Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1980's Frame Misalignment

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

1980's Frame Misalignment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-22, 08:33 PM
  #1  
branko_76 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
branko_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 703 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times in 423 Posts
1980's Frame Misalignment

Most of the bikes I've owned and worked on were 1970's era Raleigh's and all have had misaligned frames. This is the second bike I've worked on from the 1980's and both have misaligned frames. First was a ROSS Signature, this one is a SCHWINN Traveler.

How common is this?

The first photo is of the non-drive side, second is drive side, the gap is 7mm. The dropouts are parallel and are perfectly spaced for a 126mm hub.





branko_76 is offline  
Likes For branko_76:
Old 08-12-22, 09:01 PM
  #2  
bertinjim 
Senior Member
 
bertinjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Niagara Region, Canada
Posts: 1,458

Bikes: 1970s Alex Singer, 1960s Peugeot PX 10, 1960s Bertin C37, 1973 Carre Bertin C 37, 1972 Carlton Kermesse, 1981 Peugeot PX 14 Super Competition

Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 348 Post(s)
Liked 268 Times in 158 Posts
branko 76-

Misalignment of older steel bikes is pretty common in my experience. Wear and tear, getting crashed or dropped, all sorts of things happen over 40 years. I routinely have my bike purchases checked by a nearby frame builder and then aligned. It makes a great difference in the ride and tracking even when I previously considered the bike to be fine.
bertinjim is offline  
Likes For bertinjim:
Old 08-12-22, 09:13 PM
  #3  
branko_76 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
branko_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 703 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times in 423 Posts
Originally Posted by bertinjim
branko 76-

Misalignment of older steel bikes is pretty common in my experience. Wear and tear, getting crashed or dropped, all sorts of things happen over 40 years. I routinely have my bike purchases checked by a nearby frame builder and then aligned. It makes a great difference in the ride and tracking even when I previously considered the bike to be fine.
In complete agreement
branko_76 is offline  
Old 08-12-22, 09:17 PM
  #4  
3alarmer
Senior Member
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,994

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 305 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26477 Post(s)
Liked 10,441 Times in 7,244 Posts
.
...of the stuff I have redone for my own use, probably 70% of them need some sort of either minor or major realignment. As stated above, it's pretty common.
I routinely check the dropout spacing and alignment, frame alignment, fork alignment, and derailleur hanger alignment as part of the process on every bike I work on.

If a bike gets used, **** happens. And some of them were not well aligned when sold new, anyway.
3alarmer is offline  
Likes For 3alarmer:
Old 08-13-22, 10:06 AM
  #5  
easyupbug 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,706

Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 571 Post(s)
Liked 605 Times in 419 Posts
It is worth the trouble. My worst was 7 years ago an utterly unridable 80's custom from a local builder. Hung upside down by strings looped through the rims the fork would cant off 30º. A lugged Reynolds 753 which you can find Reynolds engineers documents saying 753 can not be cold set. I tried to cold set the fork first and as soon as i mount and moved it would snap back to the original position. Fortunately an old time framebuilder in town with Marchetti frame table and Lange fork table got it perfect. I enjoy it to this day.
easyupbug is offline  
Likes For easyupbug:
Old 08-13-22, 10:19 AM
  #6  
zandoval 
Senior Member
 
zandoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,549

Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 999 Post(s)
Liked 1,674 Times in 1,075 Posts
Originally Posted by bertinjim
branko 76-

Misalignment of older steel bikes is pretty common in my experience. Wear and tear, getting crashed or dropped, all sorts of things happen over 40 years. I routinely have my bike purchases checked by a nearby frame builder and then aligned. It makes a great difference in the ride and tracking even when I previously considered the bike to be fine.
For me just getting proper derailleur alignment has been a great thing. And I don't even have proper tools to do it. I just use two large "C" clamps.

As to the OP: Yes, pretty common. A further question would be what methods can we use as a DIY alignment check.

Our guys at Sheldon have a few things posted


https://sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)

Last edited by zandoval; 08-13-22 at 10:37 AM.
zandoval is online now  
Likes For zandoval:
Old 08-13-22, 03:12 PM
  #7  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,694

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1381 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,771 Times in 949 Posts
Yup, tweaked frame alignment is not at all uncommon. I always check frame and fork alignment and correct as required. And, in many cases, correction is required. I use the string method to check stays alignment but I no longer have a fork gauge. Stupid me sold mine a long time ago:-(
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Old 08-13-22, 04:15 PM
  #8  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Liked 2,648 Times in 1,104 Posts
Originally Posted by zandoval
Alarming that ShelBroCo would show a picture of doing it wrong. (I am admittedly too picky by half, but why not do it right? It's not any harder.)

The string should come off the dropout at a point that matters, namely where the wheel will sit, the inner face of the "land" for the axle. This shows the string coming off a part of the dropout that's not involved with holding the axle, and it's different between the right and left (that knot can throw off the string's centerline).

Even if you do it right, you might want to measure and compensate for the curve in the seat tube from brazing on the front derailer attachment. All tubes have some runout of course, nothing is perfectly straight, but the F. der. BO puts a pretty decent curve in the tube, more than any runout I have measured in an unbrazed tube.

So the string method is not the ultimate alignment, but it's decent as a shade-tree mechanic technique for those without more rigorous methods, or even for a pro framebuilder in too much of a hurry for a complete alignment, say for a frame that isn't valuable enough to warrant the complete tear-down and rebuild. Just run that string in the right place, and try to see how bent your seattube is!

Note this string method (done right) is equivalent to the Park ***-1 tool shown in the OP; they measure the same thing. So the ***-1 (or -2) is also, in my opinion, not a "be-all and end-all" pro alignment tool, but it is very fast and easy to use. I have one and use it, but I keep its limitations in mind.

EDIT: the asterisks were put there by the censor. They replace the name of the Park Frame Alignment Gauge.
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords!

Mark B

Last edited by bulgie; 08-13-22 at 04:19 PM. Reason: Censor bleeped the name of the Park tool!
bulgie is offline  
Old 08-13-22, 04:43 PM
  #9  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Liked 2,648 Times in 1,104 Posts
Originally Posted by easyupbug
<snip> you can find Reynolds engineers documents saying 753 can not be cold set. I tried to cold set the fork first and as soon as i mount and moved it would snap back to the original position. Fortunately an old time framebuilder in town with Marchetti frame table and Lange fork table got it perfect. I enjoy it to this day.
Yeah it's "common knowledge" that 753 can't be cold-set, but what they really should have said is it's difficult to cold set. If it springs back without taking a set, it just means you didn't push hard enough. Any steel, no matter how strong, can be bent, unless it's too brittle and snaps. But the problem with 753 isn't brittleness, it's just very thinwall (in the frame tubes, not the fork), making it likely to buckle or kink, a.k.a. beercan failure mode.

That's not a problem with the forks though, which are no thinner than 531. They're just 531 blades that got heat-treated to make them stronger, a very dubious advantage since 531 forks are strong enough. (I'm mad at Reynolds for "chickening out" and not making the blades lighter, a missed opportunity.)

The 753 steerer is also the same gauge as 531 for most of its length, but where the 531 steerer gets a butt at the bottom, the 753 doesn't, so the lower part of the steerer is lighter than 531. This a 753 fork is just a little bit lighter than a 531 fork, but it's really very little, like an ounce? Sorrry, I once knew the weight difference but I forget now, someone here will know.

Even if the blades were infinitely strong, you can still bend the crown, so yeah those forks definitely can be cold-set. You just need a longer lever, and a stout vise! Or a 100+ lb alignment fixture like the one I made recently from vintage cast iron industrial parts,


That's a work-in-progress shot. It's now finished and bolted down to a very heavy steel table that's bolted into the concrete floor. Main difference from this pic is the handwheel is spaced upward an inch so you don't pinch your fingers against the crown. Unfortunately it only does 1" forks (I'm a committed C&V retrogrouch).

Mark B

Last edited by bulgie; 08-14-22 at 11:52 PM.
bulgie is offline  
Old 08-13-22, 04:49 PM
  #10  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,834 Times in 1,998 Posts
Braze on front derailleur mounts are definitely a way to bow a seat tube.
repechage is offline  
Old 08-13-22, 09:40 PM
  #11  
easyupbug 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,706

Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 571 Post(s)
Liked 605 Times in 419 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
...(I'm a committed C&V retrogrouch).

Mark B
and an inspiration to all us tinkerer.

Last edited by easyupbug; 08-13-22 at 09:41 PM. Reason: grammer
easyupbug is offline  
Likes For easyupbug:
Old 08-14-22, 08:23 AM
  #12  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,840

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3617 Post(s)
Liked 3,446 Times in 1,957 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
Yeah it's "common knowledge" that 753 can't be cold-set, but what they really should have said is it's difficult to cold set. If it springs back without taking a set, it just means you didn't push hard enough. Any steel, no matter how strong, can be bent, unless it's too brittle and snaps. But the problem with 753 isn't brittleness, it's just very thinwall (in the frame tubes, not the fork), making it likely to buckle or kink, a.k.a. beercan failure mode.
When I was with Trek, we decided to test cold-setting a 753 frame on a crashed team frame that was headed for the scrap barrel anyway. Put it on the alignment table and had at it with the Big Levers of Alignment, and just as you say, it kept springing back, and we kept increasing the force. Finally, it gave, by crumpling at the shift lever bosses.

And that's why I don't recommend cold-setting 753 frames.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Likes For JohnDThompson:
Old 08-14-22, 10:23 AM
  #13  
Doug Fattic 
framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 1,473
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 616 Post(s)
Liked 1,921 Times in 657 Posts
I'll start by answering the OP's question about how often are classic era bike frames out of alignment. As a builder/painter since the mid 70's, I've done hundreds (thousands probably) of alignments. The answer is most frames are somewhat out of alignment and some seriously out. I've visited many framebuilding places (especially in the UK) in the 70's and most were pretty casual about it with rudimentary tools. Furthermore, the $100/150 retail cost of a painted frame in Europe required those builders to make them quickly. The exception I've found were 80's Japanese frames that always seemed to be spot on. American builders raised the price and standard although not everyone does it perfectly. Where I learned to build at Ellis Briggs in Yorkshire, they had a very nice cast iron fixture/alignment table combination. I took back with me from Manchester much of Johnny Berry's Equipment including his 3' X 4' cast iron table. I've gotten others since but that one is still my main table for alignment. I was very fortunate to get it (and the knowledge of how to use it).

The problem with DIY alignment is figuring out what is the problem. I'm not a fan of Sheldon's string method. So you measure the distance of the string to the seat tube on both sids and there is a discrepancy. What's off? One might think that the rear dropouts are left or right of the center of the frame but how do you know? Maybe the down tube is leaning over to one side or maybe it's the seat tube leaning but not the head tube. Or the other way around. Or both. Or the front triangle is really 90 degrees from the threads of the bottom bracket shell and the dropouts are really off center. So the string method is only telling you something isn't right but it can't tell you where to fix what is wrong. There is a way to DIY if one wants to make a straight edge with an adjustable screw but that is beyond the scope of my post.

Just for your amusement, I'll show a couple of pictures of frames and accessories on my Johnny Berry alignment table. The 1st picture shows a carved lug frame I was making for my nephew. The other picture shows 3 kinds of straight edges with adjustable screws.

some of the accessories to check frame alignment on a cast iron table


a gaggle of straight edges that can be used in checking alignment
Doug Fattic is offline  
Likes For Doug Fattic:
Old 08-14-22, 04:18 PM
  #14  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Liked 2,648 Times in 1,104 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
When I was with Trek, we decided to test cold-setting a 753 frame on a crashed team frame that was headed for the scrap barrel anyway. Put it on the alignment table and had at it with the Big Levers of Alignment, and just as you say, it kept springing back, and we kept increasing the force. Finally, it gave, by crumpling at the shift lever bosses.

And that's why I don't recommend cold-setting 753 frames.
Right, I think you're agreeing with what I wrote. But do you agree that 753 forks should be alignable? (Is that a word?) Can't say as I recall ever having tried it, but I have aligned Prestige forks (maybe a thousand times, but weaker than 753) and a fair number of 853, which ISTR is even stronger than 753.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Old 08-14-22, 05:14 PM
  #15  
reroll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by zandoval
For me just getting proper derailleur alignment has been a great thing. And I don't even have proper tools to do it. I just use two large "C" clamps.

As to the OP: Yes, pretty common. A further question would be what methods can we use as a DIY alignment check.

Our guys at Sheldon have a few things posted


https://sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html
Just the info I needed, the Sheldon dropout alignment check photo, at just the right time, thank you!

Bought a vintage frame set, being shipped to me now, and I wanted to do an alignment check on it.
reroll is offline  
Likes For reroll:
Old 08-14-22, 05:25 PM
  #16  
reroll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
Alarming that ShelBroCo would show a picture of doing it wrong. (I am admittedly too picky by half, but why not do it right? It's not any harder.)

The string should come off the dropout at a point that matters, namely where the wheel will sit, the inner face of the "land" for the axle. This shows the string coming off a part of the dropout that's not involved with holding the axle, and it's different between the right and left (that knot can throw off the string's centerline).

Even if you do it right, you might want to measure and compensate for the curve in the seat tube from brazing on the front derailer attachment. All tubes have some runout of course, nothing is perfectly straight, but the F. der. BO puts a pretty decent curve in the tube, more than any runout I have measured in an unbrazed tube.

So the string method is not the ultimate alignment, but it's decent as a shade-tree mechanic technique for those without more rigorous methods, or even for a pro framebuilder in too much of a hurry for a complete alignment, say for a frame that isn't valuable enough to warrant the complete tear-down and rebuild. Just run that string in the right place, and try to see how bent your seattube is!

Note this string method (done right) is equivalent to the Park ***-1 tool shown in the OP; they measure the same thing. So the ***-1 (or -2) is also, in my opinion, not a "be-all and end-all" pro alignment tool, but it is very fast and easy to use. I have one and use it, but I keep its limitations in mind.

EDIT: the asterisks were put there by the censor. They replace the name of the Park Frame Alignment Gauge.
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords!

Mark B
Your information has been noted, thank you!
reroll is offline  
Old 08-14-22, 05:36 PM
  #17  
easyupbug 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,706

Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 571 Post(s)
Liked 605 Times in 419 Posts
Originally Posted by Doug Fattic
I'm not a fan of Sheldon's string method...
The above 753 Andy saved hung afterward by strings run through the rims hung straight as an arrow and it fails Sheldon's string test badly but I can ride it around the block w/o touching the handlebars, it is a delight. Andy also painted it for me, he is a gilt to C&V in Southern Arizona and I recall him saying basically what you did above.
easyupbug is offline  
Old 08-14-22, 05:42 PM
  #18  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,840

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3617 Post(s)
Liked 3,446 Times in 1,957 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
Right, I think you're agreeing with what I wrote. But do you agree that 753 forks should be alignable? (Is that a word?) Can't say as I recall ever having tried it, but I have aligned Prestige forks (maybe a thousand times, but weaker than 753) and a fair number of 853, which ISTR is even stronger than 753.
I'm pretty sure we were able to align 753 forks. The early production used Ishiwata SCM crowns, which we milled out to profile the crown. Those seemed to bend at the crown when aligned; we dubbed them "frame saver forks." Later production used a Tange crown, but I don't recall any issues with those.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Ishiwata-SCM-crown.jpg (53.4 KB, 218 views)
File Type: jpg
ishiwata-1.jpg (32.6 KB, 216 views)
File Type: jpg
ishiwata-2.jpg (29.5 KB, 216 views)
File Type: jpg
ishiwata-3.jpg (36.0 KB, 217 views)
JohnDThompson is offline  
Likes For JohnDThompson:
Old 08-14-22, 05:42 PM
  #19  
reroll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Doug Fattic
The problem with DIY alignment is figuring out what is the problem. I'm not a fan of Sheldon's string method. So you measure the distance of the string to the seat tube on both sids and there is a discrepancy. What's off? One might think that the rear dropouts are left or right of the center of the frame but how do you know? Maybe the down tube is leaning over to one side or maybe it's the seat tube leaning but not the head tube. Or the other way around. Or both. Or the front triangle is really 90 degrees from the threads of the bottom bracket shell and the dropouts are really off center. So the string method is only telling you something isn't right but it can't tell you where to fix what is wrong. There is a way to DIY if one wants to make a straight edge with an adjustable screw but that is beyond the scope of my post.
Yes, that big, flat, smooth iron table sure does look useful.



some of the accessories to check frame alignment on a cast iron table


a gaggle of straight edges that can be used in checking alignment
reroll is offline  
Old 08-14-22, 09:04 PM
  #20  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,900

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1869 Post(s)
Liked 666 Times in 508 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
Yeah it's "common knowledge" that 753 can't be cold-set, but what they really should have said is it's difficult to cold set. If it springs back without taking a set, it just means you didn't push hard enough. Any steel, no matter how strong, can be bent, unless it's too brittle and snaps. But the problem with 753 isn't brittleness, it's just very thinwall (in the frame tubes, not the fork), making it likely to buckle or kink, a.k.a. beercan failure mode.

That's not a problem with the forks though, which are no thinner than 531. They're just 531 blades that got heat-treated to make them stronger, a very dubious advantage since 531 forks are strong enough. (I'm mad at Reynolds for "chickening out" and not making the blades lighter, a missed opportunity.)

The 753 steerer is also the same gauge as 531 for most of its lenght, but where the 531 steerer gets a butt at the bottom, the 753 doesn't, so the lower part of the steerer is lighter than 531. This a 753 fork is just a little bit lighter than a 531 fork, but it's really very little, like an ounce? Sorrry, I once knew the weight difference but I forget now, someone here will know.

Even if the blades were infinitely strong, you can still bend the crown, so yeah those forks definitely can be cold-set. You just need a longer lever, and a stout vise! Or a 100+ lb alignment fixture like the one I made recently from vintage cast iron industrial parts,


That's a work-in-progress shot. It's now finished and bolted down to a very heavy steel table that's bolted into the concrete floor. Main difference from this pic is the handwheel is spaced upward an inch so you don't pinch your fingers against the crown. Unfortunately it only does 1" forks (I'm a committed C&V retrogrouch).

Mark B
Mark, that looks like a great tool coming into being! By coinidence I've just concluded the Terry ridden by Mrs Road Fan has a back-bend t teh fork crown. I can see it in a sice view of the bike, but I haven't undone the fork to et a real look at it. After the Auburn show I'll have to take it to Mr. Fattic and see what he says.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 05-08-24, 04:44 PM
  #21  
ihm96
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 23

Bikes: 1983 Ross Aristocrat, 2023 Specialized Sirrus X 3.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bertinjim
branko 76-

Misalignment of older steel bikes is pretty common in my experience. Wear and tear, getting crashed or dropped, all sorts of things happen over 40 years. I routinely have my bike purchases checked by a nearby frame builder and then aligned. It makes a great difference in the ride and tracking even when I previously considered the bike to be fine.
How expensive does this run usually? I have a 1983 Ross Aristocrat that I just started riding heavily and when I look it appears that the wheel doesnt sit straight in the frame. It was my dads bike and I plan on putting some decent miles on it so I might have a shop do a thorough tune up, not sure if alignment is feasible or not
ihm96 is offline  
Old 05-08-24, 05:56 PM
  #22  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Liked 2,648 Times in 1,104 Posts
Originally Posted by ihm96
How expensive does this run usually? I have a 1983 Ross Aristocrat that I just started riding heavily and when I look it appears that the wheel doesnt sit straight in the frame. It was my dads bike and I plan on putting some decent miles on it so I might have a shop do a thorough tune up, not sure if alignment is feasible or not
Bike shop mechanics usually aren't tooled up or trained to do this properly. The problem is when they don't know what they don't know, so they think they are qualified, then damage can be done. If it's a precious family heirloom, then have a good framebuilder do it.

If it's just a bike for riding though and doesn't need to be perfect, a good LBS can probably do an OK job. Making things worse isn't all that likely really, I just mention it because some people have zero tolerance for risk. Lightweight frames don't like to be bent back and forth, so some of the damage a bad alignment can do can't be properly undone. So ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chances.

I don't know what a Ross Aristocrat is, is it high-end? They had a couple of world-class framebuilders (Jim Redcay,Tom Kellogg) pass through there, but I think the high-zoot ones were called "Signature".
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 05-08-24, 08:13 PM
  #23  
bertinjim 
Senior Member
 
bertinjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Niagara Region, Canada
Posts: 1,458

Bikes: 1970s Alex Singer, 1960s Peugeot PX 10, 1960s Bertin C37, 1973 Carre Bertin C 37, 1972 Carlton Kermesse, 1981 Peugeot PX 14 Super Competition

Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 348 Post(s)
Liked 268 Times in 158 Posts
ihm96-

The advice bulgie gave above is solid. Definitely have a framebuilder do the job rather than a bike shop. Most current shops are not familiar with cold setting a steel frame and could do damage. A frame and fork alignment check will likely run $100 but this is variable depending on the area and the framebuilder. Your Ross' Ishiwata 024 frame and fork mark this as a mid level bike but alignment will benefit it regardless. I have even done alignments on light gauge hi-tensile frames and they have benefited from the treatment.

Last edited by bertinjim; 05-10-24 at 09:16 AM. Reason: spelling
bertinjim is offline  
Likes For bertinjim:
Old 05-09-24, 01:15 PM
  #24  
ihm96
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 23

Bikes: 1983 Ross Aristocrat, 2023 Specialized Sirrus X 3.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
Bike shop mechanics usually aren't tooled up or trained to do this properly. The problem is when they don't know what they don't know, so they think they are qualified, then damage can be done. If it's a precious family heirloom, then have a good framebuilder do it.

If it's just a bike for riding though and doesn't need to be perfect, a good LBS can probably do an OK job. Making things worse isn't all that likely really, I just mention it because some people have zero tolerance for risk. Lightweight frames don't like to be bent back and forth, so some of the damage a bad alignment can do can't be properly undone. So ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chances.

I don't know what a Ross Aristocrat is, is it high-end? They had a couple of world-class framebuilders (Jim Redcay,Tom Kellogg) pass through there, but I think the high-zoot ones were called "Signature".
I dont think it was the top level bike they had available but from my limited knowledge it sounds like it was made with some pretty well repped components and had good reviews. Does the paint typically have to be done when the frame is aligned? I found a local shop doing online research that was recommended by the now defunct Spectrum Cycles of Tom Kellogg but the price the link shows seems fairly high , its called Bilenky Cycles . I tried to post a link to the page Im talking about but Im too new to the forum. Not sure if a lot of that stuff is overkill for what I need but it sounds like it would be almost 1000 to get it done up by them

I dont really plan on doing any racing but im starting to do a lot of regular 20-50 mile rides around Philly and my modern hybrid bike is not as good as putting on the miles as this. I was kind of regretting purchasing a Hybrid since I already am outgrowing it with the distances Im doing and was worried I might have to stick it out and get a better road/gravel bike next summer but then I remembered I had this bike. I rode it yesterday and it rides really nice and eats up the miles. Im not doing any racing so I figured I might as well get this tuned up and start riding it regularly rather than getting the itch to buy something new

It does have a little click noise that I feel as I go through the pedal stroke and I accidentally smacked it off a pole while slowly coming onto a sidewalk but I dont think it did any other damage than destroying the vintage cat eye reflector where I hit the pole . It feels like it rides fairly straight but if I look at the wheels they both look a little misaligned in the frame. Im fairly novice to actual cycling , I mostly just rode bikes around the neighborhood as a kid so any advice is majorly appreciated. Biking as an adult feels like a whole new world, especially with the great trails Philly has. I never realized before how easy it is for me to zip downtown and back to the suburbs and all on a bike. Can ride down and get a beer at the park without dealing with any of the traffic , its honestly amazing
ihm96 is offline  
Old 05-09-24, 01:15 PM
  #25  
ihm96
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 23

Bikes: 1983 Ross Aristocrat, 2023 Specialized Sirrus X 3.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bertinjim
ihm96-

The advice bulgie gave above is solid. Definitely have a framebuilder do the job rather than a bike shop. Most current shops are not familiar with cold setting a steel frame and could do damage. A frame and fork alignment check will likely run $100 but this is variable depending on the area and the framebuilder. Your Ross' Ishiwata 024 frame and fork mark this as a mid level bike but alignment will benefit if regardless. I have even done alignments on light gauge hi-tensile frames and they have benefited from the treatment.

Awesome thank you! Will definitely have to find out who around me is good in that arena. Philly has a big bike culture so hopefully theres someone good I can find
ihm96 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.