Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Is your bike good enough to have a patent on it? What’s your patent#?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Is your bike good enough to have a patent on it? What’s your patent#?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-09, 02:36 PM
  #26  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
We probably did the drawings.
patentcad is offline  
Old 09-19-09, 03:17 PM
  #27  
surfengine
Senior Member
 
surfengine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Laguna Hills
Posts: 301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nycphotography
Dude, you're disturbing his bliss. Stop that.



Seriously, he's whining about how corporations use patents to stifle innovation and stuff the little guy. Yet can't be bothered to do the 30 seconds research it took to discover that his poster child case was in fact showing how patents protect the little guy from the big corporations.

God how I do love the internet, where any clueless wanker can prattle on like he actually knows something.
innovation is only stifled due to lack of imagination. it has nothing to do with patents.
surfengine is offline  
Old 09-19-09, 03:42 PM
  #28  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,525
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1035 Post(s)
Liked 456 Times in 268 Posts
Originally Posted by surfengine
innovation is only stifled due to lack of imagination.
What world do you live in? I'd like to move there. So would some former researchers from Bell Labs, Kodak, 3M, Proctor and Gamble, ...

But he explained it much better, than I. https://www.amazon.com/Right-Stuff-To...3396612&sr=1-1
asgelle is offline  
Old 09-19-09, 04:31 PM
  #29  
pinwheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by surfengine
innovation is only stifled due to lack of imagination. it has nothing to do with patents.
get your head out of the ground, in this world, innovation is stifled by lack of funding. truly groundbreaking stuff is often very expensive to develop. without patents, nobody would bother investing in the initial effort.
pinwheel is offline  
Old 09-19-09, 04:32 PM
  #30  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times in 2,026 Posts
Look, we've been over this before. I'm not even a big fan of IP law, but you can't say the bicycle industry is a monopoly situation with any semblance of credibility when I have ten options or more at any price range. The very fact that you can take your business to someone besides Specialized proves my point.

You're more Communist than my sister.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 09-19-09, 11:54 PM
  #31  
DenisMenchov
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TandemGeek
Yes, yes and see attached.
Interesting. That looks like a photoshop job though. That is way too noticeable as well. Why do some companies feel it is necessary to put the patent no. on the frame? Do they have to put it on the frame for the patent to be valid? Here is my spin on it though:
DenisMenchov is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 12:08 AM
  #32  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
Interesting. That looks like a photoshop job though. That is way too noticeable as well. Why do some companies feel it is necessary to put the patent no. on the frame? Do they have to put it on the frame for the patent to be valid?
It's on the bottom of the chainstay!
umd is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 12:23 AM
  #33  
c0lnago
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,076
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stickers bad. Patents bad. Lolz. I hope this is the worst life brings you.
c0lnago is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 12:23 AM
  #34  
DenisMenchov
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
It's on the bottom of the chainstay!
Ok, but why does it have to even be on the frame?
DenisMenchov is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 12:32 AM
  #35  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
Ok, but why does it have to even be on the frame?
So that someone that may want to steal the innovation can't use ignorance as an excuse. Calfee certainly isn't a big corportation, and as people have said Specialized's patents are licensed so both are example of protecting the little guy. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if it is in the licensing terms to Specialized that the patent is clearly displayed so that people know where the innovation actually originated.
umd is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 12:35 AM
  #36  
schnee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,412
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
Ok, but why does it have to even be on the frame?
You really need us to tell you that?
schnee is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 12:38 AM
  #37  
DenisMenchov
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
So that someone that may want to steal the innovation can't use ignorance as an excuse. Calfee certainly isn't a big corportation, and as people have said Specialized's patents are licensed so both are example of protecting the little guy. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if it is in the licensing terms to Specialized that the patent is clearly displayed so that people know where the innovation actually originated.
Do you ride a specialized? Is there a patent on your bike?
DenisMenchov is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 12:46 AM
  #38  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
Do you ride a specialized? Is there a patent on your bike?
I do ride a Specialized, I don't have an FSR suspension, no patent.
umd is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:03 AM
  #39  
DenisMenchov
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So your saying that specialized doesn't do patents on their road bikes.
DenisMenchov is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:10 AM
  #40  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
So your saying that specialized doesn't do patents on their road bikes.
I'm saying I haven't noticed a patent printed on it. Whether or not they have a patent I couldn't say. But as has been told to you repeatedly, it's not their patent printed on your bike.

edit: just checked 4 specialized bikes (2 road, 1 tt, 1 mtb) and the only patents listed were on the Cane Creek headsets.

Last edited by umd; 09-20-09 at 01:21 AM.
umd is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:20 AM
  #41  
DenisMenchov
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
But who owns the patent, and why is specialized allowed to sell the patent to other parties?
DenisMenchov is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:23 AM
  #42  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
But who owns the patent, and why is specialized allowed to sell the patent to other parties?
Apparently you can't read...

Originally Posted by ericm979
All three of those patents were invented by Horst Leitner, a well known innovater/inventor in the area of motorcycle and bicycle suspension. The most recent of those is assigned to Specialized, which probably means that he developed it while under contract or employed by them.

But the first two are not assigned to Specialized, so they are being used under license. Leitner had his own small company making motorcycle suspension stuff. So those patents served to keep Specialized from using small inventor Leitner's ideas without compensation. I'd say that fosters innovation, since it allows small inventors some legal protection so they can obtain renumeration for their ideas.
Originally Posted by big john
Horst Leitner, what a guy. Amp Research, ATK motorcycles, bicycle suspension, software for cars, electric running boards for trucks, etc. The guy just thinks too much.
Specialized bought the mtb suspension design from him and other manufacturers pay the big S touse it.
I have a KHS mtb with a sticker that says Specialized on the swingarm. Big deal. Turner has stopped using the Leitner/Specialized design and is now using the DW Link design.
People will pay to use whatever works. People will design stuff that works so they can get paid.
umd is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:25 AM
  #43  
rydaddy
Type 1 Racer
 
rydaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 2,579

Bikes: A dozen or so.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
Ok, but why does it have to even be on the frame?
Aside from you, who the **** cares?
rydaddy is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:27 AM
  #44  
Skones MickLoud
This steel horse I ride
 
Skones MickLoud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Warshington DC
Posts: 187

Bikes: 1980something Schwinn Tempo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
But who owns the patent, and why is specialized allowed to sell the patent to other parties?
If Specialized owned the patent, why shouldn't they be allowed to sell it?
Skones MickLoud is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:28 AM
  #45  
DenisMenchov
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
Apparently you can't read...
So specialized does own the third patent apparently. Be interesting to know the details of each patent.
DenisMenchov is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:30 AM
  #46  
Skones MickLoud
This steel horse I ride
 
Skones MickLoud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Warshington DC
Posts: 187

Bikes: 1980something Schwinn Tempo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
So specialized does own the third patent apparently. Be interesting to know the details of each patent.
https://www.google.com/patents?hl=en
Skones MickLoud is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:30 AM
  #47  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DenisMenchov
So specialized does own the third patent apparently. Be interesting to know the details of each patent.
"which probably means that he developed it while under contract or employed by them. "

You really need to give this a rest.
umd is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:31 AM
  #48  
DenisMenchov
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skones MickLoud
If Specialized owned the patent, why shouldn't they be allowed to sell it?
Well if the previous post is correct, specialized only owns one of those patents, and the other two are under license.
DenisMenchov is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:38 AM
  #49  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
They own the third patent which is a continuation of the other two. Specialized needs to license the first two to make use of it. If another company wanted to use the third one, they would need to license it from Specialized. Not sure if they would also have to license the other two or if Specialized handles that. Guess it depends on the terms of the license.
umd is offline  
Old 09-20-09, 01:43 AM
  #50  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
https://rasidi.multiply.com/journal/i...ion_Technology

FSR Suspension : 4-bar-links give the benefits of independent chain and braking forces which translates to fully active suspension system which in English means:
  1. Pedalling forces move you forward and not up-and-down (bobbing)
  2. Brakes does not affect the FSR suspension even when you pull the brakes in a death-grip, it still moves freely (no brake-jack)
  3. FSR means comfort and better control of your bike - small hits compliance and big hits friendly.
Here's the brief history of Horst Link or FSR:
  • Horst Leitner father of Horst Link from from AMP Reserch
  • Invented Horst Link in 1991 and used it in AMP line of bikes
  • Patent bought by Specialized in May 1998
  • Scott used Horst Link in their Genius line but went into legal tussle when Scott tried to sell the bikes in US but was favored in Europe (patent did not apply here)
Where is Horst link placed on a bike? It's the pivot on the chain-stay, infront of the drop-out (left fig).

The other 3 links (right fig) allow bike designer to control suspension rate and making the rear triangle stiffer.

So if you're a small and independent bike manufacturer and that your bikes does not affect Specialized business, I think you can apply for the license to use FSR suspension on your bike design.
umd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.