Groupset tiers and diminishing returns
Likes For njkayaker:
#127
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,699 Times
in
2,519 Posts
I agree that there isn't much profit in this thread continuing. OP, say the word. Or report a post and ask for it to be closed.
Likes For unterhausen:
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
I appears I've walked into a men's bathroom.
Likes For seypat:
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,950
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,299 Times
in
2,947 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#130
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I like Ultegra, it just happens to be 1994 Ultegra.
#131
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Do they? They may, and they may not. Depends on context.
Saying 'money is no object' can mean(as has been shown here many times over) that it isnt even part of the determination process when selecting an option.
Saying 'money is no concern' can mean the same thing. Or it can mean that the person is not concerned about being able to afford any of the options, but money will still play a factor.
Concern can mean 'worry' and it can mean a 'caring/importance'.
I am not concerned(worried) about being able to afford a $5 conflict free environmentally sustainable chocolate bar, but I will still weigh whether I find enough value(caring/importance) in that bar's properties to buy it over a $1.50 Hershey's bar. Put another way, I am not concerned about the cost, but I am cognizant of the cost and allow it to influence my decision.
And this is why its dumb to belabor a point that was clarified pages ago- because words have multiple meanings and can mean something to one person while meaning something slightly different(or even very different) to another person. Add to it the reality that this is a global forum with some non-native English speaking posters and meaning of words becomes even more muddied.
Saying 'money is no object' can mean(as has been shown here many times over) that it isnt even part of the determination process when selecting an option.
Saying 'money is no concern' can mean the same thing. Or it can mean that the person is not concerned about being able to afford any of the options, but money will still play a factor.
Concern can mean 'worry' and it can mean a 'caring/importance'.
I am not concerned(worried) about being able to afford a $5 conflict free environmentally sustainable chocolate bar, but I will still weigh whether I find enough value(caring/importance) in that bar's properties to buy it over a $1.50 Hershey's bar. Put another way, I am not concerned about the cost, but I am cognizant of the cost and allow it to influence my decision.
And this is why its dumb to belabor a point that was clarified pages ago- because words have multiple meanings and can mean something to one person while meaning something slightly different(or even very different) to another person. Add to it the reality that this is a global forum with some non-native English speaking posters and meaning of words becomes even more muddied.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#132
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
945 Posts
Yes, yes, they do.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/money-is-no-object
There's a standard/common understanding for this common phrase. You can't try to "win" an argument by using a non-standard "meaning" for words or phrases. The OP misused the phrase (which happens; no big deal).
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/money-is-no-object
And this is why its dumb to belabor a point that was clarified pages ago- because words have multiple meanings and can mean something to one person while meaning something slightly different(or even very different) to another person. Add to it the reality that this is a global forum with some non-native English speaking posters and meaning of words becomes even more muddied.
Last edited by njkayaker; 09-07-21 at 01:54 PM.
Likes For njkayaker:
#133
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,950
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,299 Times
in
2,947 Posts
Definition of money is no object
—used to say that someone is not concerned about the price of things
Likes For tomato coupe:
#134
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
deleted
#135
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I hate to break it to everybody, but "money is no object" is really a figure of speech, it's never literally true. Obviously, everyone has a price point for everything beyond which they won't or can't go.
OP is clearly saying (and saying, and saying in the face of repetitive trolling) it isn't a question of affording the difference between Ultegra and Dura Ace or SuperCampy vs. SuperduperCampy (I don't speak Campy), it's whether the substantive differences are enough to justify the price difference.
So, technically, the OP did not literally mean that money is no object, but no one is willing to pay infinity dollars for Dura Ace, so it's a rather silly point, and not one worth two posts, let alone the multi-chaptered novel appearing in this thread.
We're really at the level of "you weren't really hit by a ton of bricks" criticism here. D-uh.
OP is clearly saying (and saying, and saying in the face of repetitive trolling) it isn't a question of affording the difference between Ultegra and Dura Ace or SuperCampy vs. SuperduperCampy (I don't speak Campy), it's whether the substantive differences are enough to justify the price difference.
So, technically, the OP did not literally mean that money is no object, but no one is willing to pay infinity dollars for Dura Ace, so it's a rather silly point, and not one worth two posts, let alone the multi-chaptered novel appearing in this thread.
We're really at the level of "you weren't really hit by a ton of bricks" criticism here. D-uh.
#136
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
If you made a full DA set out of steel it would be more durable right? That's all I'm saying. The more you get into weight saving for a given design, the more fragile it then becomes. I'm not suggesting DA is fragile, but I'm certainly not going to presume it is more durable than Ultegra or 105, which both use more steel components. When you get further down the food-chain and plastic bits start getting used in place of steel and alloys, then the balance turns back the other way. Like the lowest tier Sram Eagle plastic-fantastic for example.
#137
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,968 Times
in
4,692 Posts
This reminds me of a thread that someone started a couple years back. The OP asked 'which is the very best mechanical disc brake caliper," and so I responded with a link to this -- and the OP replied with, "No way, those are too expensive!"
Well, okay, then. You should've asked a different question.
Well, okay, then. You should've asked a different question.
#139
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times
in
3,012 Posts
Are you more concerned about crash damage than MTBF? Anecdotally, I’ve crashed a few times on various group sets. Notably, I crashed an Ultegra RD (6870) about a year ago, hit it pretty damn hard, along with splitting my helmet. It’s Di2, and I had to use crash recovery to get it functional, and straighten the hanger. It still works really well. About 6 years ago I crashed a bike with 105 on it, really smacked the RD hard, it broke it into two pieces, irreparable. What I am getting at is that the units can all take some about of impact, but I don’t think they are engineered first for impact durability. I’m sure it is a consideration, bikes get knocked around, even inadvertently. I’m guessing the engineers are in search of the sweet spot between weight savings (especially on DA and Ulty) and MTBF- literally how many times can it shift before the mechanicals fail. In that regard, to your very original question, Ultegra will just miss that sweet spot, but the miss won’t be by much.
Durability was only a minor question mark for the top level because of its focus on pro racing and a few people assuming it must be more durable simply because it is more expensive. But as usual it became another sidetrack alongside the meaning of life. I had concluded a few pages ago that durability was a none-issue with any of the major group sets.
So the mods can close this thread if they like as I doubt there is anything else to add.
Likes For PeteHski:
#140
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,222
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2584 Post(s)
Liked 5,642 Times
in
2,922 Posts
Point of clarification in this clown car of debate: What I understood and the OP confirmed, is that even though he can afford the best, he wishes to spend his money wisely (I.E. The most bang for the buck without sacrificing). People don’t usually ‘have money’ by spending it foolishly unless they inherit or are trust fund babies.
I hope this ends this ridiculous debate.
I hope this ends this ridiculous debate.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,950
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,299 Times
in
2,947 Posts
There are a lot of people that will tell you that Dura Ace shifters and front derailleurs perform better than Ultegra and 105.
#142
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,980
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10435 Post(s)
Liked 11,912 Times
in
6,100 Posts
Point of clarification in this clown car of debate: What I understood and the OP confirmed, is that even though he can afford the best, he wishes to spend his money wisely (I.E. The most bang for the buck without sacrificing). People don’t usually ‘have money’ by spending it foolishly unless they inherit or are trust fund babies.
I hope this ends this ridiculous debate.
I hope this ends this ridiculous debate.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#143
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,638
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
Just because you raised another value proposition that didn't really get discussed.
The whole premise of this thread and the OP's question, really boils down to asking what is gained by paying more for a higher level groupset? High-level dimensions offhand I'd suggest as:
1) Weight
2) Performance (eg. Smoother, faster, more precise, etc)
3) Reliability (Finicky?, hi/lo maintenance)
4) Durability (parts longevity/service life)
5) Robustness (ability to sustain damage)
The problem is that aside from #1, which is the only easily measurable dimension, and possibly (eg chains) #4, the rest tend to be very anecdotal. Waiting on controlled sledgehammer testing to settle #5.
The whole premise of this thread and the OP's question, really boils down to asking what is gained by paying more for a higher level groupset? High-level dimensions offhand I'd suggest as:
1) Weight
2) Performance (eg. Smoother, faster, more precise, etc)
3) Reliability (Finicky?, hi/lo maintenance)
4) Durability (parts longevity/service life)
5) Robustness (ability to sustain damage)
The problem is that aside from #1, which is the only easily measurable dimension, and possibly (eg chains) #4, the rest tend to be very anecdotal. Waiting on controlled sledgehammer testing to settle #5.
Likes For Sy Reene:
#144
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times
in
3,012 Posts
That’s the kind of thing I was interested in. I think that’s something I would have to test for myself. I’ve done the Ultegra vs 105 test before and not found any difference worth mentioning there.
#145
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,442
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4414 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times
in
3,012 Posts
Point of clarification in this clown car of debate: What I understood and the OP confirmed, is that even though he can afford the best, he wishes to spend his money wisely (I.E. The most bang for the buck without sacrificing). People don’t usually ‘have money’ by spending it foolishly unless they inherit or are trust fund babies.
I hope this ends this ridiculous debate.
I hope this ends this ridiculous debate.
#146
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,222
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2584 Post(s)
Liked 5,642 Times
in
2,922 Posts
Yes that was the general idea. I’m happy to pay more for tangible gains. Lets say Ultegra and 105 didn’t exist, so I had to choose between DA and Tiagra. Then I would choose DA. Cost only comes into it for me because there are these other cheaper options that appear to be just as good. Thinking about it that happens with many products, but groupsets seem like one of the most marginal gains out there. The difference between Ultegra and 105 is now almost non-existent.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#147
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,478 Times
in
1,836 Posts
^ thanks a lot, Mr. Buzzkill. You just took all the fun out of this thread.
Likes For Maelochs:
#148
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
Just because you raised another value proposition that didn't really get discussed.
The whole premise of this thread and the OP's question, really boils down to asking what is gained by paying more for a higher level groupset? High-level dimensions offhand I'd suggest as:
1) Weight
2) Performance (eg. Smoother, faster, more precise, etc)
3) Reliability (Finicky?, hi/lo maintenance)
4) Durability (parts longevity/service life)
5) Robustness (ability to sustain damage)
The problem is that aside from #1, which is the only easily measurable dimension, and possibly (eg chains) #4, the rest tend to be very anecdotal. Waiting on controlled sledgehammer testing to settle #5.
The whole premise of this thread and the OP's question, really boils down to asking what is gained by paying more for a higher level groupset? High-level dimensions offhand I'd suggest as:
1) Weight
2) Performance (eg. Smoother, faster, more precise, etc)
3) Reliability (Finicky?, hi/lo maintenance)
4) Durability (parts longevity/service life)
5) Robustness (ability to sustain damage)
The problem is that aside from #1, which is the only easily measurable dimension, and possibly (eg chains) #4, the rest tend to be very anecdotal. Waiting on controlled sledgehammer testing to settle #5.
#149
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
There is noticeable difference, albeit not significant, if comparing same generations. But, as many have said, the trickle down of tech that Shimano uses, means that current year 105 is typically as good in function as last gen Ultegra. Maybe not as light, but other than the cranksets, it’s also negligible in practice.
Likes For Badger6:
#150
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
Except the weight savings, the measurable (barely) benefits are in the bearing parts; a 105 rear derailleur has jockey wheels with bushings which are less efficient from the start and get worse with contamination, while Dura-ace run on sealed bearings. On the other hand, a cheap set of aftermarket Tacx ones are slightly better than both. Similarly, Dura-ace chains, Dura-ace bottom brackets and hubs (not a question raised, but). Bearing quality is a bigger performance gain than the few hundred grams of weight - but you don't need to pay for the full Dura-ace groupset to get that.
I couldn't actually detect a difference in shifting quality between R7000 105 and R9100 Dura-ace, both simply shift when you want them to, even under strain. For a cost / benefit perspective, 105 is ridicilously hard to beat, especially with a few cheap upgrades.
I couldn't actually detect a difference in shifting quality between R7000 105 and R9100 Dura-ace, both simply shift when you want them to, even under strain. For a cost / benefit perspective, 105 is ridicilously hard to beat, especially with a few cheap upgrades.