Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

LBS broke my HED rim, any advice?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

LBS broke my HED rim, any advice?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-15, 02:48 PM
  #1  
dpd3672
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 82

Bikes: 02 Cervelo P2K, 07 Cervelo P2SL, 07 Cervelo Soloist, 09 Cervelo RS, 96 Quintana Roo Kilo, 80 Chicago Schwinn Letour, 12 Motobecane Nemesis, 97 Kona AA, 97 Cannondale f700

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 35 Times in 16 Posts
LBS broke my HED rim, any advice?

I had an older Hed Alps rim with a wired Powertap hub that I was looking to upgrade to a wireless (ANT+). I found a used G3 on Ebay, and dropped the whole thing off to be relaced.

Just got a call from the shop, they broke my rim in the process of relacing the wheel. Is this common? Should I be upset? What would be a reasonable expectation of the shop as far as making it right?

They told me that HED quoted them $600 to replace the rim and lace it all up. I'm not looking to spend that much. Should they be buying me a rim, splitting the cost, offering a replacement?

Any advice/ideas?
dpd3672 is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 02:59 PM
  #2  
corrado33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What... exactly happened? Some of the nomenclature you're using isn't obvious to the majority of us. I'm assuming the G3 is a ANT+ hub, which you were trying to get laced into your rim?

What broke? Did a spoke pull through? What kind of shape was the rim in? Is it possible that it was damaged before?
corrado33 is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 03:06 PM
  #3  
PepeM
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
That is a tricky one. How exactly did it break?
PepeM is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 03:54 PM
  #4  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Was it a spoke hole failure? It might be hard to hold the shop responsible if this was a used rim that may have had occult cracks already.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 04:26 PM
  #5  
hueyhoolihan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
it's simple, unless they can show that the rim was defective before it broke, they are responsible for the cost of an equivalent replacement.

no different than if you hired a contractor to fix your window and they put a hole in the wall while doing it. they need to make it right.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 05:11 PM
  #6  
OnyxTiger
Bonafide N00bs
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 442

Bikes: 2015 Cannondale Quick CX 4, 2014 Fuji Sportif 1.3C Disc, 2012 Fuji SST 2.0 Ultegra Di2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The fact that they already had the replacement quote handy without - in the same conversation - discussing ways to settle the cost, tells me that they were simply assuming that you would pick up the whole tab. Sounds both unfair and inconsiderate to me, especially since (as far as we know) they didn't explain how and why it broke.

I would be going into this conversation with an aggressive stance, forcing them to right the mistake. They decided to take up the job, didn't address any possible malfunctions/defects prior to, and simply handed off the mistake to you. That's poor service.

Absolutely no way am I footing the whole cost for this. Even footing half would be giving away too much, imo.
OnyxTiger is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 05:57 PM
  #7  
calamarichris
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434

Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times in 153 Posts
Everyone's so sure the bike shop did something wrong, but this was described as an older Hed rim.
How many miles on it? What kind of riding? Are you even the original owner?

It's attitudes like above why real bike shops that have knowledgeable techs are bitter, angry bearded grouches. And it's also why modern carbon-boutiques wouldn't even touch a job like this in the first place.
So glad I'm not running a bike shop. People stink on ice.
calamarichris is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 08:24 PM
  #8  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
Originally Posted by calamarichris
Everyone's so sure the bike shop did something wrong, but this was described as an older Hed rim.
How many miles on it? What kind of riding? Are you even the original owner?

It's attitudes like above why real bike shops that have knowledgeable techs are bitter, angry bearded grouches. And it's also why modern carbon-boutiques wouldn't even touch a job like this in the first place.
So glad I'm not running a bike shop. People stink on ice.
I think we need a lot more details from the OP. I.E. What actually broke, before pointing any fingers.

Is the wheelset similar to this?

Hed Alps 700c Carbon Wheel Set | eBay

I'm now imagining all these plastic bikes, 20 years own the road may be nightmare of aged brittle plastic.

Anyway, is it an aluminum/carbon fiber composite rim? Where are the nipple seats?
CliffordK is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 08:35 PM
  #9  
OnyxTiger
Bonafide N00bs
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 442

Bikes: 2015 Cannondale Quick CX 4, 2014 Fuji Sportif 1.3C Disc, 2012 Fuji SST 2.0 Ultegra Di2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by calamarichris
Everyone's so sure the bike shop did something wrong, but this was described as an older Hed rim.
How many miles on it? What kind of riding? Are you even the original owner?

It's attitudes like above why real bike shops that have knowledgeable techs are bitter, angry bearded grouches. And it's also why modern carbon-boutiques wouldn't even touch a job like this in the first place.
So glad I'm not running a bike shop. People stink on ice.
Not that I'm mad. I'm really not. It's not my rim that broke.

My point is - the bike shop should've asked those kinds of questions that you just asked before taking on the job. Also, before taking on the job, they should've been clear about what routes they would take if the equipment was damaged in the first place. Because of not doing those things, the customer is now stuck asking the internet what should happen here.

Feel free to attack my attitude, not too sure what that accomplishes. Perhaps saying that people stink on ice doesn't, either.
OnyxTiger is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 08:41 PM
  #10  
dpd3672
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 82

Bikes: 02 Cervelo P2K, 07 Cervelo P2SL, 07 Cervelo Soloist, 09 Cervelo RS, 96 Quintana Roo Kilo, 80 Chicago Schwinn Letour, 12 Motobecane Nemesis, 97 Kona AA, 97 Cannondale f700

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 35 Times in 16 Posts
The rim is older, a carbon fairing bonded to an aluminum rim. I was told that the rim had to be drilled differently for the spokes to use a POWERTAP hub (by the mechanic, when I was told it had broke), and that's why it broke.

I assumed going from a wired to a wireless POWERTAP hub would be a simple swap, now they tell me that's not the case.

I'm not looking to demand a new set of wheels, just trying to get an opinion on what I should reasonably expect them to do to make it right. I dropped off an older, but working, wheel with a POWERTAP, expecting to have it back with the upgraded part installed. What I have now is a broken rim and an orphaned hub.

And my phone is capitalizing POWERTAP, don't know why, sorry.
dpd3672 is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 11:50 PM
  #11  
TenSpeedV2
Senior Member
 
TenSpeedV2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4,347

Bikes: Felt TK2, Felt Z5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
What shop is this in Detroit?
TenSpeedV2 is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 12:06 AM
  #12  
trailangel
Senior Member
 
trailangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times in 422 Posts
Originally Posted by dpd3672
I was told that the rim had to be drilled differently for the spokes to use a POWERTAP hub (by the mechanic, when I was told it had broke), and that's why it broke.
Huh?
trailangel is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 01:52 AM
  #13  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
I assume you have the same number of spokes on both hubs. Did you discuss what would be required for the changeover before dropping off the rims? Before modifications were attempted? Did the wheel builder discover problems during the build, then inform you before destroying your rim? And, have you seen it?

Are the hub flanges for the two powertap hubs different diameters? Different spacing? 10s vs 11s? If the nipples are at the aluminium outer rim, then go through a deep covering, then out a second small hole, then the configuration would be very sensitive to flange diameter, and maybe even flange spacing.

I am surprised that a regular bike shop would have professional equipment and expertise to attempt modification of deep wall CF rims.

I am just a little surprised they would even attempt the job.

If it is non structural CF fairing that has broken, can it be repaired? Maybe someone local has some CF repair experience. You could contact Calfee. It says they frequently reject rims and carbon/aluminum bonded joints, but it doesn't say they always reject them.

Anyway, if the shop communicated the difficulties before and/or during the process, and you authorized them to go ahead, then I would expect you to take full liability.

On the other hand, if you dropped off the wheels without a hint of potential issues, and the first you heard from them was after the rim was damaged, then I would expect them to take at least partial liability. But, that would still depend on whether it was something the wheel builder did, or a previously undiscovered flaw in the rim.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 02:58 AM
  #14  
Rowan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
The best you could expect, in my estimation, is a replacement rim of the same value and configuration as the original HED. And because it is an older rim, that might be difficult to source.

I also am a bit surprised that the shop took on the job in the first place if there are in fact complexities with the holes, flange widths and drillings.

Did the shop give you a docket and if so have you had a look at the fine print? Or is there is any signage in the shop that liability is limited or not accepted when servicing bikes?
Rowan is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 06:26 AM
  #15  
dpd3672
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 82

Bikes: 02 Cervelo P2K, 07 Cervelo P2SL, 07 Cervelo Soloist, 09 Cervelo RS, 96 Quintana Roo Kilo, 80 Chicago Schwinn Letour, 12 Motobecane Nemesis, 97 Kona AA, 97 Cannondale f700

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 35 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by TenSpeedV2
What shop is this in Detroit?
Fraser Bike. They're pretty big on the Eastside in triathlon and running events, and were recommended by more than one friend as a shop that was experienced in handling the more "exotic" stuff. They stock mostly higher end products (Cervelo, Quintana Roo, Specialized, etc). I was planning on using them for a tri fitting this winter. Their prices seemed maybe a little higher than a "mom and pop" lbs, but I figured it was worth it if they were the best.

There was no contract or service agreement, and nothing out of the ordinary was discussed when I dropped the rims off, they just mentioned that there would be a delay for them to order spokes, if they didn't have them in stock. First I heard from them about the rim was after it was damaged. The phone conversation I had with the mechanic led me to believe that there was some "caveats" to lacing up the powertap hub to a hed wheel, that the mechanic didn't realize until after the rim broke and he talked to Hed on the phone.

Going after work to the shop, just wanted some opinions on what I should expect as a reasonable resolution to the situation. I don't expect them to give me a new set of $1000+ wheels, but don't think I should go home "less whole" than I started.

Last edited by dpd3672; 11-25-15 at 06:31 AM.
dpd3672 is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 07:39 AM
  #16  
spdracr39
Senior Member
 
spdracr39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 1,538

Bikes: Lynskey Twisted Helix Di2 Ti, 1987 Orbea steel single speed/fixie, Orbea Avant M30, Trek Fuel EX9.8 29, Trek Madone 5 series, Specialized Epic Carbon Comp 29er, Trek 7.1F

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sounds like a discussion with the shop manager/owner is in order. Whether they were at fault or not your displeasure should be made known and the opportunity for them to make you happy given. No one here can know the actual circumstances only here say and thus judgement by us is irrelevant. I can tell you for sure that going in with a poor attitude created from negative feedback on a forum page will not net you the same gain as a good attitude asking for consideration. Having said that if it was mine I would be pissed and make it known that I felt like I was being treated unfairly and if they didn't cover their mistake I wouldn't be back and wouldn't recommend them to anyone in the future.
spdracr39 is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 07:55 AM
  #17  
Juan Foote
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
 
Juan Foote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299

Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times in 686 Posts
Did you know upon taking the new hub in that the spoke hole count wasn't the same, and also knew (before the work was started) that they were going to have to try and modify your old rim to make it fit?

Answer yes- buy yourself a new wheel

Answer no- shop owes you a comparable (be it used) value wheel.

I don't know whom you dropped the wheel off to. If it was the mechanic then these issues should have been discussed straight away. If you dropped it off to the phone jockey then they would not have known to ask, and it sounds like you didn't either.

In resolution (assuming no above) I think I would look at it as a learning experience and see if the shop will comp you in "non cost" service like a fitting, or bike service or something, and perhaps a "deal" on a replacement rim at your cost that WILL be compatible with the hub.
Juan Foote is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 08:07 AM
  #18  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,179 Times in 1,469 Posts
Originally Posted by spdracr39
Sounds like a discussion with the shop manager/owner is in order. Whether they were at fault or not your displeasure should be made known and the opportunity for them to make you happy given. No one here can know the actual circumstances only here say and thus judgement by us is irrelevant. I can tell you for sure that going in with a poor attitude created from negative feedback on a forum page will not net you the same gain as a good attitude asking for consideration. Having said that if it was mine I would be pissed and make it known that I felt like I was being treated unfairly and if they didn't cover their mistake I wouldn't be back and wouldn't recommend them to anyone in the future.
Excellent advice! What the OP needs to do is calmly express his disappointment and frustration to the owner/shop manager. The owner needs to see how they would feel if the situation was reversed. There's probably lots of other information the OP isn't aware of either. That kind of conversation usually leads to the best settlements. It's also much better than getting worked up from responses from others here who don't know the entire story, are distrustful of others, want to be Internet tough guys, etc.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 08:13 AM
  #19  
spdntrxi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: East Bay Area ,CA
Posts: 1,762

Bikes: not enough

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 52 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
I assume you have the same number of spokes on both hubs. Did you discuss what would be required for the changeover before dropping off the rims? Before modifications were attempted? Did the wheel builder discover problems during the build, then inform you before destroying your rim? And, have you seen it?

Are the hub flanges for the two powertap hubs different diameters? Different spacing? 10s vs 11s? If the nipples are at the aluminium outer rim, then go through a deep covering, then out a second small hole, then the configuration would be very sensitive to flange diameter, and maybe even flange spacing.

I am surprised that a regular bike shop would have professional equipment and expertise to attempt modification of deep wall CF rims.

I am just a little surprised they would even attempt the job.

If it is non structural CF fairing that has broken, can it be repaired? Maybe someone local has some CF repair experience. You could contact Calfee. It says they frequently reject rims and carbon/aluminum bonded joints, but it doesn't say they always reject them.

Anyway, if the shop communicated the difficulties before and/or during the process, and you authorized them to go ahead, then I would expect you to take full liability.

On the other hand, if you dropped off the wheels without a hint of potential issues, and the first you heard from them was after the rim was damaged, then I would expect them to take at least partial liability. But, that would still depend on whether it was something the wheel builder did, or a previously undiscovered flaw in the rim.
This completely...
spdntrxi is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 08:20 AM
  #20  
Nachoman
well hello there
 
Nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430

Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 206 Posts
One other question to ask yourself is what you would have done with the information (beforehand) if the mechanic had warned you about the risk involved in the work you requested.
If the answer is that you would have left the wheel there anyway, I would probably just limit my complaint to the mechanic's lack of communication.
If the answer is that you would NOT have taken the risk and have them attempt to work on the wheel, then I would probably make a bigger deal about it.
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 10:00 AM
  #21  
mconlonx
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by trailangel
Huh?
+1

I'm having a hard time visualizing why a rim would need to be drilled differently to install a new hub... and why a shop would even agree to do such a thing.

Depending on what was involved, this could very well be a job I would have turned down at our shop. When people insist we use used parts for a repair or build, we give a standard disclaimer -- won't/can't guarantee quality of operation; not responsible for broken parts; customer assumes any extra labor fee involved and responsibility for incompatible parts issues. Policy based on experience...

A decent resolution in this particular case might be a comparable replacement rim at or near dealer cost with customer paying original, agreed labor fee.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 10:19 AM
  #22  
dpd3672
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 82

Bikes: 02 Cervelo P2K, 07 Cervelo P2SL, 07 Cervelo Soloist, 09 Cervelo RS, 96 Quintana Roo Kilo, 80 Chicago Schwinn Letour, 12 Motobecane Nemesis, 97 Kona AA, 97 Cannondale f700

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 35 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
+1

I'm having a hard time visualizing why a rim would need to be drilled differently to install a new hub... and why a shop would even agree to do such a thing.

Depending on what was involved, this could very well be a job I would have turned down at our shop. When people insist we use used parts for a repair or build, we give a standard disclaimer -- won't/can't guarantee quality of operation; not responsible for broken parts; customer assumes any extra labor fee involved and responsibility for incompatible parts issues. Policy based on experience...

A decent resolution in this particular case might be a comparable replacement rim at or near dealer cost with customer paying original, agreed labor fee.
I'm not sure I'm understanding correctly, but I believe they're referring to how the holes in the carbon fairing are drilled, offset from the holes in the aluminum rim to accommodate the wider diameter of the Powertap hub. The mechanic told me the crack didn't start until he began to tighten the spokes, so I'm assuming he meant the holes needed a different "offset" if the hub diameter was different, and when he started to tension them, it cracked.

I'm not sure how much of the blame the shop has for not knowing better, but since they deal heavily in racing/triathlon bikes, I would think they've done this type of work before.

And I think your resolution seems reasonable...I'd be happy with a heavily discounted, comparable replacement. I'm not trying to put the shop on the hook for setting me up with new gear, just want to be around where I started, without going out of pocket for a $600 rim (which is the price they quoted me if they got a replacement rim from Hed).

And again, I didn't start this thread to trash the shop, or to get anyone up in arms taking sides with me or the shop, just to get a general idea what would be a reasonable expectation of them (and me) to "fix" the problem without anyone getting ripped off.
dpd3672 is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 12:54 PM
  #23  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
Here is my interpretation. Obviously condensed. Less of an issue with a full sized rim and a couple mm worth of changes. But, the shop should have been able to predict problems when ordering new spokes and lacing up the wheel. Re-drilling?



On the left, one has a non-structural fairing, which I think the HED rim has. Spokes originate at the aluminum rim.
Moving, say from the green flange to the red flange would change where the spoke exits out of the fairing (green line).

If one keeps the spoke exiting out the original green hole, then one gets a bend in the middle of the spoke, red spoke. Tighten that spoke down and it spells TROUBLE.

Pretty much any change would create this problem, different flange spacing, or a different flange diameter for crossed spokes (radial spokes would be less sensitive to flange diameter, but still sensitive to flange spacing, and the ultimate angle).

On the right, one has a structural fairing. The spokes and nipples originate at the bottom of the rim. Angles of the holes would be somewhat affected, but the rim is far less sensitive to flange changes.

Assuming the non-structural fairing on the left side of the diagram, I have to wonder why any shop would take on this job, unless it is something they are really setup to do, an do a dozen a day. Even so, you'll get multiple spoke holes, or enlarged spoke holes, maybe some filler, and the end result won't look pretty.

I can see why even simply re-dishing a wheel could be a problem.

It is not that you need a shop that deals with some nice bikes. You need a wheel builder that isn't in the top 10%, but rather that wheel builder that is in the top 0.1%. Maybe a job to send it back to the factory.

Attached Images
CliffordK is offline  
Old 11-26-15, 12:40 AM
  #24  
Rowan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
Here is my interpretation. Obviously condensed. Less of an issue with a full sized rim and a couple mm worth of changes. But, the shop should have been able to predict problems when ordering new spokes and lacing up the wheel. Re-drilling?



On the left, one has a non-structural fairing, which I think the HED rim has. Spokes originate at the aluminum rim.
Moving, say from the green flange to the red flange would change where the spoke exits out of the fairing (green line).

If one keeps the spoke exiting out the original green hole, then one gets a bend in the middle of the spoke, red spoke. Tighten that spoke down and it spells TROUBLE.

Pretty much any change would create this problem, different flange spacing, or a different flange diameter for crossed spokes (radial spokes would be less sensitive to flange diameter, but still sensitive to flange spacing, and the ultimate angle).

On the right, one has a structural fairing. The spokes and nipples originate at the bottom of the rim. Angles of the holes would be somewhat affected, but the rim is far less sensitive to flange changes.

Assuming the non-structural fairing on the left side of the diagram, I have to wonder why any shop would take on this job, unless it is something they are really setup to do, an do a dozen a day. Even so, you'll get multiple spoke holes, or enlarged spoke holes, maybe some filler, and the end result won't look pretty.

I can see why even simply re-dishing a wheel could be a problem.

It is not that you need a shop that deals with some nice bikes. You need a wheel builder that isn't in the top 10%, but rather that wheel builder that is in the top 0.1%. Maybe a job to send it back to the factory.

I understand what you say, but wouldn't it be obvious that the spoke wasn't going to line up with the original hole in the fairing... that there would be a significant bend in it which would then put undue force on the fairing? Or that the spoke wouldn't protrude in the right place to actually thread into the hole on the rim itself?
Rowan is offline  
Old 11-26-15, 02:00 AM
  #25  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
I understand what you say, but wouldn't it be obvious that the spoke wasn't going to line up with the original hole in the fairing... that there would be a significant bend in it which would then put undue force on the fairing? Or that the spoke wouldn't protrude in the right place to actually thread into the hole on the rim itself?
We still don't have a good description of the actual config and damage.

I haven't seen those wheels in person, but if the fairing is non-structural, then it would likely be designed to be as light as possible. And, a decade old, it probably wouldn't take much to do some damage.

It is quite likely the holes are only off by 1mm or so. Lacing the wheel, everything is loose, and you couldn't tell a thing. Only as the spokes are brought up to tension would it become clear that something was seriously wrong.

Still, the rim isn't transparent. So, one would only see the spokes resting on the side of the spoke holes, and might not realize how serious of a problem was occurring.

Hopefully the OP has had a chance to inspect his wheel.

PICTURES?
CliffordK is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.