Canyon Marketing Fail: It's All About the Aero! Or Not...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richfield, WI
Posts: 720
Bikes: Trek Domane SL7 Disc, Cannondale F29
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
186 Posts
Canyon Marketing Fail: It's All About the Aero! Or Not...
Disclaimer: I like Canyon bikes. The largely pointless post is to point-out how silly marketers can be sometimes when they "miss the obvious" in trying to get you to buy their product. And I'm bored.
While dreaming about purchasing a set of integrated handlebar and stem combinations to satisfy the weight-weenie in me (which is a completely illogical part of my brain, I confess), I found myself on the Canyon web site as they offer several of such handle bar combos. What struck me immediately as being very odd is that while they are promoting their Aerocockpit bars as being "aero" to partially justify the $400 price tag, the photos of the bars show that aero can't really be all that important to them. Spend a small fortune to save a few bazilla-seconds off one's ride time due to handlebar drag, only to add a few bazilla-seconds back on to that time because you have a rat's nest of cable and wires dangling off the front of the bike?
I think this is the case of the marketing / photoshoot team "not getting the memo" and perhaps not being cyclists themselves, so not understanding what should've been important in photographing this specific component (I.e., web site designers, photographers, and marketing teams that work for bicycle manufacturers aren't necessarily bicyclists which in this case, seems to be a problem.) According to the details on the web page, the bars do indeed have internal cable routing which certainly would help sell the "aero-ness" of the bars, but the marketing team failed to show that. If this was a $5 part, I'd understand, but when people have bicycles that cost less than these bars, wouldn't you think they'd spend a few dollars getting the advertising right?
Canyon H36 Aerocockpit
While dreaming about purchasing a set of integrated handlebar and stem combinations to satisfy the weight-weenie in me (which is a completely illogical part of my brain, I confess), I found myself on the Canyon web site as they offer several of such handle bar combos. What struck me immediately as being very odd is that while they are promoting their Aerocockpit bars as being "aero" to partially justify the $400 price tag, the photos of the bars show that aero can't really be all that important to them. Spend a small fortune to save a few bazilla-seconds off one's ride time due to handlebar drag, only to add a few bazilla-seconds back on to that time because you have a rat's nest of cable and wires dangling off the front of the bike?
I think this is the case of the marketing / photoshoot team "not getting the memo" and perhaps not being cyclists themselves, so not understanding what should've been important in photographing this specific component (I.e., web site designers, photographers, and marketing teams that work for bicycle manufacturers aren't necessarily bicyclists which in this case, seems to be a problem.) According to the details on the web page, the bars do indeed have internal cable routing which certainly would help sell the "aero-ness" of the bars, but the marketing team failed to show that. If this was a $5 part, I'd understand, but when people have bicycles that cost less than these bars, wouldn't you think they'd spend a few dollars getting the advertising right?
Canyon H36 Aerocockpit
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,791
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times
in
293 Posts
Disclaimer: I like Canyon bikes. The largely pointless post is to point-out how silly marketers can be sometimes when they "miss the obvious" in trying to get you to buy their product. And I'm bored.
While dreaming about purchasing a set of integrated handlebar and stem combinations to satisfy the weight-weenie in me (which is a completely illogical part of my brain, I confess), I found myself on the Canyon web site as they offer several of such handle bar combos. What struck me immediately as being very odd is that while they are promoting their Aerocockpit bars as being "aero" to partially justify the $400 price tag, the photos of the bars show that aero can't really be all that important to them. Spend a small fortune to save a few bazilla-seconds off one's ride time due to handlebar drag, only to add a few bazilla-seconds back on to that time because you have a rat's nest of cable and wires dangling off the front of the bike?
I think this is the case of the marketing / photoshoot team "not getting the memo" and perhaps not being cyclists themselves, so not understanding what should've been important in photographing this specific component (I.e., web site designers, photographers, and marketing teams that work for bicycle manufacturers aren't necessarily bicyclists which in this case, seems to be a problem.) According to the details on the web page, the bars do indeed have internal cable routing which certainly would help sell the "aero-ness" of the bars, but the marketing team failed to show that. If this was a $5 part, I'd understand, but when people have bicycles that cost less than these bars, wouldn't you think they'd spend a few dollars getting the advertising right?
Canyon H36 Aerocockpit
While dreaming about purchasing a set of integrated handlebar and stem combinations to satisfy the weight-weenie in me (which is a completely illogical part of my brain, I confess), I found myself on the Canyon web site as they offer several of such handle bar combos. What struck me immediately as being very odd is that while they are promoting their Aerocockpit bars as being "aero" to partially justify the $400 price tag, the photos of the bars show that aero can't really be all that important to them. Spend a small fortune to save a few bazilla-seconds off one's ride time due to handlebar drag, only to add a few bazilla-seconds back on to that time because you have a rat's nest of cable and wires dangling off the front of the bike?
I think this is the case of the marketing / photoshoot team "not getting the memo" and perhaps not being cyclists themselves, so not understanding what should've been important in photographing this specific component (I.e., web site designers, photographers, and marketing teams that work for bicycle manufacturers aren't necessarily bicyclists which in this case, seems to be a problem.) According to the details on the web page, the bars do indeed have internal cable routing which certainly would help sell the "aero-ness" of the bars, but the marketing team failed to show that. If this was a $5 part, I'd understand, but when people have bicycles that cost less than these bars, wouldn't you think they'd spend a few dollars getting the advertising right?
Canyon H36 Aerocockpit
Likes For eja_ bottecchia:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
It's all about the Benjamins.
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,987
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,809 Times
in
3,317 Posts
I can understand the concern about the cables, but then I don't know what tier bike we're in. Is this on a bike with old style cables that don't lend themselves as well to being tucked away in bars and frame? Regardless, for a any bike with exposed cables, aero bars are still something.
Aero itself can be a problem. Take an airfoil shape, and if it can be put at an angle to the relative airflow that causes it to start to produce lift, then it is also producing induced drag. Whether that is significant, I've no idea, but surely it can be groused about till some aerospace engineer comes along to set us straight.
Aero itself can be a problem. Take an airfoil shape, and if it can be put at an angle to the relative airflow that causes it to start to produce lift, then it is also producing induced drag. Whether that is significant, I've no idea, but surely it can be groused about till some aerospace engineer comes along to set us straight.
#6
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10425 Post(s)
Liked 11,899 Times
in
6,094 Posts
That's an Aeroad CF SL. You want hidden cables, you gotta drop more coin.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#7
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10425 Post(s)
Liked 11,899 Times
in
6,094 Posts
I can understand the concern about the cables, but then I don't know what tier bike we're in. Is this on a bike with old style cables that don't lend themselves as well to being tucked away in bars and frame? Regardless, for a any bike with exposed cables, aero bars are still something.
Aero itself can be a problem. Take an airfoil shape, and if it can be put at an angle to the relative airflow that causes it to start to produce lift, then it is also producing induced drag. Whether that is significant, I've no idea, but surely it can be groused about till some aerospace engineer comes along to set us straight.
Aero itself can be a problem. Take an airfoil shape, and if it can be put at an angle to the relative airflow that causes it to start to produce lift, then it is also producing induced drag. Whether that is significant, I've no idea, but surely it can be groused about till some aerospace engineer comes along to set us straight.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
As others have noted, the fully integrated canyon solution does NOT use the old H36. It uses the new CP0018 which has a one piece bar stem. Well, 3 piece but those 3 pieces are effectively one unit.
I believe the fork, frame, and bar/stem are all a proprietary solution. And I believe it's electronic only. Not the greatest solution in the world when, for example, Specialized bikes can use a normal fork, bar and stem with electronic or mechanical systems.
I believe the fork, frame, and bar/stem are all a proprietary solution. And I believe it's electronic only. Not the greatest solution in the world when, for example, Specialized bikes can use a normal fork, bar and stem with electronic or mechanical systems.
#9
Senior Member
There's an awful lot to like about my Canyon Ultimate, but the "aero" cockpit is not one of them. Matter of fact, it's a royal pain. First of all, aero design offers precious little in the way of performance advantage for anyone that doesn't routinely cruise a 20+ mph. Secondly, none of their integrated bar/stem offerings, H36 or CP18, have a convenient, secure, readily available, and reasonably priced way to mount a bike computer. Thirdly, the whole integration thing means changing stem length or replacing a damaged handlebar is going to cost a lot more than a conventional stem & bar set up.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
There's an awful lot to like about my Canyon Ultimate, but the "aero" cockpit is not one of them. Matter of fact, it's a royal pain. First of all, aero design offers precious little in the way of performance advantage for anyone that doesn't routinely cruise a 20+ mph. Secondly, none of their integrated bar/stem offerings, H36 or CP18, have a convenient, secure, readily available, and reasonably priced way to mount a bike computer. Thirdly, the whole integration thing means changing stem length or replacing a damaged handlebar is going to cost a lot more than a conventional stem & bar set up.
#11
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
Uhm, well if someone can't easily cruise at 20mph they're probably too beginner to benefit from anything aero. And being a beginner they wouldn't be able to size a bike with a integrated cockpit to fit them properly, so shouldn't be buying it anyway. More than likely they don't even have a fit yet as it'll change dramatically as they get in bike shape. But that's really not the target audience for the Aeroad or Ultimate.
__________________
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop
Likes For sfrider:
#12
Junior Member
Uhm, well if someone can't easily cruise at 20mph they're probably too beginner to benefit from anything aero. And being a beginner they wouldn't be able to size a bike with a integrated cockpit to fit them properly, so shouldn't be buying it anyway. More than likely they don't even have a fit yet as it'll change dramatically as they get in bike shape. But that's really not the target audience for the Aeroad or Ultimate.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Uhm, well if someone can't easily cruise at 20mph they're probably too beginner to benefit from anything aero. And being a beginner they wouldn't be able to size a bike with a integrated cockpit to fit them properly, so shouldn't be buying it anyway. More than likely they don't even have a fit yet as it'll change dramatically as they get in bike shape. But that's really not the target audience for the Aeroad or Ultimate.
That's an infinitesimally small market...
Better give 'em a ring and tell 'em what's up.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
It is mildly irritating that they don't offer you the option to specify length and width of the integrated bar and stem when ordering, which would be a much better solution than the three piece system for adjusting width (and "order a new one" for adjusting length).
I must say that switching to a more endurance geometry, with a shorter stem for any given size, swapping the tires to a 25/28 combo, while it does make it possibly better suited for the average consumer who isn't getting any lighter or younger, doesn't make for a better aero race bike.
I must say that switching to a more endurance geometry, with a shorter stem for any given size, swapping the tires to a 25/28 combo, while it does make it possibly better suited for the average consumer who isn't getting any lighter or younger, doesn't make for a better aero race bike.
Last edited by Branko D; 11-10-20 at 12:07 PM. Reason: Typo
Likes For Branko D:
#15
Senior Member
Whoever the intended audience might be for these bikes, the fact remains that aerodynamic benefits don't become meaningful at the speeds most enthusiasts, even gifted enthusiasts, ride most of the time. Take a good look at the quoted wattage savings for things like aero bars, etc. Almost all of them are rated at between 35 and 40 k/h (22 - 25 mph). Can't speak for anyone but myself, but if I spend more than 40% of my riding time at those speeds, I'd be very, very surprised. And BTW, both my road bikes are well fitted to me.
So let's be clear. My gripe with proprietary "integrated" stem/bar cockpits is 1) They're expensive. If your fit does change over time and you want to change stem length to accommodate changing flexibility, that adjustment means you're going to replace the stem AND bars. 2) At least where the Canyon cockpits are concerned, mounting a Garmin or other computer is problematic. The only suitable mounts I've found are not readily available and expensive. 3) In my opinion, the benefits of aero cockpits are vanishingly small for the vast majority of riders. Sure, they look cool, but just how much inconvenience (and expense) are you willing to tolerate for aesthetics?
So let's be clear. My gripe with proprietary "integrated" stem/bar cockpits is 1) They're expensive. If your fit does change over time and you want to change stem length to accommodate changing flexibility, that adjustment means you're going to replace the stem AND bars. 2) At least where the Canyon cockpits are concerned, mounting a Garmin or other computer is problematic. The only suitable mounts I've found are not readily available and expensive. 3) In my opinion, the benefits of aero cockpits are vanishingly small for the vast majority of riders. Sure, they look cool, but just how much inconvenience (and expense) are you willing to tolerate for aesthetics?
#16
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
https://www.renehersecycles.com/aero...orld-bicycles/
The most important finding probably does not come as a surprise: What you wear and how you position yourself on the bike has the largest impact on the aerodynamics. For example, simply raising your stem by 20 mm (3/4 in) increases the drag by 5%. (For comparison, other studies indicate that aero wheels bring an advantage of only 3%.) The difference between a close-fitting jacket and a looser cycling jacket is a full 8% increase in the overall wind resistance of your bike!
Perhaps more surprising to many, front bags were more aerodynamic than rear ones. A handlebar bag was more aerodynamic than a Carradice saddlebag that extended just slightly beyond the hips of the rider (see photo at the top of this post). Front panniers (on low-rider racks) were more aerodynamic than rear panniers.
Fairings actually increased the wind resistance in most positions. We tested many different fairings, and the photo above shows the “best” setup, and even that decreased the wind resistance only if the rider assumed a full aero tuck. It’s obvious that fairings only work if they form one body with the rider. Otherwise, you are just pushing one extra object through the air.
Speaking of the aero tuck, that was perhaps the most eye-opening result: A full aero tuck reduces the rider’s air resistance by 38% compared to riding “on the hoods.” There is nothing you can do to your bike that makes even nearly as much of a difference at high speed!
Perhaps more surprising to many, front bags were more aerodynamic than rear ones. A handlebar bag was more aerodynamic than a Carradice saddlebag that extended just slightly beyond the hips of the rider (see photo at the top of this post). Front panniers (on low-rider racks) were more aerodynamic than rear panniers.
Fairings actually increased the wind resistance in most positions. We tested many different fairings, and the photo above shows the “best” setup, and even that decreased the wind resistance only if the rider assumed a full aero tuck. It’s obvious that fairings only work if they form one body with the rider. Otherwise, you are just pushing one extra object through the air.
Speaking of the aero tuck, that was perhaps the most eye-opening result: A full aero tuck reduces the rider’s air resistance by 38% compared to riding “on the hoods.” There is nothing you can do to your bike that makes even nearly as much of a difference at high speed!
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,485 Times
in
870 Posts
Whoever the intended audience might be for these bikes, the fact remains that aerodynamic benefits don't become meaningful at the speeds most enthusiasts, even gifted enthusiasts, ride most of the time. Take a good look at the quoted wattage savings for things like aero bars, etc. Almost all of them are rated at between 35 and 40 k/h (22 - 25 mph). Can't speak for anyone but myself, but if I spend more than 40% of my riding time at those speeds, I'd be very, very surprised. And BTW, both my road bikes are well fitted to me.
22-25mph aero stats are a powerful marketing tool. The intended audience for these bikes/components wants to ride those speeds, and believes they can, regardless of what the reality is.
No one is sitting around wondering what it's like to ride the latest wiz bang aero race stuff at 17mph.
#18
Senior Member
22-25mph aero stats are a powerful marketing tool. The intended audience for these bikes/components wants to ride those speeds, and believes they can, regardless of what the reality is.
No one is sitting around wondering what it's like to ride the latest wiz bang aero race stuff at 17mph.
No one is sitting around wondering what it's like to ride the latest wiz bang aero race stuff at 17mph.
Likes For bmcer:
#19
Senior Member
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
Looking at the average speeds a rider goes at and concluding he derives no or insignificant (who is the arbiter of insignificant for other people) aerodynamic benefit is quite bogus.
Many people don't really quite care about average speed on a training ride (especially an easy one), nor expect an aero benefit when climbing hills. Both of these things lower the average speed. However, on the flat when going hard the speed for many riders is within the range where the benefits are tangible.
Many people don't really quite care about average speed on a training ride (especially an easy one), nor expect an aero benefit when climbing hills. Both of these things lower the average speed. However, on the flat when going hard the speed for many riders is within the range where the benefits are tangible.
#21
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,636
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Looking at the average speeds a rider goes at and concluding he derives no or insignificant (who is the arbiter of insignificant for other people) aerodynamic benefit is quite bogus.
Many people don't really quite care about average speed on a training ride (especially an easy one), nor expect an aero benefit when climbing hills. Both of these things lower the average speed. However, on the flat when going hard the speed for many riders is within the range where the benefits are tangible.
Many people don't really quite care about average speed on a training ride (especially an easy one), nor expect an aero benefit when climbing hills. Both of these things lower the average speed. However, on the flat when going hard the speed for many riders is within the range where the benefits are tangible.
#22
Trying to keep up
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 2,137
Bikes: Pinarello Prince, Orbea Onix, Ridley Fenix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
79 Posts
I don't know what my next bike will be, but the reality is I don't *need* a nicer bike than my aluminum framed, 105 equipped Ridley. I do, however, believe I would derive some increased pleasure from a nicer bike. This may be stupid and shallow, but, hey, to each their own. In short, no, most of us don't need go fast stuff, and none of us on this board will benefit from it the same way pros do. But the benefit is different to each person depending on what they are looking to gain from the purchase. It may be a fraction more speed, or maybe it's something else.
Likes For ericcox:
#23
Senior Member
I'm willing to concede that the dubious benefits of aerodynamic design for Joe Cyclist may be of some value to some folks. I have to admit it does have eye appeal. How you choose to spend your discretionary funds is, after all, a personal decision. So let's lay that aspect of the discussion to rest.
However, speaking only for myself, the not inconsequential cost and inconvenience of integrated cockpits is more than a little off putting. Which is why I replaced the defective CP10 that came with my Canyon CF Ultimate 8.0 with a Zip stem (one of only 2 brands other than Canyon that offer stems for a 1-1/4" steering tube) and a set of Easton EC 70 bars. Total cost; < $300 vs > $400 for the H36. And mounting my Garmin can be accomplished with any of several inexpensive and easily available fixtures.
However, speaking only for myself, the not inconsequential cost and inconvenience of integrated cockpits is more than a little off putting. Which is why I replaced the defective CP10 that came with my Canyon CF Ultimate 8.0 with a Zip stem (one of only 2 brands other than Canyon that offer stems for a 1-1/4" steering tube) and a set of Easton EC 70 bars. Total cost; < $300 vs > $400 for the H36. And mounting my Garmin can be accomplished with any of several inexpensive and easily available fixtures.
#24
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
It's only a marketing fail if they don't sell bikes. I suspect they're quite comfortable with their marketing.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's all about aesthetics to me.
My Aeroad is so much faster than my Ultimate, but mostly because its sexier. It will be sold though so I can have fully internal cables. Which are a huge pain, but again sexy.
Make a bike that is 2% slower, but 10% better looking and I will take the hit.
My Aeroad is so much faster than my Ultimate, but mostly because its sexier. It will be sold though so I can have fully internal cables. Which are a huge pain, but again sexy.
Make a bike that is 2% slower, but 10% better looking and I will take the hit.