What makes a good vintage century bike build?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
What makes a good vintage century bike build?
I have been upping my miles and speed during the past few months! It's been a lot of fun, and I would like to continue to go further and faster. Speed is not the ultimate goal, but a way to get more miles under my belt, and I would like to work up to a century, and from there who knows.
I have a friend who regularly rides big miles who will help with training, and I've picked up a copy of Burke and Pavelka's Complete Book of Long Distance Cycling. I'll be slowly increasing miles, adjusting nutrition, and basically doing my best to progress steadily without injury. After the stress of the shutdown, and still not being able to really visit with friends, I've taken on a new personal challenge. I fully realize my engine is what needs the most tuning, but selecting one of my rides and building it up for this purpose will be fun and motivating.
So for me, a mechanic at heart, the fun now is to select and build up a fast century ride!
My first thoughts are light weight, some carrying capacity, and most important comfort. I thought I would not use a touring bike for this, in the interest of the light and fast part, with the possible exception of a cannondale ST, which is lighter than the steel road bikes I have. Possibilities include...
1985 Miyata 710
1979 Trek 514
Both of which are built and ready for some miles
I also have some frames I'd like to get up and running, and I'll be working on them in the evenings, and trying them out when ready to roll. those include...
1985 Cannondale ST500
1974 Raleigh International
These represent the sportier rides in my stable of mostly touring bikes, I know I'll eventually try all of them, but I'm excited to do build right now, so what would you pick? I have my leanings but I'll save those for later.
Cheers!!
I have a friend who regularly rides big miles who will help with training, and I've picked up a copy of Burke and Pavelka's Complete Book of Long Distance Cycling. I'll be slowly increasing miles, adjusting nutrition, and basically doing my best to progress steadily without injury. After the stress of the shutdown, and still not being able to really visit with friends, I've taken on a new personal challenge. I fully realize my engine is what needs the most tuning, but selecting one of my rides and building it up for this purpose will be fun and motivating.
So for me, a mechanic at heart, the fun now is to select and build up a fast century ride!
My first thoughts are light weight, some carrying capacity, and most important comfort. I thought I would not use a touring bike for this, in the interest of the light and fast part, with the possible exception of a cannondale ST, which is lighter than the steel road bikes I have. Possibilities include...
1985 Miyata 710
1979 Trek 514
Both of which are built and ready for some miles
I also have some frames I'd like to get up and running, and I'll be working on them in the evenings, and trying them out when ready to roll. those include...
1985 Cannondale ST500
1974 Raleigh International
These represent the sportier rides in my stable of mostly touring bikes, I know I'll eventually try all of them, but I'm excited to do build right now, so what would you pick? I have my leanings but I'll save those for later.
Cheers!!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,503
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times
in
397 Posts
Why not the touring bikes, as that is what those vintage tourers were made for? I am not up to that level, but did it years ago and if I were to progress to that level, my newly acquired miyata 1000 would be my choice over my sport touring bike that is a wee bit lighter.
I guess the added comfort and stability would lessen the fatigue factor greatly for mere mortals. The vintage tourers it seems are way more sport leaning than the dedicated tourers of late.
I guess the added comfort and stability would lessen the fatigue factor greatly for mere mortals. The vintage tourers it seems are way more sport leaning than the dedicated tourers of late.
Likes For sd5782:
#3
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,625
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
509 Posts
So I haven't yet ridden a century on my vintage bike but I have ridden many many centuries on just about everything else I own. Fwiw, I totally planned a century on the vintage but it got cancelled due to covid, familiar story.
Anyway, it's legs, butt, and back. For me, upper back but for others, lower.
Legs - most people have 50+ in them today if they had to. Like life or death. The key is getting enough distance to enjoy the miles and to still feel ok after mile 70. I think you're doing ok here.
Butt - three parts. 1. a saddle that is shaped properly for you. 2. Adjusting the position of said saddle to make it comfortable 3. Time on the seat to harden the butt. In general, this pretty much comes with training your legs. For vintage, I could see a problem if your ideal saddle just hurts. I know he'll would have to freeze over before I'd switch mine, even if it hurt. However, my vintage bike isn't my big day bike.
Back. Kinda like the saddle. You've got to get the fit right. This is stem length, height, and handlebar width. On a vintage bike, the "hoods" riding position isn't as easy so you'll need to tinker. Of course seat height matters here too. Also, make sure you can ride hands free long enough to stretch and eat. Those throbbing muscles don't get better if you stay in the exact same position for 5-8 hours.
Other than that, just make sure you can carry enough water or have support. Choose a route that compliments the gearing on your bike. I know with UG on mine, I'd have to change more than I'm willing to if I wanted to make it a mountain goat.
Anyway, it's legs, butt, and back. For me, upper back but for others, lower.
Legs - most people have 50+ in them today if they had to. Like life or death. The key is getting enough distance to enjoy the miles and to still feel ok after mile 70. I think you're doing ok here.
Butt - three parts. 1. a saddle that is shaped properly for you. 2. Adjusting the position of said saddle to make it comfortable 3. Time on the seat to harden the butt. In general, this pretty much comes with training your legs. For vintage, I could see a problem if your ideal saddle just hurts. I know he'll would have to freeze over before I'd switch mine, even if it hurt. However, my vintage bike isn't my big day bike.
Back. Kinda like the saddle. You've got to get the fit right. This is stem length, height, and handlebar width. On a vintage bike, the "hoods" riding position isn't as easy so you'll need to tinker. Of course seat height matters here too. Also, make sure you can ride hands free long enough to stretch and eat. Those throbbing muscles don't get better if you stay in the exact same position for 5-8 hours.
Other than that, just make sure you can carry enough water or have support. Choose a route that compliments the gearing on your bike. I know with UG on mine, I'd have to change more than I'm willing to if I wanted to make it a mountain goat.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
Why not the touring bikes, as that is what those vintage tourers were made for? I am not up to that level, but did it years ago and if I were to progress to that level, my newly acquired miyata 1000 would be my choice over my sport touring bike that is a wee bit lighter.
I guess the added comfort and stability would lessen the fatigue factor greatly for mere mortals. The vintage tourers it seems are way more sport leaning than the dedicated tourers of late.
I guess the added comfort and stability would lessen the fatigue factor greatly for mere mortals. The vintage tourers it seems are way more sport leaning than the dedicated tourers of late.
So I haven't yet ridden a century on my vintage bike but I have ridden many many centuries on just about everything else I own. Fwiw, I totally planned a century on the vintage but it got cancelled due to covid, familiar story.
Anyway, it's legs, butt, and back. For me, upper back but for others, lower.
Legs - most people have 50+ in them today if they had to. Like life or death. The key is getting enough distance to enjoy the miles and to still feel ok after mile 70. I think you're doing ok here.
Butt - three parts. 1. a saddle that is shaped properly for you. 2. Adjusting the position of said saddle to make it comfortable 3. Time on the seat to harden the butt. In general, this pretty much comes with training your legs. For vintage, I could see a problem if your ideal saddle just hurts. I know he'll would have to freeze over before I'd switch mine, even if it hurt. However, my vintage bike isn't my big day bike.
I use a B-17, or a Belt, both are comfortable for me.
Back. Kinda like the saddle. You've got to get the fit right. This is stem length, height, and handlebar width. On a vintage bike, the "hoods" riding position isn't as easy so you'll need to tinker. Of course seat height matters here too. Also, make sure you can ride hands free long enough to stretch and eat. Those throbbing muscles don't get better if you stay in the exact same position for 5-8 hours.
As my mileage has gone up, I've found I've been more comfortable lowering my bars a little. I started with the bars about even, or a smidge higher than saddle height, and I'm finding 15 to 20mm below saddle to be better. I like the French Fit, but that gives me some room to get juuuust a little aero.
Other than that, just make sure you can carry enough water or have support. Choose a route that compliments the gearing on your bike. I know with UG on mine, I'd have to change more than I'm willing to if I wanted to make it a mountain goat.
Anyway, it's legs, butt, and back. For me, upper back but for others, lower.
Legs - most people have 50+ in them today if they had to. Like life or death. The key is getting enough distance to enjoy the miles and to still feel ok after mile 70. I think you're doing ok here.
Butt - three parts. 1. a saddle that is shaped properly for you. 2. Adjusting the position of said saddle to make it comfortable 3. Time on the seat to harden the butt. In general, this pretty much comes with training your legs. For vintage, I could see a problem if your ideal saddle just hurts. I know he'll would have to freeze over before I'd switch mine, even if it hurt. However, my vintage bike isn't my big day bike.
I use a B-17, or a Belt, both are comfortable for me.
Back. Kinda like the saddle. You've got to get the fit right. This is stem length, height, and handlebar width. On a vintage bike, the "hoods" riding position isn't as easy so you'll need to tinker. Of course seat height matters here too. Also, make sure you can ride hands free long enough to stretch and eat. Those throbbing muscles don't get better if you stay in the exact same position for 5-8 hours.
As my mileage has gone up, I've found I've been more comfortable lowering my bars a little. I started with the bars about even, or a smidge higher than saddle height, and I'm finding 15 to 20mm below saddle to be better. I like the French Fit, but that gives me some room to get juuuust a little aero.
Other than that, just make sure you can carry enough water or have support. Choose a route that compliments the gearing on your bike. I know with UG on mine, I'd have to change more than I'm willing to if I wanted to make it a mountain goat.
#5
small ring
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,028
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 439 Post(s)
Liked 935 Times
in
373 Posts
I would guess you're already close to your goal. In addition to the fit/comfort issues already mentioned, you have to figure out what foods work best for you on the bike. Your legs will keep working if you keep putting energy in your body. The biggest change for me was learning my body's salt habits. I lose a ton when sweating so I have to plan for it. If you are low on salts and drink more water, you just further dilute what you have in you. I used to bonk after 50 miles, now 100 is no big deal if I'm riding somewhat regularly.
__________________
59 Allegro Special -- 72 Bob Jackson -- 74 Motobecane Grand Jubile -- 74 Sekine SHS 271 -- 80 Nishiki International
85 Shogun 800 -- 86 Tommasini Super Prestige -- 92 Specialized Rockhopper -- 17 Colnago Arabesque
59 Allegro Special -- 72 Bob Jackson -- 74 Motobecane Grand Jubile -- 74 Sekine SHS 271 -- 80 Nishiki International
85 Shogun 800 -- 86 Tommasini Super Prestige -- 92 Specialized Rockhopper -- 17 Colnago Arabesque
#6
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,355
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3910 Post(s)
Liked 4,866 Times
in
2,245 Posts
The answer is:
What kind of a century?
Gearing and fit may be top ‘o th list!
AustroDaimler Puch made a ‘fast touring’ frame. Went on Vent Noir, Olympian and (maybe) Force bikes. 531 dB framesets (in the early 80’s anyway). Also put a slightly lesser fork (and therefore more damped) on it and hit a lower price point with a great riding bicycle. I forget all the models.
Both 61cm with tall headtubes, so really what is today called Endurance.
The Olympian maybe a year older, and fewer braze-ons.
What kind of a century?
Gearing and fit may be top ‘o th list!
AustroDaimler Puch made a ‘fast touring’ frame. Went on Vent Noir, Olympian and (maybe) Force bikes. 531 dB framesets (in the early 80’s anyway). Also put a slightly lesser fork (and therefore more damped) on it and hit a lower price point with a great riding bicycle. I forget all the models.
Both 61cm with tall headtubes, so really what is today called Endurance.
The Olympian maybe a year older, and fewer braze-ons.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 07-05-20 at 06:46 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,180
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3818 Post(s)
Liked 6,752 Times
in
2,626 Posts
In addition to what's already been pointed out, the choice of bike depends on terrain (do you need gears for hills?), need to carry water, overall comfort. I find that on rides longer than 50 miles, I start feeling every imperfection in the road, so wider, supple tires are most welcome on longer rides. When I do centuries or longer, I also plan when I'm going to stop and eat or just chill for a bit, rather than going until I don't feel like going. I used to think the ideal for a century was a brief stop at 25, a longer lunch break at 50, a rest/recovery at 75 miles. My nutrition and fitness have changed, so unless I run out of water, I usually only stop once to eat some food about halfway through a century.
#8
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,750
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2159 Post(s)
Liked 3,457 Times
in
1,217 Posts
Fit.
Fit.
Fit.
Fit.
Then...
Fitness.
That is all.
Fit.
Fit.
Fit.
Then...
Fitness.
That is all.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
I would guess you're already close to your goal. In addition to the fit/comfort issues already mentioned, you have to figure out what foods work best for you on the bike. Your legs will keep working if you keep putting energy in your body. The biggest change for me was learning my body's salt habits. I lose a ton when sweating so I have to plan for it. If you are low on salts and drink more water, you just further dilute what you have in you. I used to bonk after 50 miles, now 100 is no big deal if I'm riding somewhat regularly.
In addition to what's already been pointed out, the choice of bike depends on terrain (do you need gears for hills?), need to carry water, overall comfort. I find that on rides longer than 50 miles, I start feeling every imperfection in the road, so wider, supple tires are most welcome on longer rides. When I do centuries or longer, I also plan when I'm going to stop and eat or just chill for a bit, rather than going until I don't feel like going. I used to think the ideal for a century was a brief stop at 25, a longer lunch break at 50, a rest/recovery at 75 miles. My nutrition and fitness have changed, so unless I run out of water, I usually only stop once to eat some food about halfway through a century.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
... maybe it's time I bite the bullet and get a pro fit...
I've hesitated because I'm not sure where to get a touring/endurance/comfort-for-long-distance fitting. I'm not looking for a recruit-all-muscle-power-while-in-a-super-aero-position fit.
I've hesitated because I'm not sure where to get a touring/endurance/comfort-for-long-distance fitting. I'm not looking for a recruit-all-muscle-power-while-in-a-super-aero-position fit.
#11
small ring
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,028
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 439 Post(s)
Liked 935 Times
in
373 Posts
Certainly water too, but I was referring to salt/electrolytes. Years ago, I got back from a 30 mile ride and my wife asked why I wore so much sun screen. I didn't have any on, it was a layer of salt on my face. The point is simply that the nutrition side of things will keep you going for a longer period.
__________________
59 Allegro Special -- 72 Bob Jackson -- 74 Motobecane Grand Jubile -- 74 Sekine SHS 271 -- 80 Nishiki International
85 Shogun 800 -- 86 Tommasini Super Prestige -- 92 Specialized Rockhopper -- 17 Colnago Arabesque
59 Allegro Special -- 72 Bob Jackson -- 74 Motobecane Grand Jubile -- 74 Sekine SHS 271 -- 80 Nishiki International
85 Shogun 800 -- 86 Tommasini Super Prestige -- 92 Specialized Rockhopper -- 17 Colnago Arabesque
Likes For droppedandlost:
#12
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,353
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 988 Post(s)
Liked 2,397 Times
in
897 Posts
Fit
tubeset that eats up road shock
gearing for the terrain or wind
2 water bottle mounts
tubeset that eats up road shock
gearing for the terrain or wind
2 water bottle mounts
#13
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,529
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7360 Post(s)
Liked 2,504 Times
in
1,453 Posts
I agree that fit and comfort are paramount. Weight is not. I have done all my century rides (which are not that many so far) on my McLean which is fairly heavy.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#14
Senior Member
Certainly water too, but I was referring to salt/electrolytes. Years ago, I got back from a 30 mile ride and my wife asked why I wore so much sun screen. I didn't have any on, it was a layer of salt on my face. The point is simply that the nutrition side of things will keep you going for a longer period.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,723
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 157 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 5,119 Times
in
1,807 Posts
Well, I'm not expert but I'd say go for fit and then comfort above all us. Gearing will come into play also according to the route.
It's a little newer then what you are considering but I took a 1989 Lemond Ventoux and turned it into a comfortable century machine for me. The key for me was the contact points. Went with a Brooks saddle that has always worked well for me. Then since most roads out here are rough chipseal I addressed that. This is the only bike I put bar gel pads under the cork tape on. It winds up thick but my hands never get tired on it and it really kills all the road imperfections. Then the other reason I picked this frame was decent tire clearance. It the past I ran it with a light set of November wheels with GP4000s II 700 x 28 tires with latex tubes. Last year I swapped them in favor of some tubular rims with veloflex vlaanderen tubulars for a really cushy ride. Years ago I had tested my fast C.F. bikes against several steel ones and found out that for 100 mile rides the extra compliance and comfort of the steel frames let me ride the distance faster as my body just wasn't getting beat up. Hence this build and my foray into mainly all steel rides. For me also I wanted the pump peg and two water bottle mounts that were low enough on the frame to carry the larger camelbak bottles I prefer.
The 700 x 28 setup
The tubular setup
It's a little newer then what you are considering but I took a 1989 Lemond Ventoux and turned it into a comfortable century machine for me. The key for me was the contact points. Went with a Brooks saddle that has always worked well for me. Then since most roads out here are rough chipseal I addressed that. This is the only bike I put bar gel pads under the cork tape on. It winds up thick but my hands never get tired on it and it really kills all the road imperfections. Then the other reason I picked this frame was decent tire clearance. It the past I ran it with a light set of November wheels with GP4000s II 700 x 28 tires with latex tubes. Last year I swapped them in favor of some tubular rims with veloflex vlaanderen tubulars for a really cushy ride. Years ago I had tested my fast C.F. bikes against several steel ones and found out that for 100 mile rides the extra compliance and comfort of the steel frames let me ride the distance faster as my body just wasn't getting beat up. Hence this build and my foray into mainly all steel rides. For me also I wanted the pump peg and two water bottle mounts that were low enough on the frame to carry the larger camelbak bottles I prefer.
The 700 x 28 setup
The tubular setup
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
Likes For jamesdak:
#16
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,136
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1798 Post(s)
Liked 1,657 Times
in
948 Posts
WRT the salt/electrolyte thing: NuSalt can be found in the seasoning/spices section of the supermarket. NuSalt is 100% Potassium Chloride. 1 gram (1/6tsp) is 15% of your RDA & about 3 bananas worth of Potassium. It is often called "Salt Substitute." There should be only one ingredient on the lable.
You'll find that all the leading electrolyte drinks & mixes are suspiciously light in potassium content. Favoring Sodium Chloride (table salt) Calcium, & Magnesium in various forms. Potassium salt & table salt, although similar, are not interchangeable. Potassiums big benefit is staving off cramps, regulating blood pressure & heart function.
I always make sure to add 3 grams (1/2 teaspoon ~45% RDA) to my water bottles in addition to NUUN tabs before any rides that are going to be particularly warm, long, or intense.
Honey: Honey is made of glucose & fructose. Basically glucose is muscle fuel & uses 1 uptake channel. Fructose is easily converted to muscle fuel & uses another uptake channel. So by taking honey, you can tremendously increase the amount of energy you can replace in a given time. Up to some theoretical maximum of ~500 calories per hour.
If you simply must buy prepackaged supplements, Shot Blocks are straight glucose.
In the absence of honey or Shot Blocks: To sort out the second easiest sugar to take in fructose: Dried mangos & figs travel well.
HFCS, maltodextrin, & others are ok. But it takes 45 minutes for your body to break it down to something useable & still isn't as readily available in the multiple uptake channels in the way that honey is & are expensive unless your plan is plain candy bars, anyway.
Don't forget nut butters. A big ol' peanut butter & jelly sandwich is calorie dense & has all the protein you need to keep absorbing carbs. Not a nutritional road block you'll likely experience on a century, but you probably will on a double.
As always, not everything works for everyone. Experiment around & find out what works best for you. As for me? Potassium was the key to getting my blood pressure & heart palpitations under control.
You'll find that all the leading electrolyte drinks & mixes are suspiciously light in potassium content. Favoring Sodium Chloride (table salt) Calcium, & Magnesium in various forms. Potassium salt & table salt, although similar, are not interchangeable. Potassiums big benefit is staving off cramps, regulating blood pressure & heart function.
I always make sure to add 3 grams (1/2 teaspoon ~45% RDA) to my water bottles in addition to NUUN tabs before any rides that are going to be particularly warm, long, or intense.
Honey: Honey is made of glucose & fructose. Basically glucose is muscle fuel & uses 1 uptake channel. Fructose is easily converted to muscle fuel & uses another uptake channel. So by taking honey, you can tremendously increase the amount of energy you can replace in a given time. Up to some theoretical maximum of ~500 calories per hour.
If you simply must buy prepackaged supplements, Shot Blocks are straight glucose.
In the absence of honey or Shot Blocks: To sort out the second easiest sugar to take in fructose: Dried mangos & figs travel well.
HFCS, maltodextrin, & others are ok. But it takes 45 minutes for your body to break it down to something useable & still isn't as readily available in the multiple uptake channels in the way that honey is & are expensive unless your plan is plain candy bars, anyway.
Don't forget nut butters. A big ol' peanut butter & jelly sandwich is calorie dense & has all the protein you need to keep absorbing carbs. Not a nutritional road block you'll likely experience on a century, but you probably will on a double.
As always, not everything works for everyone. Experiment around & find out what works best for you. As for me? Potassium was the key to getting my blood pressure & heart palpitations under control.
Last edited by base2; 07-05-20 at 09:04 PM.
Likes For base2:
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
Likes For Chr0m0ly:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,833
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1953 Post(s)
Liked 2,192 Times
in
1,335 Posts
Have you considered a more modern vintage looking steel frame?
My brother has a Soma San Marcos and he loves it. Fits a modern cassette, even though he rides it as a 3x8. Very smooth ride.
I know this is C&V, but it is a pretty classic design.
John
My brother has a Soma San Marcos and he loves it. Fits a modern cassette, even though he rides it as a 3x8. Very smooth ride.
I know this is C&V, but it is a pretty classic design.
John
#20
Senior Member
The bike doesn't really matter that much, but you know that. Of the ones you mention, I'd probably go with the Raleigh International. Because I like them. The Cannondale might be good. I did plenty of 100 mile plus rides on mine BITD. Some people think they are stiff riding, but I never really noticed that. Pick whatever inspires you.
I kind of think anyone can ride a century with no particular training, if they have any rides in their legs at all. I'd say do a couple ~60 milers to prepare, then just go for it. It will probably hurt a bit, or maybe not. Some of it is genetic. If you're naturally more slow twitch than fast twitch in your muscle make up, it's going to be easier. If you are more of a sprinter, it could take a little more prep.
You will need to eat during the ride. If you don't you might get the bonk around the 3 hour mark.
I kind of think anyone can ride a century with no particular training, if they have any rides in their legs at all. I'd say do a couple ~60 milers to prepare, then just go for it. It will probably hurt a bit, or maybe not. Some of it is genetic. If you're naturally more slow twitch than fast twitch in your muscle make up, it's going to be easier. If you are more of a sprinter, it could take a little more prep.
You will need to eat during the ride. If you don't you might get the bonk around the 3 hour mark.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
The Marinoni Sports Tourer with Berthoud saddle was a joy when I rode it 140 miles in a day, and even more so when I got back on it the next day for another 70.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,439
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5892 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
2,081 Posts
The 1985 Cannondale ST 500 has 3 water bottles. It has a long wheelbase and long chainstays which was common on 80s era touring bikes but it rides more like a racing bike because the aluminum frame is stiff and responsive. I'd run a little fatter tire for that reason. It will soak up some road shock and it deals better with bumps and the like. So run a lightweight 700 x 32c tire and 3 x 7 gearing. That is how I have my 1985 Cannondale ST 400 set up. I've used that bike for a lot of long rides. Also very good is that 1979 Trek 514. It is a full Ishiwata 022 frameset and it's low temp silver brazed. It is a fine bike that tends to fly under the radar because it's not Reynolds or Columbus steel. It only has one water bottle though but a camelbak is a good option; plus a bag can hold more water bottles if need be.
#23
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,403
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked 1,266 Times
in
690 Posts
+1 on the comfort over weight.
My Batavus Randonneur GL can fit 35mm x 700C tyres with fenders and is not a lightweight either. It's not quite a touring bike but not a road bike either.
What it does have is a relatively low trail, meaning I can ride it no-handed, which helps a lot by the end of the ride as it makes the bike less twitchy and thus less tiresome.
I've used it for touring and 130 km (80 miles) days and where my riding companion was pretty beat up by the end on his modern aluminum road racing bike I was still pretty comfortable. If I had to replace it with something similar I would be looking at a Miyata 1000 LT or its Dutch market equivalent the Koga-Miyata Randonneur Extra as it has lighter tubing than the Batavus and some nice additions.
Then again, I have had a soft spot for Koga-Miyata since working on a couple of them and seeing the nice little details, I've started a thread with some more info: Show us your Koga-Miyata
My Batavus Randonneur GL can fit 35mm x 700C tyres with fenders and is not a lightweight either. It's not quite a touring bike but not a road bike either.
What it does have is a relatively low trail, meaning I can ride it no-handed, which helps a lot by the end of the ride as it makes the bike less twitchy and thus less tiresome.
I've used it for touring and 130 km (80 miles) days and where my riding companion was pretty beat up by the end on his modern aluminum road racing bike I was still pretty comfortable. If I had to replace it with something similar I would be looking at a Miyata 1000 LT or its Dutch market equivalent the Koga-Miyata Randonneur Extra as it has lighter tubing than the Batavus and some nice additions.
Then again, I have had a soft spot for Koga-Miyata since working on a couple of them and seeing the nice little details, I've started a thread with some more info: Show us your Koga-Miyata
Last edited by JaccoW; 07-06-20 at 06:09 AM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,085
Bikes: '72 Peugeot PX-10 '78 Motobecane Le Champion '83 Motobecane Grand Jubile '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Liked 1,215 Times
in
652 Posts
Sent you a PM.
Likes For Sedgemop:
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
I want to use one of the bikes I already own, I sure have enough of them!