This Is Ridiculous (No Ultra Low Gear Options)
#51
Newbie
My grvel bike is running a 46/30 and 11-42 and honestly sometimes I wouldn't mind having a lower gear for more casual riding or long rides where I don't want to empty the tank too much any time the road turns up 10%+. YMMV though, it really does depend on individual fitness. I myself am a mediocre climber with an ftp between 150-160 and weighing between 175-180 lbs. No matter how slow you think riding will be, it will be faster than walking.
However, grades like these on gravel with typical gravel bike tires start to make managing traction and keeping the front down more of a challenge.
However, grades like these on gravel with typical gravel bike tires start to make managing traction and keeping the front down more of a challenge.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,870
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
There are lots of solutions out there. I wouldn't expect Trek to start selling a drop bar bike with MTB range gearing anytime soon though.
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,870
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times
in
867 Posts
Shimano's MTB drivetrains are designed to work with 148mm rear hub spacing, and therefore use a wider chainline at the front. GRX was designed to work with 142mm rear hub spacing (road disc standard), but Shimano wanted a 2x option that could clear wider tires than road FD's would allow, so GRX uses a 2.5 mm wider chainline than road groupsets.
So to reiterate - Shimano's MTB derailleurs (in Di2 form) can be used with GRX Di2 shifters, but you would need to run an MTB crank with them (and you also must match the FD and RD, so you can't run a GRX FD and an XT RD). If you want a 2x setup with an 11-42 cassette, you could run a 2x XT di2 with GRX di2 shifters, but you would need a 2x MTB crank. This would actually give you a 10-45 12sp cassette on a 36-26 crank, that can be used with drop bar shifters. MTB cranks are wider, so your chainline would be more outboard than a GRX setup, but this is a small trade-off if you really want that kind of range.
Your desired gearing (48/31 with 11-42) has ratios ranging from 0.74 - 4.36 (589%)
The XT Di2 2x setup (36/26 with 10-45) has ratios ranging from 0.58 - 3.60 (620%). You might be able to run a larger big ring on that XT crankset to expand this even further, I'm not sure.
I do think the next version of GRX (likely 12sp?) will see even larger gearing range options that work with 2x - but until everything goes Di2 I would expect there to still be compatibility issues between flat bar and drop bar groupset designs, and it seems unlikely that Shimano is going to make a drop-bar 2x version of a mechanical MTB groupset, which is basically what you're asking for.
Likes For msu2001la:
#54
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2123 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
818 Posts
I'm not saying there's a contradiction, I'm saying that the market for this setup is very small - and expecting manufacturers to offer off-the-shelf builds catering to this type of setup is not realistic.
There are lots of solutions out there. I wouldn't expect Trek to start selling a drop bar bike with MTB range gearing anytime soon though.
There are lots of solutions out there. I wouldn't expect Trek to start selling a drop bar bike with MTB range gearing anytime soon though.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#55
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2123 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
818 Posts
My grvel bike is running a 46/30 and 11-42 and honestly sometimes I wouldn't mind having a lower gear for more casual riding or long rides where I don't want to empty the tank too much any time the road turns up 10%+. YMMV though, it really does depend on individual fitness. I myself am a mediocre climber with an ftp between 150-160 and weighing between 175-180 lbs. No matter how slow you think riding will be, it will be faster than walking.
However, grades like these on gravel with typical gravel bike tires start to make managing traction and keeping the front down more of a challenge.
However, grades like these on gravel with typical gravel bike tires start to make managing traction and keeping the front down more of a challenge.
#56
Newbie
I have ordered parts and will do this mod very soon. 46/30 with a GRX 810 RD. I will put a Wolftooth Roadlink 10 on it to go with the Deore M8000 11-40 cassette. Not going to push my luck with the 11-42, though. The 11-40 cassette with a roadlink looks like it works smoothly and is so easy to do. Will get me 20 gear inches that I will need for gravel routes I have planned for next year that average 7-8% grades over 3 to 4 miles. According to online calculators, at 70 rpm that would be about 4.3 mph averaging 150 watts. Better than grinding your legs off - or walking!
#58
Jedi Master
Likes For kingston:
#59
Newbie
I don't understand all the movement to 1X. Must just be me?? 2X and 3X system have more efficient (power, wear....) chainlines, have much wider gear ranges, and have smaller steps between cogs for better cadence. And I thought cross chaining was supposed to be bad.
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
Losses from crosschaining in a 2x11 setup is under 0.8W loss (running 53-28 versus closest gears in the 39 ring, 250W output, 95 rpm, tested by friction facts).
In a 1x system it is necessarily less than the worst case of a 2x setup... basically not a significant factor. With a triple extreme gear combinations are more of an issue.
In a 1x system it is necessarily less than the worst case of a 2x setup... basically not a significant factor. With a triple extreme gear combinations are more of an issue.
#61
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,506
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10873 Post(s)
Liked 7,354 Times
in
4,125 Posts
Losses from crosschaining in a 2x11 setup is under 0.8W loss (running 53-28 versus closest gears in the 39 ring, 250W output, 95 rpm, tested by friction facts).
In a 1x system it is necessarily less than the worst case of a 2x setup... basically not a significant factor. With a triple extreme gear combinations are more of an issue.
In a 1x system it is necessarily less than the worst case of a 2x setup... basically not a significant factor. With a triple extreme gear combinations are more of an issue.
Either way though, I am for sure losing more watts due to my dirty chain than either the theoretical 1x or 2x inefficiencies.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#63
Jedi Master
#64
Newbie
LOL. maybe it is just me :-) But I might as well as shake the nest..... 3X may not be "cool" to some people, but objectively they have advantages. Straighter, more power efficient chainlines can be achieved, and one small extra ring up front actually replaces gearing from 3 or more cogs on a wide ratio 13sp 1X cassette. And whatever weight/aero penalty comes from a front derailleur isn't significant to me. Plus, I don't like big jumps between gears.
I have multiple 2X bikes, but 3X works for me and I'll always keep one around. But I also went with disc brakes years ago when they weren't cool either. But don't worry, I've never had any toe clips on my bikes.
I have multiple 2X bikes, but 3X works for me and I'll always keep one around. But I also went with disc brakes years ago when they weren't cool either. But don't worry, I've never had any toe clips on my bikes.
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,595
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2964 Post(s)
Liked 1,159 Times
in
758 Posts
LOL. maybe it is just me :-) But I might as well as shake the nest..... 3X may not be "cool" to some people, but objectively they have advantages. Straighter, more power efficient chainlines can be achieved, and one small extra ring up front actually replaces gearing from 3 or more cogs on a wide ratio 13sp 1X cassette. And whatever weight/aero penalty comes from a front derailleur isn't significant to me. Plus, I don't like big jumps between gears.
I have multiple 2X bikes, but 3X works for me and I'll always keep one around. But I also went with disc brakes years ago when they weren't cool either. But don't worry, I've never had any toe clips on my bikes.
I have multiple 2X bikes, but 3X works for me and I'll always keep one around. But I also went with disc brakes years ago when they weren't cool either. But don't worry, I've never had any toe clips on my bikes.
Pretty much every mountain bike is 1x right now.
With some of us that actually have hills where we ride I think 2 x 11 with a 42 or 46T cassette would be beneficial on a gravel bike.
Last edited by prj71; 10-20-21 at 12:18 PM.
#66
Jedi Master
It has nothing to do with gear overlap. Most people don't like front shifting and don't care about wide spacing. That vast majority of people couldn't even tell you what gearing they have. They just run whatever came on the bike.
#67
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2123 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
818 Posts
Cross chaining in 2x will create a worse case compared to 1x, but not cross chaining in 2x will create a better case compared to 1x. <--that last part seems to often be ignored/missed when drivetrain efficiency for 1x is discussed.
Either way though, I am for sure losing more watts due to my dirty chain than either the theoretical 1x or 2x inefficiencies.
Either way though, I am for sure losing more watts due to my dirty chain than either the theoretical 1x or 2x inefficiencies.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#68
For The Fun of It
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2123 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
818 Posts
I think there is a lot of truth to this. I could realistically do 95% of what I want to do with a 1X with a 32 crank and an 11-42 cassette, and I am a cycling enthusiast. That combo would only fail me when I wanted to push my speeds into the mid 20's.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
The difference between a peeerfectly straight chain and the worst case scenario for a 1x is significantly similar in terms of watts than the difference between a Dura-ace 11 speed chain and a SRAM Red chain. It is really minuscule.
If 1x gives you the gearing you like, no reason to avoid it. If not, 2x gives more range and you can typically bodge something for the extra range. I could live with Campagnolo Ekar just as well as I could with GRX.
If 1x gives you the gearing you like, no reason to avoid it. If not, 2x gives more range and you can typically bodge something for the extra range. I could live with Campagnolo Ekar just as well as I could with GRX.
Last edited by Branko D; 10-20-21 at 02:46 PM.
Likes For tyrion:
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
The RX800(similar to the GRX810) handles the 11-40 and probably the 11-42T stock. You should probably just try it before you go through all the trouble of tanpans or road links
#72
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,643 Times
in
2,485 Posts
I'm almost positive she never shifts the front derailleur. I doubt she'll complain about 32-11 being her high gear.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 536
Bikes: Vilano Urbana, DownTube FS9, Montaque paratrooper, Nano mini-velo, Motobecane CX, Raleigh 20, MIFA folder, ROG Pony, Iverson Grand Touring folder, Exclusiv German folder
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 168 Post(s)
Liked 191 Times
in
119 Posts
Paul Barnard,
Age, weight, health, and general deterioration have started to make me avoid hills.
Motobecane 700c came with the standard 36/46 and 11/32 with gear inch range 29.7 - 110.3.
Ten years ago that was fine. But the steep hills are still here.
I just swapped to a 34/46 and 11/36 range, now gear inch range is 24.9 - 110.3
Hills are good for now. But 20 gear inches would be ideal.
Thanks for starting this.
Age, weight, health, and general deterioration have started to make me avoid hills.
Motobecane 700c came with the standard 36/46 and 11/32 with gear inch range 29.7 - 110.3.
Ten years ago that was fine. But the steep hills are still here.
I just swapped to a 34/46 and 11/36 range, now gear inch range is 24.9 - 110.3
Hills are good for now. But 20 gear inches would be ideal.
Thanks for starting this.
#74
Newbie
it's a salsa cutthroat with race face turbine mtb cranks with Easton 2x rings (afaik those are the only 2x rings on the market with gravel friendly tooth counts that work with mtb cranks, at least that I've been able to find so far). Front and rear derailleurs are Shimano 2x specific grx, 815 I believe is the model number. Rear derailleur is mounted on a wolftooth goat link 10 speed version. And I'm using an 11 speed slx 11-42 cassette. My bike uses a full length uncut road chain (116 links) with the stock 11-34 cassette and this still works ok in big-big with the 11-42 cassette but would probably be better with an additional chain link.
Likes For freetors:
#75
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,506
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10873 Post(s)
Liked 7,354 Times
in
4,125 Posts
I just today got a chainring to convert my wife's bike to 1x. Sometimes I think she rides in whatever gear I left it in when I worked on her bike last.
I'm almost positive she never shifts the front derailleur. I doubt she'll complain about 32-11 being her high gear.
I'm almost positive she never shifts the front derailleur. I doubt she'll complain about 32-11 being her high gear.