Surly Cross-Check bike – new
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Surly Cross-Check bike – new
Surly Bikes got started about 25 years ago and continues to make 'steel is real' bikes. As everybody here at C&V knows, however, the bicycle technologies of 25 years ago have undergone some major changes, so Surly had to develop new models for new components, and then a couple of years ago Surly discontinued production of all but one of its last few models having near-vintage components. But C&V participants could be interested about that one remaining near-vintage model, the Surly Cross-Check bike, designed for 700c wheels, has front fork and rear stay bosses for cantilever or V-linear brakes, has downtube shifter bosses, can be set up for single, double, or triple chainwheels, and it is among the last of new, near-vintage bikes available. Currently available in complete and frameset versions, its availability has been somewhat sketchy in recent years, sometimes available and sometimes not, its future in question, which prompts me to bring this bike to the attention of the C&V forum. And yes, I have one.
Here is an article written in 2020 about the Cross-Check; https://www.seasurfdirt.com/2020/08/...y-cross-check/
I have no business involvement with Surly other than my being a long time Surly retail customer.
Here is an article written in 2020 about the Cross-Check; https://www.seasurfdirt.com/2020/08/...y-cross-check/
I have no business involvement with Surly other than my being a long time Surly retail customer.
Last edited by reroll; 02-09-23 at 07:32 AM.
Likes For reroll:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,712 Times
in
2,613 Posts
“Near vintage”?
#3
Junior Member
In 2005 I bought a Cross Check new, it was my last new bike purchase and remains my newest bike.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,046
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,387 Times
in
3,672 Posts
Surly, solid, cookie cutter, plug and play, spendy substitute for a genuine C+V bike/frame/etc that might require some skill to wrangle.
Last edited by merziac; 02-09-23 at 12:12 PM.
Likes For merziac:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,712 Times
in
2,613 Posts
Likes For nlerner:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Other than the costs involved, the Cross-Check is a bike well worth having. As has been said by many, the Cross-Check is a jack of all trades but master of none sort of bike, but that is what makes it so good, that it is versatile, a general purpose utility bike.
Last edited by reroll; 02-09-23 at 10:52 AM.
Likes For reroll:
Likes For BT7274:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,046
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,387 Times
in
3,672 Posts
That's the point, C+V, not about being easier, although it can be and often for less $$$ if you know what you are doing and then when you get done you have the real thing.
Likes For merziac:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
This thread needs a picture.
I was never quite happy with the Cross Check geometry. It seemed like it was simultaneously too big and too small. Maybe that's just my taste, or maybe I should have gotten the next size up. From Surly's geometry chart, everything from the 50cm to the 58cm has nearly the same reach (within 1 cm), and, curiously, the 56 has shorter reach than the 54. I had a poor understanding of bike fit when I bought this one.
The best thing about Surlys is their tire clearance. They were ahead of the curve on that. The Cross Check is spec'd for 700x42 with fenders and it doesn't even get Surly's highest self-rating for tire clearance.
It's interesting that most of their current pictures show the bike with flat bars. The geometry makes a bit more sense that way.
I was never quite happy with the Cross Check geometry. It seemed like it was simultaneously too big and too small. Maybe that's just my taste, or maybe I should have gotten the next size up. From Surly's geometry chart, everything from the 50cm to the 58cm has nearly the same reach (within 1 cm), and, curiously, the 56 has shorter reach than the 54. I had a poor understanding of bike fit when I bought this one.
The best thing about Surlys is their tire clearance. They were ahead of the curve on that. The Cross Check is spec'd for 700x42 with fenders and it doesn't even get Surly's highest self-rating for tire clearance.
It's interesting that most of their current pictures show the bike with flat bars. The geometry makes a bit more sense that way.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 521
Bikes: 2015 Felt Z75 Disc, 2008 Fuji Cross Comp, 2010 Trek Navigator 1.0, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1974 Schwinn Le Tour, 1981 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Surly Cross Check, 2021 Giant Talon 2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
60 Posts
I really like mine.
__________________
check out the Frugal Average Bicyclist
Frugal Average Bicyclist – The goal here is to help you keep cycling on a budget.
check out the Frugal Average Bicyclist
Frugal Average Bicyclist – The goal here is to help you keep cycling on a budget.
Likes For BikingViking793:
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Here is the current Surly Cross-Check website: https://surlybikes.com/bikes/cross_check
#13
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
My son has an old rim brake long haul trucker. Built up well, surly stuff is quite nice.
Likes For 52telecaster:
#14
Newbie
"This thread needs a picture.
I was never quite happy with the Cross Check geometry. It seemed like it was simultaneously too big and too small. Maybe that's just my taste, or maybe I should have gotten the next size up. From Surly's geometry chart, everything from the 50cm to the 58cm has nearly the same reach (within 1 cm), and, curiously, the 56 has shorter reach than the 54. I had a poor understanding of bike fit when I bought this one."
The best thing about Surlys is their tire clearance. They were ahead of the curve on that. The Cross Check is spec'd for 700x42 with fenders and it doesn't even get Surly's highest self-rating for tire clearance.
It's interesting that most of their current pictures show the bike with flat bars. The geometry makes a bit more sense that way.
I was never quite happy with the Cross Check geometry. It seemed like it was simultaneously too big and too small. Maybe that's just my taste, or maybe I should have gotten the next size up. From Surly's geometry chart, everything from the 50cm to the 58cm has nearly the same reach (within 1 cm), and, curiously, the 56 has shorter reach than the 54. I had a poor understanding of bike fit when I bought this one."
The best thing about Surlys is their tire clearance. They were ahead of the curve on that. The Cross Check is spec'd for 700x42 with fenders and it doesn't even get Surly's highest self-rating for tire clearance.
It's interesting that most of their current pictures show the bike with flat bars. The geometry makes a bit more sense that way.
Wow that's a great color! I agree. I had 2 Crosschecks, and they were always a hair too big for me. I'd like to get a smaller one if the chance ever came up. To paraphrase an old review, they're like Willies jeeps. Not the best, but can handle most stuff thrown its way. I remember climbing like a beast on the old stock model up some singletrack. Triple chainring fun!
Last edited by cb400bill; 02-09-23 at 02:38 PM.
#15
Newbie
It really breaks my heart seeing Surly move to disc brakes and discontinuing the Pacer, the 1x1, etc. At least the new. models are retaining downtube braze-ons, and I kind of dig the Straggler's look.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,504
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 586 Post(s)
Liked 612 Times
in
447 Posts
I've never owned a Surly but I've always admired them and their products. I have seen many of them close-up. They have a quirky, fun vibe to them. I like the FFF sticker on the rear triangle, standing for Fatties Fit Fine. We all know larger tires can be an advantage at times.
They also have introduced some interesting components such as their "Whirly" crank set and their "Dingle Cog" , which gives fixed riders an opportunity to change gearing easily.
The Cross-Check is iconic, probably the first bike people associate with them.
They also have introduced some interesting components such as their "Whirly" crank set and their "Dingle Cog" , which gives fixed riders an opportunity to change gearing easily.
The Cross-Check is iconic, probably the first bike people associate with them.
Likes For TugaDude:
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Wow that's a great color! I agree. I had 2 Crosschecks, and they were always a hair too big for me. I'd like to get a smaller one if the chance ever came up. To paraphrase an old review, they're like Willies jeeps. Not the best, but can handle most stuff thrown its way. I remember climbing like a beast on the old stock model up some singletrack. Triple chainring fun!
Last edited by reroll; 02-09-23 at 03:02 PM.
#18
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
Yeah, the Cross-Check is built that way, long in the reach and short in the stack. Cyclocross bikes ordinarily get built that way, for riding long and low on drop bars, but after finding myself with my hands on the tops of drop bars nearly all of the time I switched over to flat or flat-ish bars, my favorites having become the Velo Orange Porteur bars https://velo-orange.com/collections/...eur-bar-config. However, because of the long reach and short stack on the Cross-Check I am now using the Velo Orange Left Bank bars https://velo-orange.com/collections/...ndlebar-config along with a -17 degree 60mm stem.
Likes For 52telecaster:
#19
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
647 Posts
Yea I have a couple Cross Checks and yea they’re pretty great
Likes For Germany_chris:
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For reroll:
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I've never owned a Surly but I've always admired them and their products. I have seen many of them close-up. They have a quirky, fun vibe to them. I like the FFF sticker on the rear triangle, standing for Fatties Fit Fine. We all know larger tires can be an advantage at times.
They also have introduced some interesting components such as their "Whirly" crank set and their "Dingle Cog" , which gives fixed riders an opportunity to change gearing easily.
The Cross-Check is iconic, probably the first bike people associate with them.
They also have introduced some interesting components such as their "Whirly" crank set and their "Dingle Cog" , which gives fixed riders an opportunity to change gearing easily.
The Cross-Check is iconic, probably the first bike people associate with them.
Likes For reroll:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,046
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 1,082 Times
in
522 Posts
I would potentially agree with this other than one very key feature to the Cross-Check that many in the touring/commuting/randonneuring world have come to appreciate (and, as you surely know, re-discover from the mid-century French) and that is the ability to fit wider than 32mm tires and/or fenders with ease, because it is designed for them. No crimping fenders, dimpling chainstays etc, which even then on many C+V models will only get you so far.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
For the first year or so that I owned this, I didn't really like it. I had heard such great things, but the ride just kind of felt dead to me. Then I took it on a tour and really loaded it down, and it was like:
The heavy load didn't really have any negative impact on the way the bike rides. I guess this is a general theme with touring bikes, but this was my first true touring bike and it surprised me.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K:
Likes For panzerwagon:
#25
Garage tetris expert
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 892
Bikes: A few. Ok, a lot
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 387 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
329 Posts
For the first year or so that I owned this, I didn't really like it. I had heard such great things, but the ride just kind of felt dead to me. Then I took it on a tour and really loaded it down, and it was like:
The heavy load didn't really have any negative impact on the way the bike rides. I guess this is a general theme with touring bikes, but this was my first true touring bike and it surprised me.
The heavy load didn't really have any negative impact on the way the bike rides. I guess this is a general theme with touring bikes, but this was my first true touring bike and it surprised me.