Headwind and Power
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,297 Times
in
2,947 Posts
If it has devolved into nonsense, it's only because people are trying to find some explanation that will resonant with you so that you can understand why you are wrong. (And, yes, you are wrong.)
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,434
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4411 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,007 Posts
Omg! Just stop :-) This was addressed several times before. Including by me in #13 and Im sure in other posts too since you all seem to throw this at me, even if I made no claim to the contrary.
This thread has devolved in to nonsense and Im out of here as I said in #27
This thread has devolved in to nonsense and Im out of here as I said in #27
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 982
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 506 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 639 Times
in
357 Posts
so, in the spirit of the season - 'off-season' for some - a thread we can all present our As and Os...
...so, I've been wonderin, for so very long...
given the same rider, on the same bike
if you're riding at 10 mph (16 kph) into a 15 mph headwind (24 kph) , are you using the equal/same 'power' as if you were riding at 25 mph (40 kph) ???
is it an equal relationship, and is it linear ?
what other factors might influence this greatly ? - are rolling resistence and impedance nominal or significant players in this drama ?
So Bill Nyes _ The Science Guys in our midst - what is the reality?
not a scientist ? have an opinion? lets hear it !
My wishes for more power to all for the coming year
...so, I've been wonderin, for so very long...
given the same rider, on the same bike
if you're riding at 10 mph (16 kph) into a 15 mph headwind (24 kph) , are you using the equal/same 'power' as if you were riding at 25 mph (40 kph) ???
is it an equal relationship, and is it linear ?
what other factors might influence this greatly ? - are rolling resistence and impedance nominal or significant players in this drama ?
So Bill Nyes _ The Science Guys in our midst - what is the reality?
not a scientist ? have an opinion? lets hear it !
My wishes for more power to all for the coming year
horse power = [Vg*W(.0053 + %G/100) + .0083(Va^3)]/375
calories/hr = [Vg*W(.0053 + %G/100) + .0083(Va^3)]*7.2
calories/hr = [V*W(.0053 + %G/100) + .0083(V^3)]*7.2
watts = [V*W(.0053 + %G/100) + .0083(V^3)]*2
where Vg is ground speed, Va is speed through the air (includes head/tail winds), W is bike + rider weight in lbs., and %G is grade in per cent. The factors listed here (0.0053 for friction + rolling resistance and 0.0083 for aerodynamic drag) are obviously not absolute. They will vary with efficiency of the tires and drive train, and with the aerodynamics of the bike + rider combination. Both of these assume a racing position on a racing bike. A clunker bike or a more efficient riding position will change these numbers, which are averages anyway. Power to overcome friction and gravity is proportional only to rider weight and ground speed. Power to overcome wind drag is proportional to the cube of the air speed. For reference, 1 hp = 2700 calories (because of human metabolic efficiency of 24%); 1 calorie = 0.276 watts; 1 hp = 746 watts. Here, all calories are kg-calories, or "food calories."
#54
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Otto
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,434
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4411 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,007 Posts
Yep, I spotted that too. Drag force is proportional to the square of the airspeed and Power is proportional to Drag Force x Vg. When there is no headwind Va = Vg and the Power equation then simplifies to V cubed. It's actually this very fact that causes confusion when you start introducing headwind.