strava to see what your power/heart rate zones are on similar climbs and use the data on your bike computer to tell you how hard to go which should also tell you have enough energy left to go ‘full gas’. Use technology.
buona gara
buona gara
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Last edited by rsbob; 08-17-23 at 02:00 PM.
Likes For rsbob:
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
If you do not know, the FTP PeteHski is referring to is the highest power you can maintain for one hour. This does not mean going full gas at maximum power except as Pete says on the steeper parts. FTP is your sustainable highest power measured in Watts. If you don’t have a power meter for FTP, then use a heart rate monitor, they are cheap in comparison. Use an app like Strava to see what your power/heart rate zones are on similar climbs and use the data on your bike computer to tell you how hard to go which should also tell you have enough energy left to go ‘full gas’. Use technology. buona gara
Almost every criterium I hot my max hr, but during training seems more hard to do. More hard to get is when I try to archive it. That's why I think may the hr can be an error due to go in an anxious mode.
Grazie
Last edited by CrowSeph; 08-17-23 at 02:39 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
Also what regarding the position, should I keep the hands on the lower part of the handlebar? (this way I'm half aero with the torso a bit inclined but still lowering my posture overall) , or going full aero with my hands on the hoods and 90° elbow? (this way I can be more aero as I can whiteout compressing my diaphragm and blocking my respiration).
Ps. I hope is understandable but I'm running low on battery. I'm typing without inspect what I text. Feel free to correct me.
Ps. I hope is understandable but I'm running low on battery. I'm typing without inspect what I text. Feel free to correct me.
#16
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,227
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2587 Post(s)
Liked 5,649 Times
in
2,924 Posts
Should I use the hr sensor in the race? Or do you think is an major error?
Almost every criterium I hot my max hr, but during training seems more hard to do. More hard to get is when I try to archive it. That's why I think may the hr can be an error due to go in an anxious mode.
Grazie
Almost every criterium I hot my max hr, but during training seems more hard to do. More hard to get is when I try to archive it. That's why I think may the hr can be an error due to go in an anxious mode.
Grazie
The majority of your climb should be in the HARD level (flats and most of climb) with your final push to the finish at VERY HARD. Don’t be tempted to go into the VERY HARD level even if you feel you have the energy until the last 1000 meters.
Quanti anni hi?
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#17
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,227
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2587 Post(s)
Liked 5,649 Times
in
2,924 Posts
Also what regarding the position, should I keep the hands on the lower part of the handlebar? (this way I'm half aero with the torso a bit inclined but still lowering my posture overall) , or going full aero with my hands on the hoods and 90° elbow? (this way I can be more aero as I can whiteout compressing my diaphragm and blocking my respiration).
Ps. I hope is understandable but I'm running low on battery. I'm typing without inspect what I text. Feel free to correct me.
Ps. I hope is understandable but I'm running low on battery. I'm typing without inspect what I text. Feel free to correct me.
You need to train with your HR monitor to see if the suggested levels for training and racing are right for you
There are very experienced racers here that can give you excellent advice as well.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Last edited by rsbob; 08-17-23 at 03:11 PM.
Likes For rsbob:
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
You SHOULD use your HR sensor if you do not have a power meter, I found this heart rate calculator most accurate HR Calc
The majority of your climb should be in the HARD level (flats and most of climb) with your final push to the finish at VERY HARD. Don’t be tempted to go into the VERY HARD level even if you feel you have the energy until the last 1000 meters.
Quanti anni hi?
The majority of your climb should be in the HARD level (flats and most of climb) with your final push to the finish at VERY HARD. Don’t be tempted to go into the VERY HARD level even if you feel you have the energy until the last 1000 meters.
Quanti anni hi?
Do you recommend any particular heart zone on the light climb section?
and then maximum effort on final part.
#19
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,227
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2587 Post(s)
Liked 5,649 Times
in
2,924 Posts
Positano? Amalfi?
You need to practice ride at those zones to see how you feel and what you have left for the finish. I was thinking zone 4 for flats and majority of climb and 5 for the finale
You need to practice ride at those zones to see how you feel and what you have left for the finish. I was thinking zone 4 for flats and majority of climb and 5 for the finale
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
(I can share some data from Strava)
But during climb I noticed, if I keep z4.5 after a while my hr increase automatically and after a while is common to feel my legs hard.
Should I practice and see how much I can keep 4.5 during climb?
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,456
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4419 Post(s)
Liked 4,873 Times
in
3,017 Posts
Should I use the hr sensor in the race? Or do you think is an major error?
Almost every criterium I hot my max hr, but during training seems more hard to do. More hard to get is when I try to archive it. That's why I think may the hr can be an error due to go in an anxious mode.
Grazie
Almost every criterium I hot my max hr, but during training seems more hard to do. More hard to get is when I try to archive it. That's why I think may the hr can be an error due to go in an anxious mode.
Grazie
Just remember that HR lags your effort, so on a long climb you have to check your HR after maybe the first 5 mins and then adjust your pace accordingly and keep checking. On a climbing TT like this I would be looking to stay very close to my LTHR (top of Z4 in that calculator).
The adrenaline rush at the start will make your effort feel too easy at first and without a power meter I guarantee you will be over-cooking it. So consciously hold yourself back until your HR settles down and has stabilised, which will take at least 5 mins. It’s better to be conservative at the start as there is plenty of time to empty the tank further up the hill if you did go out a bit too easy. Then keep checking your HR every few minutes to stay on track.
Likes For PeteHski:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,456
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4419 Post(s)
Liked 4,873 Times
in
3,017 Posts
Likes For PeteHski:
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
Stats from today ride.
in a group ride we start act like racing, me and another guy decided to go on fugitive mode. Everything seems going okay except while at one point as my instinct told me to go off saddle I lost a lot of speed and cadence. But otherwise if I don't do my legs start getting hard. I do something wrong but still I can figure what to manage. Maybe focusing more on cadence?
Here what the route was like:
There are three points, let's call them A,B,C.
From A to B is only climbing with 3.3km with 4.2% 136 ele.
The other one is A to C , basically is the entire climb (A to B) plus some negative elevation gain and a bit of climb in the final. A to C is 9.40km 1.8% with 184 elevation gain.
here my results
Road is located north direction, we had side wind from WN at 4kmh and some trait almost zero.
Speed:
A to B 25kmh
A to C 29.1kmh
Here my hr graph
Here my cadence graph
At this point here the speed one too
it was a very short ride. But does not matter.
wHat do you guys think? I'm doing something wrong?
Any advice is gold
in a group ride we start act like racing, me and another guy decided to go on fugitive mode. Everything seems going okay except while at one point as my instinct told me to go off saddle I lost a lot of speed and cadence. But otherwise if I don't do my legs start getting hard. I do something wrong but still I can figure what to manage. Maybe focusing more on cadence?
Here what the route was like:
There are three points, let's call them A,B,C.
From A to B is only climbing with 3.3km with 4.2% 136 ele.
The other one is A to C , basically is the entire climb (A to B) plus some negative elevation gain and a bit of climb in the final. A to C is 9.40km 1.8% with 184 elevation gain.
here my results
Road is located north direction, we had side wind from WN at 4kmh and some trait almost zero.
Speed:
A to B 25kmh
A to C 29.1kmh
Here my hr graph
Here my cadence graph
At this point here the speed one too
it was a very short ride. But does not matter.
wHat do you guys think? I'm doing something wrong?
Any advice is gold
#24
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,227
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2587 Post(s)
Liked 5,649 Times
in
2,924 Posts
Do you have the elevation gain profile too?
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️